<div dir="ltr">Jay,<div><br></div><div>The sending fax machine does not receive an accurate response.</div><div>The machine sees all faxes as successful because it is not really sending the fax.</div><div><br></div><div>I recommend disabling the result report on the fax machine to save on wasted paper and confusion.</div><div>The actual result will come via email.<br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Shripal Daphtary <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:shripald@gmail.com" target="_blank">shripald@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">We use this product for our fax solution and it works near flawlessly. We haven't had any complaints about large faxes so I can talk to that specifically. We also use it with a third-party fax provider who ships us the units. I'm not sure if they use a specific firmware.<br>
<br>
I know faxback also utilizes this product with great success.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Shripal<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
> On Mar 16, 2015, at 7:45 PM, Jay Hennigan <<a href="mailto:jay@west.net">jay@west.net</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> We've recently become aware of the Audiocodes MP-202B ATA that sits at a<br>
> customer premise, captures transmission from a fax machine, and sends it<br>
> via HTTPS to a remote server. We are considering this as a solution to<br>
> some specific problematic fax-over-IP situations.<br>
><br>
> I have a few concerns, and am wondering if anyone on the list has used<br>
> these units and what your experience is with them, good, bad, or ugly.<br>
> Specifically:<br>
><br>
> * Does the ATA receive the entire fax and then send it over HTTPS? If<br>
> so, is there a limitation on the number of pages or size of data?<br>
><br>
> * Does the sending fax get an accurate report of failure if the actual<br>
> destination fax is unreachable (busy, no answer, wrong number, out of<br>
> paper, etc.) once the transmission is accepted by the local Audiocodes<br>
> box, or do they get an "OK" report in error?<br>
><br>
> * What goes on the other end? Is there a bigger version Audiocodes box<br>
> that connects to a PRI or other TDM connection to the PSTN?<br>
><br>
> * Are there competing products that we should be considering?<br>
><br>
> The Audiocodes website is somewhat lacking in terms of technical detail<br>
> and I have a call into them but wanted to get some feedback from the<br>
> community about this and similar solutions.<br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - <a href="mailto:jay@impulse.net">jay@impulse.net</a><br>
> Impulse Internet Service - <a href="http://www.impulse.net/" target="_blank">http://www.impulse.net/</a><br>
> Your local telephone and internet company - <a href="tel:805%20884-6323" value="+18058846323">805 884-6323</a> - WB6RDV<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> VoiceOps mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org">VoiceOps@voiceops.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
VoiceOps mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org">VoiceOps@voiceops.org</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>