RE: [nsp] eigrp routing question

From: Scott.Keoseyan@BroadWing.com
Date: Fri Jan 28 2000 - 11:52:22 EST


Why not just adjust the delay on the appropriate interface to influence the
routing decision? That way, of the primary link (s0) fails, the router can
still use the other path...

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: gerard@cce.org [mailto:gerard@cce.org]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2000 11:07 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: cisco-nsp@iagnet.net
Subject: Re: [nsp] eigrp routing question

Though I have not implemented them on my routers it seems that setting up
routing policies using route maps will do what you are trying to
accomplish.

...........................................................................
..............
Gerard West
The Center for Collaborative Education
www.cce.org

cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net writes:
>Hello cisco-nsp,
>
>Here is situation.
>
>router1 gets incoming traffic from s0 interface but outgoing traffic go
>though via s1 because eigrp advertise.
>Here is what I did, but failed.
>I put disribution filter on the interface connected to s1, disabling any
>routerable IP update via
>access-list 99 permit 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255
>
>Here is the objective, how to make this s0 to be a primary path for out
>going.
>I even put default gateway on this router, forcing the traffic out to
>s0 interface, because of iegrp advertisement coming from s1, it
>seems to preffer that path out. How to fix it.
>
>the router connected to s0 has a filter that disable to adv. non routerble
>IP address and this router in question use it has default IP.
>
>Any suggestions?
>
>
>Tatsuya
>
>
>
>
>/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
>Tatsuya Kawasaki
>Allegiance Telecom
>Unlock the Power of the Internet
>http://www.kivex.com
>Phone 301.215.6777 Fax 301.215.5991
>Affiliation given for identification not representation
>/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:09 EDT