[cisco-voip] 4.1.3 sr5b

[Jonathan Charles]

I have to agree.

Usually a loss of secondary dial-tone is always the result of a
potential match with a pattern that does not have the box checked.

His delay for the paging system is similarly affected... another route
pattern still stands as a potential match after calling the paging
system numbers.

My guess is that he has an overlapped route-pattern...



Jonathan

On 7/13/07, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
> Both of those issues can be caused by a dial-plan problem,
> irrespective of the CM patch.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Jul 13, 2007, at 12:28 AM, Paul Choi wrote:
>
> You must have missed my post about it.
>
> We're running that now and after the patch our
> customers experienced
>
> - secondary delay after the seventh digit instead of
> after the nine
>
> - 15-20s post-dial delay when calling paging systems
>
> The patch was uninstalled but the problems remain.
> We're having a bad time with it. I'd hold off on it
> for now unless you have a test system that mirrors
> your production.
>
> Paul
>
> --- CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com wrote:
>
> > Is anyone running this version of Call Mgr?
> >
> > Please comment on it's stability if possible......
> >
> > Thanks,
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ____________
> Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell.
> http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>