[cisco-voip] Providing phone service in Mumbai and Johannesburg

[Aman Chugh]

CM cluster in Texas, Remote office in Chennai, India . We have ipsec vpn on
which we do voice and RTT is around 280 - 325 ms. We have never had delayed
dial tone. In India You can not to interconnect between PSTN and IP so we
can not have local PSTN connection drop on the same ip network to Texas. IP
phones in chennai do not have the ablitiy to call local PSTN ,it more of
Closed User group, and 90 % of the support offices use this with calls
queued in US.

Aman

On 7/16/07, Robert Kulagowski <bob at smalltime.com> wrote:
>
> Matthew Saskin wrote:
> > I should clarify - in both of my previous examples there were quite

> bit of calls traversing the WAN, hence the quality reference.
> >
> > If you have local dial-tone in all these cases, I have yet to see any
> > issues in my experience other than the aformentioned delayed dial tone -
> > all sites are totally usable with local dial being provided.
>
> Yes, I'll be providing local dial tone at each site; as far as legally,
> I remember that India used to be a big deal with telecomms, going so far
> as to "two phones on the desk".  I read a white paper on cisco.com
> talking about how they managed to do away with that, but since we're not
> a multi-billion dollar organization, I don't know that _we'd_ be allowed
> to just have a single phone on the desk.  Anyone know for sure what the
> landscape out there looks like now?
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070716/824cd67e/attachment.html