<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>We heard a few reports this week (Wednesday?) related to a number we have in a CenturyLink exchange that’s forwarded to our main office. It subsided later in the day and I haven’t heard of any new reports.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Frank<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces@voiceops.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Jared Geiger<br><b>Sent:</b> Saturday, May 25, 2013 3:34 PM<br><b>To:</b> VoiceOps<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [VoiceOps] Odd "TOS violation" op intercept?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>Did anyone narrow down an offending region/carrier? I'm curious. I haven't gotten any reports, but my customers are regionalized.<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Regards,<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Jared Geiger<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Paul Timmins <<a href="mailto:paul@timmins.net" target="_blank">paul@timmins.net</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in'><p class=MsoNormal>Reminds me of the intercepts that MagicJack (Ymax) was doing to calls delivered to them across local interconnection groups that they perceived should have come across feature group d. It was all about making sure to monetize intercarrier compensation as precisely as possible (read: not allowing a single misrouted call to terminate to the wrong groups, for fear a few tenths of a cent might slip from their grasp)<o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><br>On May 22, 2013, at 12:51 AM, April Jones <<a href="mailto:april@teliax.com">april@teliax.com</a>> wrote:<br><br>> Hi voiceops,<br>><br>> I've had a rash of tickets since Friday from various customers, to varied destinations over multiple vendors where I'm getting a terrible operator intercept/recording, and I'm wondering if anyone else has heard it or knows who is playing it.<br>><br>> Recording plays "This call was routed in violation of our terms of service" then asks to record the orig/term and advises to report it to "your phone provider."<br>><br>> I haven't found anything definitive, but I also haven't had a lot of time to really dig in...<br>><br>> april j.<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal>> _______________________________________________<br>> VoiceOps mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org">VoiceOps@voiceops.org</a><br>> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops</a><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>VoiceOps mailing list<br><a href="mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org">VoiceOps@voiceops.org</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops</a><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></body></html>