[nsp] Large MTU disadvantages?

From: Dave O'Meara (dave.omeara@eircom.net)
Date: Thu Jul 18 2002 - 09:54:51 EDT

Next message: Giles Heron: "Re: [nsp] Large MTU disadvantages?"
Previous message: odusseus: "[nsp] NoCallback - cisco router - microsoft host"
Next in thread: Giles Heron: "Re: [nsp] Large MTU disadvantages?"
Reply: Giles Heron: "Re: [nsp] Large MTU disadvantages?"
Reply: Karyn Ulriksen: "[nsp] ip address secondary limitations"
Maybe reply: Dave O'Meara: "[nsp] Large MTU disadvantages?"
Reply: Giles Heron: "Re: [nsp] Large MTU disadvantages?"
Reply: Karyn Ulriksen: "[nsp] ip address secondary limitations"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi,

Can anyone think of a disadvantage to using a large MTU value (4470 bytes for
example) on 2Mb Serial links, which (on Ciscos at least) default to 1500
bytes?

Thanks,
Dave

Next message: Giles Heron: "Re: [nsp] Large MTU disadvantages?"
Previous message: odusseus: "[nsp] NoCallback - cisco router - microsoft host"
Next in thread: Giles Heron: "Re: [nsp] Large MTU disadvantages?"
Reply: Giles Heron: "Re: [nsp] Large MTU disadvantages?"
Reply: Karyn Ulriksen: "[nsp] ip address secondary limitations"
Maybe reply: Dave O'Meara: "[nsp] Large MTU disadvantages?"
Reply: Giles Heron: "Re: [nsp] Large MTU disadvantages?"
Reply: Karyn Ulriksen: "[nsp] ip address secondary limitations"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:05 EDT