RE: peak value of traffic-rate command

From: Kevin Gannon (kgannon@lancomms.ie)
Date: Fri Aug 03 2001 - 03:43:00 EDT

Next message: Kevin Gannon: "RE: SRP/DPT over a current SDH backbone ?"
Previous message: Hank Nussbacher: "Re: [nsp] ip cef load-sharing algorithm { original|tunnel|universal }"
Maybe in reply to: kouji.baba@equant.com: "peak value of traffic-rate command"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I found "traffic-shape" commands can not exist with "frame-relay
traffic-shaping"
command of physical interface. I want to validate priority-queueing at the
same time.

Kouji,
We use the traffic-shape commands so that we get weighted-fair queueing
so we dont need the pain of configuring priority queueing. We are runing
SNA over DLSW+ sessions and we were having problems with BDC traffic
causing the DLSW+ sessions to go very slow so the WFQ helps us a lot.

Regards,
Kevin

Next message: Kevin Gannon: "RE: SRP/DPT over a current SDH backbone ?"
Previous message: Hank Nussbacher: "Re: [nsp] ip cef load-sharing algorithm { original|tunnel|universal }"
Maybe in reply to: kouji.baba@equant.com: "peak value of traffic-rate command"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:48 EDT