<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
This just appeared on slashdot:<br>
<br>
<a
href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/11/11/2246226/Remus-Project-Brings-Transparent-High-Availability-To-Xen?art_pos=1">http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/11/11/2246226/Remus-Project-Brings-Transparent-High-Availability-To-Xen?art_pos=1</a><br>
<br>
anorexicpoodle wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:1257544685.2390.19.camel@poodle-x300" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="GtkHTML/3.28.1">
I have come across the need for a stateful SIP load balancer with
fail-over and HA capabilities, and I am hoping some on this list can
chime in with some personal experience. <br>
<br>
The need is not for a particularly large volume of traffic, more to act
as a socket to adapt my active/active model UM system to Metaswitch's
1:1 UM system model, which cannot support active/active application
servers. Yes I felt this was a strange omission in functionality as
well. <br>
<br>
I have pretty much ruled out OpenSER/OpenSIPS/Kamilio because it isn't
stateful in HA failover. Passing it through an Acme is ridiculously
costly for the need i have, and most hardware based load balancers I am
finding just aren't sip-aware, so I don't see them doing much better
than OpenSER in a fail-over scenario, it would just be a different kind
of ugliness. <br>
<br>
Thanks in advance<br>
<br>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org">VoiceOps@voiceops.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>