[cisco-voip] Urgent Priority on Translation Patterns

William Roy William.Roy at l7.com.au
Sun Aug 24 21:14:24 EDT 2008


Big thanks to Mike and this alias. Have implemented the use of CTI route points to convert a 4 digit number into a forwarded 5 digit number. I did not realise that masks could be used in call forwards. So what I have set up is the following:

CTI Route point with a DN of [14567]XXX
This has a CFA set to 6XXXX.

E.g If a person dials 6005 this converts to 66005,  this matches a DN on an IP Phone - call completes.
      If a person dials 4041 this converts to 64041, this does not match an IP phone, it now matches a route pattern that sends it over to the NEC and strips off the leading 6 again.

I have the interdigit timeout currently set to 5 seconds and we are having to wait for this to expire when dialing 4 digits, is there away with the above solution to use a # at the end of the pattern on the CTI route point to make it complete quicker? From my quick testing this was not working as having the # at the end of the DN messed up the mask on the CFA.

Regards,
Wil

From: Mike Lydick [mailto:mike.lydick at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 22 August 2008 7:19 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net; William Roy
Subject: Re: Re: Urgent Priority on Translation Patterns

We have done similar call routing in the form of short dials for 10 digit assigned stations. You will not want to us translations for any number ranges that overlap because of the urgent priority. For the translations that overlap think of using CTI routepoints or ports and class of services for these to devices (virtual) to prioritize the number translations lower (or higher). If you give the Number range and examples of the overlap I am sure the group will get more specific on a solution.


--
Best Regards,

Mike Lydick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080825/ea4c07b5/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list