<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"/>
<style type="text/css">.mceResizeHandle {position: absolute;border: 1px solid black;background: #FFF;width: 5px;height: 5px;z-index: 10000}.mceResizeHandle:hover {background: #000}img[data-mce-selected] {outline: 1px solid black}img.mceClonedResizable, table.mceClonedResizable {position: absolute;outline: 1px dashed black;opacity: .5;z-index: 10000}
<!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; }
-->
</style></head><body style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><div>I really wonder if the big wireless carriers follow the same process that wireline carriers do because the typical wireline process takes more than 5 minutes to complete. The whole process is:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>1. Issue an LSR order to the losing carrier requesting the port.</div>
<div>2. When you get confirmation, submit the port request in NPAC (or a SOA system connected to NPAC)</div>
<div>3. Losing carrier confirms the port</div>
<div>4. Winning carrier accepts the port</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The greatest portion of time is spent on getting the losing carrier to accept the LSR and give confirmation, so I'm thinking these wireless carriers must have agreements set up between them that allows them to bypass the LSR process and just complete the NPAC work!</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Mary Lou Carey</div>
<div>BackUP Telecom Consulting</div>
<div>615-791-9969 </div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote type="cite" style="position: relative; margin-left: 0px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 1px blue;">On February 10, 2016 at 9:57 AM Nick Olsen <nick@flhsi.com> wrote:<br><br>
<div>Exactly this.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I actually ported my personal cell number to Verizon from ATT yesterday.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Gave the rep my ATT account number, He 30 seconds later asked me for the PIN I set on my ATT account. I provided and my number was working before I hit the door on the way out. Total port time was <5 Min.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I questioned the Rep if this was always the case and he said only if porting from Sprint/ATT/T-Mobile. And that basically any other carrier (Not including MVNO's of the above) took 3-5 Business days. Which is about in-line with my current wireline porting.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I figure they all exchange so many numbers a day it was in all of their best interest to work together.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Not to mention, By automating the process. They don't have to keep an entire call center worth of LNP personnel to handle their volume.</div>
<div><br> Nick Olsen<br> <span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;">Network Operations</span>
<div>(855) FLSPEED x106<br> <br> <img src="http://www.flhsi.com/files/emaillogo.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="168" height="56"></div>
</div>
<div> </div>
<hr width="100%" size="2">
<div><span style="font-family: tahoma,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><strong>From</strong>: "Alexander Lopez" <alex.lopez@opsys.com><br> <strong>Sent</strong>: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 6:00 PM<br> <strong>To</strong>: "Alex Balashov" <abalashov@evaristesys.com>, "voiceops@voiceops.org" <voiceops@voiceops.org><br> <strong>Subject</strong>: Re: [VoiceOps] Instant Porting</span>
<div> </div>
<!-- converted from text -->
<div>I think the incentive is to cooperate because it is a relatively small group of wireless carriers compared to wireline.
<div> </div>
<div>The main reason being that they don't want their ports held up, so they work well with others.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Also since there is a small group they could automate the back office processes between them and submit the request and aknowledgment quickly and without human interaction.</div>
<br> <br> -------- Original message --------<br> From: Alex Balashov <abalashov@evaristesys.com><br> Date: 2/9/2016 4:32 PM (GMT-05:00)<br> To: voiceops@voiceops.org<br> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Instant Porting<br> </div>
<div class="PlainText"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">This does raise, in light of the OP, the question of what economic or<br> political incentive wireless carriers have to cooperate in relatively<br> seamless porting to/from each other.<br> <br> --<br> Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC<br> 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300<br> Atlanta, GA 30346<br> United States<br> <br> Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct)<br> Web: <a href="http://www.evaristesys.com/">http://www.evaristesys.com/</a>, <a href="http://www.csrpswitch.com/"> http://www.csrpswitch.com/</a><br> _______________________________________________<br> VoiceOps mailing list<br> VoiceOps@voiceops.org<br> <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops</a></span></span></div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>VoiceOps mailing list<br>VoiceOps@voiceops.org<br>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops</blockquote>
<div><br> </div>
Mary Lou Carey<br>BackUP Telecom Consulting<br>Marylou@backuptelecom.com<br>Office: 615-791-9969<br>Cell: 615-796-1111</body></html>