[cisco-voip] Urgent Priority on Translation Patterns

[Tim Smith]

Yeah.. not always possible I know.. but you could use the technically not
possible excuse to cause them a little bit of pain with their old dialling
habits.. that way they decide on their own to use the new scheme :)

I see the CTI RP thing.. but I'm just wondering if the route pattern with
the ! will do the same thing.. but without the CTI RP, and forwarding...

Since your relying on T302 anyway now...
RP with a ! will produce more matches and not get urgently routed..
If extension exists, it will match and route
If not - T302 will expire, and RP will route to PBX.

Cheers,

Tim.

On 8/25/08, William Roy <William.Roy at l7.com.au> wrote:
>
>  I like your thinking Tim – retrain the user J
>
>
>
> The beauty of using the CTI RP and a call forward, it allows you to convert
> to a 5 digit number, check to see if any IP phones are configured with the
> extension, if not then matches a route pattern that sends the call over to
> an extension on the NEC.
>
>
>
> *From:* smithsonianwa at gmail.com [mailto:smithsonianwa at gmail.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Tim Smith
> *Sent:* Monday, 25 August 2008 4:31 PM
> *To:* William Roy
> *Cc:* Mike Lydick; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Urgent Priority on Translation Patterns
>
>
>
> Hi Guys..
>
>
>
> That is a good tip..
>
>
>
> But wouldnt this just work with a route pattern
>
> [14567]XXX!
>
>
>
> Add a prefix digit of 6 under called party tranform..
>
> Then the call wouldnt be forwarded.
>
>
>
> It would still rely on interdigit timeout... but either way.. thats a good
> opportunity to train the users... ? 5 second wait to dial 4 digits... or
> take an extra 1 second to enter the 5th digit and it goes straight away? :)
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Tim.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8/25/08, *William Roy* <William.Roy at l7.com.au> wrote:
>
> Big thanks to Mike and this alias. Have implemented the use of CTI route
> points to convert a 4 digit number into a forwarded 5 digit number. I did
> not realise that masks could be used in call forwards. So what I have set up
> is the following:
>
>
>
> CTI Route point with a DN of [14567]XXX
>
> This has a CFA set to 6XXXX.
>
>
>
> E.g If a person dials 6005 this converts to 66005,  this matches a DN on an
> IP Phone - call completes.
>
>       If a person dials 4041 this converts to 64041, this does not match an
> IP phone, it now matches a route pattern that sends it over to the NEC and
> strips off the leading 6 again.
>
>
>
> I have the interdigit timeout currently set to 5 seconds and we are having
> to wait for this to expire when dialing 4 digits, is there away with the
> above solution to use a # at the end of the pattern on the CTI route point
> to make it complete quicker? From my quick testing this was not working as
> having the # at the end of the DN messed up the mask on the CFA.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Wil
>
>
>
> *From:* Mike Lydick [mailto:mike.lydick at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, 22 August 2008 7:19 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net; William Roy
> *Subject:* Re: Re: Urgent Priority on Translation Patterns
>
>
>
> We have done similar call routing in the form of short dials for 10 digit
> assigned stations. You will not want to us translations for any number
> ranges that overlap because of the urgent priority. For the translations
> that overlap think of using CTI routepoints or ports and class of services
> for these to devices (virtual) to prioritize the number translations lower
> (or higher). If you give the Number range and examples of the overlap I am
> sure the group will get more specific on a solution.
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Mike Lydick
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080825/066fff6d/attachment-0001.html>