<html><body><div dir="ltr">
<br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mar 14, 2023 at 2:03:17 PM, Peter Beckman <<a href="mailto:beckman@angryox.com">beckman@angryox.com</a>> wrote:<br></div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" type="cite">
<div>
<div><br>We've also put numbers into production that our carrier provided, only to<br>find out they should not have been in their inventory at all.<br></div></div></blockquote><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote" dir="ltr">I’ve learned this lesson, hence the test calls. But this is a new one on me; how often should we have to test all of our numbers??</div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" type="cite"><div><div>We went as far as sending test calls or SMS messages to each number in our<br>inventory about once every 2 weeks, and generate a report of numbers that<br>have failed the test (we didn't receive the inbound call or text). This has<br>helped us detect issues earlier, but not prevent them.<br></div></div></blockquote><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote" dir="ltr">That’s uglier than a Pontiac Aztek.</div><div class="gmail_quote" dir="ltr"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote" dir="ltr">I just hope thinQ can handle this. Looking at our call records vs their TF number history, it’s clear when it was ours, then taken, then given out again. I believe someone else on the list suggested that previous ownership is superior to current ownership? If it comes down to that, anyone know the process to enforce it?</div><div class="gmail_quote" dir="ltr"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote" dir="ltr"><br></div>
</div></body></html>