Dear All,
About Catalyst 2948G-L3,
Is there anyone who knows if there is some inconvenience at switching
traffic between FastEthernet without utilizing GigabitEthernet port?
Sometimes I am in RIP routing trouble between BVI and router
connected other FastEthernet port.
We also use HSRP on each interface.
I wonder if following URL is mentioning this as a caution.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/48.html
Configuration is as follows.
!
ip subnet-zero
ipx routing 0007.eb4f.2400
bridge irb
!
!
!
interface FastEthernet1
ip address 192.168.120.252 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
no ip directed-broadcast
ipx network 1001
standby 2 priority 110 preempt
standby 2 ip 192.168.120.254
!
interface FastEthernet2
ip address 192.168.128.252 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
no ip directed-broadcast
standby 3 priority 110 preempt
standby 3 ip 192.168.128.254
!
interface FastEthernet3
ip address 192.168.123.252 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
no ip directed-broadcast
ipx network 1002
standby 4 priority 110 preempt
standby 4 ip 192.168.123.254
!
interface FastEthernet4
no ip address
no ip directed-broadcast
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 priority 0
!
(same configuration between FE4 and FE48)
!
interface FastEthernet48
no ip address
no ip directed-broadcast
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 priority 0
!
interface GigabitEthernet49
no ip address
no ip directed-broadcast
shutdown
!
interface GigabitEthernet50
no ip address
no ip directed-broadcast
shutdown
!
interface BVI1
ip address 192.168.121.252 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
no ip directed-broadcast
ipx network 1003
standby 1 priority 110 preempt
standby 1 ip 192.168.121.254
!
router rip
network 192.168.120.0
network 192.168.121.0
network 192.168.123.0
network 192.168.128.0
!
ip classless
!
!
!
!
bridge 1 protocol ieee
bridge 1 route ip
bridge 1 route ipx
bridge 1 priority 0
!
Thanks,
-----
Kouji Baba
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:41 EDT