> >Nothing else was particularly loaded (cpu/bus/...), lots of configs were
> >tried, lots of different hardware, and we've never been able to achieve
> >anything like 400mb out of a VIP 2/40.
>
> I didn't say that you could get 400mb/s out a a VIP2-40.
Sorry, I thought that's what you said.
> >Well, that's dancing around my question a bit.
>
> I wasn't intending to dance around the issue.
Again, didn't mean to be condescending, just trying to figure out your
message.
> >The question was: are those raw-performance numbers based on observation
> >on a real router, or just theoretically computed?
>
> No, I haven't observed the numbers. I'm basing it on the numbers used in
> the configuration guidelines, which are based on design goals which the
> product can achieve.
OK. That's what I was wondering. Design goals and configuration guidelines
are interesting, but actual experience varie...
> -rb
Avi
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:05 EDT