<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 10/14/2010 10:54 AM, Steven Putnam wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:SNT141-w4155B554F334283EA03BD0A2560@phx.gbl"
type="cite">
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
Anyone have any suggestions regarding which existing ICA might be
the most favorable in terms of collocation in AT&T wire
centers?<br>
<br>
Also, an idea of how the TRRO affects UNE dark fiber availability
(same market)?<br>
<br>
~SP <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
The Bells in particular have argued against making dark fiber
eligible for E-Rate discounts, noting various objections. AT&T
argues that funding dark fiber is not supported in the law, citing,
among other provisions, language that says subsidies are to be made
available for ‘services,’ which dark fiber is not.<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://blog.connectedplanetonline.com/unfiltered/2010/09/22/fcc-expected-to-allow-e-rate-funding-for-dark-fiber">http://blog.connectedplanetonline.com/unfiltered/2010/09/22/fcc-expected-to-allow-e-rate-funding-for-dark-fiber</a><br>
</body>
</html>