>> i thought we were doing layer three routing, not layer two switching. if
>> the latter, then we have to cover frame relay, atm, mpls, ethernet, ...
>> i think we will have more than enough work if we stick to the internet
>> protocols and packets.
> Is the idea of a technology-independent sub-IP control abstraction
> within scope? It would have such primitives as "create path with
> constraints".
circuit/path provisioning is an important issue for isps. but it is not
ip routing.
randy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:03 EDT