Alex Zinin <azinin@nexsi.com> writes:
> Specifically, one could envision an architecture, where mobility is
> absolutely transparent to the routing system by making address be
> always topologically signi- ficant and having a separate mechanism
> for name-to-address mapping...
Following this line, is it possible to imagine an architecture where
addresses are topologically significant and prefixes are also
topologically significant? And then having a mechanism for
name-to-prefix mapping?
I might be far off from what "topologically significant" means
exactly.
Alex
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:04 EDT