It took them a few hours. It's out there now.
It's my undestanding that most vendors were caught off
guard as the date was unexpectedly moved up. This is just my own
speculation though. Hopefully everyone has their workarounds/new software
in place at this point and it will not be a big deal.
- jared
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 10:15:36AM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 10:14:47AM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> > I still think that *Cisco* should get their act together now, and quickly
> > publish an official statement about which configurations are vulnerable
> > and which ones aren't.
>
> Ooops.
>
> They did in the mean time. Sorry.
>
> gert
>
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
> //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025 gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de
-- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:33 EDT