[nsp] new bug on cat6k?

Stephen J. Wilcox steve at telecomplete.co.uk
Thu Jul 31 15:32:17 EDT 2003


On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Jared Mauch wrote:

> 	I've not seen any issues with 12.1(19)E1 yet.

this is my first! we've been running the code 2 weeks and did not test it before 
going live
 
> 	I have seen that if you reload a router running 12.1(19)E1
> it can sometimes crash while doing the reload.  We still have a tac
> case open on that one ...

yeah i think i saw that too during the upgrade but this one definitely died for 
no apparent reason with 14 days uptime and no config changes for about 24 hours

Steve

> 
> 	- Jared
> 
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 02:09:57PM +0100, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> > hello!
> > 
> > cat6k running 12.1(19)E1 :
> > IOS (tm) c6sup1_rp Software (c6sup1_rp-PS-M), Version 12.1(19)E1, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
> > cisco WS-C6006 (R5000) processor (revision 2.0) with 114688K/16384K bytes of 
> > memory.
> > 
> > crashed with
> > 
> > SP by error - a Software forced crash, PC 0x6011E3BC
> > 
> > -Traceback= 6011E3BC 6011C6A8 60205130 60211664 60203BAC 60205D80 60206020 
> > 60207AF8 600F5834 600F5820
> > 
> > Unexpected exception, CPU signal 23, PC = 0x6011E3BC
> > 
> > $0 : 00000000, AT : 614F0000, v0 : 60640000, v1 : 4436EBE8
> > a0 : 61731F74, a1 : 614ECAE8, a2 : 00000000, a3 : 60800000
> > t0 : 00000028, t1 : 3401FF01, t2 : 34018100, t3 : FFFF00FF
> > t4 : 60122AA0, t5 : 00000000, t6 : 620C13B0, t7 : 0098812D
> > s0 : 00000000, s1 : 00000000, s2 : 620F2460, s3 : 60807B94
> > s4 : 60808074, s5 : 0000000B, s6 : 00000001, s7 : 00000000
> > t8 : 000060E2, t9 : 00000000, k0 : 3041C001, k1 : 30410000
> > gp : 614F47E0, sp : 620C1408, s8 : 00000000, ra : 6011C6A8
> > EPC  : 6011E3BC, ErrorEPC : 00808600, SREG     : 3401FF03
> > MDLO : 66666673, MDHI     : 00000032, BadVaddr : 82BE1FB7
> > Cause 00000024 (Code 0x9): Breakpoint exception
> > 
> > 
> > according to bug toolkit/output interpreter etc all the bugs are multicast 
> > related but none fits what i have (they are wrong platform or are for things I 
> > am not running - specifically multicast, ppoe, gre, ipsec, car, nat etc)
> > 
> > is this a non-public bug or somethin new and exciting?
> > 
> > Steve
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> 



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list