-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Can you give us a sh int fastxx/xx and a sh contro eth fastxx/xx
obviously on the xx/xx insert your slot/port number.
==DMT>
- ----SIGNATURE------
Douglas M. Todd, Jr.
CCNP
Network Engineering
Partners Health Care
Building 149
149 13 Street
Charlestown, MA 02129-200
Tel: 617.726.1403
Email: dtodd@partners.org
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
PGP Finger Print: 9429 CAE3 B2D1 C2E1 DFBC E7A6 E90A 9BE5 C7B6 47BC
Key
available:http://keyserver.pgp.com:80/pks/lookup?op=get&exact=off&sear
ch=dtodd%40partners.org
Verisign S/N: 3ff65cdf58b9dceda004baeed49e16cf
https://digitalid.verisign.com/services/client/index.html
>-----Original Message-----
>From: pankaj [mailto:pankaj@worldgatein.net]
>Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 5:35 AM
>To: dtodd@partners.org
>Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
>Subject: Re: [nsp] is this cisco2912XL 's bug or else.
>
>
>I think its not multicast or broadcast.
>Cause show int fastethernet x/x giving me constant value for
>multicast and broadcast packets( i.e 330 broadcast , 12 multicast).
>this numbers not increasing.
>
>If I am observing in wrong way than give me clue .
>
>--pankaj
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Douglas M. Todd, Jr." <dtodd@partners.org>
>To: "'pankaj'" <pankaj@worldgatein.net>; <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
>Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 1:08 AM
>Subject: RE: [nsp] is this cisco2912XL 's bug or else.
>
>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> What is meant by undesireable traffic?
>>
>> Are you running a trace in the port? How do you know this is not
>> broadcast or multicast traffic?
>>
>> ==DMT>
>>
>> - ----SIGNATURE------
>> Douglas M. Todd, Jr.
>> CCNP
>> Network Engineering
>> Partners Health Care
>> Building 149
>> 149 13 Street
>> Charlestown, MA 02129-200
>> Tel: 617.726.1403
>> Email: dtodd@partners.org
>> -
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>--
>> PGP Finger Print: 9429 CAE3 B2D1 C2E1 DFBC E7A6 E90A 9BE5 C7B6
>> 47BC Key
>>
>available:http://keyserver.pgp.com:80/pks/lookup?op=get&exact=off&sea
>r
>> ch=dtodd%40partners.org
>> Verisign S/N: 3ff65cdf58b9dceda004baeed49e16cf
>> https://digitalid.verisign.com/services/client/index.html
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: pankaj [mailto:pankaj@worldgatein.net]
>> >Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:27 AM
>> >To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> >Subject: [nsp] is this cisco2912XL 's bug or else.
>> >
>> >
>> >I have cisco 2912XL swtich IOS 12.0(5)XU,
>> >Suddenly since from few days, I found that undesired traffic
>pattern
>> >on few switch ports.
>> >-------------------------cisco2912XL-----------------------------
>> >| | | | | | | |
>> >| | | |
>> >m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m7 m8 m9 m10 m11
>> >m12
>> >
>> >Now on machine m7 , m8, m11 there is no any data transfer , still
>> >show int fastethernet0/7 and my monitoring (mrtg) showing me some
>> >ammount( Y amount) of (0kbps to 500 kbps) Same thing happening
>with
>> >0/8, 0/11.
>> >
>> >now 0/9 and 0/10, there is actual traffic on machine's interface
>> >is X amount , but on switch its showing me X+Y.
>> >
>> >on m4 there are some traffic flowing through but switch showing
>> >me
>0
>> >kbps.
>> >
>> >Any clue???? Why this happening?? Is this sounds switch problem
>> >or my logic problem??
>> >Is humidity or dust can create problem like this.
>> >
>> >Thanks
>> >Pankaj Patel
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: PGP 7.0
>>
>> iQA/AwUBPJuIMQgiZycqTvq3EQKZmgCdEWxi2msZw4QrZoAkxxEkLEhiV7sAoKid
>> 1F57+a1pKHuyP2Zjh2G/aStV
>> =9yyV
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0
iQA/AwUBPJ9Q7ggiZycqTvq3EQL1owCglGpoeOCuJFV+DLrR+wnLFFrEVQ8AniUz
4Z7NYbF/CP9covOzdQfOK7b2
=T1NQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:09 EDT