[cisco-voip] CM stable @ 6.1.2.1106?

Tue Aug 12 00:06:50 EDT 2008

So what are everybodies thoughts on running an ES?  as 1106-1 is an ES.  My
thoughts are ES are "pre-builds not mainstream, i.e. test are your own
risk".  6.1.2.1000-13 is the main release.  I've seen a number of these
rolled out (main release 1000-13) and only one has a problem which required
a cluster reboot, the issue didn't affect call processing but did affect
management (changing settings, etc).

Cheers,

D

On 8/12/08, Steve G <smgustafson at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  My first install with CM6 is on Business Edition running 6.1.1.3000-2.
> My BAT experience was very painful.  I first attempted to insert phones with
> users with 1 DN and 1 Intercom.  It would not let me insert the default
> activated device on the intercom line.  The syntax is SEP<mac address> but
> it does not recognize the device name as it is not valid.  I also could not
> insert the owner userid of the phone because it to was not valid.  I also
> could not insert the primary user device for mobility.  so, inserting phones
> with users is something that really needs to be tested and fixed in my
> opinion.  I went back to the old way of importing phones/users with just the
> user ID and the DN.  that seemed to work as long as you didn't use any of
> the new fields.  So I wanted to add 1 intercom using the "add intercom" tab
> in the bat.xls spreadsheet.  It was great except it did not have a field for
> the intercom default activated device, which is mandatory.  so once the
> phones were in I ended up creating a new spreadsheet for just phones, and
> imported the same fields for my DN and Intercom and this time it all seemed
> to import, except it deleted the device association of my users.  I spent
> WAY too much time on this ordeal.  I was running in circles, so I got to a
> point where I started updating 100 phones and users by hand.  That took me
> an afternoon to get everything right but I figured I would have been messing
> with BAT for much longer.
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:43 PM, STEVEN CASPER <SCASPER at mtb.com> wrote:
>
>> One was CSCso91969  - Insert of phones,RDP fails to insert CFA
>> parameters. We still have a TAC case open I believe, the work around did
>> not work for us.
>>
>> >>> Rob Gilreath <rgilreath at hbs.net> 8/11/2008 5:42 PM >>>
>>
>> Can you guys that have seen issues with the BAT give a quick summary?
>> I've not seen any yet myself, but knowing of them ahead of time would
>> be nice…
>>
>>
>> From:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<From%3Acisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>
>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of STEVEN
>> CASPER
>> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 4:39 PM
>> To: Erik Goppel; Jason Aarons (US)
>> Cc: Cisco VoIP
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CM stable @ 6.1.2.1106?
>>
>>
>>
>> Got to agree with the BAT comment. Due to BAT problems we discovered
>> during testing we had to put the upgrade to 6.1.2 on hold. We are
>> rolling out a 100-200 or so phones a week so the proper operation of BAT
>> is a big deal to us.
>>
>>
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> >>> "Erik Goppel" <egoppel at gmail.com> 8/11/2008 5:04 PM >>>
>>
>> got 2 customers over 8000 phones running stable. one customer running
>> Unity Connection with 6400 VM`s at the same version also stable.
>>
>> BAT is a total different story, i`d suggest testing BAT to see if you
>> can work with it.
>>
>>
>>
>> good luck,
>>
>>
>>
>> Erik Goppel
>>
>>
>>
>> Dimension Data Netherlands
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Jason Aarons (US)
>> <jason.aarons at us.didata.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've had no issues with 6.1.2-1000-13 in regards to stability.   Most
>> installs have been 100-500 handsets SCCP 7941/7961.  Larger 4000-12,000
>> are staying with 4.1.3sr7 (they have a longer lifecycle between upgrades
>> due to UCCE, etc). 6.1.2-1000-13 has some bugs but end users don't
>> notice.  I would call it General Deployment release.
>>
>> From:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<From%3Acisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>
>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll
>> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 3:43 PM
>> To: Cisco VoIP
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] CM stable @ 6.1.2.1106?
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm putting a new / upgraded CM 6.1.2 into production this weekend.
>> Should I be running 6.1.2.1000-13 or 1106-1?  any issues with either
>> one?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
>> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
>> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
>> you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
>> error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
>> strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
>> communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
>> message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>> ************************************This email may contain privileged
>> and/or confidential information that is intended solely for the use of
>> the addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient or entity, you are
>> strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing or using any
>> of the information contained in the transmission.  If you received this
>> communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and
>> destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.
>> This communication may contain nonpublic personal information about
>> consumers subject to the restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and
>> the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  You may not directly or indirectly reuse or
>> disclose such information for any purpose other than to provide the
>> services for which you are receiving the information.There are risks
>> associated with the use of electronic transmission.  The sender of this
>> information does not control the method of transmittal or service
>> providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security, receipt,
>> or third party interception of this
>> transmission.************************************
>> ************************************
>> This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information that is
>> intended solely for the use of the addressee.  If you are not the intended
>> recipient or entity, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying,
>> distributing or using any of the information contained in the transmission.
>>  If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>> immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or
>> hard copy.  This communication may contain nonpublic personal information
>> about consumers subject to the restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
>> and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  You may not directly or indirectly reuse or
>> disclose such information for any purpose other than to provide the services
>> for which you are receiving the information.
>> There are risks associated with the use of electronic transmission.  The
>> sender of this information does not control the method of transmittal or
>> service providers and assumes no duty or obligation for the security,
>> receipt, or third party interception of this transmission.
>> ************************************
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080812/da5847ef/attachment.html>