Re: [nsp] is this cisco2912XL 's bug or else.

From: pankaj (pankaj@worldgatein.net)
Date: Tue Mar 26 2002 - 04:32:39 EST


"Douglas M. Todd, Jr Wrote:>
> Can you give us a sh int fastxx/xx and a sh contro eth fastxx/xx

2912>show int fastEthernet 0/7
FastEthernet0/7 is up, line protocol is up
  Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0002.4b7d.27c6 (bia
0002.4b7d.27c6)
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec,
     reliability 255/255, txload 2/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
  Keepalive not set
  Auto-duplex (Half), Auto Speed (10), 100BaseTX/FX
  ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
  Last input never, output 00:00:01, output hang never
  Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
  Queueing strategy: fifo
  Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops
  5 minute input rate 6000 bits/sec, 5 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 86000 bits/sec, 17 packets/sec
     20713255 packets input, 2210091931 bytes
     Received 226 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
     0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 16 ignored
     0 watchdog, 12 multicast
     0 input packets with dribble condition detected
     70987743 packets output, 59783891 bytes, 0 underruns
     0 output errors, 40177 collisions, 0 interface resets
     0 babbles, 0 late collision, 34252 deferred
     0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

2912#show controllers ethernet-controller fastEthernet 0/7

  Transmit Receive
  59894116 Bytes 2210216667 Bytes
  66429771 Unicast frames 20713961 Unicast frames
   2741199 Multicast frames 12 Multicast frames
   1817970 Broadcast frames 176 Broadcast frames
         0 Discarded frames 16 No bandwidth frames
         0 Too old frames 0 No buffers frames
     34253 Deferred frames 15 No dest, unicast
     20576 1 collision frames 0 No dest, multicast
     18336 2 collision frames 38 No dest, broadcast
      1238 3 collision frames 0 Alignment errors
        27 4 collision frames 0 FCS errors
         0 5 collision frames 61070 Collision fragments
         0 6 collision frames
         0 7 collision frames 0 Undersize frames
         0 8 collision frames 196332 Minimum size frames
         0 9 collision frames 20317558 65 to 127 byte frames
         0 10 collision frames 169945 128 to 255 byte frames
         0 11 collision frames 8113 256 to 511 byte frames
         0 12 collision frames 21713 512 to 1023 byte frames
         0 13 collision frames 541 1024 to 1518 byte frames
         0 14 collision frames 0 Oversize frames
         0 15 collision frames
         0 Excessive collisions
         0 Late collisions
2912#

---pankaj

> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: pankaj [mailto:pankaj@worldgatein.net]
> >Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 5:35 AM
> >To: dtodd@partners.org
> >Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> >Subject: Re: [nsp] is this cisco2912XL 's bug or else.
> >
> >
> >I think its not multicast or broadcast.
> >Cause show int fastethernet x/x giving me constant value for
> >multicast and broadcast packets( i.e 330 broadcast , 12 multicast).
> >this numbers not increasing.
> >
> >If I am observing in wrong way than give me clue .
> >
> >--pankaj
> >
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Douglas M. Todd, Jr." <dtodd@partners.org>
> >To: "'pankaj'" <pankaj@worldgatein.net>;
<cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> >Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 1:08 AM
> >Subject: RE: [nsp] is this cisco2912XL 's bug or else.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> What is meant by undesireable traffic?
> >>
> >> Are you running a trace in the port? How do you know this is not
> >> broadcast or multicast traffic?
> >>
> >> ==DMT>
> >>
> >> - ----SIGNATURE------
> >> Douglas M. Todd, Jr.
> >> CCNP
> >> Network Engineering
> >> Partners Health Care
> >> Building 149
> >> 149 13 Street
> >> Charlestown, MA 02129-200
> >> Tel: 617.726.1403
> >> Email: dtodd@partners.org
> >> -
>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >--
> >> PGP Finger Print: 9429 CAE3 B2D1 C2E1 DFBC E7A6 E90A 9BE5 C7B6
> >> 47BC Key
> >>
>
>available:http://keyserver.pgp.com:80/pks/lookup?op=get&exact=off&sea
> >r
> >> ch=dtodd%40partners.org
> >> Verisign S/N: 3ff65cdf58b9dceda004baeed49e16cf
> >> https://digitalid.verisign.com/services/client/index.html
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: pankaj [mailto:pankaj@worldgatein.net]
> >> >Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:27 AM
> >> >To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> >> >Subject: [nsp] is this cisco2912XL 's bug or else.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >I have cisco 2912XL swtich IOS 12.0(5)XU,
> >> >Suddenly since from few days, I found that undesired traffic
> >pattern
> >> >on few switch ports.
> >>
>-------------------------cisco2912XL-----------------------------
> >> >| | | | | | | |
> >> >| | | |
> >> >m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m7 m8 m9 m10 m11
> >> >m12
> >> >
> >> >Now on machine m7 , m8, m11 there is no any data transfer ,
still
> >> >show int fastethernet0/7 and my monitoring (mrtg) showing me
some
> >> >ammount( Y amount) of (0kbps to 500 kbps) Same thing happening
> >with
> >> >0/8, 0/11.
> >> >
> >> >now 0/9 and 0/10, there is actual traffic on machine's interface
> >> >is X amount , but on switch its showing me X+Y.
> >> >
> >> >on m4 there are some traffic flowing through but switch showing
> >> >me
> >0
> >> >kbps.
> >> >
> >> >Any clue???? Why this happening?? Is this sounds switch problem
> >> >or my logic problem??
> >> >Is humidity or dust can create problem like this.
> >> >
> >> >Thanks
> >> >Pankaj Patel
> >>
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> Version: PGP 7.0
> >>
> >> iQA/AwUBPJuIMQgiZycqTvq3EQKZmgCdEWxi2msZw4QrZoAkxxEkLEhiV7sAoKid
> >> 1F57+a1pKHuyP2Zjh2G/aStV
> >> =9yyV
> >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 7.0
>
> iQA/AwUBPJ9Q7ggiZycqTvq3EQL1owCglGpoeOCuJFV+DLrR+wnLFFrEVQ8AniUz
> 4Z7NYbF/CP9covOzdQfOK7b2
> =T1NQ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:38 EDT