Re: [nsp] virtual link

From: Harold Ritter (hritter@cisco.com)
Date: Wed Mar 27 2002 - 21:28:09 EST


Dhiman,

In this case, you have to assign at least one interface for each R1 and R2
in one common area (transit area). If R1 and R2 do not share a common area
the VL won't work.

At 08:51 PM 3/27/2002 -0500, Dhiman Barman wrote:
>Harold,
> Wait, sorry I didnt show you the other interfaces. One other
>interface of R1 is connected to backbone.
> So, you are telling me, interface1(R1) is not be assigned
> any area (network ip_addr mask area 100) or something like that ?
> And is it true even for interface2(R2) ?
>
>-Dhiman
>
>Harold Ritter claims the following:
> > Dhiman,
> >
> >
> > At 03:34 PM 3/27/2002 -0500, Dhiman Barman wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > > If I am configuring a virtual link between R1 and R2,
> > >
> > > interface1 interface2
> > > R1---------------------------------R2
> > >
> > >
> > > do the interfaces, interface1 and interface2 should be in the
> > > same in the area ? Or is it that they should be in different
> areas ?
> > > If they are in the same area, then why do I need to use virtual
> > > link to connect R2 to the backbone thru R1 ?
> > >
> > >-dhiman
> >
> > Harold Ritter, CCIE 4168
> > Advanced Network Services - ISP East
> > Cisco Systems
> > 300 Apollo Drive
> > Chelmsford, MA 01824 USA
> > Phone: 978 497 3129
> > Fax: 978 497 3129
> > Cisco Systems- "Empowering the Internet Generation."
> >
>
>--
>The Arkansas legislature passed a law that states that the Arkansas
>River can rise no higher than to the Main Street bridge in Little
>Rock.

Harold Ritter, CCIE 4168
Advanced Network Services - ISP East
Cisco Systems
300 Apollo Drive
Chelmsford, MA 01824 USA
Phone: 978 497 3129
Fax: 978 497 3129
Cisco Systems- "Empowering the Internet Generation."



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:38 EDT