[cisco-voip] unassigned DNs in 4.x

[Kevin Thorngren]

Yes, that sounds like it would work just fine.  However, we do have  
customers that won't make even simple changes like adding a Translation  
Pattern to their dial plan without extensive testing.  They want to  
make sure that their dial plan doesn't break and that there is no  
impact on performance.

Kevin
On Mar 23, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Craig M Staffin wrote:

>
> we had the same request and there is a far easier solution
>
> If your DID range is 3400-3600 just create a transform in the  
> partition that is for that range that points to VM this will force all  
> numbers that are not assigned to go to the VM system.  Even if they  
> have never been assigned.
>
> Craig
>
>
>
> Kevin Thorngren <kthorngr at cisco.com>
> Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>
> 03/23/2006 01:55 PM
>        
>         To:        "Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll at wesd.org>
>         cc:        cisco-voip at puck.nether.net, "Matt Slaga \(US\)"  
> <Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com>
>         Subject:        Re: [cisco-voip] unassigned DNs in 4.x
>
>
>
> No, I wouldn't like to chime in ;-)
>
>  Actually this URL explains why this feature was added:
>  http://www.ciscotaccc.com/voice/showcase?case=K91031031
>
>  "Unassigned DNs allow customers to continue forwarding to voice mail  
> or  
>  another destination for DNs that are no longer assigned to devices.  
>  This happens often when employees are reassigned or terminated."
>
>  We had requirements from some customers for this type of feature.
>
>  HTH,
>  Kevin
>  On Mar 23, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Voll, Scott wrote:
>
>  >
>  > Wes, Ryan, or Kevin like to chime in?
>  >  
>  > Scott
>  >  
>  > PS.  I'm with you all
>  >  
>  >
>  > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net  
>  > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio  
>  > Fulgenzi
>  > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 8:21 AM
>  > To: Matt Slaga (US); Seth Call; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>  > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] unassigned DNs in 4.x
>  >  
>  > You have to remember that some people are doing in-house  
> management,  
>  > so more work equals less $$. :(
>  >  
>  >  
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > ---------
>  >  Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>  >  Network Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G  
> 2W1
>  >  (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>  >  
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>  >  Sanity First : Number of days with fewer than
>  >  50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day:         14
>  >> ----- Original Message -----
>  >> From: Matt Slaga (US)
>  >> To: Seth Call ; Lelio Fulgenzi ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>  >> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:31 AM
>  >> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] unassigned DNs in 4.x
>  >>  
>  >> Well, it does create more work for people like us....  That equals  
>  
>  >> $$....
>  >>  
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net  
>  >> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Seth Call
>  >> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 9:25 AM
>  >> To: Lelio Fulgenzi; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>  >> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] unassigned DNs in 4.x
>  >> There has to be a good reason for it, but I sure wish I knew what  
> it  
>  >> was… maybe line creation is expensive?  And so if you are mucking  
>  >> around with lines and partitions a lot…
>  >>  
>  >> I don't like it either, though
>  >>  
>  >>
>  >> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net  
>  >> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio  
>  >> Fulgenzi
>  >> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 8:20 AM
>  >> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>  >> Subject: [cisco-voip] unassigned DNs in 4.x
>  >>  
>  >> ok, who else doesn't like how DNs hang around after you delete  
> them?  
>  >> i can understand an actual deletion, but if i create a DN in  
>  >> partition A and move it to partition B, voila, an unassigned DN in  
>  
>  >> partition A now exists.
>  >>  
>  >> ugh.
>  >>  
>  >>  
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >> ----------
>  >>  Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>  >>  Network Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario  
> N1G  
>  >> 2W1
>  >>  (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>  >>  
>  >>  
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>  >>  Sanity First : Number of days with fewer than
>  >>  50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day:         14
> >>
>  >>  
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Disclaimer:
>  >>
>  >> This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
>  >> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
>  >> designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
>  >> intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
>  >> this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
>  >> this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
>  >> unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
>  >> notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
>  >> from your computer. Thank you.
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > cisco-voip mailing list
>  > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>  > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>  _______________________________________________
>  cisco-voip mailing list
>  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 14890 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060323/d1d3e188/attachment-0001.bin