Barry:
-> What the status of this work?
You might want to look at section 3.9 (Group A)
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-routing-reqs-groupa-00.txt
AND section 2.3.8 and section 9 in (Group B)
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-routing-reqs-groupb-00.txt
-> It would be nice to sync any sort of router security
-> requirements work.
Yes!
-> There are a couple of other efforts out there.
What are the other Routing Security work you are referring?
Venkata.
-> > -----Original Message-----
-> > From: rpsec-admin@ietf.org [mailto:rpsec-admin@ietf.org]On
-> Behalf Of
-> > Naidu, Venkata
-> > Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:29 AM
-> > To: rpsec@ietf.org
-> > Cc: 'irtf-rr@puck.nether.net'
-> > Subject: RE: [RPSEC] Charter Update....NextGen Routing Security
-> >
-> >
-> > -> > - Document security requirements for the next
-> generation routing
-> > -> > system
-> >
-> > IRTF RRG Group A and B are working on this.
-> > Isn't this a duplicate work *or*
-> > Is that RPSEC going to work with IRTF RRG?!?
-> >
-> > Venkata.
-> >
-> > _______________________________________________
-> > RPSEC mailing list
-> > RPSEC@ietf.org
-> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec
-> >
->
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:04 EDT