[SPAM] - [cisco-voip] Load balancing/ overflow handling with IP-IP gateways? - Email found in subject

[Eric Knudson]

Why not just configure another dial-peer with a higher preference for
the same destination-pattern? The call should hunt over to it.


On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:24:56 -0500, Marc Hering <mhering at reval.com> wrote:
> AS far as I know, that is what a Gatekeeper is for...  You setup a
> Gatekeeper and then instead of pointing your dial plan to the Gateway.,
> you register the gateways with a gatekeeper...then the GK can managed
> the resources and load balance between them...
> 
> I could be wrong but this is what I remember reading.,.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Stanaway
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 12:26 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [SPAM] - [cisco-voip] Load balancing/ overflow handling with
> IP-IP gateways? - Email found in subject
> 
> Does anyone know of a way to have IP-IP gateways such as the the 3745
> configured to redirect a call rather than rejecting a call when it
> overflows its resources?
> 
> Currently when the gateway has insufficient resources to accept a new
> call, it returns an ARJ reason 47 (Resource unavailable), is there a way
> to change that so that it instead bounces the call to another gateway?
> 
> The calls are coming in h323 direct to the gateway (Not able to use a GK
> to load balance).
> 
> --
> David Stanaway <david at dialmex.net>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>