[c-nsp] Humor: Cisco announces end of BGP

[TJ]

>> And therein lies the rub.  The objection was to "never be adopted" ...
>> I know several of the above (and other large carriers you omitted)
>> have "started deploying it", but "started deployment" != "commercially
>> available".
>> (i.e. - not "easy to request".  And for today, I totally agree ...
>> that is why I said in "1-3 years".)
>
>Actually, NTT/Verio have had IPv6 available, as in "commercially available
and
>fully supported" for a number of years.
>
>We're mandating full IPv6 support as part of all upstream procurements, and
>this has been quite effective :-) - (and it turns away Cogent and L3
>salespeople, which is a nice side effect).

Good point ... in fact, we had NTT/Verio for a bit.  Wish we still did (even
if they were doing the whole "/126 on point to point links" think).
(I meant to include that some carriers do fully offer IPv6 today, but
somehow edited that out ... my bad)


>gert
/TJ