<div dir="ltr">It is really hard to define a max load for a dynamic system. I haven't done any real testing, however my biggest client, using a two nodes system, is managing over than 250 clients with over than 3000 extensions registered and making/receiving more than 50000 calls every day. The system is smooth and the client is happy. I have no idea how many concurrent calls is handling. <div>
<br></div><div>Leandro</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-08-07 17:01 GMT+02:00 Peter Rad. <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:peter@4isps.com" target="_blank">peter@4isps.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div><br>
From what I have been told, Asterisk can handle 300 simultaneous
calls per user. Most ITSPs wouldn't know because they aren't
seeing that kind of volume.<br>
<br>
Cbeyond bought a company called Aretta that did Asterisk in
containers - one for each customer. It became unmanageable.<br>
<br>
Just some thoughts this morning.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Peter</font></span><div class=""><br>
<br>
<br>
On 8/6/2014 7:28 PM, MiRTA PBX team wrote:<br>
</div></div><div class="">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">I found really time and resource consuming having
an asterisk (even if virtualized) for each client. I see a lots
of companies failing when reaching around 40/50 virtual severs.
The time needed to maintain all these servers were too big for
the money the clients can provide. I think it is more convenient
to have a multi tenant setup where a single central asterisk
handle all the virtual pbx for the clients. The resources needed
for a new client are almost zero and you can acquire even little
office with just a couple of phones.
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>Leandro</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2014-08-06 19:24 GMT+02:00 Aryn Nakaoka
<a href="tel:808.356.2901" value="+18083562901" target="_blank">808.356.2901</a> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:anakaoka@trinet-hi.com" target="_blank">anakaoka@trinet-hi.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>We use a virtualized asterisk per client - makes
feature sets very powerful. Then we have a centralized
core for additional features that Asterisk can not
provide. Its not auto provisioning, but we're aiming
for B2B vs. self-service market. Billing is done via
flat rate or A2Billing.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>It'll come close to meta switch or broad soft but you
will need to service your clients. BUT you wold be 100%
opensource.<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Aryn H. K. Nakaoka<br>
<a href="mailto:anakaoka@trinet-hi.com" target="_blank">anakaoka@trinet-hi.com</a></div>
<div><br>
Direct: <a href="tel:808.356.2901" value="+18083562901" target="_blank">808.356.2901</a><br>
Fax : <a href="tel:808.356.2919" value="+18083562919" target="_blank">808.356.2919</a><br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Call me with our Browser Phone : <a href="https://encrypted.alohatone.com/3562901" target="_blank">https://encrypted.alohatone.com/3562901</a></div>
<div><br>
Tri-net Solutions<br>
733 Bishop St. #1170<br>
Honolulu, HI 96813<br>
<a href="http://www.trinet-hi.com" target="_blank">http://www.trinet-hi.com</a><span style="padding-right:16px;width:16px;min-height:16px"></span><span style="padding-right:16px;width:16px;min-height:16px"></span><span style="padding-right:16px;width:16px;min-height:16px"></span><br>
<br>
<div>Aloha Tone PBX <a href="http://youtu.be/27v2wbnFIDs" target="_blank">http://youtu.be/27v2wbnFIDs</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>EncryptedHawaii.com : <a href="http://tinyurl.com/emailchainofcustody" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/emailchainofcustody</a><br>
</div>
<div><br>
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained
in this email and any attachments may be
privileged, confidential and protected from
disclosure. Any disclosure, distribution or
copying of this email or any attachments by
persons or entities other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender
immediately by replying to the message and
deleting this email and any attachments from your
system. Thank you for your cooperation.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:38
AM, MiRTA PBX team <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:info@mirtapbx.com" target="_blank">info@mirtapbx.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">I almost agree with you, but I
think instead of saying "The drawback to
Asterisk is you have to add lots of extra stuff"
I will say "The drawback to Asterisk is you have
to DISABLE a lots of extra stuff". Yes, if you
are doing a pure SIP routing, you may disable
IAX and all other VoIP protocol you do not need,
you may disable all applications you don't use
and reduce asterisk to the bare minimum, but are
they really hurting you? I cannot compare
asterisk to other VoIP software because I just
know asterisk, but having something "more" was
never been a problem. Problems can arise when
you need a feature and you do not have it. We
are working in a highly competitive market where
we fight to the death for every single customer,
trying to pleasant them as much as we can. Often
clients have silly requests and I appreciate
when I have a software even capable to play
chess with the caller while on hold.
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>Leandro</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2014-08-06 17:10
GMT+02:00 Eric Wieling <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:EWieling@nyigc.com" target="_blank">EWieling@nyigc.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Consolas;color:#1f497d">A
well spec’d Asterisk box can
handle well 500+ calls if
audio is not going through
Asterisk. The drawback to
Asterisk is you have to add
lots of extra stuff. The few
GUIs availabe for Asterisk are
all designed for SMBs, not for
a carrier. I love Asterisk,
but it would not come close to
fufilling the original
poster’s needs for things like
SMS (for some values of
“SMS”).</span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d"> </span><br>
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
VoiceOps mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org">VoiceOps@voiceops.org</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>