Re: [nsp] QoS on frame-relay subinterfaces

From: Thomas Kernen (tkernen@deckpoint.ch)
Date: Wed Apr 03 2002 - 14:26:06 EST


Please ignore my email, I figured it out: Need to state the class in the
frame-relay interface-dlci subconfig.

Thomas

----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Kernen" <tkernen@deckpoint.ch>
To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:48 AM
Subject: [nsp] QoS on frame-relay subinterfaces

>
> I hope I'm not missing something but I'm having a hard time to get
> configs from 12.1 to work with 12.2 releases. I have a frame relay
> circuit on which I run LLQ/CBWFQ to make sure the VoIP traffic is out
> of the interface 1st (same at the other end).
>
> Sample:
>
> class-map match-all voip
> match access-group 100
> class-map match-all data1
> match access-group 101
> !
> !
> policy-map llq
> class voip
> priority 256
> class data1
> bandwidth 128
>
> interface Serial0/0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
> no ip mroute-cache
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> frame-relay lmi-type ansi
> !
> interface Serial0/0.102 point-to-point
> ip address 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.252
> frame-relay interface-dlci 102
> frame-relay ip rtp header-compression
>
> map-class frame-relay voice
> no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
> frame-relay cir 2250000
> frame-relay bc 300
> frame-relay mincir 2250000
> service-policy output llq
>
> access-list 100 permit udp any any range 16384 32000
> access-list 100 permit tcp any any eq 1720
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq www
>
> I can't get my "class voice" statement on the int s0/0.102. Works with
> 12.1 releases. but not 12.2 (tried on 3620 and 2611)
> Has the syntax changed? Did I miss something?
>
> Thomas
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:39 EDT