<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7651.59">
<TITLE>Re: [VoiceOps] Troubles calling those free conference services</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Yep - .0007, sorry about that. <BR>
<BR>
<BR>
----- Original Message -----<BR>
From: Frank Bulk <frnkblk@iname.com><BR>
To: Rick Garcia; paul@timmins.net <paul@timmins.net>; dane@corp.sonic.net <dane@corp.sonic.net><BR>
Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org <voiceops@voiceops.org><BR>
Sent: Sat Jan 29 15:27:29 2011<BR>
Subject: RE: [VoiceOps] Troubles calling those free conference services<BR>
<BR>
I think it’s triple-O 7 that they are proposing….<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Frank<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
From: voiceops-bounces@voiceops.org [<A HREF="mailto:voiceops-bounces@voiceops.org">mailto:voiceops-bounces@voiceops.org</A>] On Behalf Of Rick Garcia<BR>
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 9:35 AM<BR>
To: paul@timmins.net; dane@corp.sonic.net<BR>
Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org<BR>
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Troubles calling those free conference services<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
I believe the FCC is addressing inter-carrier compensation in Feb. So potentially the problem could be solved soon.<BR>
<BR>
Revenue sharing at .007 doesn't seem so attractive to the ILEC or the conference provider.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
----- Original Message -----<BR>
From: voiceops-bounces@voiceops.org <voiceops-bounces@voiceops.org><BR>
To: Dane Jasper <dane@corp.sonic.net><BR>
Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org <voiceops@voiceops.org><BR>
Sent: Sat Jan 29 08:19:27 2011<BR>
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Troubles calling those free conference services<BR>
<BR>
If so, we would have to band together on an ILEC network, as charging<BR>
the typical CLEC termination rates could get us accused of "traffic<BR>
pumping" ourselves.<BR>
<BR>
Dane Jasper wrote:<BR>
> I wonder if there is an opportunity for carriers to cooperate to<BR>
> eliminate the market for these traffic pumping services. In other<BR>
> words, if carriers were to band together and cooperate to launch a<BR>
> free conferencing service, chat services, etc, we might limit in some<BR>
> way the impact of the business model.<BR>
><BR>
> -DJ<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
>>> Frank Bulk wrote:<BR>
>>>> Since when did our industry stop providing carriage and completing<BR>
>>>> calls?<BR>
>>><BR>
>>> Since when did this industry aid and abet thieves? It's not very<BR>
>>> different from a doctor who gives you cholesterol drugs and vitamins<BR>
>>> instead of telling you to stop eating at McDonald's twice a day. Is it<BR>
>>> better to help someone keep doing the wrong thing? We have an<BR>
>>> opportunity to affect positive change in telecommunications.<BR>
>>><BR>
>>><BR>
>>> --<BR>
>>> Carlos Alvarez<BR>
>>> TelEvolve<BR>
>>> 602-889-3003<BR>
> _______________________________________________<BR>
> VoiceOps mailing list<BR>
> VoiceOps@voiceops.org<BR>
> <A HREF="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops</A><BR>
><BR>
<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
VoiceOps mailing list<BR>
VoiceOps@voiceops.org<BR>
<A HREF="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops</A><BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>