[c-nsp] Peering between route reflectors

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:23:10PM +0200, Cydon Satyr wrote:
> Agree, that could be the corner case, but how realistic would be to lose
> TCP sessions to RR, without some underlying physical problem, on more than
> one router, for example.

Your call :-) - that would be a reason to peer the RRs.  I can't see
any other.
 
gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140407/652bd887/attachment.sig>