Re: [nsp] is line protocol enough?

From: Steffen Baur (baur@noc.dfn.de)
Date: Tue Nov 23 1999 - 02:47:07 EST

Next message: Neil J. McRae: "Slightly off topic Newbridge question."
Previous message: Steffen Baur: "Re: [nsp] Cisco's "distribute in" command"
In reply to: Fabien Berger: "[nsp] is line protocol enough?"
Next in thread: Glen Shok: "Re: [nsp] is line protocol enough?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Fabien,

On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 11:19:12AM -0500, Fabien Berger wrote:

> 2 routers are connected via a serial v.35 (HDLC encapsulation,
> keepalives are set to 10s). on one end of the line the line protocol
> is down and on the other the line protocol stays up (link is up in
> both ends). a sh/no sh does not help.

Did you check the logs if the line protocols flaps? Another
explanation could a loop in one direction (check show interface for
that).

Steffen Baur, DFN-NOC

-- 
##   Network Operation Center, DFN-Verein Geschaeftsstelle Stuttgart   ##
## http://www.noc.dfn.de/ finger trouble@noc.dfn.de wartung@noc.dfn.de ##
##               >>>>>>  mailto:  noc@noc.dfn.de  <<<<<<               ##
##      Phone: 0711-63314-112, FAX 0711-63314-133 (business hours)     ##

Next message: Neil J. McRae: "Slightly off topic Newbridge question."
Previous message: Steffen Baur: "Re: [nsp] Cisco's "distribute in" command"
In reply to: Fabien Berger: "[nsp] is line protocol enough?"
Next in thread: Glen Shok: "Re: [nsp] is line protocol enough?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:07 EDT