Re: [nsp] router capacity question

From: Richard Steenbergen (ras@above.net)
Date: Wed Dec 08 1999 - 15:45:02 EST

Next message: Niels Bakker: "Re: [nsp] router capacity question"
Previous message: Brandon Applegate: "Non 'T' version of IOS that supports NPE-225"
In reply to: Niels Bakker: "Re: [nsp] router capacity question"
Next in thread: Niels Bakker: "Re: [nsp] router capacity question"
Reply: Niels Bakker: "Re: [nsp] router capacity question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:36:28PM +0100, Niels Bakker wrote:
> Brian Wallingford wrote:
>
> > Try 'ip route-cache same-interface'.
>
> This isn't enabled by default. Why not? What are the hidden pitfalls one
> can fall into when this is in effect?

It breaks the ability to send ICMP Redirects informing the sender of the
traffic that they should keep the traffic on that LAN and not be sending
to this interface.

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen <ras@above.net>   http://users.quadrunner.com/humble
PGP Key ID: 0x60AB0AD1  (E5 35 10 1D DE 7D 8C A7  09 1C 80 8B AF B9 77 BB)
AboveNet Communications - AboveSecure Network Security Engineer, Vienna VA

Next message: Niels Bakker: "Re: [nsp] router capacity question"
Previous message: Brandon Applegate: "Non 'T' version of IOS that supports NPE-225"
In reply to: Niels Bakker: "Re: [nsp] router capacity question"
Next in thread: Niels Bakker: "Re: [nsp] router capacity question"
Reply: Niels Bakker: "Re: [nsp] router capacity question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:08 EDT