<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We use clearip.com for our fraud protection along with our Inteliquent trunks. ClearIP also handles our STIR/SHAKEN, LCR and CNAM<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">-Matt<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">VoiceOps <voiceops-bounces@voiceops.org> on behalf of Colton Conor <colton.conor@gmail.com><br>
<b>Date: </b>Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 4:26 PM<br>
<b>To: </b>Carlos Alvarez <caalvarez@gmail.com><br>
<b>Cc: </b>VoiceOps <voiceops@voiceops.org><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [VoiceOps] Bandwidth vs Inteliquent<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="border:solid #9C6500 1.0pt;padding:2.0pt 2.0pt 2.0pt 2.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.0pt;background:#FFEB9C"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;color:#9C6500">CAUTION:</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;color:black"> This email originated from outside of Crocker. Do not click links or open attachments
unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Do either Bandwidth or Inteliquent have any fraud / overspending limits you can put in place? I have looked at something like thinQ in the past, and was impressed that their platform could put limits in place, like if international calls
exceed $1,000 in a day, block all calls. I know this is more a function of the SBC / Softswitch, but a nice to have option. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 12:31 PM Carlos Alvarez <<a href="mailto:caalvarez@gmail.com">caalvarez@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">We moved all of our services off of Inteliquent. The support was absolute garbage, and they constantly raised rates a little at a time. We took 20% off our costs going to Bandwidth, and support is lightning fast. Coverage is identical
as far as we can see in the US. Most of our term and origination are with Bandwidth, and a bit with thinQ for a variety of reasons. I'm considering porting all that to Bandwidth. They say it's dangerous to have all your eggs in one basket, but BW has simply
been 100% for us in every measure. We'd probably still use thinQ as backup term.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 6:17 AM Colton Conor <<a href="mailto:colton.conor@gmail.com" target="_blank">colton.conor@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">If you had to choose only between these two providers for wholesale services, which would you choose and why? We are only considering these two as the softswitch we are planning on using (Netsapiens) has only built out Group MMS support
for these two carriers APIs, and no one else. <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I have used many services over the years that have utilized both of these carriers, but I have never had a direct relationship with them.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Which has a better portal, API, and company overall? What are the true differences? <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Are there any resellers to consider where we would still have direct access to these carriers APIs? <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
VoiceOps mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org" target="_blank">VoiceOps@voiceops.org</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
VoiceOps mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org" target="_blank">VoiceOps@voiceops.org</a><br>
<a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops" target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>