Re: requirements sub-group draft

From: Randy Bush (randy@psg.com)
Date: Mon Jan 14 2002 - 13:40:16 EST


>> circuit/path provisioning is an important issue for isps. but it is not
>> ip routing.
>
> Hopefully, we won't preclude the use of routing as an input to more
> automated provisioning.
>
> In addition, things get blurred, admittedly when we talk about things
> we can today, when we start talking about systems of tunnels
> overlaying the actual circuits. Augmented routing protocols may very
> well be the signaling mechanisms for such systems.

if folk want to use is-is to help deliver sushi, cool. but that does
not mean it is our problem.

randy



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:03 EDT