<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<title></title>
</head>
<body style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px">
<p>Jared-<br>
<br>
Maybe this case ?<br>
<br>
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-373349A1.pdf<br>
<br>
seems to be pending / working its way through.<br>
<br>
"Since 2011, the Commission has taken numerous actions to modernize this outdated system and curb the harmful arbitrage that it invites."<br>
<br>
-Jeff<br>
<br>
Quoting Jared Geiger <<a href="mailto:compuwizz@gmail.com">compuwizz@gmail.com</a>>:</p>
<blockquote style="border-left:2px solid blue;margin-left:2px;padding-left:12px;" type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">This blog post from Transnexus highlights a filing Inteliquent placed with the FCC about an Arbitrage Scheme. <a href="https://transnexus.com/blog/2022/access-arbitrage-rules-discussion/">https://transnexus.com/blog/2022/access-arbitrage-rules-discussion/</a>
<div> </div>
<div>The link is broken to the original filing so I can't read the full details.<br>
<div> </div>
<div>Maybe I'm not understanding the full complaint, but Inteliquent is expecting a lot of traffic to come through them to the IPES's number ranges but they aren't getting the traffic. The "Wholesale Inbound Provider" instead is getting the traffic.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Wouldn't this just be similar to private peering between providers? I've had "10 Digit peering" service before from a vendor but that product went away a few years ago.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>~Jared</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
<br></p>
</body>
</html>