[cisco-voip] 7960 Phone - connected via the 10/100PC

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

I heard that there was a hospital out there that used both ports of the phone plugged into a switch and used this as a backup link configuration along with the power cube.

Totally unsupported I believe as well.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"I can eat fifty eggs." "Nobody can eat fifty eggs."
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Linsemier, Matthew 
  To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
  Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 5:06 PM
  Subject: [cisco-voip] 7960 Phone - connected via the 10/100PC


  I was wondering if anyone knew the potential effects of a phone running connected to the 10/100PC port rather then the correct 10/100SW port.  We are in the second phase of our Teleworker rollout (replacing the old routers with new Cisco 870's) and I am finding that our helpdesk that originally helped many users setup their home setup had their phones connected to the older 831/837 routers via their 10/100PC port.  These happen to be some of the same people that were also complaining about voice quality (even though the policy-maps showed that voice was being prioritized correctly).  Has anyone run across this? 

   

  Matthew M. Linsemier, CCSP/CCNP/CCDA
  Senior Network Engineer
  APCapital
  Voice: 517.324.6695
  Fax: 517.333.2812
  E-Mail: mlinsemier at apcapital.com

   



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT

  This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely for the use of the addressee identified above. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this communication is UNAUTHORIZED. Neither this information block, the typed name of the sender, nor anything else in this message is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately contact me and delete this communication from your computer. Thank you.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  cisco-voip mailing list
  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060609/5ee0e956/attachment.html