Avri,
[catching up on the old threads ;)]
...
> As to why I think we should come down to one doc. As Frank
> pointed out at one point, we are more then 80% in agreement,
> though our language is different in many places. By forcing
> Frank and i and and others (i.e. a normal 'design' team
> composed of some from each of the groups plus some new
> blood) to sit down and hammer out a doc that shows the
> agreements and the yet to be agreed areas, we will move
> closer to a coherent set of requirements and issues.
Amin!
...
> I don't think it really matters if RRG comes to 100%
> agreement on requirements. The part that is agreed becomes
> the core requirements while the rest becomes items for
> further discussion, or research, or optional whatever.
Besides, it would be perfectly ok to document multiple
opinions in the same draft.
Alex
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:04 EDT