[cisco-voip] Networkers 2007

Sun Jul 22 23:20:47 EDT 2007

Timothy,

Hi!  I'll be at networkers (CCBOOTCAMP is having a booth again this
year).  Stop by booth 736 and say hello.

thanks,
Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security)
CCSI# 30482
President
Network Learning Inc - A Cisco Sponsored Organization (SO) YES! We take
Cisco Learning credits!
brad at ccbootcamp.com
www.ccbootcamp.com (Cisco Training and Advanced Technology Rental Racks)

www.routerie.com (Routing and Switching Forums) 
www.securityie.com (Security Forums) 
www.voiceie.com (Voice Forums)
Voice: 702-968-5100
FAX: 702-446-8012 

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 8:12 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 53, Issue 102

Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Shared Line with 7941 and MGCP/EVM-HD-8FXS (Jason Aarons (US))
   2. Re: Shared Line with 7941 and MGCP/EVM-HD-8FXS (Lelio Fulgenzi)
   3. Fw: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) (Lelio Fulgenzi)
   4. Re: Fw: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) (Paul Choi)
   5. dtmf-relay in IOS dial-peer (Jason Aarons (US))
   6. Networkers 2007 (Frazee, Timothy)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:11:37 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons \(US\)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Shared Line with 7941 and MGCP/EVM-HD-8FXS
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:

<C1FE15183DA37645BC0633BC604E44F00633F8F6 at USNAEXCH.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I have a conference room with a SCCP/7941 and a analog Polycom
SoundStation2 on a EVM-HD-8FXS (MGCP) with the same dn on both devices.
I've noticed the shared lines don't work exactly like two SCCP 7941s. It
appears a lot of shared features require both sides be SCCP devices,
which makes sense.

Anyone else tried this same setup.

In general do others give the two devices different numbers or tried the
same number?

CallManager 4.1(3)

-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential
and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s)
named above only.  If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby
notified that you have received this communication in error and that any
use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070722/dbaa3b
ee/attachment-0001.html 

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:28:19 -0400
From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Shared Line with 7941 and MGCP/EVM-HD-8FXS
To: "Jason Aarons \(US\)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>,
	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <001301c7ccd1$22b69250$6601a8c0 at pdp11>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

 think barge definately works differently. but now that they have
cBarge, you can now barge in on an analog shared line. i can't remember
if it pushes a tone down the line or not.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Jason Aarons (US)
  To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 10:11 PM
  Subject: [cisco-voip] Shared Line with 7941 and MGCP/EVM-HD-8FXS

  I have a conference room with a SCCP/7941 and a analog Polycom
SoundStation2 on a EVM-HD-8FXS (MGCP) with the same dn on both devices.
I've noticed the shared lines don't work exactly like two SCCP 7941s. It
appears a lot of shared features require both sides be SCCP devices,
which makes sense.

  Anyone else tried this same setup.

  In general do others give the two devices different numbers or tried
the same number?

  CallManager 4.1(3)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
------

  Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
------

  _______________________________________________
  cisco-voip mailing list
  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070722/9c15e9
3d/attachment-0001.html 

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:38:13 -0400
From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Fw: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <002001c7ccd2$845f8740$6601a8c0 at pdp11>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-7";
	reply-type=original

is anyone else getting this error when they post to the list?

----- Original Message -----
From: <postmaster at ARWENTECH.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 10:38 PM
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

> This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
> 
> Delivery to the following recipients failed.
> 
>       postmaster at arwentech.com
> 
> 
> 
>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Paul Choi <asobihoudai at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fw: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <627384.12439.qm at web57211.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

no but I sure get a gankload of 419 emails...

________________________________________________________________________
____________
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.  Join Yahoo!'s user
panel and lay it on us.
http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 23:00:42 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons \(US\)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] dtmf-relay in IOS dial-peer
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:

<C1FE15183DA37645BC0633BC604E44F00633F90B at USNAEXCH.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

What happens when someone configures a dial-peer with all 3 methods to
CVP (Cisco Voice Portal) 3.1?

Does it send dtmf 3 times, once each in each format? Someone else
configured this and I'm reverse engineering what they did.

Example;

dial-peer voice 28800 voip

 description CCMSubscriber2

 destination-pattern 28[89]..

 session target ipv4:10.60.10.11

 dtmf-relay rtp-nte h245-signal h245-alphanumeric

 codec g711ulaw

 no vad

-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070722/f77009
6e/attachment-0001.html 

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:41:50 -0700
From: "Frazee, Timothy" <Timothy_Frazee at adp.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Networkers 2007
To: "Cisco Puck" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <1620b01c7ccd3$065bd8a8$56cc7e8b at ds.ad.adp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"

Anyone on list in LA this week?

Any interesting booths to check out?

Sent from my Palm Treo.

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
addressee and may contain information that is privileged and
confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient
or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any
attachments from your system.

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 53, Issue 102
*******************************************