Re: requirements sub-group draft

From: J. Noel Chiappa (jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu)
Date: Wed Dec 12 2001 - 02:42:11 EST


> From: smd@ebone.net (Sean Doran)

>>> this split is "institutionalized"? I am sure the authors and
>>> editors will be happy to think of definitive ways to exclude
>>> architectures which ELIMINATE the concept of intra-domain/inter-domain
>>> protocol splits.

> Well, except that I missed a "not" in between "ways" and "to" in the
> 2nd line above, which you fortunately seem to have obligingly
> hallucinated into the sentence, figuring that must have been what I
> meant (I hope). :-)

Huh. I hallucinated a "not" too, but it was before the "ELIMINATE". :-)
(Along with a "do", I guess, to make it grammatical.)

        Noel



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:03 EDT