<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Do either of those support transcoding? If so, would they be easy enough to set up for an enterprise-level IT person to get that set up? <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Frank <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b>From:</b> Dovid Bender <dovid@telecurve.com> <br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, May 14, 2019 1:45 PM<br><b>To:</b> Frank Bulk <frnkblk@iname.com><br><b>Cc:</b> Voiceops.org <voiceops@voiceops.org><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [VoiceOps] Looking for cost-effective eSBC that supports inband DTMF <-> RFC2833 transcoding support<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>Why not use something like FreeSwitch or Asterisk in the middle?<o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 2:16 PM Frank Bulk <<a href="mailto:frnkblk@iname.com">frnkblk@iname.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in'><p class=MsoNormal>We have an educational customer with an IVR that only supports RFC 2833 and<br>an eSBC (Mitel border gateway) that cannot not perform transcoding from<br>inband DTMF to RFC2833. There are some local VoIP to VoIP calls where the<br>caller's device only supports inband DTMF and our softswitch cannot<br>transcode them, so the IVR doesn't work for some parents and constituents.<br><br>We'd like to recommend a cost-effective eSBC that supports inband DTMF <-><br>RFC2833 transcoding. <br><br>Any recommendations from this group? I looked at EdgeMarc, but apparently<br>their newer models don't have a DSP, or at least that functionality,<br>anymore.<br><br>Frank <br><br>_______________________________________________<br>VoiceOps mailing list<br><a href="mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org" target="_blank">VoiceOps@voiceops.org</a><br><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops</a><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div></div></body></html>