[cisco-voip] css, partitions and extension mobility

[Leonardo D'Urso]

thanks for testing, I can only confirm that all works fine without
extension mobility, and with the same configuration that includes rp,css
and variable lenght phone numbers.

ciao,
Leonardo

--
Leonardo D'Urso              alter.net Srl
e-mail: durso at alter.it       Via Attilio Ambrosini, 177
VOICE: +39-06-5405740        I-00147 Roma
FAX:   +39-06-5405883        Italy

On Sat, 22 May 2004, Wes Sisk wrote:

> Leonardo,
>
> I suspect ! is going to be a special case because it implies any digit, any
> number of digits.  Therefore the idea of "better match" pretty much
> disappears.
>
> We typically use calculations to see which is "better match"
>
> Example:
>
> 91X = (1 possible match) * (1 possible match) * (10 possible matches) = 10
> 1XX = (1 possible match) * (10 possible matches) * (10 possible matches) =
> 100
>
> Therefore 91X is a closer match if both 9 and 1 are matched.
>
> However in the case of a variable length dialplan, this analysis does not
> hold up.  I need to do a bit of testing, but I fear that solution was tested
> with the fixed length US dialplan in mind.
>
> /Wes
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Leonardo D'Urso [mailto:durso at alter.it]
> > Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 11:09 AM
> > To: Wes Sisk
> > Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] css, partitions and extension mobility
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Wes, hi all
> >
> > oh no Leonardo again! ;-)
> >
> > I have read the chapter in online manual (chapter 7 page 8,9), and I have
> > read chapter 9 of Paul Girard: Troubleshooting ecc... I think my
> > configuration respect the closest match concept.
> >
> > I have the same configuration on another customer of mine, with a
> > difference, lines(DN) are defined statically on phones and no user device
> > profile is in use. In this case all works fine.
> >
> > This is an example of configuration in which I describe all of components:
> >
> > the phone can call everyone. So it has a css in which there is a partition
> > in which I have the rp 0.! that points to the voice gateway for this
> > location.
> >
> > the user device profile, in which I have the line, has a css in which I
> > have a partition in which I have a rp that blocks all calls to the
> > international. This route pattern is 0.00!
> >
> > when I call:
> >
> > 0001-555-5555555 (where the first zero is used to catch the line)
> >
> > the ccs of the user device profile defined into DN should match the block,
> > and then go to the bogus voice gateway.
> >
> > But what happens is that the call is routed to voice gateway, and so this
> > approach seems that don't works.
> >
> > Any idea?
> >
> >
> > thanks in advance.
> > Leonardo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 22 May 2004, Wes Sisk wrote:
> >
> > > Leonard,
> > >
> > > It sounds like you are attemting use "An Alternative Approach
> > to Configuring
> > > Calling Search Spaces" found in the Callmanager 3.3 SRND
> > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/largeent/it/ese/srnd.html
> > >
> > > In order the for the blocking/permitting patterns to work as
> > described, your
> > > 'permit' patterns must be a closer match than your 'deny' patterns.  The
> > > "closest match" logic is best described in Chapter 9 of Paul
> > Giralt's book
> > > "Troubleshooting Cisco IP Telephony".
> > >
> > > Currently Dialed Number Analyzer actually uses its own match
> > logic instead
> > > of using that of the currently active ccm.exe process.  This can lead to
> > > incorrect results in very specific corner cases, such as yours.
> >  95% of the
> > > time, DNA should provide accurate results.
> > >
> > > /Wes
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > > > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of
> > Leonardo D'Urso
> > > > Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 6:45 PM
> > > > To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > > > Subject: [cisco-voip] css, partitions and extension mobility
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > hi there,
> > > >
> > > > I have done this configuration:
> > > >
> > > > my phones has a css in which I have a route pattern that
> > authorize all for
> > > > the phone.
> > > >
> > > > I have user device profile in which I have configured a css with
> > > > partitions that don't permit for example international calls.
> > > >
> > > > When I try to verify with Dialed number analyzer all works fine, the
> > > > international call, that is NOT authorized match the rule and ends on
> > > > bogus gateway.
> > > >
> > > > But when I do this making phone call the call is routed.
> > > >
> > > > Is this an Extension mobility limit? I have this configuration without
> > > > extension mobility and all works fine.
> > > >
> > > > thanks in advance,
> > > > Leonardo
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > cisco-voip mailing list
> > > > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > >
>