[cisco-voip] Maximum number of T1 on 3845

[Voice Noob]

I follow this thread but usually only chime in when I see wrong information
being passed around. Why don't you circle back around once you try to deploy
all of those PRI's in one router and let the group know how it turns out.

I am not an expert on everything, just what I talk about.



On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Frazee, Timothy <Timothy_Frazee at adp.com>wrote:

>  I wouldn't worry about trying to apologizing.
>
> "Voice Noob" seems to be pretty much an expert on everything.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of Mordechai
> *Sent:* Tue 8/26/2008 10:39 PM
>
> *To:* 'Voice Noob'
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Maximum number of T1 on 3845
>
>    Not sure what do you mean by "support". Again, Cisco has tested with
> 540 calls, albeit no compression, so it seems in terms of raw performance it
> is all there. If you are aware of other issues I would love to hear, before
> we deploy them out there.
>
>
>
> I am not trying to teach anything, especially not math. Just relaying some
> info I have that seems to be relevant to the question.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Voice Noob [mailto:voicenoob at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 26, 2008 10:55 PM
> *To:* Mordechai
> *Cc:* Matthew Saskin; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Maximum number of T1 on 3845
>
>
>
> Thanks for the math lesson but there is a big diffrence between port
> density and being able to support that many PRI's. Good luck.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Mordechai <m.rabinovich at nves.ca> wrote:
>
> 8 * VWIC-2MFT
>
> 4 * NM-HDV2-2T1/E1
>
>
>
> According to Cisco this configuration supporting up to 540 calls was
> internally tested (75% cpu util)
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Voice Noob [mailto:voicenoob at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 26, 2008 5:54 PM
> *To:* Mordechai
> *Cc:* Matthew Saskin; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Maximum number of T1 on 3845
>
>
>
> No they don't. Where in the world did you get that from????
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Mordechai <m.rabinovich at nves.ca> wrote:
>
> 3845 supports at least 16, more likely 24 pris if I remember right. We
> chose
> them over 6509e with CMM blades because they provided appropriate density
> and a newer voip platform.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Saskin
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 3:25 PM
> To: Voice Noob
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Maximum number of T1 on 3845
>
> For one particular client I've got a series of 8 x 3845's with 12 PRI's
> + 230 configured xcoding sessions per device and no cpu/memory issues to
> speak of.  Nominal CPU utilization is around 35% with peaks of about 50%
> during peak call times.
>
> -matt
>
> Voice Noob wrote:
> >
> > I think that device will support 12 or 14 PRI's. Don't remember off hand.
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Aman Chugh <aman.chugh at gmail.com
> > <mailto:aman.chugh at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >     Just wanted to know if I can have 8 T1 pri terminate on Cisco 3845 ,
> >     any one already doing the same , any caveats that I need to be aware
> >     of , apart from the AS5300/5400 , what are my other options to
> >     terminate 8 T1 on a single router, I am putting in 6 PVDM2-64 to
> >     support this configuration.
> >
> >
> >     Aman
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     cisco-voip mailing list
> >     cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> >     https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.9/1635 - Release Date: 8/26/2008
> 7:29 AM
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.9/1635 - Release Date: 8/26/2008
> 7:29 AM
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.9/1635 - Release Date: 8/26/2008
> 7:29 AM
>
> ------------------------------
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential.
> If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized
> representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail
> and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080827/28083bd3/attachment.html>