Absolutely. With the new Flex-WAN mods and ATM OC-12c capabilities, coupled
with µôÅ;MS
protocols, low-speed synchronous interfaces, etc. In the core, itµôÅ;gr
alThough I would use a GSR for an Intrenet backbone router before a 6509.
As a matter of fact, I wouldn't use a 6509 µôÅ;ll
in a datacenter or server farm and feed a GSR with it, though.
-/chris
> -----Original MeµôÅ;e-
> From: Terence [mailto:terry@tdce.com.au]
> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 1:17 AM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
>µôÅ;je
>
>
>
> Anyone tried using the cat 6000 line for routing
> and switching on the one platform?
>
> µôÅ;>
>
> +-------------------------------+--------------------------+
> | TereDonn Computer EngineeµôÅ; |
> | 1/128 Bowen St, SPRING HILL | FAX +61-[0]7-32369930 |
> | PO BOX 1054, SPRING HILL 40µôÅ; M
> | Queensland Australia | Mobile +61-[0]414-784461 |
> +------------------------------µôÅ;--
>
>
From owner-cisco-nspµôÅ;k.
Received: from someone claiming to be
hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.µôÅ;
for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 15:14:10 -0500
µôÅ;ve
Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 15:14:10 -0500
Received: from neuman.interaccesµôÅ;m
by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA14040
for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.µôÅ;;
Received: from tapper (internet.chi.interaccess.com [207.70.102.65])
by neuman.inteµôÅ;es
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:14:06 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <006e01bf9503$bfe13070$8b674µôÅ;in
From: "Tony Hiller" <thiller@interaccess.com>
To: "Jesper Skriver" <jesper@skriver.dk>,
"Tatsuya KaµôÅ;ki
Cc: <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1000323122147.10724B-100000@kds1> <20000323200#ëÅ;A8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-TypµôÅ;ex
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: MicrosoftµôÅ;lo
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
The CT3 allows you to bert test indiviµôÅ; t
1. Config the interface:
conf t
int sX/0/0:16
2. Loop the telco's smartjack
Or Loop the CSU
LOOPBACK REMOTE LINE FDL ANSI
3. Config the T-3
5. Start aµôÅ;T
T1 27 BERT PATTERN 2^23 INTERVAL 60
(This sends quasi random data)
6. Exit config mode
7. Vi
Telcordia / Bellcore has some excellent T1 / DS3 test
I understand, these µôÅ;be
telco side of things...
hiller
----- Original Message -----
From: Jesper µôÅ;ve
To: Tatsuya Kawasaki <tatsuya@kivex.com>
Cc: <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 1µôÅ;PM
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 01:46:30PM -0500, Tatsuya Kawasaki wrote:
> > T3 4/0/0µôÅ;up
> > CT3 H/W Version : 5.0.1, CT3 ROM Version: 1.2, CT3 F/W Version: 2.8.0
> > Mx H/W version: 3, #ëÅ;co
>
> > I am bit confused on cisco web site.
> > Here is what I wanµôÅ; d
> > I need to test a channl on this DS3. ie 4/0/0:16.
> > I want to use external CSU and test the circuit.
> >
> > coulµôÅ;yo
>
> You need to have the T3 split into T1's, so unless the telco
> does that for you, or you have equipµôÅ; t
> cannot test it.
>
> /Jesper
>
> --
> Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456
> WorkµôÅ; N
> Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)
>
> OnµôÅ;ix
> One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
>
From CMartin@mercuryµôÅ;in
Received: from someone claiming to be
hermes.balink.com (baisgate.balink.com [199.45.32.µôÅ;
for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 15:18:56 -0500
µôÅ;ve
Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 15:18:56 -0500
Received: by HERMES with Internet MaiµôÅ;rv
id <FSFJL2KP>; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 15:18:06 -0500
Message-ID: <4F8C08CC6E76D311AD1F00508B7872495DA79B@HERME#ëÅ;ro
SµôÅ;ct
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 15:18:04 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)µôÅ;te
charset="windows-1252"
If your aggregate port rate exceeds 100 Mbps and you ned to do dCAR or dWREDµôÅ;dT
-/chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Beckmann [mailto:petzi@apfel.de]
> Sent: Thursday, March µôÅ;20
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: SRAM on VIP2-50
>
>
> Under which conditions does it make sense to
4 MB SRAM on a VIP2-50 to 8 MB ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael
>
From neil@COLT.NET µôÅ;Ma
Received: from someone claiming to be
NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET (NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET [212.74.95.132])
by pµôÅ;ne
for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 16:05:05 -0500
(envelopeµôÅ;m
Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 16:05:05 -0500
Received: from COLT.NET (localhost.colt.net
by
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:04:5
To: Michael Beckmann <petzi@apfel.de>
cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET>
Subject: #ëÅ;SR
<20000323210242.B13309@apfel.dµôÅ;Fr
Reply-To: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:04:56 +0000
SenderµôÅ;il
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:02:42 +0100
Michael Beckmann <petzi@apfel.de> wrote:
Every condition :-)
> Under whiµôÅ;on
> 4 MB SRAM on a VIP2-50 to 8 MB ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael
>
-- Neil J. µôÅ;e neil@COLT.NET "In this world there's two kinds of people my friendµôÅ;From owner-cisco-nspµôÅ;k.Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.µôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 18:14:50 -0500 µôÅ;veReceived-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 18:14:50 -0500 Received: from verdi.nethelp.no µôÅ;di by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA17873 for <cisco-nsp@qual.net>; Thu, 23 MaµôÅ;00From: sthaug@nethelp.no Received: (qmail 49725 invoked by uid 1001); 23 Mar 2000 23:14:41 +0000 (GMTµôÅ;: Subject: Re: [nsp] WCCP 2 IOS compatibility In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 26 Jan 2000 12:51:19 -05µôÅ;ReX-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-TµôÅ; TContent-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 00:14:41 +0100 Message-ID: <49723.953µôÅ;81
[From an earlier message to this list]
> IOS 12.0(7)T (for 72xx) most certainly does > i> WCCPv2 is> > 12.0T since 12µôÅ;)T> 12.0 mainline only has (and will only ever have) WCCPv1. > 12.0S currently only has WCCPv1. WCCPv2 imaµôÅ;fo> EFT (along with some other neat WCCP enhancements).
Anybody know when 12.0S will get WCCPv2? µôÅ;(9have it.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
From owner-cisco-nspµôÅ;k.Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.µôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 20:10:43 -0500 µôÅ;veReceived-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 20:10:43 -0500 Received: from shandakor.tharsisµôÅ; ( by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA19077 for <cisco-nsp@µôÅ;etReceived: (from grr@localhost) by shandakor.tharsis.com (8.8.6/8.7.3) id UAA0µôÅ;; Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 20:10:39 -0500 (EST) From: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharµôÅ;coMessAge-Id: <200003240110.UAA05422@shandakor.tharsis.com> To: cisco-nsp@iagnet.net, tatsuya@kivex.com Subject: Re: [nspµôÅ;es
The first 3 t1's can be brought out on the first 3 external connectors, one additional t1 can be selectedµôÅ;co
controller t1 3/1/0 t1 test n linecode x lenth y
for internal testing and pattern geµôÅ;tifor the internal "bert" port, which some of the other replies talk about.
George
> From cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net Thu MaµôÅ; 1> Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:03:10 -0500 > Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:51:22 -0500 > Date: Thu, µôÅ;ar> From: Tatsuya Kawasaki <tatsuya@kivex.com> > X-Sender: tatsuya@kds1 > To: cisco-nsp@iagnet.neµôÅ;MI> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > Subject: [nsp] question DS 3 card. > Resent-From: cisco-nspµôÅ;k.> X-Mailing-List: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> archive/latest/2442 > X-Loop: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > PrecedeµôÅ; l> REsent-Sender: cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net > > T3 4/0/0 is up. Hardware is CT3IP > CT3 H/W Version : 5.0.1#ëÅ;3 > Applique type is Channelized T3 > µôÅ; I> Here is what I want to do. > I need to test a channl on this DS3. ie 4/0/0:16. > I wµôÅ;to> > could anyone tell me how to? > > > Tatsuya > > > /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_µôÅ;/_> Tatsuya Kawasaki > Allegiance Telecom > Unlock the Power of the Internet > http://www.kivex.comµôÅ;ho> Affiliation given for identification not representation > /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_µôÅ;/_> >
From rkuhljr@uol.comµôÅ; TReceived: from someone claiming to be cummings.uol.com.br (cummings.uol.com.br [200.230.198.69])µôÅ; p for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 20:52:11 -0500 (enµôÅ;peReceived-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 20:52:11 -0500 Received: from rubens (sec-0.users.uol.com.br [20µôÅ;1. by cummings.uol.com.br (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id WAA03295 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22µôÅ;30From: "Rubens Kuhl Jr." <rkuhljr@uol.com.br> To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Shasta and Cisco routerµôÅ;d Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:51:35 -0300 Message-ID: <004801bf9533$7c53ca40$5cf1e7c8@users.uol.com.br> MIME-Version:µôÅ; C charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: NµôÅ;l X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: NµôÅ;l with Cisco routers and switches ? Does it goesµôÅ;wibridging ? Is EGP/IGP to Cisco routers running smoothly ?
Ru
From petzi@mail.apfeµôÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be mail.apfel.de (mail.apfel.de [212.122.128.72]) by puck.nµôÅ;r. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 04:15:06 -0500 (envelope-fromµôÅ;ziReceived-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 04:15:06 -0500 Received: (from petzi@localhost) by mail.apfel.de (8.9.3/8µôÅ;) Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:15:03 +0100 (MET) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:15:03 +0100 From: Michael Beckmann <petzi@apµôÅ;deCc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: SRAM on VIP2-50 Message-ID: <200003241015µôÅ;15References: <20000323210242.B13309@apfel.de> <200003232104.VAA15106@NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET> Mime-Version: 1.0 C#ëÅ;nt
So you have upgraded each of your VIP2-50 ? :-)
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 aµôÅ;:0> On Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:02:42 +0100 > Michael Beckmann <petzi@apfel.de> wrote: > > µôÅ;y > > > Under which conditions does it make sense to upgrade the > > 4 MB SRAM on a VIP2-50 to 8 MB ? > > > µôÅ;an> >> > Michael
-- Michael Beckmann Telefon: +49 172 7777 098
From neil@COLT.NET µôÅ;MaReceived: from someone claiming to be NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET (NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET [212.74.95.132]) by pµôÅ;ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 05:08:14 -0500 (envelopeµôÅ;m Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 05:08:14 -0500 Received: from COLT.NET (localhost.colt.net by Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:08:1To: Michael Beckmann <petzi@apfel.de> cc: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: µôÅ;SRIn-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:15:03 +0100." <20000324101503.A15281@apfel.dµôÅ;FrReply-To: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:08:12 +0000 SenderµôÅ;il
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:15:03 +0100 Michael Beckmann <petzi@apfel.de> wrote:
> So you have upgraded each of yµôÅ;VI
Yes. We saw random nevada errors on even quiet ports and ports with only one PA around the 40M mark. We havµôÅ;cimore is much more.
Neil. -- Neil J. McRae C O L T I N T E R N E T neil@COLT#ëÅ;
From owner-cisco-nspµôÅ;k.Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.µôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:48:22 -0500 µôÅ;veReceived-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:48:22 -0500 Received: from e by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ES for <cisco-nsp@qual.net>; FµôÅ;24Received: from orlandi.com (nabla.xt.net [62.212.0.41]) by etabeta.xt.net (Postfix) with EµôÅ; i for <cisco-nsp@qual.net>; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 15:47:51 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <38DB8016.1119D258@orlandi.com>µôÅ;e:From: Daniele Orlandi <daniele@orlandi.com> Organization: Utility Line Italia X-Mailer: MµôÅ;laX-Accept-Language: it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-nsp@qual.net Subject: Re: [nsp] WCCP 2 IOS compatibµôÅ;y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=uµôÅ;ci
sthaug@nethelp.no wrote: > > Anybody know when 12.0S will get WCCPv2? 12.0(9)S doesnµôÅ;pp have it.
While we're talking about WCCPv2... I'm asking to the kind cisco people on the list, are there any planµôÅ; mmore 'Open' ? I'd like to continue to use Squid but:
http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/µôÅ;17
> CISCO's Web Cache Coordination Protocol V1.0 is supported in squid 2.3 and > later. Due to licencing reqµôÅ;me> If CISCO chooses to open WCCP V2 and relax the licensing terms, Squid may >µôÅ;ab
Thanks.
-- Daniele
-----------------------------------------------------------------µôÅ;-- Daniele Orlandi - Utility Line Italia - http://www.orlandi.com Via Mezzera 29/A - 20030 - Seveso (MI) - Italy -µôÅ;--
From jared@puck.nethµôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA32670 for cisco-nsp@pµôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003250203.VAA32670@puck.nether.netµôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA15808; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 00:21:13 -0500 (envelope-frµôÅ;isDate: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 00:21:13 -0500 X-From_: owner-cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Fri Mar 24µôÅ;21Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.33]) by puck.nether.net (8.µôÅ;8. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 00:21:12 -0500 (envelope-from owner-cisco-µôÅ;puReceived-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 00:21:12 -0500 Received: from omega.cisco.com (omega.cisco.com [171.69.63.1µôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@qual.net>; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 00:21:11 -0500 (EST) RµôÅ;ve by omega.cisco.com (8.8.8-Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) with µôÅ;P Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:20:06 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <4.3.2.20000323211439.01cd9100@omega.cisco.com> X-Sender: µôÅ;omX-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3 Old-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:15:55 -0500 To: From: Lincoln Dale <ltd@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [nsp] WCCP 2 IIn-Reply-To: <49723.9538532µôÅ;erReferences: <Your message of "Wed, 26 Jan 2000 12:51:19 -0500"> <200001261750.JAA05703@omega.cisco.com> MiµôÅ;erContent-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Diagnostic: MµôÅ;coX-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 21:0µôÅ; -ReSent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
At 18:14 23/03/00, sthaug@nethelp.no wrote: >[From an earlier message to this lµôÅ; >> > it also has WCCPv1 (which is explicitly enabled via "ip µôÅ; v> > WCCPv2 is the default otherwise). > > > > 12.0T since 12.0(5)T has had WCCPv2. > > 12.0 mainline only has (µôÅ;wi> > 12.0S currently only has WCCPv1. WCCPv2 images for 12.0S are currently in > > EFT (along wµôÅ;so> >Anybody know when 12.0S will get WCCPv2? 12.0(9)S doesn't appear to >have it.
the WCµôÅ; E
cheers,
lincoln.
-- Lincoln Dale Content Switching ltd@ciscµôÅ;m || || +1 (408¶ôÅ;5- +61 (3) 9659-4294 << San Jose CA 95134 ..:||||||:..:||||||:..
From jared@puck.neth¶ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA00823 for cisco-nsp@p¶ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003250208.VAA00823@puck.nether.net¶ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA27735; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 14:36:56 -0500 (envelope-fr¶ôÅ;isDate: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 14:36:56 -0500 X-From_: rodrigo.loureiro@netstream.com.br Fri Mar ¶ôÅ;4:Received: from someone claiming to be nsrjo4.netstream.com.br ([200.244.82.19]) by puck.neth for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 14:36Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 14:36:52 -0500 Received: by nsrjo4 with Internet Mail Service ( id Message-ID: <F12A0EB611C0D21193BB00105A1From: "Loureiro, Rodrigo¶ôÅ;odTo: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: "Loureiro, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.loureiro@netstream.com.br> #ëÅ;DaContent-Type: text/plai¶ôÅ;chContent-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-n¶ôÅ;esResent-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 21:08:54 -0500 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject:¶ôÅ;p]
Does anyone know which MIB variable could give me information about E1 controllers call-stats? I mean, i would¶ôÅ;e the command #show controllers E1 call-stats. Actually, I=B4m looking f¶ôÅ; sCisco MIB, so any suggestions are welcome.
Thanks, --
Rodrigo Loureiro
From jared@puck.neth¶ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA01292 for cisco-nsp@p¶ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003250210.VAA01292@puck.nether.net¶ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA27477; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 14:26:13 -0500 (envelope-fr¶ôÅ;isDate: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 14:26:13 -0500 X-From_: rodrigo.loureiro@netstream.com.br Fri Mar ¶ôÅ;4:Received: from someone claiming to be nsrjo4.netstream.com.br ([200.244.82.19]) by puck.neth for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 14:26Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 14:26:06 -0500 Received: by nsrjo4 with Internet Mail Service ( id Message-ID: <F12A0EB611C0D21193BB00105A1From: "Loureiro, Rodrigo¶ôÅ;odTo: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Old-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 16:19:01 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 ¶ôÅ;ilContent-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept lis¶ôÅ;EnResent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 21:10:55 -0500 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@¶ôÅ;.nSubject: [nsp] BGP-4
Thanks all for the suggestions given about BGP. I realized that a 3640 with a 64 MB (upgra¶ôÅ;e hardware to start running BGP-4, considering a good performance and a small budget.
Thanks all¶ôÅ;in
ROdrigo Loureiro
From jared@puck.neth¶ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA01573 for cisco-nsp@p¶ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003250212.VAA01573@puck.nether.net¶ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA32351; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 20:41:37 -0500 (envelope-fr¶ôÅ;isDate: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 20:41:37 -0500 X-From_: glen.turner@aarnet.edu.au Fri Mar 24 20:41¶ôÅ;20ReceIved: from someone claiming to be tiny-teddy.aarnet.edu.au (IDENT:root@tiny-teddy.aarnet.edu.au [203.21.37.30]) ¶ôÅ;uc for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 20:41:33 -0500 (enve¶ôÅ;-fReceived-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 20:41:33 -0500 Received: from aarnet.edu.au (sa058.dialup.c¶ôÅ;.a by tiny-teddy.aarnet.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA32081 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sat,¶ôÅ;MaSender: glen.turner@aarnet.edu.au Message-ID: <38DC194B.18358340@aarnet.edu.au> Old-Date: Sat, 25 Ma¶ôÅ;00From: Glen Turner <glen.turner@aarnet.edu.au> Organization: Australian Academic and Research Network X-Mai¶ôÅ; MX-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net S¶ôÅ;ctReferences: <20000323210242.B13309@apfel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Tran¶ôÅ;-EX-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date¶ôÅ;i,Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Michael Beckmann wrote: > > Under which conditions does¶ôÅ;ma> 4 MB SRAM on a VIP2-50 to 8 MB ?
A related question, is there third party suppliers of compatib¶ôÅ;RA
Due to what appears to be a typo in the Cisco pricelist, the Australian prices are a¶ôÅ; o
Ta, Glen
-- Glen Turner Network Engineer (08) 8303 3936 Australian Ac¶ôÅ;ic glen.turner@aarnet.edu.au http://www.aarnet.edu.au/ -- Earth is a single point of failure#ëFrom grr@shandakor.t¶ôÅ;isReceived: from someone claiming to be shandakor.tharsis.com (IDENT:root@shandakor.tharsis¶ôÅ; [ by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA05399 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 24 Mar 2000¶ôÅ;49 (envelope-from grr@shandakor.tharsis.com) Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 21:49:28 -0500 Received: (from grr@lo¶ôÅ;osDate: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 21:49:¶ôÅ;05From: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com> Message-Id: <200003250249.VAA12218@shandakor.tharsis.com> To: ci¶ôÅ;nsSubject: Re: SRAM on VIP2-50
The VIP2/40 style is just a SIMM. They are ava¶ôÅ;lereasonable cost. Probably could have been sourced commerically at one time, but the day when PC's used SR¶ôÅ;IMlast for too long.
On the other hand, the SRAM in the VIP2/50 is a cisco-manufactured board a¶ôÅ;rior avilability of used modules...
George
> From: Glen Turne¶ôÅ;le> Organization: Australian Academic and Research Network > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject¶ôÅ;: > > Michael Beckmann wrote: > > > > Under which conditions does it make sense to upgrade the > > 4 MB SR¶ôÅ;n > > A related question, is there third party suppliers of > compatible SRAM for the V> Due to what appears to be a typo in the Cisco pricelist, > the Austra> > Ta, >¶ôÅ;n > --> Glen Turner Network Engineer > (08) 8303 3936 Australian Academic and Re¶ôÅ;ch> glen.turner@aarnet.edu.au http://www.aarnet.edu.au/ > -- > Earth is a single point of failure > > #From jared@puck.neth¶ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA01551 for cisco-nsp@p¶ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003252027.PAA01551@puck.nether.net¶ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA22648; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 08:33:29 -0500 (envelope-fr¶ôÅ;isDate: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 08:33:29 -0500 X-From_: owner-cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Fri Mar 24¶ôÅ;33Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.33]) by puck.nether.net (8.¶ôÅ;8. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 08:33:28 -0500 (envelope-from owner-cisco-¶ôÅ;puReceived-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 08:33:28 -0500 Received: from exchange.nst ([204.116.23.150]) by hq.oh.ver¶ôÅ;et for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 08:33:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by EXCH¶ôÅ; w id <HPCXB43J>; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 08:33:21 -0500 Message-ID: <71CC63E46CCED211A6580#ëÅ;F6To: cisco-nsp@iagnet.net Old-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 08:33:2¶ôÅ;50X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Diagno¶ôÅ;: X-Diagnostic: Mail coming from a daemon, ignored X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.n¶ôÅ;r.ResEnt-Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 15:27:35 -0500 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsp] [nsp] ATM Ignored pac¶ôÅ;
on my PA-A1-OC3MM. They don't seem to affect ¶ôÅ;fian annoyance. Here are the interface stats:
Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang¶ôÅ;er Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/¶ôÅ;8 5 minute output rate 1946000 bits/sec, 1077 packets/sec ¶ôÅ;47 Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 inpu¶ôÅ;ro 446463737 packets output, 1413247936 bytes, 0 underruns 0¶ôÅ;pu 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
Sometimes I will ¶ôÅ; dreceive 15 or so per second. Any info is appreciated.
Thanks,
Dav¶ôÅ;urNorTh State Telephone Company dcurran(at)northstate(dot)net
From jared@puck.neth¶ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA02362 for cisco-nsp@p¶ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003252042.PAA02362@puck.nether.net¶ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA02338; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 15:42:07 -0500 (envelope-fr¶ôÅ;isDate: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 15:42:07 -0500 X-From_: owner-cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sat Mar 25¶ôÅ;42Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.33]) by puck.nether.net (8.¶ôÅ;8. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 15:42:06 -0500 (envelope-from owner-cisco-¶ôÅ;puReceived-Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 15:42:06 -0500 Received: from freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162¶ôÅ;.9 by for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 15:42:04 -0500 ¶ôÅ;) id 98FAF3E24; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 21:41:56 +0100 (CET) Old-Date: ¶ôÅ; 2From: "Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen" <ncbp@bank-pedersen.dk> To: cisco-nsp@iagnet.net Subject: Re: [¶ôÅ; AMessage-ID: <20000325214156.E28013@bank-pedersen.dk> References: <71CC63E46CCED211A65800805F66558B4A9F3¶ôÅ;CHMIme-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <71CC63E46CCED211A65¶ôÅ;05X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept¶ôÅ;t X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: ¶ôÅ; 2Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 08:33:29AM -0500, David Curran wro¶ôÅ;> > on my PA-A1-OC3MM. They don't seem to affec¶ôÅ;af> an annoyance. Here are the interface stats: > > > > Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00,¶ôÅ;pu> Last clearing of "show interface" counters 3d23h > Queueing strategy: fifo > Output queue 0/40, 0 dro¶ôÅ;in> 5 minute input rate 5263000 bits/sec, 1171 packets/sec > 5 minute output rate 1946000 bits/s¶ôÅ;10> 471460789 packets input, 603722526 bytes, 0 no buffer > Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giant¶ôÅ; t> 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 720969 ignored, 0 abort > 446463737 packets output, 141324¶ôÅ; b> 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffe¶ôÅ;wa> > > Sometimes I will go a day without a single error and then all of a sudden > receive 15 or so per second. ¶ôÅ; i
Do you by any chance have any low speed output if's on the same router experiencing congestion at the¶ôÅ;e
We have seen something similar on ATM-E3 (CSCdp96197).
> David Curran
/Niels Chr.
-- Niels Christi¶ôÅ;an Network Manager, Tele Danmark NET, IP-section.
"Hey, are any of you guys out there actually *usi¶ôÅ;RF
From owner-cisco-nsp¶ôÅ;k.Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.¶ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 16:18:51 -0500 ¶ôÅ;veReceived-Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 16:18:51 -0500 Received: from mw3.texas.net (mw¶ôÅ;xa by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA14125 for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; Sat, 25 Mar 2¶ôÅ;16Received: from staff2.texas.net (staff2.texas.net [207.207.0.39]) by mw3.texas.net (2.4/2.4) ¶ôÅ; E Received: (from ed@localhost) by staff2.texas.net (8.8.5/8.7.5)¶ôÅ;PADate: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 15:18:49 -0600 From: Edward Henigin <ed@staff.texas.n¶ôÅ;ToCc: cisco-nsp@iagnet.net Subject: Re: [nsp] [nsp] ATM Ignored packets Message-ID: <20¶ôÅ;25References: <71CC63E46CCED211A65800805F66558B4A9F39@EXCHANGE> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type:¶ôÅ;t/X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <71CC63E46CCED211A65800805F66558B4A9F39@EXCHANGE>; from dcurran@n$ëÅ;codropped packets: 1) ¶ôÅ; o
I haven't found specific documentation from Cisco as to what causes a packet to b¶ôÅ;gnI've been able to correlate on my own. I'd be happy to see official docs on what causes ¶ôÅ;gn
Ed
-- On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 08:33:29AM -0500, David Curran said: > Since we installed it, I ¶ôÅ; b> on my PA-A1-OC3MM. They don't seem to affect traffic but it is some what o¶ôÅ;an
[...]
From owner-cisco-nsp¶ôÅ;k.Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.¶ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 17:12:15 -0500 ¶ôÅ;veReceived-Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 17:12:15 -0500 Received: from tcb.net (tcb.net ¶ôÅ;.1 by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA14516 for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 17:12:07¶ôÅ;00Received: from sofos.tcb.net (sofos.tcb.net [127.0.0.1]) by tcb.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA31051 for <cis¶ôÅ;spMessage-Id: <200003252211.PAA31051@tcb.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.3 To:¶ôÅ;coFrom: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> Reply-To: danny@tcb.net Subject: Re: [nsp] [nsp] ATM Ignored packets$ëÅ;meSender: danny@sofos.tcb.net¶ôÅ; > dropped packets: 1) lack of cpu on the VIP, 2) drops due to CAR. >¶ôÅ; I> what causes a packet to be 'ignored'. The above 2 are the ones >¶ôÅ;e > docs on what causes an ignore if anyone has any :)
On a¶ôÅ;0
Essentially, it means that the pack¶ôÅ;rr
o starved VIP/RSP CPU cycles o starved VIP/RSP (DRAM) MEMD buffers o starved VIP¶ôÅ; (
As Niels suggested, if you've got a low-speed egress interface and bursty traffic ingress to ¶ôÅ;)I
If you're already doing this then "show vip¶ôÅ;um
Another thing you could look at with VIPs is "¶ôÅ;nt
Also, some port adpaters actually report pack¶ôÅ;os
Of course, in my experience with the¶ôÅ;0,
Hope this helps!
-danny
From owner-cisco-nsp¶ôÅ;k.Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.¶ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:08:15 -0500 ¶ôÅ;veReceived-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:08:15 -0500 Received: from freesbee.wheel.dk¶ôÅ;ee by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA21463 for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; Sun,¶ôÅ;MaReceived: by freesbee.wheel.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9F1083E42; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 18:¶ôÅ;7 Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 18:08:07 +0200 From: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk> To: "Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen"$ëÅ;bpMessage-ID: <20000326180807.F31657@skri¶ôÅ;dkMime-Version: 1.0¶ôÅ;teX-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000325214156.E28013@bank-pedersen.dk>; from nc¶ôÅ;an
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 03:42:07PM -0500, Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen¶ôÅ;te> > Since we installed it, I have been getting a fair am¶ôÅ; o> > on my PA-A1-OC3MM. They don't seem to affect traffic but it is some what of > > an annoyance. Here¶ôÅ; t> > > > > > > > Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never > > Last clearing of "sho¶ôÅ;te> > Queueing strategy: fifo > > Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 8 drops > > 5 mi¶ôÅ; i> > 5 minute output rate 1946000 bits/sec, 1077 packets/sec > > 471460¶ôÅ;pa> > Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles > > 0 input ¶ôÅ;rs> > 446463737 packets output, 1413247936 bytes, 0 underruns > > ¶ôÅ; 0> > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > > > > ¶ôÅ; S> > receive 15 or so per second. > Do you by any chance have any low speed output if's on the same route > We have seen something similar on ATM-E3 (CSCdp96197).
Important not sure if the same buffer allocation is used on PA-A1 and PA-A3.
But the problem on PA-A3 is basicly the foll¶ôÅ;g the same applies to VIP's)
The PA-A3 gets assigned a static amount of SRAM (1200 particles(*) on NPE20¶ôÅ;nnnot sure when it was introduced in the 12.x brances, and 400 o¶ôÅ;E1anD NPE200 before the above release), and each vc is assigned a static part of these depending on PCR (max. 400 on NP¶ôÅ; wmax 200 on NPE150, and NPE200 before the above release).
When a packet is recieved on a vc, it gets wr¶ôÅ;n (rx_ring), and a pointer is handled by the routing process, and moved to a ouput queue of the egress ¶ôÅ;rfthe packet will remain in the input vc's rx_ring until it's transmitted or dr¶ôÅ;d egress interfaces, quite a few packets can be "stuck" on ¶ôÅ;inrx_ring (which is of static size), and if that rx_ring fill's up, input packet's will be blindly dropped, and thi¶ôÅ;unimportant to note, this is a totally blind drop, all traffic flowing in on that vc will suffer from¶ôÅ; dtraffic to other (uncongested) interfaces, and this regardless of the router having pl¶ôÅ; oto the static buffer allocation for the PA-A3 ...
I've been arguing th¶ôÅ;t'the other PA's (Ethernet, HSSI, POS, high speed Serials) use dynamic buffer ¶ôÅ;caproblem.
If any of you have similar problems, please log a ca¶ôÅ;itfor it to be linked to CSCdp96197
(*) the SRAM on the NPE is carved into 512 bytes particles, and each ¶ôÅ;ck
/Jesper
-- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCI¶ôÅ;45Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ¶ôÅ; OOne IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
From tonyb@uk.uu.net¶ôÅ;n Received: from someone claiming to be pool.pipex.net (IDENT:5010@pool.pipex.net [158.43.128.24]) b¶ôÅ;ck for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 14:34:35 -0500 (envelo¶ôÅ;roReceived-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 14:34:35 -0500 Received: (qmail 5908 invoked by uid 679); 26 Mar 2000 1¶ôÅ;:3Message-ID: <20000326193433.5907.qmail@pool.pipex.net> Subject: Re: SRAM on VIP2-50 In-Reply-To: <200003232104.VAA¶ôÅ;6@~h\7B.pipex.netSRAM on VIP2-50 at "Mar 23, 2000 09:04:56 pm" To: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET> Date: Sun, 26¶ôÅ; 2CC: Michael Beckmann <petzi@apfel.de>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net From: Tony Barber <tonyb@uk.uu.n¶ôÅ;X-X-ID: Tony Barber (ACB118-RIPE) X-Role: Systems Engineer X-Organisation: UUNET (UK), 3X-Old-Org: PIPEX - Public IP Exchange Ltd X-Contact: +44 (0)122Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Neil J. McRae wrote: >On Thu¶ôÅ; M> Michael Beckmann <petzi@apfel.de> wrote: > >Every condition :-)
Well, at least when you are an ¶ôÅ;:-
tb
> >> Under which conditions does it make sense to upgrade the >> 4 MB SRAM on a VIP2-5$ëÅ; 8> >> T> Those with loaded guns and those who > >
--Tony
From terry@camelot.t¶ôÅ;coReceived: from someone claiming to be camelot.tdce.com.au (terry@camelot.tdce.com.au [203¶ôÅ;0. by for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 00:18:46 -$ëÅ; Received: from localhost (terry@l¶ôÅ;ho by for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 15:10:¶ôÅ;10Date Mon, 27 Mar 2000 15:10:26 +1000 (EST) From: Terence <terry@tdce.com.au> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID:¶ôÅ;neMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charSub
Anyone using the 6500's with flexwan and DPT OC12 PA's?
Any pointers at www.cisco.¶ôÅ;fo
--- Terence C. Giufre-Sweetser
+-------------------------------+--------------------------+ | TereD¶ôÅ;Co| 1/128 Bowen St, SPRING HILL | FAX +61-[0]7-32369930 | | PO BOX 1054¶ôÅ;RI| Queensland Australia | Mobile +61-[0]414-784461 | +------------------¶ôÅ;--
From terry@camelot.t¶ôÅ;coReceived: from someone claiming to be camelot.tdce.com.au (terry@camelot.tdce.com.au [203¶ôÅ;0. by for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 07:22:20 -$ëÅ; Received: from localhost (terry@l¶ôÅ;ho by Mon, 27 Mar 2000 22:13:56 +1000 Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 ¶ôÅ;3:From: Terence <terry@tdce.com.au> To: Raffaele Nardin <rnardin@cisco.com> cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sub¶ôÅ;: In-Reply-To: <200003270606.WAA10130@galaga.cisco.com> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003272213000.102¶ôÅ;00MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> >Anyone using the 6500's with fl¶ôÅ;n > > > > There is no plan to support the DPT OC12 PA on flexwan
just been told "coming soon"?
--- Ter¶ôÅ; C
+-------------------------------+--------------------------+ | TereDonn Computer Engineering | Phone +¶ôÅ;0]| 1/128 Bowen St, SPRING HILL | FAX +61-[0]7-32369930 | | PO BOX 1054, SPRING HILL 4004 | Mobile +61-[0]¶ôÅ;66\ Queensland Australia | Mobile +61-[0]414-784461 | +-------------------------------+---------------------From jared@puck.neth¶ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA05919 for cisco-nsp@p¶ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003271358.IAA05919@puck.nether.net¶ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA00331; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 01:07:24 -0500 (envelope-fr¶ôÅ;isDate: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 01:07:24 -0500 X-From_: rnardin@cisco.com Mon Mar 27 01:07:24 2000¶ôÅ;ei galaga.cisco.com (galaga.cisco.com [171.71.161.89]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) w¶ôÅ;ES for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 01:07:23 -0500 (envelope-from rnardin@cisco.com) Recei¶ôÅ;DaReceived: from rnardin-nt (blab-nat-1.cisco.com [171.69.247.1]) by galaga.cisco.com (8¶ôÅ;-CMessage-Id: <200003270606.WAA1¶ôÅ;@gX-Sender: rnardin@galaga.cisco.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.2 Old-Date: Sun, 26¶ôÅ; 2To: Terence <terry@tdce.com.au>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net From: Raffaele Nardin <rnardin@cisco.com> Su¶ôÅ;t:In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003271509110.6238-100000@camelot.tdce.com. au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Co¶ôÅ;t-X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck¶ôÅ;heREsent-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 08:58:36 -0500 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
At 03:10 PM 3/27/00 +1000, Terenc¶ôÅ;ot> >ANyone using the 6500's with flexwan and DPT OC12 PA's? >
There is no plan to support the DPT OC12 PA on flexwan
L¶ôÅ; >> >Any pointers at www.cisco.com for performance stats? > >--- >Terence C. Giufre-Sweetser > >+----------¶ôÅ;-->| TereDonn Computer Engineering | Phone +61-[0]7-32369366 | >| PO BOX 1054, SPRING HILL 4004 | Mob>| Queensla¶ôÅ;us>+-------------------------------+--------------------------+ >
From jared@puck.neth¶ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA07688 for cisco-nsp@p¶ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003271509.KAA07688@puck.nether.net¶ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA07036; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 09:41:36 -0500 (envelope-fr¶ôÅ;isDate: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 09:41:36 -0500 X-From_: Joao.Ribeiro@lis2.siemens.pt Mon Mar 27 09¶ôÅ;35REceived: from someone claiming to be lontra.ip.pt (lontra.ip.pt [195.23.13.50]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3)¶ôÅ;h for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 09:41:10 -0500 (envelope-from Joao.Ribeiro@lis2.sieme¶ôÅ;t)Received: (qmail 66280 invoked by uid 1037); 27 Mar 2000 14:40:59 -0000 Re¶ôÅ;ed by lontra2.ip.pt with SMTP; 27 Mar 2000 14:40:59 -0000 Received: from ¶ôÅ;nt by mail2.ip.pt with SMTP id PAA66003 for <cisco-nsReceived: from siepor43.net.siemens.pt by via smtpd (fo¶ôÅ;ilReceived: by siepor43.net.siemens.pt with Internet Mail Servic¶ôÅ;.5 id <HRYQBA81>; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 15:36:09 +0100 Message-ID: <753C243100F8D211B15C0800060D9D6E9F5E3A@siepor43.net¶ôÅ;meFrom: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Ribeiro?= <Joao.Ribeiro@lis2.siemens.pt> To: "Cisco-Nsp Mailing List (E-mail)" <cisco-n¶ôÅ;ucOld-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 15:36:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Co¶ôÅ;t- charset="iso-8859-1" X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@p¶ôÅ;neResent-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 10:09:10 -0500 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsp] ATM interface go¶ôÅ;up
Hi!
I have a 7200 router connected to a WAN IGX switch and I am having a weird problem on the router. Ab¶ôÅ;evchanged state to up" on the router. Everything was workin¶ôÅ; fI am using the PA-A3 STM-1 Port Adapter on the 7200. I have experienced this same probl¶ôÅ;efrouters and swicthes. The only way I got rid of it was replacing the ATM card on the IGX swi¶ôÅ;(Isame switch card without problems. I am using S¶ôÅ;e-quite small distances (few meters). Do you think this can be a probl¶ôÅ;(TmuchDoes anybody experienced anything like this?
Any help would be good...
Thanks, _¶ôÅ;__Joao Fonseca Ribeiro
TAC Support, GNS IB SIEMENS SA, Information & Communication Net
From CMartin@mercury¶ôÅ;inReceived: from someone claiming to be hermes.balink.com (baisgate.balink.com [199.45.32.¶ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:29:19 -0500 ¶ôÅ;veReceived-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:29:19 -0500 Received: by HERMES with Internet Mai¶ôÅ;rv id <FSFJL6ZJ>; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:28:22 -0500 Message-ID: <4F8C08CC6E76D311AD1F00508B7872495DA7AF@HERME$ëÅ;ro¶ôÅ;ecDate: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:28:18 -0500 Return-Receipt-To: "Martin, Christian" <CMart¶ôÅ;erMIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-88¶ôÅ;" > >Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 3d23h > Queu¶ôÅ; s> Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 8 drops > 5 minute input rate 5263000 bits/sec, 1171 packe¶ôÅ;ec> 471460789 packets input, 603722526 bytes, 0 no buffer > ¶ôÅ;Re> 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 720969 ignored, 0 abo¶ôÅ; > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets > 0¶ôÅ;pu>
In my experience, this has nothing to do with low-level SRAM drops or o¶ôÅ; sthe network dropped a cell due to UPC. I've a¶ôÅ;sebut that has changed in newer versions of code. I have a 100Mbps SCR on a VBR-nrt circuit that co¶ôÅ;uaignores, never CRCs. We upgraded to 12.08S and this mysteriously began to occur¶ôÅ;homight trry correlating cell loss due to UPC with ignores. ¶ôÅ;o serial interfaces ignore packets larger than the MTU on the interface. So, if the network doesn't support PPD or¶ôÅ;, large frame may merge with another(other) large frame(s) and cause the rx_ring packet buffe¶ôÅ; ohand the network layer payload up to the switching process.
HTH,
-/chris ¶ôÅ;
Thanks, > > >David Curran >North State Telephone Company >dcurran(at)northstate(dot)net >
From neil@COLT.NET ¶ôÅ;MaReceived: from someone claiming to be NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET (NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET [212.74.95.132]) by p¶ôÅ;ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:42:27 -0500 (envelope¶ôÅ;m Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:42:27 -0500 Received: from COLT.NET (localhost.colt.net by Mon, 27 Mar 2000 17:42:1To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Ribeiro?= <Joao.Ribeiro@lis2.siemens.pt> cc: "Cisco-Nsp Mailing List (E-mail¶ôÅ;ci "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET> Subject: Re: [nsp] ATM interface going up every 30 secs.¶ôÅ;-r <753C243100F8D211B15C0800060D9D6E9F5E3A@siepor43.ne$ëÅ;emFrom:Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 17:42:16 +$ëÅ; S> quite small distances (few meters). Do you t¶ôÅ; t> much power on the transmit lasers??) > Does anybody experienced anything like this? >
I've ¶ôÅ;d You should try attenuating the signal. Does a loopback work?¶ôÅ;ilNeIl J. McRae C O L T I N T E R N E T neil@COLT.NET "In this world there's two kinds ¶ôÅ;eo Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig?"
From wwilliam@cisco.¶ôÅ; MReceived: from someone claiming to be mailman.cisco.com (mailman.cisco.com [171.68.225.9]) by p¶ôÅ;ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 12:46:57 -0500 (envelope¶ôÅ;m Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 12:46:57 -0500 Received: from wwilliampc (rtp-dial-2-25.cisco.com [10.¶ôÅ;6.From: ¶ôÅ;e To: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Ribeiro?= <Joao.Ribeiro@¶ôÅ;.sCc: "Cisco-Nsp Mailing List \(E-mail\)" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: RE: [nsp] ATM interface going up e¶ôÅ; 3Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:43:24 -0600 Message-ID: <NCBBJJMHNMHCKBBLEDPOCEGFGEAA.wwilliam@cisco.com> MIME-Version:¶ôÅ; C charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: N¶ôÅ;l X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Impo¶ôÅ;ceIn-Reply-To: <200003271642.RAA01872@NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET>
This sounds very much like the case (receiver being ove¶ôÅ;).cable on, or find some sort of signal attenuator.
Are you seeing all sorts of receive errors?
Incidentall¶ôÅ;'dthat card.
Wade
----------------------------------------------¶ôÅ;--Wade Williams "Put your message in a modem Systems Engineer, Cisco Systems ·ôÅ;d NSP Ohio Valley Region - N. Peart Brentwood, TN 615-221-2918 wwilliam@cisco.co·ôÅ;--
-----Original Message----- From:Sent: Monday, March 27, 2000 10:42 AM To: João Ribeiro Cc: Cis·ôÅ;ec
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000 09:41:36 -0500 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Ribeiro?= <·ôÅ;.R
> I am using Single-Mode Port Adapters and Single-Mode optical fibers for > quite small di·ôÅ;ce(Too > much power on the transmit lasers??) > Does anybody experienced·ôÅ;th>
I've heard of this, I suspect that one of the recievers is being blown. You should try attenuating the s·ôÅ;l.
Neil. -- Neil J. McRae C O L T I N T E R N E T neil@COLT.NET "In t·ôÅ;wo Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig?"
From jared@puck.neth·ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA12308 for cisco-nsp@p·ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003271806.NAA12308@puck.nether.net·ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA12198; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 13:01:02 -0500 (envelope-fr·ôÅ;isDate: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 13:01:02 -0500 X-From_: Joao.Ribeiro@lis2.siemens.pt Mon Mar 27 13·ôÅ;01REceived: from someone claiming to be doninha.ip.pt (doninha.ip.pt [195.23.13.51]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.·ôÅ;it for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 13:00:27 -0500 (envelope-from Joao.Ribeiro@lis2.sie·ôÅ;.pReceIved-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 13:00:27 -0500 Received: (qmail 46656 invoked by uid 1037); 27 Mar 2000 17:59:40 -0000 ·ôÅ;iv by doninha2.ip.pt with SMTP; 27 Mar 2000 17:59:40 -0000 Received: fr·ôÅ;ie by mail2.ip.pt with SMTP id SAA70972; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 18:59:39·ôÅ;00Received: from siepor43.net.siemens.pt by sieinter.siemens.pt via smtpd (for mail2.ip.pt [194.79.69.132]·ôÅ;thReceived: by siepor43.net.siemens.pt with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <HRYQBBSD·ôÅ;onMessage-ID: <753C243100F8D211B15C0800060D9D6E9F5FB1@siepor43.net.siemens.pt> From: =?iso-8859·ôÅ;?JTo: Wade Williams <wwilliam@cisco.com> Cc: "Cisco-Nsp MailiSubject: RE: [nsp] ATM interface going up every 30 secX-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transf·ôÅ;ncX-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@pRResent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hiinterface when this problem happens.
Slot 5: ATM WAN OC3 (SMI) port adapter, 1 port ·ôÅ; Port adapter insertion time 3w4d ago EEPROM contents at hardware discovery: ·ôÅ;Ha Serial number 15225939 Part number 73-2427-04 ·ôÅ; h EEPROM format version 1 EEPROM contents (hex): ·ôÅ;0: 0x30: 50 00 00 00 99 09 10 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
Thanks, ·ôÅ;o
-----Original Message----- From: Wade Williams [mailto:wwilliam@cisco.com] ·ôÅ;: To: Neil J. McRae; Jo=E3o Ribeiro Cc: Cisco-Nsp Mailing List (ESubject:
This sounds very much like the long·ôÅ;ab
Are you seeing all sorts of receive errors?
Incidentally, I'd appreciate ·ôÅ; sfor that card.
Wade
--------------------------------------------------------------·ôÅ;--- - Wade Williams "Put your message in a modem Systems Engineer, Cisco Systems and throw it·ôÅ;thNSP Ohio Valley Region - N. Peart Brentwood, TN 615-221-2918 wwilliam@cisco.com ------------·ôÅ;-----
-----Original Message----- From: neil@COLT.NET [mailto:neil@·ôÅ;.NSenT: Monday, March 27, 2000 10:42 AM To: Jo=E3o Ribeiro Cc: Cisco-Nsp Mailing List (E-mail); Neil J. McRae Subject: R%ëÅ;ns =3D?iso-8859-1?Q?Jo=3DE3o_Ribeiro?=3D <Joao·ôÅ;eiwrote:
> I am using Single-Mode Port Adapters and Single-Mode optical fibers = for > quite small di·ôÅ;ceproblem? (Too > much power on the transmit lasers??) > Does anybody experienc·ôÅ;ny>
I've heard of this, I suspect that one of the recievers is being blown. You should try attenuating the·ôÅ;na
Neil. -- Neil J. McRae C O L T I N T E R N E T neil@COLT.NET "In·ôÅ;s Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig?"
From jared@puck.neth·ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA22859 for cisco-nsp@p·ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003280250.VAA22859@puck.nether.net·ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA20081; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 18:36:30 -0500 (envelope-fr·ôÅ;isDate: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 18:36:30 -0500 X-From_: pete@kpnqwest.fi Mon Mar 27 18:36:29 2000 ·ôÅ;iv silver.kpnqwest.fi (silver.kpnqwest.fi [193.64.226.17]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3·ôÅ;th for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 18:36:27 -0500 (envelope-from pete@kpnqwest.fi) Rec·ôÅ;d-Received: from tossu (silver.kpnqwest.fi [193.64.226.17]) by silver.kpnqwest.fi (8.·ôÅ;8. Tue, 28 Mar 2000 02:36:13 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from pete@kpnqwest.fi) Message-ID: <005301b·ôÅ;5$From: "Petri Helenius" <pete@kpnqwest.fi> To: "Rubens Kuhl Jr." <rkuhljr@uol.com.br>, <c·ôÅ;-nReferences: <004801bf9533$7c53ca40$5cf1e7c8@users.uol.com.br> Subject: Re: Shasta and Cisco routers an·ôÅ;itOlD-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:06:27 +0930 Organization: KPNQwest Finland Oy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plai·ôÅ;chContent-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Exp·ôÅ; 5X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To:·ôÅ;coReSent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 21:50:45 -0500 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net ·ôÅ; W> with Cisco routers and switches ?
It didn´t wo·ôÅ;it
> Does it goes ok with ATM connections to Cisco Catalyst doing·ôÅ;er> bridging ?
Yes. (also with earlier code)
> Is EGP/IGP to Cisco routers running smoothly ?
Yes. (1.5 onward·ôÅ;Pe
> > > > Rubens Kuhl Jr. > > > > >
From mfcho@hknet.com·ôÅ;e Received: from someone claiming to be emethist.hknet.com (emethist.hknet.com [202.67.240.233]) by ·ôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 08:42:42 -0500 (envelop·ôÅ;omReceived-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 08:42:42 -0500 Received: from intranet.hknet.com (intranet.hknet.com [20·ôÅ;.2 by emethist.hknet.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id VAA28846 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 21:·ôÅ;9 Received: from localhost (mfcho@localhost) by intranet.hknet.com with ESMTP id e2SDgdv11408 for <cisco-nsp@·ôÅ;.nX-Authentication-Warning: intranet.hknet.com: mfcho owned process doing ·ôÅ;DaFrom: Cho Man Fai <mfcho@hknet.com> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <P·ôÅ;BSMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject:·ôÅ;p]
Dear all,
>From my understanding, fully mesh is required for ibgp within an AS. What if there is no full mesh? I ·ôÅ;d find any mention about full mesh of ibgp.
Any input is welcome.
Thanks in advance·ôÅ;ho
From daniele@orlandi·ôÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be etabeta.xt.net (IDENT:postfix@etabeta.xt.net [62.212.0.40·ôÅ;by for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:02:45 -0500 (·ôÅ;loReceived-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:02:45 -0500 Received: from orlandi.com (ne by etabeta.xt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1864014001B for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netES Sender: orlandi@etabeta.xt.net Message-ID: <38E0AD75.F63FC08B@orlandi.cFr·ôÅ;DaOrganization: Utility Line Italia X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12-20 %ëÅ;) Subject: Re: [nsp] ibgp References: <Pine.BSI.4.21.0·ôÅ;82Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cho Man·ôÅ; w>> Dear all, > > >From my understanding, fully mesh is required for ibgp within an AS. What > if there is no full·ôÅ;h?to other IBGP peers.
Suppose you have a config·ôÅ;io
A------------B-----------C
A speaks IBGP with B. B speaks IBGP with C. A doesn't speak IBGP with C.
Routes%ëÅ;rn
There may be situations where you don't need a full mesh, but you have to·ôÅ;er
Hope this helps!
Bye!
From mfcho@hknet.com·ôÅ;e Received: from someone claiming to be emethist.hknet.com (emethist.hknet.com [202.67.240.233]) by ·ôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:03:18 -0500 (envelop·ôÅ;omReceived-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:03:18 -0500 Received: from intranet.hknet.com (intranet.hknet.com [20·ôÅ;.2 by emethist.hknet.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id WAA00925; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 22:03:16 +0800 (HKT) Received: from%ëÅ;al Tue, 28 Mar 2000 22:03:15 +0800 (HKT) X-Authen·ôÅ;tiDate: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 22:03:15 +0800 (HKT) From: Cho Man Fa·ôÅ;fcTo: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com> cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] ibgp IMessage-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.21.0003282201330.9029-10MIME-Version: 1.0 C%ëÅ;nt
> Cho Man > > > >From my understanding,·ôÅ;ly> > if there is no full mesh? I tried to find the BGP4 RFC, however, I don't%ëÅ; f> > Yakov.
·ôÅ;. talking ibgp, but one of them is not fully meshed.. See·ôÅ;heproblem... What is the potential problems?! Any pointer?
Thanks. :)
Cho Man Fai
From fhege@sover.net·ôÅ;e Received: from someone claiming to be marble.sover.net (fhege@marble.sover.net [209.198.87.131]) b·ôÅ;ck for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:41:38 -0500 (envel·ôÅ;frReceived-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:41:38 -0500 Received: from localhost (fhege@localhost) by marble.s·ôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:41:36 -0500 (EST) Comments: ·ôÅ;rN localhost from fhege@localhost 0 Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:41:36 -0500 (EST) X-Authentic·ôÅ;n-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:41:36 -0500 (EST) From:To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.1000328093942MIME-Versio·ôÅ;.0Subject: [nsp] Load Balancing of Frame PVCs
Does anyone have a suggestion on·ôÅ;oo3.072Mb frame PVCs? Bell Atlantic doesn't seem to want to build anything bigger. Any id·ôÅ;or
Thanks,
-Dale
From jesper@skriver.·ôÅ;TuReceived: from someone claiming to be freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]) by ·ôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 13:17:25 -0500 (envelop·ôÅ;omReceived-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 13:17:25 -0500 Received: by freesbee.wheel.dk (Postfix, from userid 10·ôÅ; iDate: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 20:17:23 +0200 From: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skr·ôÅ;.dTo: Dale Hege <fhege@sover.net> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] Load Balancing of Frame PVCs Message-I·ôÅ;20References: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10003280939420.20038-100000@marble.sover.net> Mime-Version: 1.·ôÅ;ntX-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10003280939420.20038-100000@marb·ôÅ;ov
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 09:41:36AM -0500, Dale Heg·ôÅ;ot> >> 3.072Mb frame PVCs? Bell Atlantic doesn%ëÅ;ee
Per packet load-sharing, if the routers ar·ôÅ;pathe below should work (given same static routes, or IGP metrics are applied to all links, and maxim·ôÅ;at
ip cef [distributed] ! interface Serial A ip route-cache cef ip load-sharing per-packet ! interface Se·ôÅ; B ip load-sharing per-packet ! interface Serial C ip route-cache cef ip load-sharing per-packet ! in·ôÅ;ac ip route-cache cef ip load-sharing per-packet ! interface Serial E ip route-cache cef ip load-sharing per-p·ôÅ;t ip route-cache cef ip load-sharing per-packet ! interface Serial G ip route-cache cef ip load-sha·ôÅ; p
/Jesper
-- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Da·ôÅ;k Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)
One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to fi·ôÅ;heOne IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
From spork@inch.com ·ôÅ; MReceived: from someone claiming to be arutam.inch.com (ns.inch.com [207.240.140.101]) by puck.nethe·ôÅ;t for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:09:02 -0500 (envelope-from spo·ôÅ;ncReceived-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:09:02 -0500 Received: from shell.inch.com (inch.com [207.240.140.100] (may be fo·ôÅ;)) Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:08:56 -0500 (EST) Received·ôÅ;omDate: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:08:55 -0·ôÅ;(EFroM: Charles Sprickman <spork@inch.com> To: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk> cc: Dale Hege <fhege@sover.net>, cisco·ôÅ;@pSubject: Re: [nsp] Load Balancing of Frame PVCs In-Reply-To: <20000328201723.D40471@skriver.dk> Message-ID:·ôÅ;neMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Hello, ·ôÅ;t cpu usage noticeable?
I've been itching to try this ·ôÅ; abugs with CEF mentioned here... Is CEF less buggy on "single CPU" platforms like th·ôÅ;00ThanKs,
Charles
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Jesper Skriver wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 09:41:36AM -0500, Dale Hege wro·ôÅ;> > > Does anyone have a suggestion on a good method for load balancing over 6 > > 3.072Mb frame PVCs? Bell Atlantic does·ôÅ;se> > bigger. Any ideas or suggestions would be great. > > Per packet load-sharing, if the rou·ôÅ; a> the below should work (given same static routes, or IGP metrics are > applied to all links·ôÅ;d > > ip cef [distributed] > ! > interface Serial A > ip route-cache cef > ip> ! interface Serial B > ip route-cache cef > ip load-sharing per-packe> ip route-cache%ëÅ; >> ip load-sharing per-packet > ! > interface ·ôÅ;al> iP route-cache cef > ip load-sharing per-packet > ! > interface Serial F > ip route-cache cef > ip load-sharing p·ôÅ;ac> ! > interface Serial G > ip route-cache cef > ip load-sharing per-packet > > /Jesper > > -- > Jesper Skriver, j·ôÅ;r(> Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) > Private> > One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver >
From jared@puck.neth·ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA13966 for cisco-nsp@p·ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003282112.QAA13966@puck.nether.net·ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA09607; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:42:23 -0500 (envelope-fr·ôÅ;isDate: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:42:23 -0500 X-From_: owner-cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Tue Mar 28·ôÅ;42Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.33]) by puck.nether.net (8.·ôÅ;8. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:42:22 -0500 (envelope-from owner-cisco-·ôÅ;puReceived-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:42:22 -0500 Received: from weblogs.netpacq.net ([208.239.156.19]) by hq·ôÅ;ve for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:42:19 -0500 (EST) Received: ·ôÅ; [Message-Id: <4.3.1.0.20000328093510.0129a7d8@mail.netpacq.com> X-Sender: paul@mail.netpacq·ôÅ; XOld-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:38:37 -0800 To: cisco-nsp@iagnet.net From: Pa·ôÅ;acMime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Diagnostic: Not on %ëÅ;acX-DiX-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Res·ôÅ;DaResent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsp] cisco switch
Hi all...
As you ma·ôÅ; mjune this year.
So I am looking at a cisco switch solution for ·ôÅ;ulwhat recommendations does everyone have for me on a catalyst switch 48 ports layer 3 switching..?
Be·ôÅ;egPAul Jacobs /Senior Network Eng. Commerce Service Provider (CSP) Internet Presence Provider (IPP) Streaming Video an·ôÅ;EGmailto:paul@netpacq.com Picture : http://www.netpacq.com/nis_team.htm
From jesper@skriver.·ôÅ;TuReceived: from someone claiming to be freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]) by ·ôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:41:21 -0500 (envelop·ôÅ;omReceived-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:41:21 -0500 Received: by freesbee.wheel.dk (PostfixDate: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 23:To: Charles Sprickman <spork@inch.com> Cc: Dale Hege <fhege@sover.net>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] Lo·ôÅ;alMessage-ID: <20000328234120.A41376@skriver.dk> References: <20000328201723.D40471@skriver.dk> <Pine.B·ôÅ;.2Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1·ôÅ;i
ON Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 04:08:55PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote: > Hel> cpu usage noticeable?
No CPU impact at all, it's the same "normal" cef switching.
> I·ôÅ;be> bugs with CEF mentioned here... Is CEF less buggy on·ôÅ;ng> CPU" platforms like the 7200?
We run it on all our routers, 7200, 7500 and GSR's late 11.1(x)CC, 12.0(x)S or 12.0(x)·ôÅ;Je
- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetw·ôÅ;)
One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One I·ôÅ; b
From jared@puck.neth·ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA15523 for cisco-nsp@p·ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003282142.QAA15523@puck.nether.net·ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA15470; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:40:11 -0500 (envelope-fr·ôÅ;isDate: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:40:11 -0500 X-From_: mcpick@laurel.us.net Tue Mar 28 16:40:10 2·ôÅ;Re laurel.us.net (laurel.us.net [198.240.72.4]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ·ôÅ;P for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:40:10 -0500 (envelope-from mcpick@laurel.us.net) Receiv·ôÅ;atReceived: from localhost (mcpick@localhost) by laurel.us.net (8.9.3/8. Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:39:49 -0500 (EST) X-Provider: US Net - Where Busin US N·ôÅ;ebOld-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:39:49 -0500 (EST) From: McLean Pickett <·ôÅ;ckTo: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com> cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, rkuhljr@uol.com.br Subject: Re: [ns·ôÅ;isIn-Reply-To: <200003230714.CAA18929@shandakor.tharsis.com> Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.000328163·ôÅ;.4MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept li·ôÅ;-EResent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:42:38 -0500 Resent-To: cisco-nsp·ôÅ;k.
I ran into the same problem with a 4000M and the NP-2E-FDX module. Cisco states on their site: http://www.c·ôÅ;.cthat the NP-2E-FDX is only supported on the 4·ôÅ;&
Ship it back and get a NP-2E.
McLean
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, George Robbins wrote:
> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 02:·ôÅ;9 > From: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com> > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, rkuhljr@uol.com.br > Subje%ëÅ;Re> Resent-From: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.·ôÅ;> > > in the Cisco 4500 and Cisco 4700 ser·ôÅ;ro> > releases 11.2(14)P and 11.3(4)T. > > You might want to try the P or T train post these·ôÅ;ea> the 12.0T train. "new" hardware doesn't neccessarily make it into > the mainstream releases, and what thi·ôÅ;in> got an NP card with and ID code that it doesn't know what it is... > > If this fails, I guess ·ôÅ; a> notes of boot-rom version dependencies, and I assume you've been > promised that t·ôÅ;ar> > George > > > From: "Rubens Kuhl Jr." <rkuhljr@uol.com.br> > > To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net·ôÅ;> > > Importance: Normal > > Subject: [nsp] Cisco 4000 and FDX interfaces > > > > I'm·ôÅ;in> > Cisco 4000-M, with no sucess. During boot time the erro·ôÅ;ss> > is > > %NIM-2-BADNIMID: Bad NIM ID (Ox16) in slot 1 > > > > Documentation list IOS 11.2(14) as minimu r·ôÅ;re> > 12.0(9) have both failed to recgonize the module. Hints ? > > > > > > > > Rubens Kuhl J > > > >
From jared@puck.neth·ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA16940; Tue, 28 Mar 20·ôÅ;7: (envelope-from jared) Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 17:04:06 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 17:04:06 -0500 Fr·ôÅ;JaTo: Charles Sprickman <spork@inch.com> Cc: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk>, Dale Hege·ôÅ;eg cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] Load Balancing of Frame PVCs Message-ID: <2000032817040·ôÅ;47Mail-Followup-To: Charles Sprickman <spork@inch.com>, Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk>, Dale Hege <·ôÅ;e@skriver.dkail-Followup-To: Charles Sprickman <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net References: <20000328201723.D40471@skriver.dk> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003281606350.10773-1·ôÅ;0@skriver.dkct)&In-Reply-To=<4F8C Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.·ôÅ;00
On Tue, Mar 28, 200%ëÅ; 0> > I've been itching to try this over a few T's, but I've seen so many nasty > bugs with CEF m·ôÅ;on> CPU" platforms like the 7200?
CEF is very stable on the 720x series routers. ·ôÅ;coTo the 12xxx and 75xx series routers, your 720x will run like your telephone service. It will just work. Very few·ôÅ;s running MPLS or something cool like that...
I haven't filed a DDTS on my 72xx series routers in a fair am·ôÅ; o
- Jared
From warner@cats.UCS·ôÅ;U Received: from someone claiming to be cats.ucsc.edu (rumpleteazer.ucsc.edu [128.114.129.45]) ·ôÅ;uc for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 18:36:41 -0500 (enve·ôÅ;-fReceived-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 18:36:41 -0500 Received: from sasha.UCSC.EDU (IDENT:12@sasha.ucs·ôÅ;u by cats.ucsc.edu (8.9.3/8.8.4.cats-athena) with ESMTP id PAA29223; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 15:36:3·ôÅ;80From: Jim Warner <warner@cats.UCSC.EDU> Received: (from warner@localhost) by sasha.UCSC.EDU (8.8.8/8.8.8.cats-cli·ôÅ; i Tue, 28 Mar 2000 15:36:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 15:36:29 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200003282336.P%ëÅ;00Cc: cisco-nsp@puck·ôÅ;he
Jesper Skriver said:
> > Per packet load-sharing, if the routers are capable of doing cef, then ·ôÅ;e > applied to all links, and maximum-paths are set to 6) > ·ôÅ;e about the effect of CEF load sharing on the CPU. I'd like to ·ôÅ; hso strict that if the packet comes in on an unexpected ·ôÅ;llthat it will be dropped or is there enough info in the forwarding table to check the reverse path against all path·ôÅ;Ifchecking still works when there are lots of reverse paths to check, does THAT have an effect on the CPU?
-j
From owner-cisco-nsp·ôÅ;k.Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.·ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 19:14:06 -0500 ·ôÅ;veReceived-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 19:14:06 -0500 Received: from amber.greyhelm.co·ôÅ;DE by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA03043 for <cisco-nsp@iagne·ôÅ;t>Received: (from khagen@localhost) by amber.greyhelm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA32017·ôÅ;ueDate: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 18:15:00 -0600 From: "Karl S. Hagen" <khagen@greyhelm.com> To: Paul Ja·ôÅ; <Cc: cisco-nsp@iagnet.net Subject: Re: [nsp] cisco switch Message-ID: <20000328181500.A32014@greyhelm.com%ëÅ;feMime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-·ôÅ;erIn-Reply-To: <4.3.1.0.20000328093510.0129a7d8@mail.netpacq.com>; from Paul Jacobs on Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at ·ôÅ;2:
If your going new.. look at 6x00 or 4x00 switchs. The backplanes are more advanced than the 550x line·ôÅ;ch
Thus spake Paul Jacobs (paul@netpacq.com):
> Hi all... > > As you may or may not have heard 3·ôÅ;is> june this year. > > So I am looking at a cisco switch solution for my fully 3Com netwo·ôÅ;, > ports layer 3 switching..? > > Best regards,·ôÅ;au> Commerce Service Provider (CSP) > Internet Presence Provider (IPP) > Streaming Video and M·ôÅ;> > mailto:paul@netpacq.com > Picture : http://www.netpacq.com/nis_team.htm
-- Karl S. Hagen ·ôÅ; Cisco Certified Network Assoc. (CCNA) pager email: 4317622@skyt·ôÅ;omRaytheon IT Network Security http://www.greyhelm.com/~khagen/
From jared@puck.neth·ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA23354 for cisco-nsp@p·ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003290125.UAA23354@puck.nether.net·ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA23271; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 20:17:52 -0500 (envelope-fr·ôÅ;isDate: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 20:17:52 -0500 X-From_: looney@babar.isc-net.upenn.edu Tue Mar 28 ·ôÅ;7:Received: from someone claiming to be babar.isc-net.upenn.edu (BABAR.ISC-NET.UPENN.EDU [165.123.210.172]) by pu·ôÅ;et for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 20:17:51 -0500 (envelope-·ôÅ; lReceived-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 20:17:51 -0500 Received: (from looney@localhost) by babar.·ôÅ;ne Tue, 28 Mar 2000 20:17:50 -0500 Sender: looney@isc.upenn.edu From: Jon Looney <loo·ôÅ;isTo: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: priority queueing Old-Date: 28 Mar 2000 20:17:50 -0500 Message-ID: <m3·ôÅ;o9X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 21.1 - "Bryce Canyon" X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X·ôÅ;elResent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 20:25:12 -0500 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puc·ôÅ;th
Does anyone know the performance impact of priority queueing on a link's throughput and the router's processor in ·ôÅ;12or 1.1?
-Jon
-- Jonathan Looney Phone: (215)898-3121 University of Pennsylvania401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A E-mail: looney@isc.upenn.edu Philad
From jared@puck.neth·ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA24223 for cisco-nsp@p·ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003290145.UAA24223@puck.nether.net·ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA21848; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 19:31:31 -0500 (envelope-fr·ôÅ;isDate: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 19:31:31 -0500 X-From_: pete@kpnqwest.fi Tue Mar 28 19:31:31 2000 ·ôÅ;iv silver.kpnqwest.fi (silver.kpnqwest.fi [193.64.226.17]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3·ôÅ;th for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 19:31:30 -0500 (envelope-from pete@kpnqwest.fi) Rec·ôÅ;d-Received: from tossu (silver.kpnqwest.fi [193.64.226.17]) by silver.kpnqwest.fi (8.·ôÅ;8. Wed, 29 Mar 2000 03:31:11 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from pete@kpnqwest.fi) Message-ID: <00bf01b·ôÅ;6$From: "Petri Helenius" <pete@kpnqwest.fi> To: "Travis Pugh" <tpugh@shore.net>, "Martin C·ôÅ;r"Cc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0003221730590.838-100000@stonecoast> Subje·ôÅ;ReOld-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:01:34 +0930 Organization: KPNQwest Finland Oy MIME-Version: 1·ôÅ;on charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mai·ôÅ; MX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Diagnostic: Not on the ·ôÅ;ptX Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 20:45:25 -0500 Resent-To: ·ôÅ;o-
The 6500 _MAYBE_ will not block when the crossbar switch will be available. Before that the aggregat·ôÅ;ndinterfaces into it.
Pete
----- Original Message -·ôÅ; FTo: "Martin Cooper" <mjc@cooper.org.uk> Cc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Sent: Thursda·ôÅ;arSubject: Re: Non-blocking Cisco switches?
> > as far as i know, the 6500 doesn't block. I've never ·ôÅ; a> problems on it ... The LINX problem was that 5500s still have the 3.5 g > crossbar backplane, and I don't ·ôÅ;k > summer of 98, when LINX was looking to upgrade. The 6500 will go to 256 > Gig ... so there is%ëÅ;th> > > In the light of <URL:http://www.lightreadi·ôÅ;om> > can anyone say if Cisco's new switches (e.g. Catalyst 6000, 8500 series, > > etc.) support n·ôÅ;lo > > > (I wondered if perhaps these product lines weren't available when the > > LINX was planning its upgrade to ·ôÅ;bi> > time ago now.) > > > > We're going to need to upgrade our Catalyst 5500s to support Gigab·ôÅ; >> > kit again, we're inclined to share LINX's view th·ôÅ;on> > a desirable feature in a gigabit ether-switch. > > > > M. > > > > > >
From jared@puck.neth·ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA26937 for cisco-nsp@p·ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003290335.WAA26937@puck.nether.net·ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA07029; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:59:44 -0500 (envelope-fr·ôÅ;isDate: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:59:44 -0500 X-From_: yakov@cisco.com Tue Mar 28 09:59:44 2000 R·ôÅ;ve omega.cisco.com (omega.cisco.com [171.69.63.141]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ·ôÅ;P for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:59:44 -0500 (envelope-from yakov@cisco.Received-DaReceived: from localhost (yakov@localhost) by o Tue, 28 Mar 2000 06:59:00 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200003281459.GAA11280@omega.cisco.com> To: Cho M·ôÅ;aicc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] ibgp In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 28 Mar 2000 2·ôÅ;:1 <Pine.BSI.4.21.0003282201330.9029-100000@intranet.hknet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/'ëÅ;n;Old-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 06:59:00 -0800 From: Yakov Rekhte·ôÅ;akX-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date·ôÅ;e,Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cho Man, > > > >From my understanding, fully mesh is r·ôÅ;re> > > if there is no full mesh? I tried to find the BGP4 RFC, however, I don't > > > find an·ôÅ;nt> > > > One could use BGP Route Reflectors to avoid full mesh of iBGP. > > > > Yakov. > > ·ôÅ;. > talking ibgp, but one of them is not fully meshed.. S·ôÅ; t> problem... What is the potential problems?! Any pointer?
One of the potential problems is creation of persis·ôÅ; floops. Bear in mind, that this is a potential problem, and therefore it may occur in some, but not all circumsta·ôÅ;.
From jared@puck.neth·ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA26973 for cisco-nsp@p·ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003290335.WAA26973@puck.nether.net·ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA05845; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:26:43 -0500 (envelope-fr·ôÅ;isDate: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:26:43 -0500 X-From_: Joao.Ribeiro@lis2.siemens.pt Tue Mar 28 09·ôÅ;43REceived: from someone claiming to be lontra.ip.pt (lontra.ip.pt [195.23.13.50]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3)·ôÅ;h for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:26:40 -0500 (envelope-from Joao.Ribeiro@lis2.sieme·ôÅ;t)Received: (qmail 45693 invoked by uid 1037); 28 Mar 2000 14:26:04 -0000 Re·ôÅ;ed by lontra2.ip.pt with SMTP; 28 Mar 2000 14:26:04 -0000 Received: from ·ôÅ;nt by mail2.ip.pt with SMTP id PAA45502; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 15:26:03 +0·ôÅ;(WReCeived: from siepor43.net.siemens.pt by sieinter.siemens.pt via smtpd (for mail2.ip.pt [194.79.69.132]) w·ôÅ;SMReceived: by siepor43.net.siemens.pt with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <HRYQBD1V>; ·ôÅ; 2Message-ID: <753C243100F8D211B15C0800060D9D6EA313D9@siepor43.net.siemens.pt> From: =?iso-8859-1?'ëÅ;=ECc: "Cisco-Nsp Mailing List (E-mail)" <cisco·ôÅ;@pSubject: RE: [nsp] ibgp Old-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 15:21:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mai·ôÅ;rvContent-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Diagnostic·ôÅ;t X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 22:35:41 -050·ôÅ;se
Hi!
The reason is that when BGP router receives an update via IBGP from = another BGP r·ôÅ;r other BGP routers of the same AS. It will only redistribute t·ôÅ;= to BGP routers outside its AS.
-----Original Message----- From: Cho Man Fai [mailto:mfcho@hknet.com] Sent: Te·ôÅ;a-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsp] ibgp
Dear all,
>From my understanding,·ôÅ;lyWhat if there is no full mesh? I tried to find the BGP4 RFC, however, I = don't·ôÅ;d
Any input is welcome.
Thanks in advance.
Cho Man Fai
From jared@puck.neth·ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA27019 for cisco-nsp@p·ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003290336.WAA27019@puck.nether.net·ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA03759; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:00:03 -0500 (envelope-fr·ôÅ;isDate: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:00:03 -0500 X-From_: yakov@cisco.com Tue Mar 28 09:00:03 2000 R·ôÅ;ve omega.cisco.com (omega.cisco.com [171.69.63.141]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ·ôÅ;P for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:00:02 -0500 (envelope-from yakov@cisco.Received-DaReceived: from localhost (yakov@localhost) by o Tue, 28 Mar 2000 05:59:28 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200003281359.FAA07000@omega.cisco.com> To: Cho M·ôÅ;aicc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] ibgp In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 28 Mar 2000 2·ôÅ;:3 <Pine.BSI.4.21.0003282141050.9029-100000@intranet.hknet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/'ëÅ;n;Old-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 05:59:28 -0800 From: Yakov Rekhter'ëÅ;koXResent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date:·ôÅ;, Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cho Man
> >From my understanding, fully mesh is require·ôÅ;r > if there is no full mesh? I tried to find the BGP4 RFC, however, I don't > find any mention abou·ôÅ;ll
One could use BGP Route Reflectors to avoid full mesh of iBGP.
Yakov.
From khagen@greyhelm·ôÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be amber.greyhelm.com (IDENT:root@amber.greyhelm.com [199.46·ôÅ;.3 by for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 00:28:12 -'ëÅ; Received: (from khagen@localhost) by a·ôÅ;.g for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 23:29:12 -0600 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 20·ôÅ;3:From: "Karl S. Hagen" <khagen@greyhelm.com> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <20000328232912.A32435@g·ôÅ;elMime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us Subject: [nsp] iBGP
Depen·ôÅ; o simulate a Full mesh when there is none.
An example wou·ôÅ;e the key interface. Then setup your mesh against the loopbacks w·ôÅ; w Look as a fully meshed network thanks to eigrp. This works very well, especially if you have many different pa·ôÅ;an loads or bandwidth. You basically let iBGP worry about the edge and eigrp worry about how ·ôÅ;et
I have it setup now, works great. Its handled automatic(hehe) link failures without·ôÅ; i the best links at that moment.
-- Karl S. Hagen ·ôÅ; Cisco Certified Network Assoc. (CCNA) pager email: 4317622@skyt·ôÅ;omRaytheon IT Network Security http://www.greyhelm.com/~khagen/
From danny@sofos.tcb·ôÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be tcb.net (tcb.net [205.168.100.1]) by puck.nether.net (8.·ôÅ;8. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 01:07:59 -0500 (envelope-from danny@sofos.·ôÅ;neReceIved-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 01:07:59 -0500 Received: from sofos.tcb.net (sofos.tcb.net [127.0.0.1]) by tcb.net (8.·ôÅ;8. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 23:07:40 -0700 Message-Id: <200003290607.XA·ôÅ;40X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.3 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> Reply-To: danny·ôÅ;.nSubjEct: Re: [nsp] iBGP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 23:07:40 -'ëÅ; Sroute that wa·ôÅ;aryou have non-BGP speaking intermediate transient routers and th·ôÅ;ecpacket with a destination address external to the AS they'll have no knowledge of how to reach th
Ianything regarding a layer 2-only core (via ATM, MPLS, FR, whatever), which is perhap·ôÅ;e
If you're simply suggesting that he use the loopback addresses as iB·ôÅ;ouinTerfaces and [insert_IGP_here] for BGP next hop reachibility, then that makes sense, though it still doesn't accom·ôÅ;temesh" comments.
As for the observation that your IGP converges faster than BGP, that was c·ôÅ;an
As already suggested, depending on the number of routers in the AS, ·ôÅ;RoReFlection is usually the most elegant solution.
-danny
> > Depending on your layout, you could try to layer ro·ôÅ;g > simulate a Full mesh when there is none. > > An example would be a wide area network with eigrp on ·ôÅ;si> the key interface. Then setup your mesh against the loopbacks which will > look as a fully meshed ·ôÅ;or> especially if you have many different paths and each path has different > ·ôÅ;oa> worry about how to get the packets to the iBGP·ôÅ;e.> > without the iBGP even blinking.·ôÅ;s > the best links at that moment. > > -- > Karl S. Hagen ·ôÅ; > Cisco Certified Network Assoc. (CCNA) pager email: 4317622@skytel.com > Sr. N'ëÅ;rk>
From grr@shandakor.t·ôÅ;isReceived: from someone claiming to be shandakor.tharsis.com (IDENT:root@shandakor.tharsis·ôÅ; [ by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA00512 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000·ôÅ;31 (envelope-from grr@shandakor.tharsis.com) Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 01:31:21 -0500 Received: (from grr@lo·ôÅ;osDate: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 01:31:·ôÅ;05From: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com> Message-Id: <200003290631.BAA08276@shandakor.tharsis.com> To: ci·ôÅ;nsSubject: Re: [nsp] iBGP
Then again, BGP confederations let you set up a multi-tier·ôÅ; sthAt's all very explicit. We use iBGP only for small clusters that are actually meshed across an ethernet or via mul·ôÅ;e links and use private AS's within the confederation for parts that are less well connnected.
Cisco offers many w'ëÅ;to> From: "Karl S. Hagen" <khage·ôÅ;ey> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Subject: [nsp] iBGP > > > Depending on your layout, y·ôÅ;ou> simulate a Full mesh when there is none. > > An example would be a wide are·ôÅ;tw> the key interface. Then setup your mesh against the loopbacks which will > ·ôÅ;k > especially if you have many different paths and ea·ôÅ;at> loads or bandwidth. You basically let iBGP worry about the edge and eigrp > worry about how to get·ôÅ; p> > I have it setup now, works great. Its handled automatic(hehe) link failures > without·ôÅ; i> the best links at that moment. > > -- > Karl S. Hage·ôÅ; > Cisco Certified Network Assoc. (CCNA) pager email: 43·ôÅ;2@puck.nether.netlinks at that moment. > Sr. Network Engineer pager: (888) 431-7622 > Raytheon IT Network Security http://www.greyhelm.com·ôÅ;ag>
From khagen@greyhelm·ôÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be amber.greyhelm.com (IDENT:root@amber.greyhelm.com [199.46·ôÅ;.3 by for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 02:35:37 -'ëÅ; Received: (from khagen@localhost) by a·ôÅ;.g Wed, 29 Mar 2000 01:36:29 -0600 Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 01:36:29 -0600 From: "Karl ·ôÅ;agTo: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] iBGP Messag·ôÅ;: References: <200003290607.XAA18440@tcb.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plai·ôÅ;haX-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <200003290607.XAA18440@tcb.net>; from Danny McPherson on Tue, Mar 28, 2·ôÅ;at
Thus spake Danny McPherson (danny@tcb.net):
> I'm confused here. How does this solve the "one iBGP ro·ôÅ; c> route that was learned from another iBGP router to a third iBGP router"? If > you have non-BGP speak·ôÅ;in> packet with a destination address external to the AS they'll have no kn·ôÅ;dg> of
True. What I suggested would established a Full Mesh. Meaning ever'ëÅ; r mesh.
> I suppose in a teny(sp?) tiny network ·ôÅ;co> their IGP, though this is ill-advised .. for many reasons. You didn't mention > anyt·ôÅ; r> perhaps the way things are evolving, though still ·ôÅ;e
I didnt say anything about redistribution. Not a thing. What I suggested provides a fully-meshed iBGP, n·ôÅ;ng redistribution.. be my guest. I dont.
> If you're simply suggesting that he use the l·ôÅ;ac> interfaces and [insert_IGP_here] for BGP next hop reachibility, then that > makes sense, th·ôÅ; i> mesh" comments.
True.. it doesnt handle his "not" wanting a·ôÅ;l- his comment more to the fact that he couldn't fully-mesh due to most not being directly conn·ôÅ;d. non-directly connected routers into a iBGP, that works very well for me. It ·ôÅ;no own. :)
> As for the observation that your IGP converge·ôÅ;st> certianly a goal when the default Holdtime was selected :-) > > As already suggested, depending ·ôÅ;he> Reflection is usually the most elegant solution.
True. Size could make thi·ôÅ;ry that he might or might not find usefull.
The idea behind "Suggestions" i·ôÅ; f try to solve world hunger.
-- Karl S. Hagen ema·ôÅ;khCisco Certified Network Assoc. (CCNA) pager email: 4317622@skytel.com Sr. Network Engineer ·ôÅ; Raytheon IT Network Security http://www.greyhelm.com/~khagen/
From khagen@greyhelm·ôÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be amber.greyhelm.com (IDENT:root@amber.greyhelm.com [199.46·ôÅ;.3 by for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 02:41:07 -'ëÅ; Received: (from khagen@localhost) by a·ôÅ;.g Wed, 29 Mar 2000 01:42:07 -0600 Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 01:42:07 -0600 From: "Karl ·ôÅ;agTo: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] ·ôÅ; MReferences: <200003290631.BAA08276@shandakor.tharsis.com> Mime-Version: 1.·ôÅ;ntX-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <200003290631.BAA08276@shandakor.tharsis.com>;·ôÅ;m
Thus spake George Robbins (grr@shandakor.tharsis.com):
> Then ag·ôÅ; B> that's all very explicit. We use iBGP only for small clusters t·ôÅ;> > links and use private AS's within the confederation for ·ôÅ;s > Are less well connnected. > > Cisco offers many ways to confuse you or your routers... 8-)
Oh so very true. ·ôÅ; Y and doing Layer 3 routing. Oh what fun. IPSEC isnt a valid trackable ·ôÅ;te at layer 3.
> George
Try it sometime·ôÅ;et mode against 3 other routers. Then try to layer on routing, such·ôÅ;t a Oh and GRE tunnels is cheating since IPS·ôÅ;un huge waste, tho funny enough, that was one suggesting I got from cisco.
-- Karl S. Hagen ·ôÅ; Cisco Certified Network Assoc. (CCNA) pager email: 4317622·ôÅ;teSR. Network Engineer pager: (888) 431-7622 Raytheon IT Network Security http://www.greyhelm.com/~khagen/'ëFrom jesper@skriver.·ôÅ;WeReceived: from someone claiming to be freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]) by ·ôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 03:12:51 -0500 (envelop·ôÅ;omReceived-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 03:12:51 -0500 Received: by freesbee.wheel.dk (PostfixDate: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:To: Jim Warner <warner@cats.UCSC.EDU> Cc: spork@inch.com, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, fhege@sover.net Subject: Re: [nsp]·ôÅ;d Message-ID: <20000329101250.B43148@skriver.dk> References: <200003282336.PAA11004@sasha.UCSC.EDU> ·ôÅ;-VContent-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200003282336.PAA11004@sasha.UCS·ôÅ;U>
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 03:36:29PM -0800, Jim Warner'ëÅ;te> > the below ·ôÅ;ld> > applied to all links, and maximum-paths are set to 6) > > > > Th·ôÅ;es> about the effect of CEF load sharing on the CPU. I'd like to kn·ôÅ; h> so strict that if the packet comes in on an unexpecte·ôÅ;ra> that it will be dropped or is there enough info in the forwarding > table to check the reverse path against al·ôÅ;th> checking still works when there are lots of reverse paths to check, > does THAT have an effect on th·ôÅ;U?I'd expect it to be small.
/Jesper
-- Jesper S·ôÅ;erWork: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: Geek ·ôÅ;
One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and
From dol@info.east.r·ôÅ;edReceived: from someone claiming to be frog.east.ru (frog.east.ru [195.170.62.133]) by puck.nether·ôÅ; ( Wed, 29 Mar 2000 03:51:57 -0500 (envelope-from dol@info.east.ru) Received-Date: Wed·ôÅ; MReceived: from info.east.ru (info.east.ru [195.170.33.24]) by frog.east.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMT·ôÅ; M Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:52:25 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from dol@info.east.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127·ôÅ;.1 by Info.east.ru (8.9.3/8.8.5/BD2) with ESMTP id MAA29721; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:51:53 +0400 (MSD) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 200·ôÅ;:5From: Basil Dolmatov <dol@info.east.ru> To: Jon Looney <looney@isc.upenn.edu> cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.n·ôÅ;jaSubject: Re: priority queueing In-Reply-To: <m3u2hqo9q9.fsf@babar.isc-net.upenn.edu> Message-ID: <Pine·ôÅ;.4X-NCC-RegID: ru.east MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-A·ôÅ;
> Does anyone know the performance impact of priority queueing > on a link's throu·ôÅ;t > or 12.1? Priority queueing is process-swiched.
---------------------------------·ôÅ;--Basil (Vasily) Dolmatov CCIE #5347, CCNP-Security, CCDA East Connection ISP, Moscow, Russia. (http://·ôÅ;ea
From jared@puck.neth·ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA08486 for cisco-nsp@p·ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003291339.IAA08486@puck.nether.net·ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA08224; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 08:08:53 -0500 (envelope-fr·ôÅ;isDate: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 08:08:53 -0500 X-From_: Joao.Ribeiro@lis2.siemens.pt Wed Mar 29 08·ôÅ;49REceived: from someone claiming to be arminho.ip.pt (arminho.ip.pt [195.23.13.49]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.·ôÅ;it for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 08:08:46 -0500 (envelope-from Joao.Ribeiro@lis2.sie·ôÅ;.pReceIved-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 08:08:46 -0500 Received: (qmail 70490 invoked by uid 1037); 29 Mar 2000 13:08:09 -0000 ·ôÅ;iv by arminho2.ip.pt with SMTP; 29 Mar 2000 13:08:09 -0000 Received: fr·ôÅ;ie by mail2.ip.pt with SMTP id OAA43829; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:08:08·ôÅ;00Received: from siepor43.net.siemens.pt by sieinter.siemens.pt via smtpd (for mail2.ip.pt [194.79.69.132]·ôÅ;thReceived: by siepor43.net.siemens.pt with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <HRYQBFFX·ôÅ;edMessage-ID: <753C243100F8D211B15C0800060D9D6EA31A2F@siepor43.net.siemens.pt> From: =?iso-8859·ôÅ;?JTo: Chris Fairbanks <ChrisF@winterlink.net>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subj·ôÅ; ROld-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:03:15 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.2·ôÅ;on charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept l'ëÅ;X-Resent-To: cisco-ns·ôÅ;ck
Hi Chris,
I am going to replace a MSM (running IOS 12.0) on a Catalyst6009 for a Supervisor with MSFC. I was·ôÅ;nkon the MSFC. If you use IOS on the Sups does it mean that you·ôÅ;e for the Sup and for the MSFC? What about the Config file? Will it become a = single one also?
__________·ôÅ;__Joao Fonseca Ribeiro
TAC Support, GNS IB SIEMENS SA, Information & Communication Networks=20 ·ôÅ;e:
-----Original Message----- From: Chris Fairbanks [mailto:ChrisF@winterlink.net] Sent: Quinta-feira, 23·ôÅ;MaTo: 'Terence'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [nsp] Cat 6000?
I have installed a couple of do·ôÅ;cathe last couple of months and they have been working fine. Only had one = little CEF ·ôÅ;leof 6500s, has anyone played with running IOS on the sups? ·ôÅ;stinstAlled it on a pair of 6509s to play with last night. Seems like they have some definite issues to work out yet.
·ôÅ;isReceived: from someone claiming to be vortex.cc.mcgill.ca (vortex.CC.McGill.CA [132.206.27'ëÅ; ·ôÅ;veReceived-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:12:33 -0500 Received: from localhost by vortex.cc.m·ôÅ;l. Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:12:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:12:22 -0500 (EST·ôÅ;omTo: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Ribeiro?= <Joao.Ribeiro@lis2.siemens.pt> cc: cisco-nsp@·ôÅ;.nSubject: RE: [nsp] Cat 6000? In-Reply-To: <753C243100F8D211B15C0800060D9D6EA31A2F@siepor43.net.siemens.pt> Messa·ôÅ;D:MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-885'ëÅ;Co
> I am going to replace a MSM (running IOS 12.0) ·ôÅ; C> Supervisor with MSFC. > I was thinking about running 5.3(4)CSX on the Supervisor and 12.1(1)E on the >·ôÅ;C.> Sup and for the MSFC? What about the Co·ôÅ; f> one also?
Since 12.0(7)XE and 12.1(1)E, there are two completely different images for the ·ôÅ;, Catalyst IOS.
The MSFC IOS as in previous versions, runs on the MSFC. It sti·ôÅ;eq
The Catalyst IOS also runs on the MSFC but also takes over the Supe·ôÅ;orbut in IOS-spoke added to the standard layer 3 IOS config (sing·ôÅ;on
A sample Catalyst IOS config (the syntax is similar to the 2·ôÅ;35switChes):
interface Port-channel1 no ip address switchport switchport trunk encapsulation isl switchport mode tru·ôÅ; i no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ! interface GigabitEthernet1/2 no ip address no ip ·ôÅ;ct! interface FastEthernet3/1 no ip address switchport switchport access vlan 35 switchport mode access sw·ôÅ;po switchport protocol ipx auto switchport protocol appletalk auto switchport protocol other auto spa·ôÅ;g-! interface FastEthernet3/2 no ip address switchport switchport trunk encapsulation isl switchport mode ·ôÅ;k
... other traditional IOS config commands ...
Currently, 12.0(7)XE1 and 12.1(1)E are similar ·ôÅ;eathe latter is based on the new 12.1 train.
Quan,
-------------Quan Nguyen-------------McGill UNIVERSI·ôÅ;-- -o Voice (514)398-3709 Computing Center (Burnside Hall) ()/// FAX (514)398-6876 805·ôÅ;rb quan@CC.McGill.CA Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6
From fhege@sover.net·ôÅ;d Received: from someone claiming to be marble.sover.net (fhege@marble.sover.net [209.198.87.131]) b¸ôÅ;ck for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:25:59 -0500 (envel¸ôÅ;frReceived-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:25:59 -0500 Received: from localhost (fhege@localhost) by marble.s¸ôÅ;.n Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:25:55 -0500 (EST) Comments: SoVerNet Verific Localhost from fhege@localhost 0 Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:25:55 -0500 (EST)Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:25:55 -0500 (EST) From: Dale Hege <fhege@sover.net> To: Jesper Skriver ¸ôÅ;pecc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] Load Balancing of Frame PVCs In-Reply-To: <20000328201723.D¸ôÅ;1@puck.nether.netailto:ciscHMessage-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10003290924590.1736-100000@marble.sover.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/'ëÅ;N;to the sub-interfaces as well¸ôÅ;Da
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Jesper Skriver wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 09:41:36AM -0500, Dale Hege wrote: > > > > Does¸ôÅ;on> > 3.072Mb frame PVCs? Bell Atlantic doesn't seem to want ¸ôÅ;ui> > bigger. Any ideas or suggestions would be great. > > Per packet load-sharing, if the routers are capable ¸ôÅ;oi> the below should work (given same static routes, or IGP metrics are > applied to all links, and maximum-pat¸ôÅ;re> > ip cef [distributed] > ! > interface Serial A > ip route-cache cef > ip load-sharing per-packet > ! > in¸ôÅ;ac> ip route-cache cef > ip load-sharing per-packet > ! > interface Serial C > ip route-cache cef > ip load-s¸ôÅ;ng> ! > interface Serial D > ip route-cache cef > ip load-sharing per-packet > ! > interface Serial E > ip ro¸ôÅ;ca> ip load-sharing per-packet > ! > interface Serial F > ip route-cache cef > ip load-sharing per-packet > ! > i¸ôÅ;fa> ip route-cache cef > ip load-sharing per-packet > > /Jesper > > -- > Jesper Skriver, je> Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks> > One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, > One IP to bring them all and in the zone to b>
From rkuhljr@uol.com¸ôÅ; WReceived: from someone claiming to be breton.uol.com.br (breton.uol.com.br [200.230.198.74]) by¸ôÅ;k. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:47:38 -0500 (envelo¸ôÅ;roReceived-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:47:38 -0500 Received: from rubens (sec-0.users.uol.com.br [200.23¸ôÅ;1. bY breton.uol.com.br (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id LAA17109 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:46:51¸ôÅ;00From: "Rubens Kuhl Jr." <rkuhljr@uol.com.br> To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: RE: Non-blocking Cisco switch¸ôÅ;DaMessage-ID: <002601bf998d$9c974120$5cf1e7c8@users.uol.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Conten¸ôÅ;pe charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mai¸ôÅ; MX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <00bf01bf99¸ôÅ;73Importance: Normal
Any ideas on how a 6500 achieve 15 Mpps (more with future supervisors)¸ôÅ;L3A 6500 MSFC is something like a 7200, which is rated@200 kpps (more with new NPEs), far less than 15000 kpps.
¸ôÅ;en
> -----Original Message----- > From: Petri Helenius [mailto:pete@kpnqwest.fi] > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000¸ôÅ;2 > To Travis Pugh; Martin Cooper > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: Non-blocking Cisco switches? > > > > Th¸ôÅ;00> available. > Before that the aggregate > bandwidth of the box i¸ôÅ;pr> interfaces into it. > > Pete > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tr¸ôÅ; P> To: "Martin Cooper" <mjc@cooper.org.uk> > Cc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> > Sent: Thursday, March¸ôÅ; 2> Subject: Re: Non-blocking Cisco switches? > > > > > > as far as i know, the 6500 doesn't block. I've never ¸ôÅ; a> thRoughput > > problems on it ... The LINX problem was that 5500s still have the 3.5 g > > crossbar backplane, and I ¸ôÅ;t > > summer of 98, when LINX was looking to upgrade. The 6500 will go to 256 > > Gig ... s¸ôÅ;er> > > > -travis > > > > On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Martin Cooper wrote: > > > > > In the light of > <U¸ôÅ;tt> > > can anyone say if Cisco's new switches (e.g. Catalyst 6000, > 8500¸ôÅ;ie> > etc.) support non-blocking? > > > > > > (I wondered if perhaps these product lines weren't available when the > >¸ôÅ;IN> > > time ago now.) > > > > > > We're going to need to u¸ôÅ;de> > > ethernet fairly soon, and although we're quite keen to go for Cisco > > > kit¸ôÅ;in> > > a desirable feature in a gigabit ether-switch. > > > > > >>> > > > >
From quan@vortex.cc.¸ôÅ;llReceived: from someone claiming to be vortex.cc.mcgill.ca (vortex.CC.McGill.CA [132.206.27'ëÅ; ¸ôÅ;veReceived-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:08:18 -0500 Received: from localhost by vortex.cc.m¸ôÅ;l. Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:08:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:08:12 -0500 (EST¸ôÅ;omTo: "Rubens Kuhl Jr." <rkuhljr@uol.com.br> cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject:¸ôÅ; NIn-Reply-To: <002601bf998d$9c974120$5cf1e7c8@users.uol.com.br> Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0003¸ôÅ;04MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Ru¸ôÅ; K
> Any ideas on how a 6500 achieve 15 Mpps (more with future supervisors) of L3 > routing ? > A 6500 MSFC i¸ôÅ;me> NPEs), far less than 15000 kpps.
From what I know, the MSFC s¸ôÅ;rtswitching. Only the first packet of a flow will get to the MSFC. QoS and access-lists ar¸ôÅ;ndthing that the MSFC has to do.
Quan,
-------------Quan Nguyen-------------McG¸ôÅ;UN -o Voice (514)398-3709 Computing Center (Burnside Hall) ()/// FAX (514)39¸ôÅ;76 quan@CC.McGill.CA Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6
From rkuhljr@uol.com¸ôÅ; WReceived: from someone claiming to be breton.uol.com.br (breton.uol.com.br [200.230.198.74]) by¸ôÅ;k. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:28:23 -0500 (envelo¸ôÅ;roReceived-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:28:23 -0500 Received: from rubens (sec-0.users.uol.com.br [200.23¸ôÅ;1. bY breton.uol.com.br (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA22169; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:27:06 -0300 (BRT) From: "Rubens Kuhl 'ëÅ; <Cc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: RE: Non-blocking¸ôÅ;coDate: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:27:02 -0300 Message-ID: <002d01bf9993$3bac67e0$5cf1e7c8@users.uol.com.br> MIME-Versio¸ôÅ;.0 charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority:¸ôÅ;maX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To¸ôÅ;inImportance: Normal
> > Any ideas on how a 6500 achieve 15 Mpps ¸ôÅ;e > supervisors) of L3 > > routing ? > > A 6500 MSFC is something like a 7200, which is rated@200 kpps > (more w'ëÅ;ne> switchin¸ôÅ;nl> and access-lists are handled by the PFC hardware so there is litt¸ôÅ; t
A 7200 is capable of 100-to-300 kpps of CEF-switching, but only some thousands of pps of pr¸ôÅ;s-is capable of 30 kpps of process-switching and flows are 16 packets per f¸ôÅ; t
Rubens Kuhl Jr.
From mjc@cooper.org.¸ôÅ;WeReceived: from someone claiming to be nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk (nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.12.28]) by¸ôÅ;k. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:20:12 -0500 (envelo¸ôÅ;roReceived-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:20:12 -0500 Received: from mjc64 by nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk with local ¸ôÅ;m id 12aLCU-0004bJ-00 for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:20:10 +0100 From: Martin Cooper <mjc@coo¸ôÅ;orTO: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: Non-blocking Cisco switches? Message-Id: <E12aLCU-0004bJ-00@nmg4.csi.cam.¸ôÅ;k>
"Rubens Kuhl Jr." <rkuhljr@uol.com.br> wrote:
> A 7200 is capable of 100-to-300 k¸ôÅ;of> some thousands of pps of process-switching, which would be the > case. Suppose MSFC is capable ¸ôÅ;0 > and flows are 16 packets per flow, this would limit performance > to near 0.5 Mpps.
But Netfl¸ôÅ;orI understand it (someone please correct me if I'm wrong about that!), so t¸ôÅ;irrather than process switched, thereby allowing higher throughput than on a route¸ôÅ;th
M.
From quan@vortex.cc.¸ôÅ;llReceived: from someone claiming to be vortex.cc.mcgill.ca (vortex.CC.McGill.CA [132.206.27'ëÅ; ¸ôÅ;veReceived-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:21:17 -0500 Received: from localhost by vortex.cc.m¸ôÅ;l. Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:21:08 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:21:08 -0500 (EST¸ôÅ;omTo: "Rubens Kuhl Jr." <rkuhljr@uol.com.br> cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject:¸ôÅ; NIn-Reply-To: <002d01bf9993$3bac67e0$5cf1e7c8@users.uol.com.br> Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0003¸ôÅ;16MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Ru¸ôÅ; K
> > > Any ideas on how a 6500 achieve 15 Mpps (more with future > > supervisors) of L3 > > > routing ? > >¸ôÅ; 6> > (more with new > > > NPEs), far less than 15000 kpps. > > >¸ôÅ;Fr> > switching. Only the first packet of a flow will get ¸ôÅ;he> > and access-lists are handled by the PFC hardware so there is little > > thing that the MSFC has to do. > >¸ôÅ;20> thousands of pps of process-switching, which would be th¸ôÅ;se> is capable of 30 kpps of process-switching and flows are 16 packets per > flow, this would limit performa¸ôÅ;to
MLS uses CEF. For sure it's not process-switched. With Layer 3 flows, the flow last much longer than 16 p¸ôÅ;tsthinking might apply to layer 4 flows only. So 15 Mpps is a marketing number and it is easy to de
AUan,
From CMartin@mercury¸ôÅ;inReceived: from someone claiming to be hermes.balink.com (baisgate.balink.com [199.45.32.¸ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:16:11 -0500 ¸ôÅ;veReceived-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:16:11 -0500 Received: by HERMES with Internet Mai¸ôÅ;rv id <FSFJM1XY>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:15:18 -0500 Message-ID: <4F8C08CC6E76D311AD1F00508B7872495DA7C6@HERME'ëÅ;ro <danny@'ëÅ;neCc: Aisco-nReturn-Receipt-To: "Martin,¸ôÅ;isMIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain¸ôÅ;ha
>Thus spake Danny McPherson (danny@tcb.net): > >> I'm confused here. How does this solve the "one i¸ôÅ;ro>Can't advertise a >> route that was learned from another iBGP router to a third >iBGP router"? If >> you have n¸ôÅ;GP>they receive a >> packet with a destination address external to the AS the¸ôÅ; >> of how to reach the destination, regardless. > > True. What I suggested would established a Full¸ôÅ;h.>MeaNing every > router in the path. Skipping any router would not be >considered a full > mesh.
No. What you ¸ôÅ;eseigrp mesh. Unless you have point-to-point connections between every¸ôÅ;te
" Depending on your layout, you could try to layer routing protocols to simu¸ôÅ; a
> >> I suppose in a teny(sp?) tiny network one could redistribute >BGP routes into >> 'ëÅ;r >> anything regarding a layer >whatever), which is >> perhaps the way things are evolving, thoug> > I didnt say any¸ôÅ;g >What I suggested > provides a fully-meshed iBGP, nothing more. If you want to at¸ôÅ;t
No, you didn't. You suggested it, though.
"You basically let iBGP worry abo¸ôÅ;he worry about how to get the packets to the iBGP edge"
What Danny was saying is that this cannot be assu¸ôÅ; aknow how to forward a packet outside the AS if there is no route there. Just because a BGP edge router¸ôÅ;s the insertion point in the RIB, does not mean that a non-BGP speaker has this inf¸ôÅ;ti
> >> If you're simply suggesting that he use the loopback >addresses as iBGP source >> inte'ëÅ;es>> makes sense, though it still doesn't accommodate his¸ôÅ;n'>wanT a full iBGP >> mesh" comments. > > True.. it doesnt handle his "not" wanting a full-mesh. But >then I read >'ëÅ;is> not being directly connected. I found an interst¸ôÅ;wa> non-directly connected routers into a iBGP, that works very >well for me. > It may not be for everyon¸ôÅ;ut>at on their > own. :)
Somewhere along the line, someone made the erroneous assumption th¸ôÅ; Bfulluntrue. An iBGP full-mesh is required to preve¸ôÅ;or(in most cases) misconfiguration in terms of costs. Since the BGP decision process uses various metr¸ôÅ; abetween different routers. If NLRI information was allowed to be transitively ¸ôÅ;ricould cause a persistent forwarding loop. There are countless ways¸ôÅ; tto Happen. If this is unclear, think of why DV IGPs implement hold-downs when routes with worse metrics become the on¸ôÅ;ayhas been lost.
>> As for the observation that your IGP converges faster than >BGP, that was >>¸ôÅ;ti>> >> As already suggested, depending on the number of routers in ¸ôÅ;e >> Reflection is usually the most elegant solution. > > True. Size could make this very harsh. Again.. ¸ôÅ;s > that he might or might not find usefull. > > The idea behind "Suggestions" is to find interest¸ôÅ; >> try to solve world hunger.
There are very important reasons why the BGP designers required a full¸ôÅ;P confderations, etc. Your solution cannot work in a network¸ôÅ;h speakers carrying a full-table and core IGP speakers with next-hop infromation only.
The point is, make sure th¸ôÅ;veinformation from every other router, be from a full mesh, reflection, or confederation-b¸ôÅ; e
Regards, Chris
> >-- >Karl S. Hagen em¸ôÅ; >Cisco Certified Network Assoc. (CCNA) pager email: >4317622@skytel.com >Sr. Network Engin¸ôÅ; >Raytheon IT Network Security http://www.greyhelm.com/~khagen/
From jesper@skriver.¸ôÅ;WeReceived: from someone claiming to be freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]) by ¸ôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:10:36 -0500 (envelop¸ôÅ;omReceived-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:10:36 -0500 Received: by freesbee.wheel.dk (Postfix, from userid 10¸ôÅ; iDate: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 20:10:35 +0200 From: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skr¸ôÅ;.dTo: Dale Hege <fhege@sover.net> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] Load Balancing of Frame PVCs Message-I¸ôÅ;20References: <20000328201723.D40471@skriver.dk> <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10003290924590.1736-100000@¸ôÅ;leMime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.05¸ôÅ;00
On Wed, Mar 29, 2¸ôÅ;at> When you turn on ip route-cache cef on the interface does this also apply > to the s¸ôÅ;nt
Yes.
router#sh ip int s6/3.16 Serial6/3.16 is up, line protocol is up Internet address is x.x.x.x/30 ¸ôÅ;oa Address determined by non-volatile memory MTU is 1500 bytes Helper address is not s¸ôÅ; D Outgoing access list is not set Inbound access list is not set Proxy ARP i¸ôÅ;sa Security level is default Split horizon is enabled ICMP redirects are never sent ICMP unreachables are always¸ôÅ;t IP fast switching is enabled IP fast switching on the same interface is enabled I¸ôÅ;ow IP CEF switching is enabled IP Feature Fast switching turbo vector IP Feature CEF switching t¸ôÅ; v IP multicast distributed fast switching is disabled IP route-cache flag'ëÅ;e Ro IP access violation a RTP/IP header compression is disable ¸ôÅ;cy Network address translation is disabled WCCP Redirect outbound is disabled WCCP Redirect exclud'ëÅ; drouter#sh ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Softwar¸ôÅ;OS
/Jesper
-- Jesper Skriver, jesWork: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) P
One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
From jared@puck.neth¸ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA20575 for cisco-nsp@p¸ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003291839.NAA20575@puck.nether.net¸ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA20565; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:38:58 -0500 (envelope-fr¸ôÅ;isDate: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:38:58 -0500 X-From_: majdi@puck.nether.net Wed Mar 29 13:38:58 ¸ôÅ; R by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA20549 for cisco-nsp; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:38:58 -0¸ôÅ; (From: Majdi Abbas <majdi@puck.nether.net> Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:38:58 -0500 Message-Id: ¸ôÅ;00To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Old-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:38:57 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ¸ôÅ;[vMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Diagnostic:¸ôÅ; oX-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:39:14 -0500¸ôÅ;enSubject: [nsp] RSM DMA stats via SNMP?
Anyone know if it's possible to get the stats fr¸ôÅ; 'running 11.2(17)P. Upgrading this is not out of the question (32M RAM/16M fl¸ôÅ;.
Thanks
--msa
RSM>sh control c5ip DMA Channel 0 (status ok) Received 8078738K packets, 335085¸ôÅ;yt ONe minute rate, 14962788 bits/s, 4606 packets/s Ten minute rate, 13479916 bits/s, 4367 packets/s Dropped 5818¸ôÅ;ac Last drop (0x814009), vlan 9, length 64, rsm¸ôÅ;cr Error counts, 56 crc, 0 index, 0 dmac-length, 1 dmac-synch, 0 dmac-timeout Transmitted 5314920K ¸ôÅ;et One minute rate, 9989399 bits/s, 3077 packets/s Ten minute rate, 10297908 bits/s, 3082 packets/s ¸ôÅ; C Received 1600735K packets, 483994542K bytes One minute rate, 1917237 bits/s, 845 packets/s Te¸ôÅ;nu Dropped 304105 packets 235 ignore, 0 line-down, 0 runt, 0 giant, 303870 uni¸ôÅ;-f Error counts, 18 crc, 0 index, 0 dmac¸ôÅ;gt Transmitted 3771000K packets, 1184619M bytes One minute rate, 8063576 bits/s, 2190 p¸ôÅ;ts TEn minute rate, 6106989 bits/s, 1889 packets/s
Vlan Type DMA Channel Method 1 ethernet 1 ¸ôÅ; 2 ethernet 0 auto 3 ethernet 1 auto 4 ethe¸ôÅ; 5 ethernet 1 auto 7 ethernet 0 auto 8 ¸ôÅ; 9 ethernet 0 auto 10 ethernet 1 auto ¸ôÅ; 12 ethernet 1 auto 13 ethernet 0 ¸ôÅ; a14 ethernet 1 auto 15 ethernet 0 auto 16 ethernet ¸ôÅ; 17 ethernet 0 auto 18 ethernet 1 auto 19 ¸ôÅ;rn20 ethernet 1 auto 21 ethernet 0 auto ¸ôÅ; 23 ethernet 0 auto 24 ethernet 1 a¸ôÅ; 2 ethernet 0 auto 30 ethernet 0 auto 31 ethernet 1 ¸ôÅ; 32 ethernet 0 auto 33 ethernet 1 auto 34 ethern¸ôÅ; 35 ethernet 1 auto 36 ethernet 0 auto 37 ¸ôÅ;et38 ethernet 0 auto 39 ethernet 1 auto ¸ôÅ; 41 ethernet 1 auto 50 ethernet 0 ¸ôÅ;ut51 ethernet 1 auto 52 ethernet 0 auto 53 ethernet ¸ôÅ; 54 ethernet 0 auto 55 ethernet 1 auto 56 et¸ôÅ;et57 ethernet 1 auto 58 ethernet 0 auto ¸ôÅ; 60 ethernet 1 auto 61 ethernet 0 aut¸ôÅ; 62 63 ethernet 0 auto 64 ethernet 1 ¸ôÅ; 70 ethernet 0 auto 71 ethernet 1 auto 72 ethernet¸ôÅ;0 73 ethernet 1 auto 74 ethernet 0 auto 75 ¸ôÅ;he76 ethernet 0 auto 77 ethernet 1 auto ¸ôÅ;7879 ethernet 1 auto 80 ethernet 0 ¸ôÅ;o 81 ethernet 1 auto 82 ethernet 0 auto 83 ethernet 1 ¸ôÅ; 84 ethernet 0 auto 85 ethernet 1 auto 90 ethe¸ôÅ; 91 ethernet 1 auto 92 ethernet 0 auto 93¸ôÅ; 94 ethernet 0 auto 95 ethernet 1 auto ¸ôÅ; 97 ethernet 1 auto 98 ethernet 0 ¸ôÅ; a99 ethernet 1 auto 203 ethernet 0 auto 250 ethernet ¸ôÅ; 251 ethernet 0 auto 252 ethernet 1 auto 253 ¸ôÅ;rn254 ethernet 1 auto
Inband IPC (status running) Pending mess¸ôÅ;,
Vlan0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is Cat5k Virtual Ethernet, address is 00¸ôÅ;e9 Internet address is 127.0.0.3/8 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 us ARP ty Last input ¸ôÅ;, Last clearing of "show interface" counters never Queueing strategy: fifo Output queu¸ôÅ;40 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 ¸ôÅ;et Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 ¸ôÅ;t 1249 packets output, 117792 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output er¸ôÅ;, 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
From jared@puck.neth¸ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA24238 for cisco-nsp@p¸ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003292121.QAA24238@puck.nether.net¸ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA23674; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 15:31:10 -0500 (envelope-fr¸ôÅ;isDate: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 15:31:10 -0500 X-From_: dlucey@exodus.net Wed Mar 29 15:31:09 2000¸ôÅ;ei localhost.localdomain (hebephrenic.exodus.net [209.185.97.100]) by puck.nether.net (8.¸ôÅ;8. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 15:31:05 -0500 (envelope-from dlucey@exodu¸ôÅ;t)Received: from localhost (dog@localhost) by localhost.loc for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:Old-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:27:22 -0800 (PST) From: David Lucey <dlucey@exodus.ne¸ôÅ;-STo: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] RSM DMA stats via SNMP? In-Reply-To: <20¸ôÅ;29Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003291213450.27703-100000@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version:¸ôÅ; CX-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared¸ôÅ;k.Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 16:21:16 -0500 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
I've been looking for someth¸ôÅ;tochannel in the MIB for a while (been on the phone to cisco, etc.). As far as I know there is nothing in ¸ôÅ;MI
Regards, David Lucey
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Majdi Abbas wrote:
> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:38:58 -0500 > Fr¸ôÅ;Ma> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [nsp] RSM DMA stats via SNMP? > Resent-Date: 'ëÅ; 2> Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > > Anyone know¸ôÅ;it> from a 'show controller c5ip' via SNMP? The RSM is > running 11.2(17)P. Upgrading this i¸ôÅ;t > question (32M RAM/16M flash). Sample output below: > > Thanks > > --msa > > RSM>sh control c5ip > DMA C¸ôÅ;el> Received 8078738K packets, 3350850M bytes > One minute rate, 14962788 bits/s, 4606 packets/s > T¸ôÅ;in> Dropped 581866 packets > 251 ignore, 0 line-down, 0 runt, 0 giant, 581¸ôÅ;un> Last drop (0x814009), vlan 9, length 64, rsm-discrim 0, result-bus 0x5 > Error counts, 56 crc, 0 ind¸ôÅ;0 > Transmitted 5314920K packets, 2807845M bytes > One minute rate, 9989399 ¸ôÅ;/s> Ten minute rate, 10297908 bits/s, 3082 packets/s > > DMA Channel 1 (status ok) > Received 1600735¸ôÅ;ck> One minute rate, 1917237 bits/s, 845 packets/s > Ten minute rate, 2077573 bits/s, 790 packet¸ôÅ;> > 235 ignore, 0 line-down, 0 runt, 0 giant, 303870 unicast-flood > Last drop (0x814047'ëÅ;la>> One minute rate, 8063576 bits/s, 2190 packets/s > Ten minute rate¸ôÅ;06> > Vlan Type DMA Channel Method > 1 ethernet 1 auto ¸ôÅ; 2> 3 ethernet 1 auto > 4 ethernet 0 ¸ôÅ; > 5 ethernet 1 auto > 7 ethernet 0 auto > 8 eth¸ôÅ;t > 9 ethernet 0 auto > 10 ethernet 1 auto ¸ôÅ; 1> 12 ethernet 1 auto > 13 ethernet 0 ¸ôÅ; > 14 ethernet 1 auto > 15 ethernet 0 auto > 16 eth¸ôÅ;t > 17 ethernet 0 auto > 18 ethernet 1 auto ¸ôÅ; 1> 20 ethernet 1 auto > 21 ethernet 0 ¸ôÅ; > 22 ethernet 1 auto > 23 ethernet 0 auto > 24 eth¸ôÅ;t > 25 ethernet 0 auto > 30 ethernet 0 auto ¸ôÅ; 3> 32 ethernet 0 auto > 33 ethernet 1 ¸ôÅ; > 34 ethernet 0 auto > 35 ethernet 1 auto > 36 eth¸ôÅ;t > 37 ethernet 1 auto > 38 ethernet 0 auto ¸ôÅ; 3> 40 ethernet 0 auto > 41 ethernet 1 ¸ôÅ; > 50 ethernet 0 auto > 51 ethernet 1 auto > 52 eth¸ôÅ;t > 53 ethernet 1 auto > 54 ethernet 0 auto ¸ôÅ; 5> 56 ethernet 0 auto > 57 ethernet 1 ¸ôÅ; > 58 ethernet 0 auto > 59 ethernet 1 auto > 60 eth¸ôÅ;t > 61 ethernet 0 auto > 62 ethernet 1 auto ¸ôÅ; 6> 64 ethernet 1 auto > 70 ethernet 0 ¸ôÅ; > 71 ethernet 1 auto > 72 ethernet 0 auto > 73 eth¸ôÅ;t > 74 ethernet 0 auto > 75 ethernet 1 auto ¸ôÅ; 7> 77 ethernet 1 auto > 78 ethernet 0 ¸ôÅ; > 79 ethernet 1 auto > 80 ethernet 0 auto > 81 eth¸ôÅ;t > 82 ethernet 0 auto > 83 ethernet 1 auto ¸ôÅ; 8> 85 ethernet 1 auto > 90 ethernet 0 ¸ôÅ; > 91 ethernet 1 auto > 92 ethernet 0 auto > 93 eth¸ôÅ;t > 94 ethernet 0 auto > 95 ethernet 1 auto ¸ôÅ; 9> 97 ethernet 1 auto > 98 ethernet 0 ¸ôÅ; > 99 ethernet 1 auto > 203 ethernet 0 auto > 250 eth¸ôÅ;t > 251 ethernet 0 auto > 252 ethernet 1 auto ¸ôÅ; 2> 254 ethernet 1 auto > > Inband IPC (status runni¸ôÅ; >> > Vlan0 is up, line protocol is up > Hardware is Cat5k Virt¸ôÅ;Et> Internet address is 127.0.0.3/8 > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 K¸ôÅ; D> Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) > ARP type: ARPA,¸ôÅ; T> Last input 1w2d, output 4d21h, output hang never > Last clearing of "show interface" counters never ¸ôÅ;Qu> Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops > 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 pack¸ôÅ;se> 1455 packets input, 87307 bytes, 0 no buffer > Received 0¸ôÅ;ad> 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort > 1249 pac¸ôÅ; o> 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 4 interface resets > 0 output buffer failures,¸ôÅ;ut>
From garlic@garlic.c¸ôÅ;WeReceived: from someone claiming to be bulb-en0.garlic.com (bulb-en0.garlic.com [208.195.160.144])¸ôÅ; p for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 19:47:05 -0500 (en¸ôÅ;peReceived-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 19:47:05 -0500 Received: from garlic.com (aa4re-4 by bulb-en0.garlic.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e2U0l3H20810 forMessage-ID: <38E2A3EB.21470742@garlic.com> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 16:46:35 -0800 From: Garlic <garlic@garlic.c¸ôÅ;X-X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net" <cisco-ns¸ôÅ;ckContent-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [nsp] Access list speed
)ëÅ;ablist for packet filtering on a
Roy
From mark@noc.mainst¸ôÅ;.nReceived: from someone claiming to be noc.mainstreet.net (noc.mainstreet.net [207.5.0.45]) ¸ôÅ;pu for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 20:21:04 -0500 (env¸ôÅ;e-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 20:21:04 -0500 Received: (from mark@localhost) by noc.mains¸ôÅ;t. Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:21:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:21:02 -0800 (PST) Message-¸ôÅ;<2From: Mark Kent <mark@noc.mainstreet.net> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: ¸ôÅ;C-
Say, I just got another PA-MC-T3 and it says:
CT3 H/W Version : 1.0.1, CT3 ROM Version :
while one I got last May says:
CT3 H/W Version : 1.0.1, CT3 ROM Ver
Note th¸ôÅ;W
a) Should I be concerned? b) Is there any way I get the 2.3.0 up to 2.4.0 firmware?
Thanks, -mark
From grr@shandakor.t¸ôÅ;isReceived: from someone claiming to be shandakor.tharsis.com (IDENT:root@shandakor.tharsis¸ôÅ; [ by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA05041 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 30 Mar 2000¸ôÅ;55 (envelope-from grr@shandakor.tharsis.com) Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 02:55:54 -0500 Received: (from grr@lo¸ôÅ;osDate: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 02:55:¸ôÅ;05From: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com> Message-Id: <200003300755.CAA07543@shandakor.tharsis.com> To: ci¸ôÅ;nsSubject: Re: [nsp] Access list speed
I think the story is that they're both encoded ¸ôÅ; tstructure when all is said and done...
George
> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 16:46:35 -0800 > From: Garlic ¸ôÅ;li> To: "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> > Subject: [nsp] Access list speed > > Probab¸ôÅ; d> > Is a standard access list any faster or slower than an extended access > list for packet filtering on a > Roy
From dol@info.east.r¸ôÅ;huReceived: from someone claiming to be frog.east.ru (frog.east.ru [195.170.62.133]) by puck.nether¸ôÅ; ( for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 05:05:42 -0500 (envelope-from dol@¸ôÅ;.eReceived-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 05:05:42 -0500 Received: from info.east.ru (info.east.ru [195.170.33.24]) by frog¸ôÅ;t. Thu, 30 Mar 2000 14:05:25 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from dol@info.east.ru) Received¸ôÅ;om by info.east.ru (8.9.3/8.8.5/BD2) with ESMTP id OAA67709; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 14:04:43 +)ëÅ; (DaTe: ThuTo: Garlic <garlic@garlic.com> cc¸ôÅ;isSubject: Re: [nsp] Access list speed In-Reply-To: <38E2A3EB.21470742@g¸ôÅ;c.MeSsage-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003301402450.66601-100000@info.east.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.east MIME-VersionContent-Ty
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Garlic wrote:
> Probably a d> Is a standard access list¸ôÅ; f> list for packet filtering on an interface? Faster be definition, but on such tin¸ôÅ;acin real life... Btw, extended access list, which compares addresses only (without ports), is ¸ôÅ;ny
Ignore the difference, it will not bring you any real profit ;)
>
---¸ôÅ;--Basil (Vasily) Dolmatov CCIE #5347, CCNP-Security, CCDA East Connection(ëÅ;, Received: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA15228 for cisco-nsp@p¸ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200003301550.KAA15228@puck.nether.net¸ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id EAA07628; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 04:50:19 -0500 (envelope-fr¸ôÅ;isDate: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 04:50:19 -0500 X-From_: ducktape@puck.nether.net Thu Mar 30 04:50:¸ôÅ;00 popper2.pbi.net (popper2.pbi.net [206.13.1.17]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3¸ôÅ;th for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 04:50:18 -0500 (envelope-from ducktape@puck.nether.¸ôÅ; RReceived: from - (ppp-216-101-156-133.dialup.snrf01.pacbell.net) by popper2¸ôÅ;.n with ESMTP id <0FS80098BBB03W@popper2.pbi.net> for cisco-nsp@p¸ôÅ;ne Thu, 30 Mar 2000 01:49:51 -0800 (PST) Old-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 01:55:41 -0800 From: ducktape@puck.nether.net ¸ôÅ;ndTo: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-id: <4.2.2.20000330015301.00a24270@puck.nether.net> MIM¸ôÅ;rsX-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii X-D¸ôÅ;osX-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 10:5¸ôÅ; -ReSent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsp] 6400 bug?
Anyone experiencing the 6400 NOT dropping the customer¸ôÅ;C disconnect when configed for PPPoA?
-bob
******************************************************** Do not me¸ôÅ; ifor they are subtle and quick to anger....
*********************************************
From cle@cisco.com ¸ôÅ;MaReceived: from someone claiming to be mail1.cisco.com (mail1.cisco.com [171.68.225.60]) by puck.neth¸ôÅ;et for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:26:02 -0500 (envelope-from cl¸ôÅ;scReceived-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:26:02 -0500 Received: from cle-pc (dhcp-171-71-3-158.cisco.com [171.71.3.158]) b¸ôÅ;ilMessage-Id:¸ôÅ;1.X-Sender: cle@sj-email X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Thu, 30 ¸ôÅ;20To: Garlic <garlic@garlic.com>, "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> From: Ch¸ôÅ;LeSubject: Re: [nsp] Access list speed In-Reply-To: <38E2A3EB.21470742@garlic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Conten¸ôÅ;pe
If your standard ACL has 32-bit IP address specified, then it will be put in a hash so I¸ôÅ;il
For extended ACL, IOS will have to check the entries seq¸ôÅ;ia
Chris
At 04:46 PM 3/29/00 -¸ôÅ;, >Probably a dumb question. > >Is a standard access list any faster or slower than an extended access >list f¸ôÅ;ac> >Roy > >
From fhege@sover.net¸ôÅ;u Received: from someone claiming to be marble.sover.net (fhege@marble.sover.net [209.198.87.131]) b¸ôÅ;ck for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:45:31 -0500 (envel¸ôÅ;frReceived-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:45:31 -0500 Received: from localhost (fhege@localhost) by marble.s¸ôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:45:30 -0500 (EST) Comments: ¸ôÅ;rN localhost from fhege@localhost 0 Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:45:30 -0500 (EST) X-Authentic¸ôÅ;n-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:45:30 -0500 (EST) From:To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.1000330105144MIME-Version:¸ôÅ; CSubject: [nsp] 802.1q VLANS & 7200 FE Lockup.
I tried to move a customer that ¸ôÅ;ava vlan to save of router port space this morning. I am using a pair of 3com switches.¸ôÅ;lo
---------- | 7200 | ---------- | 100Mb VLAN 1 defualt, VLAN 2 802.1q -------------- | 100Mb 3com VLT (All VLANS) ------------- | SSII 3000 | ----------- ------------ | customer | ------------
I installed a sub interface as fe0/0.2 with enca¸ôÅ;t1as the default. Once setup it worked fine for a while but then fe0/0 locked up and wouldn't pass any pa¸ôÅ;s.but the cisco wouldn't communicate with the lan. The interface was up and protocol was u¸ôÅ;Th
Any ideas on what happend?
Thanks,
-Dale
From niels@euro.net ¸ôÅ; MReceived: from someone claiming to be venus.euro.net (venus.euro.net [194.134.0.9]) by puck.nether.¸ôÅ;(8 Fri, 31 Mar 2000 17:58:14 -0500 (envelope-from niels@euro.net) Received-Date: Fri, 3¸ôÅ;r Received: from localhost (niels@localhost) by venus.euro.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id AAA05836; Sa¸ôÅ; ADate: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 00:58:11 +0200 (MET DST) From: Niels Bakker <niels@euro.net> To: du¸ôÅ;pecc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] 6400 bug? In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000330015301.00a24270@pu¸ôÅ;etMessage-ID: <1000401005658.12457L-100000@venus.euro.net> X-NCC-RegID: nl.euronet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: ¸ôÅ;/P
ducktape@puck.nether.net wrote:
> Anyone experiencing the 6400 NOT dropping the customers PVC ses¸ôÅ; o> diSconnect when configed for PPPoA?
Lots of customers of the local telco (ex-)monopoly's current ADSL trial (KPN MxS)ëÅ;m)
From spork@inch.com ¸ôÅ; MReceived: from someone claiming to be arutam.inch.com (ns.inch.com [207.240.140.101]) by puck.nethe¸ôÅ;t for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 20:22:19 -0500 (envelope-from spo¸ôÅ;ncReceived-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 20:22:19 -0500 Received: from shell.inch.com (inch.com [207.240.140.100] (may be fo¸ôÅ;)) for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 31 Mar 20¸ôÅ;0:Received: from localhost by shell.inch.com (8.8.8) id UAA23146; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 20:22:18 -0500 (EST) Da¸ôÅ;FrFrom: Charles Sprickman <spork@inch.com> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <Pi¸ôÅ;SFMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [ns¸ôÅ;RB
Hello all,
Any new developments in 12.1 for those of us looking to aggregate large numbers of bridged ¸ôÅ;su
What's the practical limit on a 72xx series router? We've passed 300 bridged customers and we're growing rapi¸ôÅ;..finding the limit on the number of (sub)interfaces under the 12.x software through CCO...
Thanks ¸ôÅ;an
Charles
| Charles Sprickman | Internet Channel | INCH System Administration Team | (212)¸ôÅ;52| sPork@inch.com | access@inch.com
From CMartin@mercury¸ôÅ;inReceived: from someone claiming to be hermes.balink.com (baisgate.balink.com [199.45.32.¸ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 20:43:09 -0500 ¸ôÅ;elReceived-Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 20:43:09 -0500 Received: by HERMES with Internet Mail ¸ôÅ;ic id <FSFJMQ86>; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 20:42:11 -0500 Message-ID: <4F8C08CC6E76D311AD1F00508B7872495DA7EC@HERMES> ¸ôÅ;: To: "'Charles Sprickman'" <spork@inch.com>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sub¸ôÅ;: Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 20:42:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.¸ôÅ;48ConTent-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
The 6400 can aggregate thousands of bridged users with RBE. RSMs c¸ôÅ;itat doing small 'point-to-point' bridge groups¸ôÅ;m LANE card can terminate 2000 PVCs and map them into up to 1000 VLANs on a 5500. I don't think a si¸ôÅ; Rlimit is prolly 300 or so.
7200 should be able to do the same as the 6400, s¸ôÅ;PP
regards, -/chris
> -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Sprickman [mailto:spork@inch.com] > Sent: Fr¸ôÅ;, > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [nsp] IRB, DSL and Friends > > > Hello all, > > Any n¸ôÅ;ev> aggregate large > numbers of bridged DSL subscribers? > > What's the prac¸ôÅ;l > bridged customers and we're growing rapidly... I've also had trouble >¸ôÅ;di> software through CCO... > > Thanks for any pointers, > > ¸ôÅ;le> \ Charles Sprickman | Internet Channel > | INCH System Administration Team | (212)243-5200 > |¸ôÅ;rk>
From grr@shandakor.t¸ôÅ;isReceived: from someone claiming to be shandakor.tharsis.com (IDENT:root@shandakor.tharsis¸ôÅ; [ by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21188 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 ¸ôÅ;7: (envelope-from grr@shandakor.tharsis.com) Received-Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 22:27:28 -0500 Received: (from grr@loca¸ôÅ;t)Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 22:27:22 -)ëÅ; (FrMm: GeoTo: cisco-¸ôÅ;puSubject: RE: [nsp] IRB, DSL and Friends
> From: "Martin, Christ¸ôÅ; <> To: "'Charles Sprickman'" <spork@inch.com>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: RE: [nsp] I¸ôÅ;DS> Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 20:42:10 -0500 > Resent-From: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > X-Mailing-List: <cisco-ns¸ôÅ;ck> X-Loop: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Precedence: list > Resent-Sender: cisco-nsp-request¸ôÅ;k.> > The 6400 can aggregate thousands of bridged users with RBE. RSMs can with > IRB as well. This is assumin¸ôÅ;e > at doing small 'point-to-point' bridge groups, I'm not sure, but I know a > LANE¸ôÅ;d > 5500. I don't think a single RSM can do 1000 VLAN inter¸ôÅ;s,> limit is prolly 300 or so. > > 7200 should be able to do the same as the 6400, sans PPPoE and SSG. > > r¸ôÅ;ds
PPPoE for 7200/7500 is supposedly in 12.1T though I haven't had a chance to play with it yet.
George )From jared@puck.neth¸ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA09850 for cisco-nsp@p¸ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004030014.UAA09850@puck.nether.net>¸ôÅ;ei by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA06372; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 08:12:39 -0500 (envelope-from¸ôÅ;coDate: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 08:12:39 -0500 X-From_: owner-cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sat Apr 1 08¸ôÅ;39REceived: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.33]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3¸ôÅ;.3 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 08:12:38 -0500 (envelope-from owner-cisco-nsp@¸ôÅ;.nReceived-Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 08:12:38 -0500 Received: from vision.tigerteam.net (qmailr@vision.tigerteam.net ¸ôÅ;.1 by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA11634 for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 08:12:33 ¸ôÅ;0 REceived: (qmail 24348 invoked by uid 201); 1 Apr 2000 13:12:32 -0000 Received: from vision.tigerteam.net (andy@207.¸ôÅ;21 Old-Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 07:12:32 -0600 (CST) From: ¸ôÅ; WX-Sender: andy@vision.mtco.com To: cisco-nsp@iagnet.net Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.000401070757¸ôÅ;32MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept lis¸ôÅ;DiX-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Sun,¸ôÅ;prResent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsp] IBGP fun...
Just curios about some of the issue¸ôÅ;ator so Cisco 75xx at pops on a major providers backbone and then running IBGP with a single¸ôÅ;anothers also at each point. What is a safe number of peers for fully meshing like¸ôÅ;s?cut down on the size? How many routers in a confederation would w¸ôÅ;befor the time.
andy
From hank@att.net.il¸ôÅ;n Received: from someone claiming to be MaX.ibm.net.il (MaX.IbM.NeT.iL [192.115.72.170]) by puck.net¸ôÅ;ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 01:07:37 -0400 (envelope-from ha¸ôÅ;ttReceived-Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 01:07:37 -0400 Received: from docking (hank.tlv.ibm.net.il [192.115.72.7]) by MaX¸ôÅ;.n Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:07:30 +0300 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000403070703.0080e8d0@m¸ôÅ;bmX-Sender: hank@max.ibm.net.il X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 07:¸ôÅ;3 TO: Garlic <garlic@garlic.com>, "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> From: Hank Nussbache¸ôÅ;anSubject: Re: [nsp] Access list speed In-Reply-To: <38E2A3EB.21470742@garlic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-T¸ôÅ; t
At 16:46 29/03/00 -0800, Garlic wrote:
For that matter, does anyone know the Cisco URL tha¸ôÅ;taCPU by various acl sizes? I heard Cisco tried to bury it.
Thanks, Hank
>Probably a dumb question. > >¸ôÅ; s>list for packet filtering on an interface? > >Roy > >
From owner-cisco-nsp¸ôÅ;k.Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.¸ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 03:11:01 -0400 ¸ôÅ;elReceived-Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 03:11:01 -0400 Received: from shandakor.tharsis.c¸ôÅ;ID by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA09319 for <cisco-nsp@ia¸ôÅ;.nReceived: (from grr@localhost) by shandakor.tharsis.com (8.8.6/8.7.3) id DAA2547¸ôÅ;onDate: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 03:10:48 -0400 (EDT) From: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.c¸ôÅ;MeTo: andy@tigerteam.net, cisco-nsp@iagnet.net Subject: Re: [nsp] IB¸ôÅ;un
> From: Andy Walden <andy@tigerteam.net> > X-Sender: andy@vision.mtco.com > To: cisco-nsp@iagnet.net > Just curios about some of the issues that could arise through putt> IBGP with a single AS and BGP with the provider and probably some > others also at each p¸ôÅ;. > meshing like this? Would confederations or route reflectors work better to > cu¸ôÅ;wn> best? What else needs to be considered in a for the time. > > andy
I think this is one of those questions that try paraphrase ¸ôÅ;thprovides a fairly uniform, reliable mesh, then iBGP can be an effecti¸ôÅ;olit would be if you're taking some approximatino of "f¸ôÅ;roprovider at each point.
The route-reflector approach lets you centralize the work and keep the number of s¸ôÅ;onnetwork is non-uniform, with some high capacity links and clustering¸ôÅ;nothe clusters and better connections between them.
Anyw¸ôÅ; Bassam Halabi Cisco Press ISBN 1-56205-652-2
It's the BGP bible, so don't l¸ôÅ; hyou the answer, it'll at least provide the starting point for the arguments...
From owner-cisco-nsp¸ôÅ;k.Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.¸ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 09:12:02 -0400 ¸ôÅ;elReceived-Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 09:12:02 -0400 Received: from freedman.net (freed¸ôÅ;ne by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA11553 for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 09¸ôÅ;01Received: (from freedman@localhost) by freedman.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA09663; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 10:25:55 -04¸ôÅ;esSubject: Re: [nsp] IBGP fun... To: grr@shandakor.tharsis.com (George Robbins¸ôÅ;teFrom: Avi Freedman <avi@freedman.net> Cc: andy@tigerteam.net, cisco-nsp@iagnet.net ¸ôÅ;epX-Mailer: ELM [vers¸ôÅ;2.MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Except confederation¸ôÅ;lsat next NANOG) have historically had fewer bugs (at least in recent years),¸ôÅ; adon't (as George alludes to).
FYI,
Avi
> I think this)ëÅ;on> prOvides a fairly uniform, reliable mesh, then iBGP can be an effective > solution. While 35 sessions isn't a big nu¸ôÅ; i> it would be if you're taking some approximatino of "full routes" from the > provider at each poin¸ôÅ; > number of sessions on the client routers managa¸ôÅ; > network is non-uniform, with some high capacity links and clustering of > nodes, then the confederatio¸ôÅ;pr> the clusters and better connections between them. > > Anyway: > > Internet Rout¸ôÅ;Ar> Bassam Halabi > Cisco Press > ISBN 1-56205-652-2 > > It's the BGP bible, so don't leave home wi¹ôÅ;t > you the answer, it'll at least provide the starting point for the arguments... > > George >
From jared@puck.neth¹ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA26856 for cisco-nsp@p¹ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004031318.JAA26856@puck.nether.net>¹ôÅ;ei by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA19825; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 02:26:36 -0400 (envelope-from¹ôÅ;coDate: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 02:26:36 -0400 X-From_: ams@vicnet.net.au Mon Apr 3 02:26:36 2000 Re¹ôÅ;ed viper.vicnet.net.au (postfix@viper.vicnet.net.au [203.10.72.231]) by puck.nether.net (8.9¹ôÅ;.9 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 02:26:33 -0400 (envelope-from ams@vicnet.net¹ôÅ; RReceived: by viper.vicnet.net.au (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0F5FD31814; ¹ôÅ; Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by viper.vicnet.net.au (Postfix) with ES¹ôÅ; iOld-Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 16:26:26 +1000 (EST) From: Alan Sawyer <ams@¹ôÅ;etTo: Hank Nussbacher <hank@att.net.il> Cc: Garlic <garlic@garlic.com>, "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net" <cisco-¹ôÅ;puSubject: Re: [nsp] Access list speed In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20000403070703.0080e8d0@max.ibmMessageMIME-Version: 1Resent-Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 ¹ôÅ;8:Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
I don't know if there is a link off CCO but if you email phillip harris (ph¹ôÅ;s@puck.nether.net a link off point you to a list that correlates switching paths/max pps¹ôÅ; swould give you a general idea of the effects anyway. I don't have it on hand.
-- Alan Sawyer Network Operation¹ôÅ;giVICNET - 328 Swanston St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000. Ph - +61 3 9669 9710 Fax - +61 3 9669 9805
On Mo¹ôÅ; A
> At 16:46 29/03/00 -0800, Garlic wrote: > > For that matter, does anyone know the Cisco¹ôÅ; t> CPU by various acl sizes? I heard Cisco tried to bury it. > > Thanks, > Hank > > >Probably ¹ôÅ;mb> > > >Is a standard access list any faster or slower than an extended access > >list for packet filtering on a > > >Roy > > > > > >
From jared@puck.neth¹ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA26897 for cisco-nsp@p¹ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004031318.JAA26897@puck.nether.net>¹ôÅ;ei by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA25990; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:51:34 -0400 (envelope-from¹ôÅ;coDate: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:51:34 -0400 X-From_: owner-cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Mon Apr 3 08¹ôÅ;33REceived: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.33]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3¹ôÅ;.3 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:51:33 -0400 (envelope-from owner-cisco-nsp@¹ôÅ;.nReceived-Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:51:33 -0400 Received: from exchange.nst ([204.116.23.150]) by hq.oh.verio.ne¹ôÅ;.9 for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:51:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by EXCHANGE w¹ôÅ;In id <HPCXBX0C>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:51:39 -0400 Message-ID: <71CC63E46CCED211A65800805F66)ëÅ;4AOld-Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:51:37 -0400 ¹ôÅ;E-X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Diagnostic: N¹ôÅ;n X-Diagnostic: Mail coming from a daemon, ignored X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.n¹ôÅ;esResent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsp] Has anyone seen...
Has anyon¹ôÅ;en4 ports of IMA? Oh yeah, it has to be about 2 RU high and b¹ôÅ; pWhile I'm at it, it needs to slice bagels, cook my steaks in 5 minutes while reducing the fat by 7%, and put a lus¹ôÅ;s seats.
If anyone has seen such a creature, or better yet has used one, please let me know. T¹ôÅ;ox
Thanks in advance,
David Curran North State Telephone Company dcurran(at))ëÅ;hs
From owner-cisco-nsp¹ôÅ;k.Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.¹ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 09:56:03 -0400 ¹ôÅ;elReceived-Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 09:56:03 -0400 Received: from mailserver-ng.cs.um¹ôÅ;du by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA12064 for <cisco-nsp@iag¹ôÅ;neReceived: from localhost (wrath@localhost) by mailserver-ng.cs.umbc.edu (8.9.3/8¹ôÅ;) Mon, 3 Apr 2000 09:55:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 09:55:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Vijay Gill <¹ôÅ;h@localhostITo: Avi Freedman <avi@freedman.net> cc: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com>, andy@tige Subject: Re: [nsp] IBGP fun... InMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN¹ôÅ;ar
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Avi Freedman wrote:
> > Except confederations (also covered by Halabi, and I think by ¹ôÅ;to> At next NANOG) have historically had fewer bugs (at least in recent years), > and allow you to do types of traffic ¹ôÅ;ne> don't (as George alludes to). > > FYI, > > Avi
Avi, did you ever complete your work on tr¹ôÅ;c you alluded to at the montreal nanog (nanog 17) BOF. thanks
/vijay
From owner-cisco-nsp¹ôÅ;k.Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.¹ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 10:57:02 -0400 ¹ôÅ;elReceived-Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 10:57:02 -0400 Received: from freedman.net (freed¹ôÅ;ne by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA13000 for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 10¹ôÅ;02Received: (from freedman@localhost) by freedman.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA12837; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 12:10:48 -04¹ôÅ;esSubject: Re: [nsp] IBGP fun... To: wrath@cs.umbc.edu (Vijay Gill) Date: Mon,¹ôÅ;prFrom: Avi Freedman <avi@freedman.net> Cc: avi@freedman.net (Avi Freedman), grr@shandako¹ôÅ;ar cisco-nsp@iagnet.net, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net In-Reply-To: <Pine.S¹ôÅ;.9X-Mailer: ELM [vers¹ôÅ;2.MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Yep...
There should¹ôÅ;a from Williams, with theory and examples.
Avi
> > On Mon, 3 Apr 2000¹ôÅ;i > > > > > Except confederations (also covered by Halabi, and I think by a tutorial > > at next NANOG) ha¹ôÅ;is> > and allow you to do types of traffic engineering that route-refle¹ôÅ;s > > > > FYI, > > > > Avi > > Avi, did you ever complete your work on traffic engineer¹ôÅ;us> you alluded to at the montreal nanog (nanog 17) BOF. > thanks > > /vijay >
From CMartin@mercury¹ôÅ;inReceived: from someone claiming to be hermes.balink.com (baisgate.balink.com [199.45.32.¹ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 14:44:57 -0400 ¹ôÅ;elReceived-Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 14:44:57 -0400 Received: by HERMES with Internet Mail ¹ôÅ;ic id <FSFJMVCC>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 14:44:02 -0400 Message-ID: <4F8C08CC6E76D311AD1F00508B7872495DA7F6@HERMES> ¹ôÅ;: To: "'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.Subject: PiDate: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 14:44:01 -0400 Return-Receipt-To: "Martin, ChrisMIME-Vers¹ôÅ; 1X-MaIler: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Has anyone ver seen this?¹ôÅ;ipRepeat count [5]: Datagram size [100]: 2000 Timeout in seconds [2]: Extended co¹ôÅ;dsSource address or interface: Type of service [0]: Set DF bit in IP header? [no]: y Validate reply DataLoose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]: Sweep range of sSen¹ôÅ; 5MMMMM Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
MMMMM?
TIA, -/chris
From ELAW@dr.dk Mon¹ôÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be exch03.dr.dk (mailgate2.dr.dk [129.142.20.132]) by puck.nether.ne¹ôÅ;.9 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 16:07:45 -0400 (enveloReceived-Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 16:07:45 -0400 Received: by exchMessage-ID: <3F467ECB5463D2119DTo: CMa¹ôÅ;@mSubject: RE: Ping Response? Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 22:07:36 +0100 MIME-Versio¹ôÅ;.0Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Sending 5, 2000-byte ICM¹ôÅ;ho> 2 seconds: > MMMMM > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) > > MMMMM?
"Could not fragment" ¹ôÅ;ri---- ---------------------------- Erik Lawaetz Danish Broadcasting http://www.dr.dk/
From swhyte@cisco.co¹ôÅ;onReceived: from someone claiming to be ce-nfs-1.cisco.com (ce-nfs-1.cisco.com [171.68.202.251]) by¹ôÅ;k. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 16:24:06 -0400 (envelop¹ôÅ;omReceived-Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 16:24:06 -0400 Received: from dhcp-c2-2-41.cisco.com (dhcp-c2-2-41.cisco¹ôÅ; [ by ce-nfs-1.cisco.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA00086; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 13:23:23 -0700 (PDT) Dat¹ôÅ;onFrom: Scott Whyte <swhyte@cisco.com> X-Sender: swhyte@localhost To: "Martin, Christian" )ëÅ;rtSubject: Re: Ping Response? In-Reply-¹ôÅ;<4Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0004031322010.2716-100000@localhost> MIME-Version¹ôÅ;0
I believe it is unreachable type code 4, which should be Fragmentation needed ¹ôÅ;DFdebug ip icmp.
-Scott
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Martin, Christia¹ôÅ;ot
> HAs anyone ver seen this? > > p ip > Target IP address: www.fredericksburg.com > Repeat count [5]: > Datagram size ¹ôÅ;]:>> Extended commands [n]: y > Source address or interface: > Type of service [0]: > Set DF ¹ôÅ;in> Validate reply data? [no]: > Data pattern [0xABCD]: > Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none¹ôÅ; S> Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 2000-byte ICMP Echoes to 209.97.59.111, timeout is ¹ôÅ;co> MMMMM > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) > > MMMMM? > > TIA, > -/chris > > > >
-- Scott Whyte swhyte@cis¹ôÅ;omNetwork Supported Accounts (NSA) | to prove anything, Kent. 14 percent of CCIE ¹ôÅ;
From CMartin@mercury¹ôÅ;inReceived: from someone claiming to be hermes.balink.com (baisgate.balink.com [199.45.32.¹ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 16:26:14 -0400 ¹ôÅ;elReceived-Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 16:26:14 -0400 Received: by HERMES with Internet Mail ¹ôÅ;ic id <FSFJMVSV>; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 16:25:18 -0400 Message-ID: <4F8C08CC6E76D311AD1F00508B7872495DA7FA@HERMES> ¹ôÅ;: To: "'Scott Whyte'" <swhyte@cisco.com>, "Martin, Christian" <CM¹ôÅ;n@cisco.comhristian" Cc: "'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: RE: Ping Response? Date: Mon, 3¹ôÅ; 2Return-Receipt-To: "Martin, Christian" <CMartin@mercury.balink.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Intern¹ôÅ;aiContent-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
I gathered that from my debugs and what I was tr¹ôÅ; taback... ;)
Thanks for all the replies!
./~chris
>-----Original Message----- >From: Scott Whyte¹ôÅ;il>Sent: Monday, April 03, 2000 4:23 PM >To: Martin, Christian >Cc: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net' >Subjec¹ôÅ;e:> > >I believe it is unreachable type code 4, which should be Fragmentation >needed and DF bit set. Try t¹ôÅ;ng>the ping, or >debug ip icmp. > >-Scott > > >On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Martin, Christian wrote: > >> ¹ôÅ;an>> >> p ip >> Target IP address: www.fredericksburg.com >> Repeat count [5]: >> Datagram size [100]: ¹ôÅ; >>> Extended commands [n]: y >> Source address or interface: >> Type of service [0]: >> Set DF bi¹ôÅ; I>> Validate reply data? [no]: >> Data pattern [0xABCD]: >> Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[non¹ôÅ;>>>> Type escape sequence to abort. >> Sending 5, 2000-byte ICMP Echoes to 209.97.59.111, timeout¹ôÅ;s >> MMMMM >> Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) >> >> MMMMM? >> >> TIA, >> -/chris >> >> >> >> > >-- >Scott ¹ôÅ;e >statistics >Network Supported Accounts (NSA) | to prove anything, Ken¹ôÅ; >>CCIE 3340 | all people know that." >-H. Simpson >
From jared@puck.neth¹ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA24265 for cisco-nsp@p¹ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004040617.CAA24265@puck.nether.net>¹ôÅ;ei by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA23059; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 01:17:11 -0400 (envelope-from¹ôÅ;coDate: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 01:17:11 -0400 X-From_: muthukrishnan.p@datacraft-asia.com Tue Apr 4¹ôÅ;17Received: from someone claiming to be md2.vsnl.net.in (md2.vsnl.net.in [202.54.6.20]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.¹ôÅ;9. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 01:17:05 -0400 (envelope-from muthukrishnan.p¹ôÅ;acReceived-Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 01:17:05 -0400 Received: from pdc.datacraft-asia.com ([203.197.132.52]) by ¹ôÅ;vs for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 10:53:39 +0530 (IST) Recei¹ôÅ; fMessage-ID: <38E97906.9A8F45F7@datacraft-asia.com> Old-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 10:39:26 +05¹ôÅ;roX-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Ver¹ôÅ;: To: "kumaravelu.k@datacraft-asia.com" <kumaravelu.k@datacraft-asia.com>, "v¹ôÅ;mu Mulugu Srinivasarao <smulugu@cisco.com> CC: "tomy.tho¹ôÅ;daSubject: PIX - Claririfcation - Urgent Content-Type: text/plain; charse¹ôÅ;-aCoNtent-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck¹ôÅ;heREsent-Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 02:17:51 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi ,
We need a clarification on ¹ôÅ;- Network Interface cards that are supported in PIX - 520 firewall.
Can you please treat t¹ôÅ;as
Regards --
Regards, P. Muthukrishnan Network Specialist Datacraft RPG Chennai
Tel : 044 - 8290496 044 - 829F
From dol@info.east.r¹ôÅ;ueReceived: from someone claiming to be frog.east.ru (frog.east.ru [195.170.62.133]) by puck.nether¹ôÅ; ( Tue, 4 Apr 2000 04:58:20 -0400 (envelope-from dol@info.east.ru) Received-Date: Tue,¹ôÅ;prReceived: from info.east.ru (info.east.ru [195.170.33.24]) by frog.east.ru (8.9.3/8. Tue, 4 Apr 2000 12:59:26 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from dol@info.east.ru) Tue, 4 Apr 2000 12:57:59 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 12:¹ôÅ;9 From: Basil Dolmatov <dol@info.east.ru> To: MuthuKrishnan <muthukrishnan.p@datacraft-asia.com> cc: cisco-nsp@p¹ôÅ;ne "kumaravelu.k@datacraft-asia.com" <kumaravelu.k@datacraft-asia.com>, "velu.muthiah@datacraft-asi¹ôÅ;m" Mulugu Srinivasarao <smulugu@cisco.com>, "tomy.thomas@datacraft-asia.c¹ôÅ;<t jared@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: PIX - Claririfcation - Urgent In-Reply-To: <38E¹ôÅ;6.Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004041257320.43935-100000@info.east.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.east MIME¹ôÅ;siContent-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, MuthuKrishnan wrote:
> > Hi , > > We need a cla¹ôÅ;ca> Network Interface cards that are supported in PIX - 520 firewall. > > Ca¹ôÅ;u Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100 - works fine in PIX 520.
> > Regards > -- > > > Regards, > P¹ôÅ;th> Network Specialist > Datacraft RPG > Chennai > > > Tel : 044 - 8290496 > 044 - 8292496 > Fax : 044 - 82202¹ôÅ; Basil (Vasily) Dolmatov CCIE #5347, CCNP-Security, CCDA East ¹ôÅ;ec
From hcb@clark.net ¹ôÅ;ApReceived: from someone claiming to be jake.cais.net (jake.cais.net [205.252.14.6]) by puck.nether.ne¹ôÅ;.9 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 09:36:51 -0400 (envelope-from hcb@clar¹ôÅ;t)Received: from [63.216.127.98] (63-216-127-98.sdsl.cais.net [63.216.127.98]¹ôÅ; id JAA27328 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 09:36:46 -0¹ôÅ;(EMimE-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: hcb@mail.clark.net Message-Id: <v04220824b50f9fce8bbd@[63.216.127.98]> Date: Tue, 4 Apr 20)ëÅ;9:ToContent-Type: text/plain; charset="u¹ôÅ;ciSubject: [nsp] IS-IS over IP?
Is anyone running IS-IS over IPv4, rather than a data link protocol, ¹ôÅ;romedium dependency problems?
Thanks.
Howard
From jesper@skriver.¹ôÅ;TuReceived: from someone claiming to be freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]) by ¹ôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 09:42:29 -0400 (envelope¹ôÅ;m Received-Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 09:42:29 -0400 Received: by freesbee.wheel.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001¹ôÅ;d Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 15:42:26 +0200 From: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skrive¹ôÅ;> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] IS-IS over IP? Message-ID: <200¹ôÅ;41References: <v04220824b50f9fce8bbd@[63.216.127.98]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; c¹ôÅ;etX-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <v04220824b50f9fce8bbd@[63.216.127.98]>; from hcb@clark.net on Tue, Apr 04, 2¹ôÅ;at
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 09:35:30AM -0400, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: > Is anyone running IS-IS over IPv¹ôÅ;at> in production? If so, does it appear to solve the jumbo LSP and > medium dependency pro¹ôÅ;s?question ?
/Jesper
-- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)¹ôÅ;veWork: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A¹ôÅ;h
One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to binFrom danny@sofos.tcb¹ôÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be tcb.net (tcb.net [205.168.100.1]) by puck.nether.net (8.¹ôÅ;8. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 11:09:14 -0400 (envelope-from danny@sofos.t¹ôÅ;etReceived: from sofos.tcb.net (sofos.tcb.net [127.0.0.1]) by tcb.net (8.9.¹ôÅ;9. Tue, 4 Apr 2000 09:03:13 -0600 Message-Id: <200004041503.JAA03274@tcb.net> To: Jesper Skriver ¹ôÅ;pecc: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb@clark.net>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> R¹ôÅ;-TSubject: Re: [nsp] IS-IS over IP? Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 09:03:13 -0600 Sender: danny@sofos.tcb.net
Th)ëÅ;ISrequirement for the OSI CLNP support, and the need for m¹ôÅ;ef"ISIS over [something] over ATM" so that AAL5 SNAP could be replaced with AAL5 MUX or the like to alleviate over¹ôÅ; ridentifier.
However, workarounds have been provided for the ATM overhead issue and the "ISIS ove¹ôÅ;v4an academic exercise.
A few good things did come out of the WG, how¹ôÅ;.
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/isis-charter.html
for current working group information.
-danny
> ISIS is a ro¹ôÅ;g > question ? > > /Jesper > > -- > Jesper Skriver, je> Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks> > One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, > One IP to bring them all and in the zone to b>
From jared@puck.neth¹ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA18305 for cisco-nsp@p¹ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004042346.TAA18305@puck.nether.net>¹ôÅ;ei by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA17879; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 19:30:47 -0400 (envelope-from¹ôÅ;coDate: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 19:30:47 -0400 X-From_: davidw@gnac.com Tue Apr 4 19:30:46 2000 Rece¹ôÅ;: yosemite.rwc.gnac.net (yosemite.rwc.gnac.net [198.151.248.221]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8¹ôÅ;) for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 19:30:46 -0400 (envelope-from davidw@gnac.com) R¹ôÅ;veReceived: by yosemite.rwc.gnac.net; id QAA29872; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 16:31:42 -0700 (PD¹ôÅ;ec id xma029867; Tue, 4 Apr 00 16:31:36 -0700 Rec¹ôÅ;d: by pepe.main.gnac.com (8.8.7/8.8.7/GNAC-GW-2.1) with E)ëÅ; i fReceived: (from davidw@localhost) by¹ôÅ;et for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 16:30:36 -0700 (PDT¹ôÅ;d-From: David Williamson <davidw@gnac.com> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <2¹ôÅ;40Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i X-Dia¹ôÅ;tiX-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 19:46:2¹ôÅ;40Subject: [nsp] ACL logging
Hey!
So, I've got a bunch of ACLs that have logging tu¹ôÅ; oa bunch of lines like this:
access-list 100 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any log
This works great, of cours¹ôÅ;nd
Apr 4 23:15:19: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 100 denied tcp 10.1.7.42(0) -> 209.18 2.¹ôÅ;yy
My question is this: how can I get this to log the tcp/udp port number as well as the addresses? Accordin¹ôÅ; t"if appropriate", whatever that may mean. (Of course, it would be nice if my upstreams ¹ôÅ;d
Many thanks!
-David
-- David Williamson | "Experience ¹ôÅ;haGNAC, Inc. | when you don't get what you davidw@gnac.com | want
From grr@shandakor.t¹ôÅ;isReceived: from someone claiming to be shandakor.tharsis.com (IDENT:root@shandakor.tharsis¹ôÅ; [ by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA20646 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 ¹ôÅ;7: (envelope-from grr@shandakor.tharsis.com) Received-Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 21:07:03 -0400 Received: (from grr@loca¹ôÅ;t)Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 21:06:54 -)ëÅ; (FrMm: GeoTo: cisco-¹ôÅ;puSubject: Re: [nsp] ACL logging
> From: David Williamson <davidw@gnac.com> > To: cisco-nsp@¹ôÅ;.n> Subject: [nsp] ACL logging > > Hey! > > So, I've got a bunch of ACLs that have logging turned on. It's > a ¹ôÅ;h > > access-list 100 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any log > > This works great, of course, and it¹ôÅ;ts> > Apr 4 23:15:19: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 100 denied tcp 10.1.7.42(0) -> 209.18 > 2.xxx¹ôÅ;(0> > My question is this: how can I get this to log the tcp/udp port number as > well as the addresses? Accor¹ôÅ; t> "if appropriate", whatever that may mean. (Of course, it would be nice > if my ups¹ôÅ;ms
If you really care:
access-list 100 deny tcp 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.25¹ôÅ;y accEss-list 100 deny udp 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any log access-list 100 deny icmp 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any log a¹ôÅ;s-
8-(
From ehmeier@faui40.¹ôÅ;rmReceived: from someone claiming to be faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (¹ôÅ;@f by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA29600 for <cisco-nsp¹ôÅ;k. (envelope-from ehmeier@faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de) Received-Date: Wed,¹ôÅ;prReceived: from faui46e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui46e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.89]¹ôÅ;y Rece¹ôÅ;: by faui46e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.9.1/8.1.75-FAU) id JAA23103; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 09:34:53 +)ëÅ; (Date:To: George Robbin¹ôÅ;rrCc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, davidw@gnac.com Subject: Re: [nsp] ACL logging Message-ID: <2000040¹ôÅ;45References: <200004050106.VAA04973@shandakor.tharsis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Con¹ôÅ;-TIn-Reply-To: <200004050106.VAA04973@shandakor.tharsis.com>; from grr@shandakor.tharsis.c¹ôÅ;n
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 09:06:54PM -0400, George Robbins wrote: > > From: David Wil¹ôÅ;so> > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Subject: [nsp] ACL logging > > > > Hey! > > > > So, I've got a¹ôÅ;ch> > a bunch of lines like this: > > > > access-list 100 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.¹ôÅ;25> > > > This works great, of course, and it spits out log messages like this: > > > > Apr 4 23:15:19: %SE¹ôÅ;IP> > 2.xxx.yyy(0), 1 packet > > > > My question is this: how can I ¹ôÅ;th> > well as the addresses? According to the docs, those numbers are logged > > "if a¹ôÅ;pr> > if my upstreams would filter this crap ou> If you really care: > > access-list 100 deny tcp 10.0.0.0 0.255.25> access-list 100 deny icmp 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any log > access-list 100 deny ip 10.0.0.0 ¹ôÅ;5.
If the zero port log entries still remain, you may be hit by a bug that I sus- pect at least in IOS 11.3 ¹ôÅ;iohave no port number info) opposed to what is written in the manuals.
So t¹ôÅ; l
Erich
From dek@hades.uz W¹ôÅ;prReceived: from someone claiming to be hades.uz (postfix@hades.uz [196.22.173.11]) by puck.nether.net ¹ôÅ;.3 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 05:53:22 -0400 (envelope-from dek@hades.¹ôÅ;ReReceived: by hades.uz (Postfix, from userid 214) id 43BDBB51B9; Wed, 5 Apr 2¹ôÅ;11Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 11:53:07 +0200 From: Dmitri Kalintsev <dek@hades.uz> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.n¹ôÅ;ubMessage-ID: <20000405115307.G12088@hades.uz> Mail-Followup-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Refer¹ôÅ;s:Mime-Version: 1.0 ¹ôÅ;enContent-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.11i In-Reply-To: <20000405093453.A59¹ôÅ;vaX-Cl¹ôÅ; FRetUrn-Receipt-To: dek@hades.uz Precedence: special-delivery
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 09:34:53AM +0200, Erich Meier wr¹ôÅ; >> pect at least in IOS 11.3 versions. T)ëÅ; I> > So these ¹ôÅ;en
Hmm. Interesting note: I do have an inbound access list, and there is NO e¹ôÅ; tentries about these packets being denied. I've added ¹ôÅ;y eq 0" (all these were tcp, nothing else) and, obviously, log entries did stop to appear. My worry is: wha¹ôÅ;s *nothing* that may have possibly matched these packets.. I'm running 12.0(4)T IP-PL¹ôÅ;n
SY, -- CCNA,CCDA (R&S) ¹ôÅ;tr CDPlayer@irc Senior network engineer at NetActive Internet dek @ hades.uz p¹ôÅ;: http://hades.uz UIN:7150410 cell +27 (0)82-336-1033
From dol@info.east.r¹ôÅ;edReceived: from someone claiming to be frog.east.ru (frog.east.ru [195.170.62.133]) by puck.nether¹ôÅ; ( for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 07:39:29 -0400 (envReceived-Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 07:39:29 -0400 Received: from info.east. by frog.e¹ôÅ;ru Wed, 5 Apr 2000 15:40:46 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from dol@info.east.ru) Received: f¹ôÅ;lo by info.east.ru (8.9.3/8.8.5/BD2) with ESMTP id PAA85903; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 15:39:09 +0400¹ôÅ;D)From: Basil Dolmatov <dol@info.east.ru> To: Dmitri Kalintsev <dek@hades.uz> cc¹ôÅ;scSubject: Re: [nsp] ACL logging In-Reply-To: <20000405115307.G12088@hades.uz> Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4¹ôÅ;00X-NCC-RegID: ru.east MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
¹ôÅ;ed
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 09:34:53AM +0200, Erich Meier wrote: > > > > If the zero¹ôÅ;t > > pect at least in IOS 11.3 versions. These IOS do also bl¹ôÅ;IP> > have no port number info) opposed to what is written in the manuals. > > > > So these log entries c¹ôÅ; a> > Hmm. Interesting note: I do have an inbound access list, and there is NO > entry th¹ôÅ;en> entries about these packets being denied. I've added "deny¹ôÅ; a> eq 0" (all these were tcp, nothing else) and, obviously, log entries did stop > to appear. My worry is: what¹ôÅ; d> *nothing* that may have possibly matched these packets.. I'm running 12.0(4)T > IP¹ôÅ;S Logging with zero port number does not mean "0" in port nu¹ôÅ; fmost cases. If ACL has no comparisons with port numbers of packets, then code, extracting port numbers from packe¹ôÅ;adand all packets logged with this ACL will have port number "0".
If any rule in ACL contains¹ôÅ;t extracted from packet headers and will be logged correctly with port information.
So, if ¹ôÅ;ha
deny ip any any log
and wonders about (0) in logged entries then one can rewrite ACL as
deny tcp any any¹ôÅ;te deny ip any any log
(this ACL does _exactly_ the same operation as previous one in terms of packet filtering)
¹ôÅ;en> > SY, > -- > CCNA,CCDA (R&S) Dmitri E. Kalin¹ôÅ; >> dek @ hades.uz phone: +27 (0¹ôÅ;71> http://hades.uz UIN:7150410 cell +27 (0)82-336-1033 >
----------------------¹ôÅ;--Basil (Vasily) Dolmatov CCIE #5347, CCNP-Security, CCDA East Connection ISP, Moscow, Russi
From dek@hades.uz W¹ôÅ;prReceived: from someone claiming to be hades.uz (postfix@hades.uz [196.22.173.11]) by puck.nether.net ¹ôÅ;.3 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 07:49:47 -0400 (envelope-from dek@hades.¹ôÅ;ReReceived: by hades.uz (Postfix, from userid 214) id F2D6AB51BA; Wed, 5 Apr 2¹ôÅ;13Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 13:49:37 +0200 From: Dmitri Kalintsev <dek@hades.uz> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.n¹ôÅ;ubMessage-ID: <20000405134937.J12088@hades.uz> Mail-Followup-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Refer¹ôÅ;s:Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: ¹ôÅ;/pContent-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.11i In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004051533290.7784¹ôÅ;00X-Class: Fast Return-Receipt-To: dek@hade¹ôÅ; P
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 03:39:09PM +0400, Basil Dolmatov wrote:
> Logging with zero port num¹ôÅ;do> most cases. If ACL has no comparisons with port numbers of packets, then > code¹ôÅ;tr> and all packets logged with this ACL will have port nu)ëÅ; "> If an> extracted from packet headers and will be logg¹ôÅ;or> information.
Yep. There are plenty rules with port numbers in the ACL in question.
> So, if one have ¹ôÅ;li> >
Nope, I don't have this. ACL is terminated with:
permit ip any any
Now, as I said, I've ¹ôÅ;
in the midst of the ACL, and now I do enjoy the absence of these tcp:0->tcp:0 entries, thou¹ôÅ;y
"Is *it* an IOS bug? If it is, how bad is it?" (where "it" is being define¹ôÅ; "*deny* conditions and the presence of the condition¹ôÅ;t *and* logged").
SY, -- CCNA,CCDA (R&S) Dmitri E. Kalintsev CDP)ëÅ;r@hadeamp;S) I dek @ hades.uz phone: +27 (0)11 719-0333 fa¹ôÅ;44
From jared@puck.neth¹ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA06590 for cisco-nsp@p¹ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004051424.KAA06590@puck.nether.net>¹ôÅ;ei by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id GAA00664; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 06:32:34 -0400 (envelope-from¹ôÅ;coDate: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 06:32:34 -0400 X-From_: jamie@bbnplanet.com Wed Apr 5 06:32:34 2000 ¹ôÅ;iv burlma1-smrt1.gtei.net (burlma1-smrt1.gtei.net [4.2.35.10]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8¹ôÅ;) for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 06:32:34 -0400 (envelope-from jaReceived: from audi (bur-dhcp128-19 by burlma1-smrt¹ôÅ;ei Wed, 5 Apr 2000 10:32:31 GMT Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.20000405062812.00c034a0@pop.¹ôÅ;gtX-Sender: jbyrne@pop.sys.gtei.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Old-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2*ëÅ;06T davidw@gnac.com From: Jami¹ôÅ;rnSubject: Re: [nsp] ACL logging In-Reply-To: <200004050106.VAA04973@shandakor.tharsis.com> Mime-Ver¹ôÅ;: ConTent-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From¹ôÅ;reResent-Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 10:24:22 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
At 09:06 PM 4/4/00 -04¹ôÅ;Ge>> From: David Williamson <davidw@gnac.com> >> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >> Subjec>>> HEy! >> >> So, I've got a bunch of ACLs that have logging turned on. I>> >> ac¹ôÅ;-l>> >> This works great, of course, and it spits out log messages like th¹ôÅ;>>-> 209.18 >> 2.xxx.yyy(0), 1 packet >> >> My ¹ôÅ;ti>> well as the addresses? According to the docs, those n¹ôÅ;rs>> "if appropriate", whatever that may mean. (Of course, it would be nice >> if my upstreams would filter thi¹ôÅ;ap> >If you really care: > >access-list 100 deny tcp 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any log >access-l¹ôÅ;10>access-list 100 deny icmp 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any log >access-list 100 d¹ôÅ; >
Even in the more recent IOS versions {12.0(9.6)S1 for example} , I still receive sou*ëÅ;anto gEt the actual source and destination port numbers to be logged with the 'log' option is to make the extended ip acc¹ôÅ;linumbers. So this is what I've always used when looking for port numbers...
access-list 100 deny tc¹ôÅ;.0access-list 100 deny udp 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any gt 0 log access-list 100 deny icmp¹ôÅ;0.access-list 100 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any log
Jamie Byrne
From owner-cisco-nsp¹ôÅ;k.Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.¹ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 09:01:32 -0400 ¹ôÅ;elReceived-Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 09:01:32 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.kivex.com ¹ôÅ;p- by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA09414 for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; Thu, *ëÅ;r by smtp-out.kivex.com (8.8.8/8.8.7-KIVEX)¹ôÅ;h for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 09:02:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 08:56:28 -0400 (E¹ôÅ;FrX-Sender: tatsuya@kds1 To: cisco-nsp@iagnet.net Message-ID: <PineMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-AS
Hello I need a ¹ôÅ;plAssume using only 1 routing protocol no access-list that prevent from reaching IP.
why¹ôÅ;g
I guess what I really want to know is how ping works and how traceroute works.
TIA,
Tatsuya
¹ôÅ;/_Tatsuya Kawasaki Allegiance Telecom Unlock the Power of the Internet http¹ôÅ;wwPhone 301.215.6777 Fax 301.215.5991 Affiliation given for identification not representation /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_¹ôÅ;/_
From owner-cisco-nsp¹ôÅ;k.Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.¹ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 10:31:48 -0400 ¹ôÅ;elReceived-Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 10:31:48 -0400 Received: from speedus.com (root@s¹ôÅ;n. by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA11135 for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; Thu, 6 ¹ôÅ;20Received: from kai-vaio (mars.speedus.net [208.241.100.3]) by speedus.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMT¹ôÅ; K Thu, 6 Apr 2000 10:31:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000406102615.02f6a2a0@mail.speedus.netX-MAiler: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Thu, 06 Apr 200To: Tatsuya Kawasaki <tatsu¹ôÅ;ivFrom: Kai <kai-cisco-nsp-trap@conti.nu> Subject: Re: [nsp] question In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3¹ôÅ;10Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At Thursday 08:56 AM 4/6/00¹ôÅ;at>Hello >I need a exmaple of why it could possibly happen. >Assume using only 1 routing protocol no ac¹ôÅ;-l>reaching IP. > >why ping works but not traceroute? > >I guess what I really want to know is how pin¹ôÅ;rk>works. > >TIA, > >Tatsuya
I don't know what exactly you are filtering, but a quick workout with a s¹ôÅ;erthere is 'man' :
From the traceroute man page: -p Set¹ôÅ;e (default is 33434). [..]
From the ping man page: -v ¹ôÅ;os other than ECHO_RESPONSE that are received. [...]
W¹ôÅ;wsstandard NAT boxes, and probably breaks in a couple other situa¹ôÅ;s:even start.
bye,Kai
-- kai@conti.nu "Jus¹ôÅ;y Palo Alto, New York, You name it Sophisticated Technical Peon Kai's Spa¹ôÅ;el| ¹ôÅ; LeAsedLines-FrameRelay-IPLs-ISDN-PPP-Cisco-Consulting-VoiceFax-Data-Muxes WorldWideWebAnything-Intranets-NetAdmin-Uni¹ôÅ;in
From jared@puck.neth¹ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA12271 for cisco-nsp@p¹ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004062134.RAA12271@puck.nether.net>¹ôÅ;ei by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA11067; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 16:23:18 -0400 (envelope-from¹ôÅ;coDate: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 16:23:18 -0400 X-From_: rodrigo.loureiro@netstream.com.br Thu Apr 6 ¹ôÅ;3:Received: from someone claiming to be nsrjo4.netstream.com.br ([200.244.82.19]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3¹ôÅ;th for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 16:23:15 -0400 (envelope-from rodrigo.loureiro@netst¹ôÅ;.cReceived-Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 16:23:15 -0400 Received: by nsrjo4 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <G7GP¹ôÅ;>;Message-ID: <F12A0EB611C0D21193BB00105A18482529B3D7@nsrjo4> From: "Loureiro, Rodrigo" <rod¹ôÅ;.lTo: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: "Loureiro, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.loureiro@netstream.com.br>, ¹ôÅ;SeOld-Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 17:16:31 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet ¹ôÅ; SContent-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Diagnost¹ôÅ;NoX-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 17:34:07 -04¹ôÅ;esSubject: [nsp] DLCI 1007 and Cisco MIB
Hi,
I=B4ve expirienced some problems with a con¹ôÅ;onthat=B4s the last one implemented by the Cisco code. The very curious fact is that = it worked fine fo¹ôÅ;lothe problem I could see that everthing was working fine with frame-rel¹ôÅ;I incremented, but the IP didn=B4t work. I made a parallel ¹ôÅ;ecaddressing, and it worked. Then I moved the original addressing to the workin¹ôÅ;CIDLCI 1007.=20
I would like to monitor the traffic in an ATM ¹ôÅ;ciMIB=B4s, but I could see that the Cisco code doesn=B4t generate a MIB variable (interface) for each PVC¹ôÅ; ointerface ATM, ignoring the subinterfaces (PVC=B4s).
Does anyone know something about ¹ôÅ;re
Thanks, --
Rodrigo Loureiro
From Phil.Sykes@cweu¹ôÅ;.nReceived: from someone claiming to be relay.cwplc.com (relay.cwplc.com [194.6.6.11]) by pu¹ôÅ;et for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 05:43:51 -0400 (envelope-f¹ôÅ;PhReceived-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 05:43:51 -0400 Received: from fr_par_p_e01.cwe.cwplc.com ([146.135.2¹ôÅ;4] for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:43:46 ¹ôÅ;0 REceived: from de_mun_b_e01.cwe.cwplc.com (DE_MUN_B_E01 [141.1.160.14]) by fr_par_p_e01.cwe.cwplc.com with SMTP (Mic¹ôÅ;ft id 1NHPX9XL; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:39:19 +0200 Received: by DE_MUN_B_E01¹ôÅ;h id <F4SSPDG2>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:34:59 +0200 Message-ID: <F90097CDF02CD311968E00508B1*ëÅ;B1To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [nsp] DLCI 10¹ôÅ;ndDate: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:34:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Ty¹ôÅ;te charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> I would like to monitor the traffic in an A¹ôÅ;vc> using SNMP MIB=B4s, but I could see that the Cisco code doesn=B4t = generate a MIB variable > the interface ATM, ignoring the su
If you're using IOS*ëÅ;1,into this code (hence th¹ôÅ;at
Bug Id : CSCdk18481=20 Headline ifSpeed for ATM subinterfaces is wrong =09 Product all Model =09 Component s¹ôÅ;DuSeverity 4 Status C =09 Version Found 11.1CC Fixed-in Version =09 Release Notes The ifSpeed on ATM s¹ôÅ;tecorrectly. * The support for ATM subinterfaces has been added in 12.0(5)S*=09
IOS 12.0(8)S work¹ôÅ;ll
Phil Sykes, Network Engineer Cable & Wireless Europe p: +49 89 92699 204 m: +49 172 89¹ôÅ;72From mfcho@hknet.com¹ôÅ;i Received: from someone claiming to be emethist.hknet.com (emethist.hknet.com [202.67.240.233]) by ¹ôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 07:51:33 -0400 (envelope¹ôÅ;m Received-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 07:51:33 -0400 Received: from intranet.hknet.com (intranet By emethist.hknet.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA25774 for <cisco-Received: from localhost (mfcho@localhost) by intranet.hknet.com with ESMTP id e37BpU407348 for <cisco-nsp@puc¹ôÅ;thX-Authentication-Warning: intranet.hknet.com: mfcho owned process doing -bs ¹ôÅ;: From: Cho Man Fai <mfcho@hknet.com> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <Pine.B*ëÅ;.2Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [nsp*ëÅ;S
A12.¹ôÅ;T?but T does. Where may I find the features supported by each¹ôÅ;?!
Rgds, Kenneth Cho
From mike.norris@hea¹ôÅ;ieReceived: from someone claiming to be urda.heanet.ie (urda.heanet.ie [193.1.219.124]) by puc¹ôÅ;th for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 07:58:30 -0400 (envelope-fr¹ôÅ;ikFrom: mike.norris@heanet.ie Received-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 07:58:30 -0400 Received: from leviathan (pc¹ôÅ;ea by urda.heanet.ie (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA00651; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 12:58:23 +0100 Reply-To: <¹ôÅ;.nSender: "Mike Norris" <mike.norris@heanet.ie> To: "'Cho Man Fai'" <mfcho@hknet.com>, <cisco-nsp@puck.neth¹ôÅ;etDate: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 12:58:37 +0100 Message-ID: <3F2D1A940FB8D1118A1F0060978361292F5A72@ntserver¹ôÅ;neMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Nor¹ôÅ; XX-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <3F2D1A940FB8D1118A1F006097836129¹ôÅ;3EImportance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
> A short and quick questi¹ôÅ;. > 12.0(5)T?! I want to do irb and found tha¹ôÅ;st> but T does. Where may I find the features supported by each IOS?!
Find the Cisco IOS roadmap a*ëÅ;tphttp://www.cisco.com/warp/publ¹ôÅ;20gives more or less the full scoop on version numbering.
Ihth.
Mike Norris
From jared@puck.neth¹ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA30754 for cisco-nsp@p¹ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004071309.JAA30754@puck.nether.net>¹ôÅ;ei by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id GAA26910; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 06:08:54 -0400 (envelope-from¹ôÅ;coDate: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 06:08:54 -0400 X-From_: Joao.Ribeiro@lis2.siemens.pt Fri Apr 7 06:08¹ôÅ;20ReceIved: from someone claiming to be arminho.ip.pt (arminho.ip.pt [195.23.13.49]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) ¹ôÅ; S for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 06:08:51 -0400 (envelope-from Joao.Ribeiro@lis2.siemens¹ôÅ; RReceived: (qmail 5343 invoked by uid 1037); 7 Apr 2000 10:08:44 -0000 Receive¹ôÅ;ro by arminho2.ip.pt with SMTP; 7 Apr 2000 10:08:44 -0000 Received: from siein¹ôÅ;si by mail2.ip.pt with SMTP id LAA92695 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; F¹ôÅ;7 Received: from siepor43.net.siemens.pt by sieinter.siemens.pt via smtpd (for mail¹ôÅ;.pReceived: by siepor43.net.siemens.pt with Internet Mail Service (5.5.¹ôÅ;.2 id HRYQB45W>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:03:33 +0100 Message-ID: <753C243100F8D211B15C0800060D9D6EAE1FA1@siepor43.net.siemens¹ôÅ; FTo: "Cisco-Nsp Mailing List (E-mail)" OLd-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:03:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: InContent-Ty¹ôÅ;te charset="iso-8859-1" X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.neth¹ôÅ;etResent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsp] MPLS based VPNs
Hi all, ¹ôÅ;onstability of the code? I know that the use of a Link-state¹ôÅ;tiMPLS Traffic Engineering. Is it also a requirement if I just want to use MPLS VPNs?
____¹ôÅ;__Joao Fonseca Ribeiro
TAC Support, GNS IB SIEMENS SA, Information & Communication Networ
From jared@puck.neth¹ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA30801 for cisco-nsp@p¹ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004071310.JAA30801@puck.nether.net>¹ôÅ;ei by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA23407; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 02:35:38 -0400 (envelope-from¹ôÅ;coDate: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 02:35:38 -0400 X-From_: bradley@dunn.org Fri Apr 7 02:35:38 2000 Rec¹ôÅ;d: gould.dunn.org (gould.dunn.org [216.254.16.152]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESM¹ôÅ;d for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 02:35:37 -0400 (envelope-from bradley@dunn.org) Received-Date:¹ôÅ;, Received: from bradley (helo=localhost) by gould.dunn.org with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 1*ëÅ;i- forOld-Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:35:36 -0700 (PDT) F¹ôÅ; BTo: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004062330160.155-100000@gould.dun¹ôÅ;g>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-ns¹ôÅ;seResent-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 09:10:15 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [¹ôÅ; M
Anyone know when/if MBGP will be supported on the Catalyst 6000 series?
It doesn't appear to be in 1¹ôÅ;1)MBGP as a new feature.
From jared@puck.neth¹ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA31512 for cisco-nsp@p¹ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004071319.JAA31512@puck.nether.net>¹ôÅ;ei by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA31451; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 09:18:50 -0400 (envelope-from¹ôÅ;coDate: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 09:18:50 -0400 X-From_: wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca Fri Apr 7 09:18:50*ëÅ;0 by puck.ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 09:1RecEived-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 09:18:49 -0400 Received: from localhost (wmaton@localhost) by ryouko.dgim.crc.ca (8.10¹ôÅ;.1 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 09:18:18 -0400 (EDT) Old-Date: Fri, 7 Apr¹ôÅ;0 From: "William F. Maton" <wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca> Reply-To: wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca To: cisco-ns¹ôÅ;ckSubject: Re: [nsp] MBGP for 6000 series In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004062330160.155-100000@gould.dunn.org> M¹ôÅ;geMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; cha¹ôÅ;=UX-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Fri,¹ôÅ;prResent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Bradley Dunn wrote:
> Anyone know when/if ¹ôÅ; w> > It doesn't appear to be in 12.1(1)E, even though the docs for 12.1 list¹ôÅ;BG
I think the considered opinion from Cisco is "Why? That's a closet switch."
I have heard similar ple¹ôÅ;p know if this has changed for 12.1 though.
wfms
From panigl@cc.univi¹ôÅ;.aReceived: from someone claiming to be access.cc.univie.ac.at (access.cc.univie.ac.at [192.15¹ôÅ;4. by for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:54:52 -04¹ôÅ;(eReceived-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:54:52 -0400 Received: by cc.univie.ac.at (MX V4.1 V¹ôÅ;id MET-DST Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 16:54:35 MET-DST From: "Christian Panigl, ACOnet/VI¹ôÅ;iVTo: mfcho@hknet.com CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, panigl@cc.univie.ac.at Message-ID: <009E84*ëÅ;AE¹ôÅ;12 IOS (tm) 7200 Software (C7200-P-M), Version 12.0(7)S, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE ... bridge irb *ëÅ; CP
From jared@puck.neth¹ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA03203 for cisco-nsp@p¹ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004071459.KAA03203@puck.nether.net>¹ôÅ;ei by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA02826; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:45:17 -0400 (envelope-from¹ôÅ;coDate: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:45:17 -0400 X-From_: tishi@ziplink.net Fri Apr 7 10:45:17 2000 Re¹ôÅ;ed tiger.ziplink.net (IDENT:tishi@tiger.ziplink.net [208.196.97.189]) by puck.nether.net (8.¹ôÅ;8. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:45:12 -0400 (envelope-from tishi@ziplink¹ôÅ;) Received-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:45:12 -0400 Received: from localhost (tishi@localhost) by tiger¹ôÅ;li for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:42:50 -0400 X-Authenticat¹ôÅ;WaOld-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:42:50 -0400 (EDT) To: cisco-nsp@puck.¹ôÅ;erSuBject: Secure Shell Version 1 Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10004071033010.8999-100000@tiger.ziplink.net> MIME-Version¹ôÅ;0 X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jare¹ôÅ;ckResent-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:59:33 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
hi, secure shell version 1 ¹ôÅ;ini m running 12.0(9)S, assuming secure shell is part of it but it is not. what version of IOSºôÅ;ul
>>> "crypto key generate rsa", crypto command is not there. lab(config)#cryptºôÅ; % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
lab(config)# <<<
thank you in advance.
-tishi
From amb@uk.concentrºôÅ;omReceived: from someone claiming to be sapphire.noc.gxn.net (sapphire.noc.gxn.net [194.143.161ºôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:26:43 -0400 ºôÅ;elReceived-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:26:43 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=uºôÅ;nc by sapphire.noc.gxn.net with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #2) id 12daed-0003s4-00; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 16:26:39 +0100 X-MailºôÅ;exFrom: Alex Bligh <amb@gxn.net> To: tishi@ziplink.net cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: SºôÅ;e In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 07 Apr 2000 10:45:17 EDT." <Pine.LNX.4.10.10004071033010.ºôÅ;-1Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 16:26:39 +01ºôÅ;enMessage-Id: <E12daed-0003s4-00@sapphire.noc.gxn.net>
Tishi,
> i m running 12.0(9)S, assuming ºôÅ;re
There are 2 crypto images as well as the normal images. The crypto ones have filenameºôÅ;ke gsR-k4p-mz.120-9.S
-- Alex Bligh VP Core Network, Concentric Network Corporation (formerly GX Networks, Xara Networks)
From CMartin@mercuryºôÅ;inReceived: from someone claiming to be hermes.balink.com (baisgate.balink.com [199.45.32.ºôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:48:27 -0400 ºôÅ;elReceived-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:48:27 -0400 Received: by HERMES with Internet Mail ºôÅ;ic id <FSFJN1PB>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:47:29 -0400 Message-ID: <4F8C08CC6E76D311AD1F00508B7872495DA81B@HERMES> ºôÅ;: To: "'wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca'" <wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca>, ciºôÅ;nsSubject: RE: [nsp] MBGP for 6000 series Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:47:20 -0400 Return-Receipt-To: "MartinºôÅ;riMIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plaiºôÅ;ch
I would think that there would be, what with the FlexWAN modules being released. The MSFC may not, ºôÅ;th
./chris
>-----Original Message----- >From: William F. Maton [mailto:wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca] >SenºôÅ;ri>To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >Subject: Re: [nsp] MBGP for 6000 series > > >On Fri, 7 Apr 200ºôÅ;ra> >> Anyone know when/if MBGP will be supported on the Catalyst >6000 series? >> >> It doesn't appear t*ëÅ; i> >I think the considered opinion from Cisco isºôÅ;y?>closet switch." > >I have heard similar pleas up here in Canada for it (and >BGP4). I don't >know if this haºôÅ;an> >wfms >
From asr@latency.netºôÅ;i Received: from someone claiming to be latency.net (IDENT:qmailr@pimpbox.latency.net [209.123.200.18ºôÅ;by for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:53:14 -0400 (enºôÅ;peReceived-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:53:14 -0400 Received: (qmail 14247 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 200ºôÅ;:5Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:52:27 -0400 From: Adam Rothschild <asr@latency.net> To: tishi@ziplink.net Cc: cisco-nsºôÅ;ckSubject: Re: Secure Shell Version 1 Message-ID: <20000407115227.A14068@pimpbox.latency.net> References: <Pine.ºôÅ;4.Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-DispºôÅ;ioUser-Agent: Mutt/1.1.9i In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10004071033010.8999-100000@tiger.ziplink.net>; from tishi@ziºôÅ;k.
On Fri, Apr 07, 2000 at 10:45:17AM -0400, tishi@ziplink.net wrote: > hi, secºôÅ;sh> i m running 12.0(9)S, assuming secure shell is part of it but it is noºôÅ; w
Works for me under 12.0(8)S just fine. I'm pretty suºôÅ;hiin the k3p/k4p releases of 12.0(9)S as well.
-adam
From rodrigo.loureirºôÅ;tsReceived: from someone claiming to be nsrjo4.netstream.com.br ([200.244.82.19]) ºôÅ;uc for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 13:45:50 -0400 (envelºôÅ;frReceived-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 13:45:50 -0400 Received: by nsrjo4 with Internet MailºôÅ;vi id <G7GPRTLP>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 14:39:50 -0300 Message-ID: <F12A0EB611C0D21193BB00105A18482529B3DD@nsrjo4>ºôÅ;m:To: "'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> DatºôÅ;riMIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; chaºôÅ;="Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [nsp] RES: [nsp] DLCI 1007 and Cisco MIB
I run a program*ëÅ;t PºôÅ;20--
Rodrigo Loureiro Netstream Telecom (AT&T)
-----Mensagem original----- De: Sykes, Phil [mailto:Phil.SykºôÅ;weEnviada em: Sexta-feira, 7 de Abril de 2000 06:35 Para: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Assunto: RE: [nsp] DLCI 1007 *ëÅ;Ci
> I > using SNMP MIB=B4s, but I could see that the CiºôÅ;cogenerate a MIB variable > (interface) for each PVC. It only generates a variable for=20 > the interface ATMºôÅ;no
If you're using IOS 11.1, you're out of luck here. I don't think Cisco have any plansºôÅ;adinto this code (hence the status C).
Bug Id : CSCdk18481=20 Headline ifSpeed for ATM subiºôÅ;faProduct all Model =09 Component snmp Duplicate of =20 Severity 4 Status C =09 Version Found 11.ºôÅ; FRelease Notes The ifSpeed on ATM subinterfaces is not reported = correctly. * The support for ATM subºôÅ;rf
IOS 12.0(8)S works well for us to collect PVC statistics.
Phil Sykes, Network EnginºôÅ;Cap: +49 89 92699 204 m: +49 172 89 79 727
From jared@puck.nethºôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA16315 for cisco-nsp@pºôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004072150.RAA16315@puck.nether.net>ºôÅ;ei by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA10622; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 13:47:03 -0400 (envelope-fromºôÅ;coDate: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 13:47:03 -0400 X-From_: rrt@vagrant.research.telcordia.com Fri Apr 7ºôÅ;47Received: from someone claiming to be thumper.research.telcordia.com (thumper.research.telcordia.com [128.96.41ºôÅ; for <cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 13:46:57ºôÅ;00Received-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 13:46:57 -0400 Received: from vagrant.ºôÅ;ar by thumper.research.telcordia.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA10027 for <ciºôÅ;nsReceived: (from rrt@localhost) by vagrant.research.telcoºôÅ;.c for cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 13:46:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Rajesh TalºôÅ; <Message-Id: <200004071746.NAA04067@vagrant.research.telcordia.com> To: cisco-nsp-request@puck.ºôÅ;erOlD-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 13:46:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/pºôÅ;; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Diagnostic: undecipherable, help sent X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp-request ºôÅ;ntResent-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 17:50:58 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsºôÅ;ue
Hi Folks
We are using some Cisco routers in our lab for experiments.
Do the TOS/ºôÅ;edpacket to the outer when an IP packet is encapsulated during IPSec tunneling ?
If ºôÅ; wspecific ?
If no, can someone point me in the right direction about whºôÅ;ot
Please respond directly to me since I am not yet a member of this list.
Thanks. RajeºôÅ; -RajeSh R. Talpade rrt@research.telcordia.com 973 829-4261 Telcordia Technologies (formerly Bellcore)
From jared@puck.nethºôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA16363 for cisco-nsp@pºôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004072151.RAA16363@puck.nether.net>ºôÅ;ei by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA14469; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 16:12:15 -0400 (envelope-fromºôÅ;coDate: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 16:12:15 -0400 X-From_: johnf@texas.net Fri Apr 7 16:12:14 2000 ReceºôÅ;: mw2.texas.net (mw2.texas.net [206.127.30.12]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP iºôÅ;A1 fOr <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 16:12:14 -0400 (envelope-from johnf@texas.net) Received-Date: Fri,ºôÅ;prReceived: from staff3.texas.net (staff3.texas.net [207.207.0.40]) by mw2.te id PAA26652 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 15:12:0 for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 15:12:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelopºôÅ;omOld-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 15:12:08 -0500 From: "John J. Faulk" <johnf@staff.texas.net> To: cisco-nsp@pucºôÅ;thSubject: PPTP with a PIX box Message-ID: <20000407151208.H24766@staff.texas.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: teºôÅ;laX-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@ºôÅ;.nResent-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 17:51:25 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Per users request, they would ºôÅ; tPIX box. I have the release notes for 5.1 but the configuration guide is extremely ºôÅ;teor suggestions on how to configure the pix box. Iplent
TºôÅ;Jo
-
Thanks for being a Texas.Net customer!
+-----------------------------------+--------------- | Engi | Texas Networking Inc. | Austin : (512) 427-1652 | | Hours Of Phone Support ºôÅ;| | Monday - Friday :8am to 12am | Boerne : (830) 249-7058 | | Saturday - SºôÅ;y | http://www.texas.net | Georgetown : (512) 869-5947 ºôÅ;| +-----------------------------------+--------------ºôÅ;-- | CCNA CCDA Network Engineer | +--------------------------------ºôÅ;--
From grr@shandakor.tºôÅ;isReceived: from someone claiming to be shandakor.tharsis.com (IDENT:root@shandakor.tharsisºôÅ; [ by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA19959 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 ºôÅ;7: (envelope-from grr@shandakor.tharsis.com) Received-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 19:07:00 -0400 Received: (from grr@locaºôÅ;t)Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 19:06:57 -+ëÅ; (FrMm: GeoTo: mfcho@ºôÅ;t.Subject: RE: [nsp] IOS Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
That's weird. IRB is not in the 7500 12ºôÅ;impain becuase you have to run some bloated 12.0T image with a ton of features/bugs which we don't neºôÅ;orfeature 8-)
I've never been able to find anything definitive on the various feature chartsºôÅ; da way of checking inlucded features.
George
> From cis+ëÅ;sp> Received-Date: Fri, 7 ApºôÅ;00> Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 16:54:35 MET-DST > From: "Christian Panigl, ACOnet/VIX/UniVie" <panigl@cc.univie.ºôÅ;t>> CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, panigl@cc.univie.ac.at > Subject: RE: [nsp] IOS > Resent-From: cisºôÅ;sp> X-Mailing-List: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> archive/latest/2558 > X-Loop: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > PºôÅ;de> Resent-Sender: cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net > > Hm, dunno about 12.0(5)S/T but we have "bridge irb"ºôÅ;fi> 12.0(7)S on a Cisco7200: > > IOS (tm) 7200 Software (C7200-P-M), Version 12.0(7)S, EARLY DEPLOYMENT ºôÅ;AS> bridge irb > ... > > Or what's your specific problem ? > > Kind regards > CP > >
From ras@poppa.thickºôÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be poppa.thick.net (IDENT:root@poppa.thick.net [209.61.9.10]ºôÅ;y for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 9 Apr 2000 11:39:14 -0400 (enºôÅ;peReceived-Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2000 11:39:14 -0400 Received: from localhost (ras@localhost) by poppºôÅ;ic for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 9 Apr 2000 11:39:09 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 AºôÅ;00From: Rich Sena <ras@poppa.thick.net> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.1000ºôÅ;13MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [nsp] 3640 and FEºôÅ;Ag3640 router - I was trying to aggregate a couple fºôÅ;rthave the commands available to me but I get an error when I add the port number saying that it is an inºôÅ;d
-- I am nothing if not net-Q! - ras@poppa.thick.net
From spork@inch.com ºôÅ; AReceived: from someone claiming to be arutam.inch.com (ns.inch.com [216.223.192.21] (may be forged))ºôÅ; p for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 9 Apr 2000 19:39:34 -0400 (envºôÅ;e-Received-Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2000 19:39:34 -0400 Received: from shell.inch.com (inch.com [216.223.192.20ºôÅ;by for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 9 Apr 2000 19ºôÅ;31Received: from localhost by shell.inch.com (8.8.8) id TAA05186; Sun, 9 Apr 2000 19:39:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: SuºôÅ; AFrom: Charles Sprickman <spork@inch.com> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.ºôÅ;.0MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [nsp] IRB oºôÅ;rv
Hi,
Can anyone confirm whether IRB is available in the "S" images? I'm having some issues with theºôÅ; wgave 12.0.10S a quick try. It did not complain about the bvi config or 'brºôÅ; i
If it's not in there, I have to wonder why, I can't really imagine too many folksºôÅ;id
Can anyone recommend a stable 12.0 release that supports the 7206 VXR and has stable irbºôÅ;po
ThAnks,
Charles
| Charles Sprickman | Internet Channel | INCH System Administration Team | (212ºôÅ;-5| Spork@inch.com | access@inch.com
From grr@shandakor.tºôÅ;isReceived: from someone claiming to be shandakor.tharsis.com (IDENT:root@shandakor.tharsisºôÅ; [ by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA15385 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 9 Apr 2000 ºôÅ;4: (envelope-from grr@shandakor.tharsis.com) Received-Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2000 21:04:20 -0400 Received: (from grr@locaºôÅ;t)Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2000 21:04:12 -+ëÅ; (FrMm: GeoTo: cisco-ºôÅ;puSubject: Re: [nsp] IRB on Service Provider images?
Well, IRB is a subset of "bridging" and ºôÅ;'sof worms that corporate types were more likely to need than ISP's until DSL came to town...
I'd be iºôÅ;esis that on booting up a 12.0.*S image on my 7505, it bitched about allºôÅ; "
George
> Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2000 19:39:30 -0400 (EDT) > From: Charles Spric+ëÅ; <> Resent-From: cisco-nsp@ºôÅ;.n> X-Mailing-List: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> archive/latest/2568 > X-Loop: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > PrecedenºôÅ;li> ReSent-Sender: cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net > > Hi, > > Can anyone confirm whether IRB is available in the "S"ºôÅ;ge> some issues with the BVI wedging in what I'm now running (12.0.5T1), and > gave 12.0.10S a quick try. ItºôÅ; n> 'bridge irb', but nonetheless it did not work... > > If it's not in there, I have tºôÅ;nd> many folks besides ISPs doing dsl aggregation... > > Can anyone recommend a stable 1ºôÅ;re> has stable irb support? > > Thanks, > > Charles > > | Charles Sprickman ºôÅ; > | INCH System Administration Team | (212)243-5200 > | spork@inch.com | acc >
From garlic@garlic.cºôÅ;SuReceived: from someone claiming to be windmill-en0.garlic.com (windmill-en0.garlic.com [208.195.1ºôÅ;30 by Puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA19385 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 9 Apr 2000 23:43:26 -04ºôÅ;(eReceived-Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2000 23:43:26 -0400 Received: from garlic.com (aa4re-4.garlic.coºôÅ;08 by windmill-en0.garlic.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e3A3hMf57966 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun,ºôÅ;prMessage-ID: <38F14D1C.29BE7FB8@garlic.com> Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2000 20:43:00 -0700 From: Garlic <garlicºôÅ;liX-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Su+ëÅ;t:Content-Type: text/plºôÅ; cContent-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
It has a lot more to do with the feature set rather than the release leveºôÅ;IfTAC said)
George Robbins wrote:
> Well,ºôÅ; i> of worms that corporate types were more likely to need than ISP'ºôÅ;un> > I'd be interested in anything definitive on this, my recollection > is that on booting up a 12ºôÅ;S > all the "bridge" statements and dissapeared them. > > ºôÅ; > > > Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2000 19:39:30 -0400 (EDT) > > From: Charles Sprickman <spork@inch.com> > > To: ciºôÅ;ns> > Subject: [nsp] IRB on Service Provider images? > > Resent-From: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > X-MailºôÅ;Li> > X-Loop: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Precedence: list > > Resent-ºôÅ;er> > > > Hi, > > > > Can anyone confirm whether IRB is available in the "S" images? I'ºôÅ;vi> > Some issues with the BVI wedging in what I'm now running (12.0.5T1), and > > gave 12.0.10S a quick try. It did notºôÅ;pl> > 'bridge irb', but nonetheless it did not work... > > > > If it's not in there, I have to wºôÅ;r > > many folks besides ISPs doing dsl aggregation... > > > > Can anyone recommend a stableºôÅ;0 > > has stable irb support? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Charles > > > > | Charles SpricºôÅ; > > | INCH System Administration Team | (212)243-5200 > > | spork@inReceived: from someone claiming to be ns0.teliafi.net (ns0.teliafi.net [62.236.5.12]) by ºôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 02:37:43 -0400 (envelopeºôÅ;m Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 02:37:43 -0400 Message-Id: <200004100637.CAA24632@puck.nether.neºôÅ;ec (SMTPD32-4.06) id A77222AD01EC; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:40:50 ºôÅ;0 Priority: Normal To: rrt@research.telcordia.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net X-Mailer: FTP SoftwºôÅ;InMIME-Version: 1.0 From: Jorma Mellin <jorma.mellin@teliafi.net> Sender: Jorma Mellin <jormContent-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCContent-Transfer-ºôÅ;diSubject: [nsp] [nsp] question regarding tunneling and tos bits
>Do the TOS/precedence bits get copieºôÅ;om>packet to the outer when an IP packet is encapsulated during >IPSec tunneling ?
Yes it's copied. Although ºôÅ;y it is copied. I checked further down the path and the packets do get the same TOS whatºôÅ;gi
>If yes, what is the IOS that does this ? and is it hardware >specific ?
I run it on a
IOS (tm) C1700 Software (C1700-K2SY-M), Version 12.0(5)T1, RELEASE SOCopyright (c) 1986-1999 by ciºôÅ;Sy
It shouldn't be hardware depend but I haven't verified it.
Jorma
From jared@puck.nethºôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id FAA29760 for cisco-nsp@pºôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004100934.FAA29760@puck.nether.netºôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id FAA29287; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 05:15:20 -0400 (envelope-frºôÅ;isDate: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 05:15:20 -0400 X-From_: t.bjorklund@wineasy.se Mon Apr 10 05:15:20+ëÅ;0 by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3ºôÅ;th for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 05:15:19 -0400 (envelope-from t.bjoReceived: from gsus.wineasy.se (gs by smtp.winºôÅ;.s Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:15:15 +0200 Received: by GSUS with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)ºôÅ; <Message-ID: <D1EC4320087FD311895100902773F43C5A82D0@GSUS> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?ºôÅ;s_To: "'tishi@ziplink.net'" <tishi@ziplink.net>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RºôÅ;ecOld-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:15:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.ºôÅ;Co charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept ºôÅ; XResent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 05:34:16 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nºôÅ;uc
After some help from the list I got this to work on both 12.0(5)S and 12.0(9)S.
Are you sure you have the rºôÅ;4pssh encryption?
core1(config)#crypto key generate rsa ? usage-keys Generate sepeºôÅ; R <cr> =20
IOS (tm) RSP Software (RSP-K4PV-M), Version 12.0(9)S, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEºôÅ;SO
Best regards, Tomas Bj=F6rklund
> -----Original Message----- > From: tishi@ziplink.net [mailto:tishi@zipliºôÅ;et> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Secure Shell Version 1 >=20 >=20 >=20 > hi, seºôÅ; s> i m running 12.0(9)S, assuming secure shell is part of it but=20 > itºôÅ;no> whAt version of IOS should i get? do i have to run 12.0(5)S release? >=20 > >>> "crypto key generate rsa", crypto comºôÅ; i> lab(config)#crypto > ^ > % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. >=20 > lab(config)# > <<< >=2ºôÅ;20>=20 >=20 > -tishi >=20
From spork@inch.com ºôÅ; AReceived: from someone claiming to be arutam.inch.com (ns.inch.com [216.223.192.21] (may be forged))ºôÅ; p for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:08:54 -0400 (enºôÅ;peReceived-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:08:54 -0400 Received: from shell.inch.com (inch.com [216.223.192.ºôÅ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:08:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: ºôÅ; lDate: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:08:49 -040ºôÅ;DTTo: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com> cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Su+ëÅ;t:Message-ID: <Pine.BSºôÅ;21MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Sun, 9 Apr 20+ëÅ;Ge> is that on booting up a 12.0.*SºôÅ;ge> all the "bridge" statements and dissapeared them.
I can tell you that in my case (12.0.10ºôÅ;thshowing "up/up", but showed no input/output, and did not seem to be part of the bridge group. AlºôÅ;a subscriber subinterfaces as members of bridge-group 1. So it looks like some bridginºôÅ;nc
Has anyone else seen the bvi interface just disappear? I didn't see anything in the Bug Navigator ºôÅ; sall subinterfaces were in the bridge group and were able to see broadcasts from eachºôÅ;erfor in/out, however, and it basically looked like the bvi leftºôÅ; bgRoup...
thanks,
Charles > George > > > Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2000 19:39:30 -0400 (EDT) > > From: Charles SpºôÅ;ma> > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Subject: [nsp] IRB on Service Provider images? > > Resent-From: cºôÅ;-n> > X-Mailing-List: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> archive/latest/2568 > > X-Loop: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.nºôÅ; >> > Resent-Sender: cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net > > > > Hi, > > > > Can anyone confirm whether IRºôÅ; a> > some issues with the BVI wedging in what I'm now running (12.0.5T1), and > > gºôÅ;12> > 'bridge irb', but nonetheless it did not work... > > ºôÅ; I> > many folks besides ISPs doing dsl aggregation...ºôÅ; > > has stable irb support? > > > > Thanks,ºôÅ; > > > > | Charles Sprickman | Internet Channel > > | INCH System Administration Team | (2ºôÅ;43 > | spork@inch.com | access@inch.com > > > > >
From niels@euro.net ºôÅ; AReceived: from someone claiming to be venus.euro.net (venus.euro.net [194.134.0.9]) by puck.nether.ºôÅ;(8 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:25:56 -0400 (envelope-from nielsºôÅ;o.ReCeived-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:25:56 -0400 Received: from localhost (niels@localhost) by venus.euro.net (8.8.8/8ºôÅ;) for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:25:43 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 ºôÅ;5:From: Niels Bakker <niels@euro.net> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: Secure Shell Version 1 IºôÅ;plMessage-ID: <1000410192225.25807F-100000@venus.euro.neMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Tr
On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, ºôÅ;s
> Are you sure you have the rsp-k4pv-mz.120-9.S IOS image with 168 bit ssh > enºôÅ;ti
I Didn't know this was available to customers outside the USA and Canada. Has this policy changed? Where can I downlºôÅ; :It'dusually isn't included in standard SSH client i
-- Niels.
From fhege@sover.netºôÅ;n Received: from someone claiming to be marble.sover.net (fhege@marble.sover.net [209.198.87.131]) bºôÅ;ck for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:28:42 -0400 (envelºôÅ;frReceived-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:28:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (fhege@localhost) by marble.sºôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:28:37 -0400 (EDT) Comments: ºôÅ;rN localhost from fhege@localhost 0 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:28:37 -0400 (EDT) X-AuthenticºôÅ;n-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:28:37 -0400 (EDT) From:To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.1000410181641MIME-VersioºôÅ;.0Subject: [nsp] iBGP
We are getting ready to add a second high speed link betºôÅ; opops and are going to be using a pair of 4700s that we had sitting around. We don't want to run bgp on them becaºôÅ;webe able to handle 2 full feeds. We currently have iBGP setup talking via loopbacks over thºôÅ;roof the routers not in the BGP mesh it gets stuck in a loop. This makes ºôÅ;e.4700s?
Thanks,
-Dale
From jared@puck.nethºôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA23130; Mon, 10 Apr 20ºôÅ;9: (envelope-from jared) Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:12:51 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:12:51 -0400 FrºôÅ;JaTo: Dale Hege <fhege@sover.net> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] iBGP MeºôÅ;e-Mail-Followup-To: Dale Hege <fhege@sover.net>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net ReferºôÅ;s:Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10004101816410.19833-100000@marbl
MPLS, or some other tunneling protocol.
On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 06:28:37PM -0400, Dale Hege wºôÅ;: > We> pops and are going to be using a pair of 47ºôÅ;th> We don't want to run bgp on them because we are worried that they will not > be able to handleºôÅ;ul> loopbacks over the 2 routes available but anytime data gets passed to ºôÅ;> > sense. But what is the best way to do this with oºôÅ;un> 4700s? > > Thanks, > > -Dale
-- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.nºôÅ;luEND OF LINE |
From jared@puck.nethºôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA23901 for cisco-nsp@pºôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004102321.TAA23901@puck.nether.netºôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA23884; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:21:11 -0400 (envelope-frºôÅ;isDate: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:21:11 -0400 X-From_: nkartsio@clark.fix.net Mon Apr 10 19:21:10+ëÅ;0 by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8ºôÅ;) for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:21:09 -0400 (envelope-from nkartsio@clark.fiºôÅ;t)Received: (from nkartsio@localhost) by clark.fix.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAAºôÅ;3;Old-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 16:20:46 -0700 From: Nick Kartsioukas <nkartsio@fix.netºôÅ;: Subject: Re: [nsp] iBGP Message-ID: <20000410162045.A6954@clark.fixºôÅ;> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10004101816410.1983X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.ne+ëÅ;.nReseLt-Date
On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 06:28:37PM -ºôÅ;, > > We are getting ready to add a second high speed link between our 2 main > pops and are going to be uºôÅ; a> We don't want to run bgp on them because we are worried that they will not > ºôÅ;bl> loopbacks over the 2 routes available but anytime datºôÅ;ts> of the routers not in the BGP mesh it gets stuck in a loop. This makes > sense. But what is the best way ºôÅ;o > 4700s?
We've got a pair of 4700s taking two views, they each have 64megs of RAM, and tºôÅ;re
-- Nick Kartsioukas Network Operations, The FIX Network, Inc. "Worldwide TechnºôÅ;y 805-781-6301
From brian@meganet.nºôÅ;MoReceived: from someone claiming to be cerise.meganet.net (cerise.meganet.net [209.213.64.3]) by ºôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 23:31:40 -0400 (envelopºôÅ;omReceived-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 23:31:40 -0400 Received: from localhost (brian@localhost) by cerise.mºôÅ;et Mon, 10 Apr 2000 23:31:16 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: cerise.meganet.net: ºôÅ;n Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 23:31:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Wallingford <brian@meganetX-Sender: To: Dale Hege <fhege@sover.net> cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.ºôÅ;41Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10004102312130.18792-100000@cerise> MIME-Version: 1.0 C+ëÅ;nt: : We are getting ready to add a second high ºôÅ;d : pops and are going to be using a pair of 4700s that we had sitting around. : We don't want to ruºôÅ;p : be able to handle 2 full feeds. We currently have iBGP setup talking v+ëÅ; l: of the routers not in the BGP mesh it gets stucºôÅ; a: sense. But what is the best way to do this with out running BGP on the : 4700s?
So, you've got a singºôÅ;hiadding another via two other routers? If I'm not misunderstanding the questioºôÅ;hyoff the 4700's? Splitting traffic between routers would be anºôÅ;ngopTimal.
If this is indeed the case, there's no reason you shouldn't be able to handle it with the 4700's. You'd efºôÅ;ivon each. Worst case, you may need to filter on prefix length (at your border) to shortenºôÅ; tdefaults (on the 4700s) for sanity's sake.
We have used 2600's (w/64M) as tºôÅ;rataking full routes via T1 or ethernet, and have found that in the last 18 months or so, prºôÅ;-l4700 probably manages memory differently, but I'd expect the same safeguºôÅ; a
hth, brian
From owner-cisco-nspºôÅ;k.Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.ºôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 09:26:38 -0400 ºôÅ;veReceived-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 09:26:38 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.kivex.coºôÅ;mt by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA25875 for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; TueºôÅ; AReceived: from kds1 (kds1.kivex.com [208.213.150.16]) by smtp-out.kivex.com (8.8.8/8.8.7-KIVºôÅ;wi for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 09:27:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 09:21:22 -04ºôÅ;EDFrom Tatsuya Kawasaki <tatsuya@kivex.com> X-Sender: tatsuya@kds1 To: cisco-nsp@iagnet.net Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1+ëÅ;11Subject: [nsp] HDLC error not sure+ëÅ;. Illegal HDºôÅ;erApr 11 08:41:47 xxxxxxx 10490: *Apr 10 23:38:43.750 CST: Illegal HDLC serial type code 69, ºôÅ;x6
When I look at cisco web site, it tells me that .. Illegal HDLC serial type code xxx, PC = 0xnnnnn This message ºôÅ;is
I have been checking config, I have not found anythng wrong with it.
DoesºôÅ;on
Tatsuya
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ Tatsuya Kawasaki Allegiance TeleºôÅ;Unhttp://www.kivex.com Phone 301.215.6777 Fax 301.215.5991 Affiliation given for identificatºôÅ;no/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
From owner-cisco-nspºôÅ;k.Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.ºôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:59:08 -0400 ºôÅ;veReceived-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:59:08 -0400 Received: from speedus.com (rootºôÅ;ur by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA27816 for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; Tue, +ëÅ;pr by speedus.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with EºôÅ; i for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:58:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000411105722.00c07570@mºôÅ;spX-Sender: (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:58:57 -0ºôÅ;ToFrom: Kai <kai-cisco-nsp-trap@conti.nu> Subject: Re: [nsp] HDLC error not sure why. In-Reply-To: <PºôÅ;GSMime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At Tuesday 09:21 ºôÅ;/1
>When I debug serial interface, >I got the following.. >Apr 11 08:41:45 xxxxxxx 10488: *ApºôÅ; 2>Illegal HDLC serial type code 1, PC=0x6005C7B8 >Apr 11 08:41:47 xxxxxxx 10490: *Apr 10 23:38:43.750 CST:ºôÅ;le> >When I look at cisco web site, it tells me that .. >Illegal HDLC serial typºôÅ;de>This message is displayed if an unknown packet type is received. > >I have been checking config, I hºôÅ;no> >Does anyone have any suggestions? > > >Tatsuya
I am assuming this has something to do wºôÅ;yoyou posted about on 04/06, is it Tatsuya ?
Mind following up on that story ? And beat me if I ºôÅ;ed
From owner-cisco-nspºôÅ;k.Received: from someone claiming to be hq.oh.verio.net (hq.oh.verio.net [209.57.200.ºôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:55:04 -0400 ºôÅ;veReceived-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:55:04 -0400 Received: from puck.nether.net (ºôÅ;.n by hq.oh.verio.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA03099 for <cisco-nsp@iagnet.net>; Tue, 11 ApºôÅ;00Received: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA29147; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14ºôÅ;06 (envelope-from jared) Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:53:46 -0400 From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> To: Darin DiºôÅ;a Cc: cisco-nsp@iagnet.net Subject: Re: [nsp] HDLC error not sure why. Message-ID: <20000411145346.,ëÅ;56 cisco-nsp@iagnet.net References: <Pine.GSO.3.ºôÅ;00MIme-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.200004111013ºôÅ;0a
You are removed.
On TuºôÅ;pr> How do I get off this crazy thing. > > D. > > > At 10:58 AM 4/11/ºôÅ;04> >At Tuesday 09:21 AM 4/11/00 , Tatsuya Kawasaki wrote: > > > > >When I debug serial interface, > > >I gotºôÅ; f> > >Apr 11 08:41:45 xxxxxxx 10488: *Apr 10 23:38:41.742 CST: > > >Illegal HDLC serial type code 1, PC=0x6005C7ºôÅ; >> > >Illegal HDLC serial type code 69, PC=0x6005C7B8 > > > > > ºôÅ;n > > >Illegal HDLC serial type code xxx, PC = 0xnnnnn > > >This message is diºôÅ;ye> > > > > >I have been checking config, I have not found anythng wrong with it. >ºôÅ; >> > > > > > > > >Tatsuya > > > >I am assuming this has something to do with your pinºôÅ;ac> >you posted about on 04/06, is it Tatsuya ? > > > >Mind following up on that story ? And beat me if I misºôÅ;th> > --------------------------------------- > Darin Divinia > Yahoo! > ddivinia@yahoo-inc.com > ------------ºôÅ;--
-- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puºôÅ;etEND OF LINE |
From jared@puck.nethºôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA29214 for cisco-nsp@pºôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004111856.OAA29214@puck.nether.netºôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA14126; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:36:48 -0400 (envelope-frºôÅ;isDate: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:36:48 -0400 X-From_: bruno.de.troch@bt.be Tue Apr 11 10:36:47 2ºôÅ;Re mailrelay.bt.be (access2.bt.be [195.171.36.21]) by puck.nether.net for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:36:46 -04RecºôÅ;d-Received: from techie.bt.be ([195.171.36.105] helo=exchange2.zav.bt.be) by mailrelaºôÅ;.b id 12f1oh-0004jm-00 for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:38:59 +0200 Received: ºôÅ; E (Mail essentials server 2.421) witºôÅ;TP for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> 4/11/00 4:34:43 PM +0200 Received: by exchange2.zav.bt.ºôÅ;it id <2WYQJALF>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:34:43 +0200 Message-ID: <E37AFB1B5837D211BF58000,ëÅ;41To: "'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'" <cisco-nsp@puck.neºôÅ;.nOld Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:34:31 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-TypeºôÅ;xt charset="iso-8859-1" X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.netherºôÅ; RResent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsp] Route reflector
Is there ºôÅ;ecrouter as route reflector?
Bruno De Troch BT Belgium Network ServºôÅ; aNetwork Design Engineer
Tel. : +32 2 718 3599 Fax. : +32 2 725 5671 Mobile : +32 496 573599 E-Mail : bruno.ºôÅ;ro
From jared@puck.nethºôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA29279 for cisco-nsp@pºôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004111857.OAA29279@puck.nether.netºôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id FAA08835; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 05:53:28 -0400 (envelope-frºôÅ;isDate: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 05:53:28 -0400 X-From_: marct@ip.versatel.net Tue Apr 11 05:53:27 ºôÅ; R styx.ip.versatel.net (styx.ip.versatel.net [212.48.44.7]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.ºôÅ;9. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 05:53:26 -0400 (envelope-from marct@ip.versaºôÅ;neReceIved-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 05:53:26 -0400 Received: from mail.ip.versatel.net ([10.31.0.31]) by styx.ip.ºôÅ;at id LAA69364 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:53:09 +0200 (CEST) RecºôÅ;d: by mail.ip.versatel.net (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA76461 for <cisco-nspºôÅ;k.Old-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:55:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Marc Teichtahl ºôÅ;ctX-Sender: marct@fank.m2.ip.versatel.net To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: SRP and IOS In-Reply-To: ºôÅ;e.Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10004111153150.74119-100000@fank.m2.ip.versatel.neºôÅ;IMContent-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp ReºôÅ;-FResent-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:57:57 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
just a quck ºôÅ; f
there is a serious bug in I0S 12.0.5S with respect to SRP.
it seems that there is a problem which riºôÅ;shoctets. This results in a broken SRP topology database.
I just thought id post this as informaºôÅ; o
-
Marc Teichtahl Manager, Data Network Engineering Versa(tel Telecom NASDAQ: VRSA AEX: VERSReceived: from someone claiming to be mw1.texas.net (mw1.texas.net [206.127.30.11]) by puck.nether.neºôÅ;.9 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:26:49 -0400 (envelope-from ed@texaºôÅ;t)Received: from staff2.texas.net (staff2.texas.net [207.207.0.39]) ºôÅ; m id OAA29292 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:26:42 -0500 (CDT) ReºôÅ;edDate: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:26:41 -0500 From: Edward Henigin <ed@datafoundry.net> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net MesºôÅ;-IMime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0ºôÅ;bj
Does anyone know of a page (Cisco-provided or otherwise) to help troubleshoot oºôÅ;t a slow trickle of output drops on a *very* lightly loaded T3 POET card, and I'd like ºôÅ;ig
Here's what I did look at:
1) show int ser 9/0/0 - check output queue: it hasn't deviatºôÅ;ro that I've looked at it.
2) if-cons 9 c - connects me to the VIP, then I do 'show proc cpu' andºôÅ;ee
3) show controllers cbus util - I see that I'm below 30% for both bus 0 and bus 1ºôÅ; s - comes up blank
5) show mem sum - plenty of Processor memory, but I'm low on Fast memory, wouºôÅ;
Anything else to check? Any Cisco-provided debug papers?
Ed
From mksmith@semaphoºôÅ;omReceived: from someone claiming to be mx.nether.net (mx.nether.net [204.42.253.2]) by puck.nºôÅ;r. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:14:25 -0400 (envelope-fromºôÅ;miReceived-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:14:25 -0400 Received: from exchange.semaphore.com (gatekeeper.semaphoºôÅ;et by mx.nether.net (8.10.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e3BKED200873 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 11 AºôÅ;00Received: by exchange.semaphore.lan with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <H1LMZ3C7>; Tue, 1ºôÅ;r Message-ID: <B9D34B897699D3118D6700D0A800079514B953@exchange.semaphore.lan> From: "Michael K. Smith" ,ëÅ;miDate: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:05:36 -0700 MIMEºôÅ;siX-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: [nsp] BGP MºôÅ;c
Hi All:
In looking at the following Looking Glass output, what is the difference between the two metrics, one iºôÅ;re
xxxx xxxxx 192.41.177.143 (metric 27) from 165.117.1.122 (165.117.1.122) OriginºôÅ;, Community: 2548:200 2548:666 3706:127 5650:650 Thanks,
MºôÅ; MManager of Network Operations Semaphore CorporatiºôÅ;ICmksmith@semaphore.com Seattle, WA 98121 206-905-5023 206-905-5ºôÅ;--PGP Key Fingerprint - 92F3 3C34 34A2 6900 8F9C 9AºôÅ;D2-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From jesper@skriver.ºôÅ;TuReceived: from someone claiming to be freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]) by ºôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:23:26 -0400 (envelopºôÅ;omReceived-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:23:26 -0400 Received: by freesbee.wheel.dk (PostfixDate: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:To: Michael K. Smith" <mksmith@semaphore.com> Cc: "'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: ºôÅ;[nMessage-ID: <20000411222319.A3017@skriver.dk> References: <B9D34B897699D3118D6700D0A800079514B953@ºôÅ;anMime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <B9D34B8ºôÅ;9D
OnºôÅ;, > Hi All: > > In looking at the following Looking Glass outputºôÅ;at> between the two metrics, one in parenthesis and the one below it? > > xxxx xxxxx > 192.41.177.ºôÅ;(m ^^ IGP metric.
> ºôÅ; ^^^^^^^^^^ ºôÅ; > Community: 2548:200 2548:666 3706:127 5650:650
/Jesper
-- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk ºôÅ;CIWork: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller neºôÅ;k
OnE Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
From grr@shandakor.tºôÅ;isReceived: from someone claiming to be shandakor.tharsis.com (IDENT:root@shandakor.tharsisºôÅ; [ by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA03502 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000ºôÅ;38 (envelope-from grr@shandakor.tharsis.com) Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:38:09 -0400 Received: (from grr@loºôÅ;osDate: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:37:ºôÅ;04From: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com> Message-Id: <200004112037.QAA00815@shandakor.tharsis.com> To: ciºôÅ;nsSubject: Re: [nsp] troubleshooting output drops?
show interface switching should giºôÅ;orwere dropped.
George
> From cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net Tue Apr 11 15:40:03 2000 > RºôÅ;t-> Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:26:49 -0400 > Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:26:41 -,ëÅ; >> Subject: [nsp] troubleshooting output drops? ºôÅ;se> X-Mailing-List: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> archive/latest/2584 > X-Loop: cisco-nsp@pºôÅ;ne> Precedence: list > Resent-Sender: cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net > > Does anyone know of a page (Cisco-proºôÅ;d > to help troubleshoot output drops on a Cisco router? I'm seeing > a slow trickle of output drops on a *veºôÅ;li> card, and I'd like to figure out what's causing that. > > Here's what I did look at: > > 1) showºôÅ; s> - check output queue: it hasn't deviated from 0/40 at any time > that I've looked at it. > > 2) if-conºôÅ;c > that the VIP CPU load is at 7% > > 3) show contºôÅ;er> - I see that I'm below 30% for both bus 0 and bus 1 > > 4) show buffers failures > - comes up blank >ºôÅ;5)> - plenty of Processor memory, but I'm low on Fast memory, would > that cause this problem? > > >ºôÅ;yt> > Ed > >
From grr@shandakor.tºôÅ;isReceived: from someone claiming to be shandakor.tharsis.com (IDENT:root@shandakor.tharsisºôÅ; [ by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA03631 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000ºôÅ;41 (envelope-from grr@shandakor.tharsis.com) Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:41:25 -0400 Received: (from grr@loºôÅ;osDate: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:41:ºôÅ;04From: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com> Message-Id: <200004112041.QAA14052@shandakor.tharsis.com> To: ciºôÅ;nsSubject: Re: [nsp] BGP Metric Question
The metric in parentheses is an internal ºôÅ;meOrigin IGP is the "MED/Multi-exit-discriminator" controlled by the "set metric xxx" statement in a roºôÅ;maalso a default control somewhere that make it either 0 or infinite when not specified - thatºôÅ; nsomebody's idea of BGP infinity...
George
> From cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.neºôÅ;e > Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:33:03 -0400 > Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:14:25 -0400 > FroºôÅ;Mi> To: "'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> > Date: Tue, 11 AºôÅ;00> Subject: [nsp] BGP Metric Question > Resent-From: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > X-Mailing-List: <cisco-nsºôÅ;ck> X-Loop: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Precedence: list > Resent-Sender: cisco-nsp-requestºôÅ;k.> > Hi All: > > In looking at the following Looking Glass output, what is the difference > between the two meºôÅ;s,> > xxxx xxxxx > 192.41.177.143 (metric 27) from 165.117.1.122 (165.117.1ºôÅ;) > Community: 2548:200 2548:666 3706:127 ºôÅ;:6> > Thanks, > > Mike > > Michael K. Smith--------------------------------------------------------- > Manager of NeºôÅ;k > NIC Handle: ms1986 2001 6th Ave Suite 400 > mksmith@semaphore.com Seattle, WA ºôÅ;1 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > PGP ºôÅ;Fi> ---------------------------------------------------------> > >
From niels@euro.net ºôÅ; AReceived: from someone claiming to be venus.euro.net (venus.euro.net [194.134.0.9]) by puck.nether.ºôÅ;(8 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:31:11 -0400 (envelope-from nielsºôÅ;o.ReCeived-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:31:11 -0400 Received: from localhost (niels@localhost) by venus.euro.net (8.8.8/8ºôÅ;) Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:30:15 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:30:15 +0200 (MET DST) From: NiºôÅ;BaTo: "De Troch, Bruno" <Bruno.De.troch@bt.be> cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] Route ºôÅ;ecIn-Reply-To: <E37AFB1B5837D211BF580008C7A4119A01C92734@EXCHANGE1> Message-ID: <1000411232859.7332B-100000@venus.euro.nºôÅ;X-MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Bruno de Troch wrote:
> Is there a spºôÅ;ic> router as route reflector?
Yes. One of them is that you're introduºôÅ; awhich you're loading even more CPU-wise.
-- Niels.
From ser@dipsy.tch.oºôÅ;TuReceived: from someone claiming to be dipsy.tch.org (IDENT:root@dipsy.tch.org [166.88.4.10]) by ºôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:12:07 -0400 (envelopºôÅ;omReceived-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:12:07 -0400 Received: (from ser@localhost) by dipsy.tch.org (8.10.ºôÅ;ta Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:11:47 -0700 From: Steve ºôÅ;n To: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, mksmith@semaphSubject:Message-ID: <20000411181147.A17603@tch.org> ReferenceMX-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200004112041.QAA14052@shanda»ôÅ;th
Slight correction, the numer is paren»ôÅ; tnothing to do with BGP specificly.
On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 04:41:13PM -0400, George »ôÅ;in> The metric in parentheses is an internal BGP metric, the one in the > Origin IGP is the "MED/Multi-exit-discrim»ôÅ;or> "set metric xxx" statement in a route-map somewhere. I think there's > also a default control somew»ôÅ; t> when not specified - that big number could either be explict or > somebody's idea of BG»ôÅ;fi> > George > > > From cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net Tue Apr 11 16:33:02 2000 > > Resent-Date: Tue, 11 »ôÅ;20> > Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:14:25 -0400 > > From: "Michael K. Smith" <mksmith@semaphore.com>»ôÅ; T> > Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:05:36 -0700 > > Subject: [nsp] »ôÅ;Me> > Resent-From: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > X-Mailing-List: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> archive/latest/25»ôÅ; >> > Precedence: list > > Resent-Sender: cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net > > > > Hi A»ôÅ;> > > In looking at the following Looking Glass output, what is the difference > > between the two metrics, one in parent»ôÅ;s > > > > xxxx xxxxx > > 192.41.177.143 (metric 27) from 165.117.1.122 (165.117.1.122) > > »ôÅ;ig> > Community: 2548:200 2548:666 3706:127 5650:650 >»ôÅ; > > > > Mike > > > > Michael K. Smith--------------------------------------------------------- > > Manager o»ôÅ;tw> > NIC Handle: ms1986 2001 6th Ave Suite 400 > > mksmith@semaphore.com Seat»ôÅ; W> > 206-905-5023 206-905-5000 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------»ôÅ;- > > -----------------------------------------»ôÅ;--> > > > > >
-- Steve Rubin * ser@tch.org * http://www.tch.org/~ser/
From jared@puck.neth»ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA17585 for cisco-nsp@p»ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004120234.WAA17585@puck.nether.net»ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA17428; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:29:34 -0400 (envelope-fr»ôÅ;isDate: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:29:34 -0400 X-From_: roddy@satlink.com.au Tue Apr 11 22:29:33 2»ôÅ;Re satlink.com.au (IDENT:root@southx.sx.com.au [203.19.222.1]) by puck.nether.net (8.9»ôÅ;.9 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:29:30 -0400 (envelope-from roddy@satlink»ôÅ;.aReceIved-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:29:30 -0400 Received: from vtss.satlink.com.au (nisn200sx.glasgow-ra By satlink.com.au (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e3C2Tdr13696; Wed, 12 Message-Id: <4.3.0.2»ôÅ;41X-Sender: roddy@mail.satlink.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3 Ol»ôÅ;teTo: aussie-isp@aussie.net From: Roddy Strachan <roddy@satlink.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 »ôÅ;enX-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: ResentResent-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:34:44 -0400 Resent-To:Subject: [nsp] Ro»ôÅ;g
Hi, Ive searched High and Dry for an answer to this problem, but can't seem to work it out.
Here goes :-
We»ôÅ;e account, here is how it is setup.
Through radius he is a»ôÅ;nethrough to 203.19.222.116
In our main Cisco router I have a route for th»ôÅ; i255.255.255.240 203.19.222.96 There subnet works a treat, they dial into one out of
Now the problem is on our analouge dialin lines, they are both control203.19.222.115
For some reason the IP's of 203.19.222.111 - 203.19.222.114 are routed to the 203.»ôÅ;22to the dialin interface of the client with the 16 ip subnet. »ôÅ;avchecked and there are no static routes set in the max, and none on the cisco, nothing in the radius profile to »ôÅ;cacleared the arp tables on both the Cisco and maxes, but still no go. Another thing I have noti»ôÅ;isthe MAC address for the ip range above (.100 - .115) has teh same MAC addres»ôÅ; t
Here is the output of a show ip route on the max :
ascend% sh ip route»ôÅ;.1
Destination Gateway IF Flg Pref Met Use Age 203.19.222.112/28 203.19.222.116 w»ôÅ;
ascend% sh ip route 203.19.222.114
Destination Gateway IF Flg Pr»ôÅ;et203.19.222.112/28 203.19.222.116 wan11 rGT 60 1 29994 5098
and on the cisco :
Routing e»ôÅ; f Known via "connected", distance 0, metric 0 (connected, via interface) Routing Descriptor Blocks:»ôÅ;* Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
As mentioned above, there are no st»ôÅ; rstatic routes in the cisco which I could think of that woudl be causing the problem. »ôÅ;veno difference.
I have also double checked with the client to m»ôÅ;subroadcasting any strange things, and its all fine down there (i set it up) and have double checked »ôÅ; W
Thanks guys.
--- Cheers,
R. Strachan Satlink Internet S»ôÅ;cePh. +61-3-9775-2600 Fax. +61-3-9775-2456 Email. roddy@satlink.com.au
From jared@puck.neth»ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA24673 for cisco-nsp@p»ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004120648.CAA24673@puck.nether.net»ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA24637; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:46:34 -0400 (envelope-fr»ôÅ;isDate: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:46:34 -0400 X-From_: roddy@satlink.com.au Wed Apr 12 02:46:33 2»ôÅ;Re satlink.com.au (IDENT:root@southx.sx.com.au [203.19.222.1]) by puck.nether.net (8.9»ôÅ;.9 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:46:29 -0400 (envelope-from roddy@satlink»ôÅ;.aReceIved-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:46:29 -0400 Received: from vtss.satlink.com.au (nisn200sx.glasgow-ra By satlink.com.au (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e3C6PgM11187; Wed, 12 Message-Id: <4.3.0.2»ôÅ;41X-Sender: roddy@mail.satlink.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3 Ol»ôÅ;teTo: ascend-users@bungi.com From: Roddy Strachan <roddy@satlink.com.au> Cc: cisco-nsp@puc»ôÅ;thMime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list »ôÅ;veResent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:48:40 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@pu»ôÅ;etSubject: [nsp] OSPF on Max problems?
Hi, I have just implemented OSPF on our Maxes, the problem I am having is, »ôÅ;t himself, say for example he dialled in on max1, he hang»ôÅ; ato max2, a traceroute to one of his ips on the class he was assigned, shows a routing loop at our router, »ôÅ;t
If i reset the OSPF session, it works fine. Any ideas as to why OSPF wont update its da»ôÅ;sewith the other max. Everything the debug information looks ok, a»ôÅ;he
eg :
6 max2.satlink.com.au (x.x.x.x) 89 ms 85 ms 70 ms 7 gw1.mel.satlink.com.au (»ôÅ;x.
It keeps doing that for about 20 hops, then stops, its looping in other words
Any hel
R. Strachan Satlink Internet Services Pty Ltd. Ph. +61-3-9775-2600 FaxEmail. roddy@satlink.com.a,ëÅFrom neil@COLT.NET »ôÅ;ApReceived: from someone claiming to be NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET (NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET [212.74.95.132]) by p»ôÅ;ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 03:47:17 -0400 (envelope»ôÅ;m Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 03:47:17 -0400 Received: from COLT.NET (localhost.colt.net by Wed, 12 Apr 2000 08:47:0To: Edward Henigin <ed@datafoundry.net> cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET>»ôÅ;jeIn-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:26:41 CDT." <2»ôÅ;41From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET> Reply-To: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET> Date: Wed,ëÅ; A Edward Henigin <ed@datafoundry.net> wro»ôÅ; H
> Does anyone know of a page (Cisco-provided or otherwise) > to help troubleshoot o»ôÅ;t > a slow trickle of output drops on a *very* lightly loaded T3 POET > card, and I'd l»ôÅ;to> > Here's what I did look at: > > 1) show int ser 9/0/0 > - check output queue: it»ôÅ;n'> that I've looked at it. > > 2) if-cons 9 c > - connects me to the VIP, then I »ôÅ;sh> that the VIP CPU load is at 7% > > 3) show controllers cbus util > - I see that I'm belo,ëÅ;% > > 5) show mem sum > - plenty of Process»ôÅ;em> that cause this problem? > > > Anything else to check? Any Cisco-provide»ôÅ;bu> > Ed >
-- Neil J. McRae C O L T I N T E R N E T neil@COLT.NET "In this,ëÅ;ld
From neil@COLT.NET »ôÅ;ApReceived: from someone claiming to be NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET (NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET [212.74.95.132]) by p»ôÅ;ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 03:48:40 -0400 (envelope»ôÅ;m Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 03:48:40 -0400 Received: from COLT.NET (localhost.colt.net by Wed, 12 Apr 2000 08:48:3To: "Michael K. Smith" <mksmith@semaphore.com> cc: "'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'" <cisco-nsp@puck.nethe»ôÅ;t>Subject: Re: [nsp] BGP Metric Question In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 11 Ap»ôÅ;00 <B9D34B897699D3118D6700D0A800079514B953@exchange.semaphore.lan> From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@»ôÅ;.NRepLy-To: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 08:48:31 +0100 Sender: neil@COLT.NET
On Tue, 11 Apr ,ëÅ; 1
One is EGP [BGP], the other is IGP [and
> Hi All: > > In looking at the following Looking Glass output, what > between the two metrics,»ôÅ; i> > xxxx xxxxx > 192.41.177.143 (metric 27) from 165.117.1.122 (165.117.1.122) »ôÅ; > Community: 2548:200 2548:666 3706:127 5650:6»ôÅ; > > Mike > > Michael K. Smith--------------------------------------------------------- > Manager of Network -ëÅ;at> mksmith@semaphore.com Seattle, WA 98121 »ôÅ;6-> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > PGP Key Fi»ôÅ;pr> ---------------------------------------------------------------»ôÅ;--> >
-- Neil J. McRae C O L T I N T E R N E T neil@COLT.NET "In this world the»ôÅ; t Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig?"
From jaitken@aitken.»ôÅ; WReceived: from someone claiming to be eagle.aitken.com (jaitken@eagle.aitken.com [209.249.97.250»ôÅ;by for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:16:09 -0400 (»ôÅ;loReceived-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:16:09 -0400 Received: (from jaitken@localhost) by eagle.ai»ôÅ;.c for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:15:59 -0400 From: Jeff Aitken <jaitken@a»ôÅ;n.MeSsage-Id: <200004121415.KAA26033@eagle.aitken.com> Subject: number of prefixes heard from bgp neighbor] To: cisco-n»ôÅ;ucDate: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:15:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL53 (25)]
I'd like to be able to »ôÅ; tpeer. Despite the fact that Cisco routers, at least, keep this nummib. The only solution I sean»ôÅ; tbetter way to do this?
--Jeff
From mike.norris@hea»ôÅ;ieReceived: from someone claiming to be urda.heanet.ie (urda.heanet.ie [193.1.219.124]) by puc»ôÅ;th for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:32:52 -0400 (envelope-f»ôÅ;miFrom: mike.norris@heanet.ie Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:32:52 -0400 Received: from leviathan (»ôÅ;.h by urda.heanet.ie (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA21710; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:32:43 +0100 Reply-To»ôÅ;ikSender: "Mike Norris" <mike.norris@heanet.ie> To: "'Jeff Aitken'" <jaitken@aitken.com>, <cisco-nsp@puc»ôÅ;thSubject: RE: number of prefixes heard from bgp neighbor] Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:33:19 +0100 Message-ID: <3F2D1A-ëÅ;B8Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-T»ôÅ;feX-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4In-ReImportance: Norm
> I'd like to be able to poll the number of prefixes heard from a bgp> in a counter somewhere, I can't find any reference to it in the bgp > mib. The only solution I »ôÅ;is> and do the counting myself. Can anyone confirm that there is no > better way to d»ôÅ;isI doN't know about a MIB variable, but the bottom line of
show ip bgp neighbor <neighbor-address> routes
gives the »ôÅ;l
Mike Norris
From jaitken@aitken.»ôÅ; WReceived: from someone claiming to be eagle.aitken.com (jaitken@eagle.aitken.com [209.249.97.250»ôÅ;by for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:41:55 -0400 (»ôÅ;loReceived-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:41:55 -0400 Received: (from jaitken@localhost) by eagle.ai»ôÅ;.c Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:41:45 -0400 From: Jeff Aitken <jaitken@aitken.com> Message-Id: <200004-ëÅ;41In-Reply-To: <3F2D1A940FB8D1118A1F006»ôÅ;36To: mike.norris@heanet.ie Date: W»ôÅ;12Cc: jaitken@aitken.com, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.> I don't know about a MIB variable, but the bottom l> > gives the total number of prefixes. But maybe you knew this already...
Yup, it's available in the output»ôÅ;secommands (sh ip bgp n, su ip bgp su are two that come to mind). But unless I'm missing somethin»ôÅ; dpoll directly with SNMP.
--Jeff
From cosmo@olywa.net»ôÅ;d Received: from someone claiming to be valis.olywa.net (valis.olywa.net [216.173.192.2]) by puck.ne»ôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:44:38 -0400 (envelope-from »ôÅ;o@puck.nether.netReceived-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:44:38 -0400 Received: from rocinante ([216.173.193.132]) by valis.olywa.net »ôÅ; with SMTP id net for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.n»ôÅ; Message-ID: <005d01bfa48d$9ed75780$84c1add8@olywa.net> From: "Jay Stewart" <cosmo-ëÅ;waTM: <cisSubject: Re: number of prefixes»ôÅ;rdDate: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 07:44:34 -0700 Organization: OlyWa.Net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/pla»ôÅ; cContent-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook »ôÅ;esX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Try "show ip bgp sum". The number of prefixes »ôÅ; yin the rightmost column.
Jay Stewart Vice President Olympia Networking Services - "The Northwest'»ôÅ;emhttp://www.olywa.net
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Aitken" <jaitken@aitken.com> To: <cisco-nsp@puck»ôÅ;heSent: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 7:15 AM Subject: number of prefixes heard from bgp neighbor]
I'd like to be able »ôÅ;olpeer. Despite the fact that Cisco routers, at least, keep this number in a coun»ôÅ;somib. The only solution I see is to poll the entire bgp4PathAttrTable»ôÅ; dbetter way to do this?
--Jeff
From CMartin@mercury»ôÅ;inReceived: from someone claiming to be hermes.balink.com (baisgate.balink.com [199.45.32.»ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:02:44 -0400 »ôÅ;veReceived-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:02:44 -0400 Received: by HERMES with Internet Mai»ôÅ;rv id <2ZB215J9>; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:01:36 -0400 Message-ID: <4F8C08CC6E76D311AD1F00508B7872495DA841@HERME-ëÅ;roCc: ci»ôÅ;nsSubject: RE: number of prefixes heard from bgp neighbor] Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:01:36 -0400 MIME-Vers»ôÅ; 1X-MaIler: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Let us not forget that th»ôÅ;mbtrain (11.1). Pre-CC images, or non 12.x images do not disply the count. In tha»ôÅ;se
-/chris
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Aitken [mailto:jaitken@aitken.co»ôÅ; S> To: mike.norris@heanet.ie > Cc: jaitken@aitken.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > -ëÅ;ec> > I don't know about a MIB vari»ôÅ;, > > > > show ip bgp neighbor <neighbor-address> routes > > > > gives the total number of prefix»ôÅ; B> this already... > > Yup, it's available in the output of several of the 'sh ip bgp' > commands (sh »ôÅ;gp> unless I'm missing something it doesn't seem to be something you can >»ôÅ;l > > > --Jeff >
From niels@euro.net »ôÅ; AReceived: from someone claiming to be venus.euro.net (venus.euro.net [194.134.0.9]) by puck.nether.»ôÅ;(8 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:01:11 -0400 (envelope-from niels»ôÅ;o.ReCeived-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:01:11 -0400 Received: from localhost (niels@localhost) by venus.euro.net (8.8.8/8»ôÅ;) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 01:01:00 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 01:00:59 +0200 (MET DST) From: Ni»ôÅ;BaTo: "Martin, Christian" <CMartin@mercury.balink.com> cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: numb»ôÅ;f In-Reply-To: <4F8C08CC6E76D311AD1F00508B7872495DA841@HERMES> Message-ID: <1000413005911.-ëÅ;B-Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> Let us not »ôÅ;et> train (11.1). Pre-CC images, or non 12.x images> IN that case, performa a 'show ip route summary'.
Really? 11.2 has had
From CMartin@mercury»ôÅ;inReceived: from someone claiming to be hermes.balink.com (baisgate.balink.com [199.45.32.»ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:19:17 -0400 »ôÅ;veReceived-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:19:17 -0400 Received: by HERMES with Internet Mai»ôÅ;rv id <2ZB21690>; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:18:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4F8C08CC6E76D311AD1F00508B7872495DA843@HERME-ëÅ;ro "Martin, Christian" <»ôÅ;tiCc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: number of prefixes heard from bgp neighbor] Date: Wed, 12»ôÅ; 2MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="wind»ôÅ;12
HrMm... My mistake. I was unaware that there was considerable deployment of 11.2 in SP networks. Of course, 11.2 En»ôÅ;rifor corporate gear, so I see where this would be a useful image. I stand corrected.
-/chris»ôÅ;--> From: Niels Bakker [mailto:niels@euro.net] > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 7:01 PM > To: Mart»ôÅ;Ch> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: number of prefixes heard from bgp neighbor] > > > > Let us not fo»ôÅ; t> introduced in the 'CC' > > train (11.1). Pre-CC images, or non 12.x images do not > di»ôÅ; t> > In that case, performa a 'show ip route summary'. > > Really? 11.2 has had that feature at least since 11.> > -- Niels. >
From hcadiz@i2sys.co»ôÅ;huReceived: from someone claiming to be fileserver.ph.i2sys.com ([202.43.193.253]) by puck.nether.n»ôÅ;8. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 09:07:43 -0400 (envelope-from hcadiz»ôÅ;ysREceived-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 09:07:43 -0400 Received: from bombim (bombim.ph.i2sys.com [202.43.193.3]) by fileser»ôÅ;ph id 2MLH3RMN; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:00:5»ôÅ;80Reply-To: "Horacio T. Cadiz" <hcadiz@i2sys.com> From: "Horacio»ôÅ;CaTo: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> References: <20000203103347.X12834@shrubbery.net> Date: Thu, 13 Ap»ôÅ;00Organization: Infinity Information Systems, Inc. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso»ôÅ;9-ContEnt-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1-ëÅ;X-
Any pointers on load balancing f»ôÅ;eb
-- Bombim Cadiz ************************************************************ ** * Horacio T. Cadiz »ôÅ;di* * Infinity Information Systems, Inc. | "Seize the paycheck!" * *************************»ôÅ;*********************** **
From scream@zenon.ne»ôÅ;huReceived: from someone claiming to be ns1.aha.ru (ns1.aha.ru [195.2.80.142]) by puck.nether.net (»ôÅ;3/ for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:06:58 -0400 (envelope-from scream@zen»ôÅ;etX-BodyDigest: 3cd831a7fe7f36b5135d95fc2c180b93 Received: from pb.zenon.ne»ôÅ;b. by ns1.aha.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3/aha-r/0.04B) with ESMTP id SAA16626 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>;»ôÅ;, Received: from LOST (lost.zenon.net [195.2.69.67]) by pb.zenon.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SM»ôÅ;d for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:06:18 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <001001bfa551$e65dbc60$434502»ôÅ;enFrom: "Victor L. Belov" <scream@zenon.net> To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> References: <20000203103347.X12834@shru»ôÅ;y.Subject: Re: [nsp] Load Balancing Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:09:35 +0400»ôÅ;anMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-EncodX-PrioX-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
Hi,
Server Load Balancing (SLB) is available for 7xxx and Cat 6xxx platforms in 12.0.7-XE take a look at this: h»ôÅ;//limit/120xe/120xe7/iosslb.htm
--- Victor L. Belov Z»ôÅ; N+ 095 250 4629
----- Original Message ----- From: "Horacio T. Cadiz" <hcadiz@i2sys.com> To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether»ôÅ;> Subject: [nsp] Load Balancing
> Any pointers on load balancing for > web servers throu»ôÅ;OS> - Bombim Cadiz > ************************************************************ > ** > * Horacio T. Cadiz hcadiz@i2s»ôÅ;om> * > * Infinity Information Systems, Inc. | "Seize the paycheck!" > * > ****************************»ôÅ;******************** > ** > > >
From tatsuya@kivex.c»ôÅ;ThReceived: from someone claiming to be smtp-out.kivex.com (smtp-out.kivex.com [204.177.32.18]) by»ôÅ;k. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:01:13 -0400 (envelo»ôÅ;roReceived-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:01:13 -0400 Received: from kds1 (kds1.kivex.com [208.213.150.16]) »ôÅ;sm Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:02:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 »ôÅ;5:From: Tatsuya Kawasaki <tatsuya@kivex.com> X-Sender: tatsuya@kds1 To: "Horacio T. Cadiz" <hcadiz@i2sys.com>»ôÅ; cSubject: Re: [nsp] Load Balancing In-Reply-To: <119101bfa549$382c3480$03c12bca@ph.i2sys.com> Mess-ëÅ;IDContent-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Horacio, »ôÅ; IThere are commerical gears that help you to load balace. I suggest the following. - load balancing via DNS -»ôÅ;d
If you are getting more than it can handle, I suggest to get either hi performace mach»ôÅ; Ion Pent. based machine with apache should be suffice for the most case.
Tatsuya
/_/_/_/_/_»ôÅ;/_Tatsuya Kawasaki Allegiance Telecom Unlock the Power of the Internet http://www.kiv»ôÅ;omAffiliation given for identification not representation /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_»ôÅ;/_
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Horacio T. Cadiz wrote:
> Any pointers on load balancing for > web servers th»ôÅ;h > > -- Bombim Cadiz > ************************************************************ > ** > * Horacio T. Cadiz hcadiz»ôÅ;ys> * > * Infinity Information Systems, Inc. | "Seize the paycheck!" > * > ************************»ôÅ;************************ > ** > > >
From ssaner@jasper.s»ôÅ;wiReceived: from someone claiming to be jasper.southwind.net (ssaner@jasper.southwind.net»ôÅ;6. by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA17901 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, envelope-from ssaner@jasper.southwind.net) Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr Received: (from ssaner@l»ôÅ;ho by for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:29:12 -0500 (CD»ôÅ;atFrom: Steven Saner <ssaner@southwind.net> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <20»ôÅ;13Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.94.15i Subject:»ôÅ;p]
This may be a pretty elementary question, but I can't seem to find any documentation on it.
I have a 2610 and »ôÅ;trit. I do a show version and get the following line:
cisco 2610 (MPC860) process»ôÅ;reof memory
What is the 18432K/6144K really telling me? Do I have 18MB, 6MB, 24MB, or»ôÅ;et
Thanks.
-- ================================================================== Steven Saner »ôÅ; ssaner@southwind.net Systems/Network Administrator http://www2.sout»ôÅ;d. 263-7963 Wichita (800)525-7963
From simonl@rd.bbc.c»ôÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be gateg.kw.bbc.co.uk (gateg.kw.bbc.co.uk [132.185.132.16]) »ôÅ;pu for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:34:02 -0400 (env»ôÅ;e-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:34:02 -0400 Received: from sunf0.rd.bbc.co.uk (ddmailgate.rd.»ôÅ;co by gateg.kw.bbc.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA14660; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:33:46 +0100 (BST) »ôÅ;ivReceived: from sunf25 by sunf25.rd.bbc.co.»ôÅ;ThX-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Steven Saner <ssaner@southwind.net> Cc: ci»ôÅ;nsSubject: Re: [nsp] 2600 RAM In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:29:12 CDT." -ëÅ;00Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:33»ôÅ;+0MesSage-Id: <4654.955640023@sunf25> From: Simon Lockhart <simonl@rd.bbc.co.uk>
>I have a 2610 and I'm trying to figur-ëÅ;t > >cisco 2610 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x1»ôÅ;wi>of memory > >What is the 18432K/6144K really telling me? Do I have 18MB, 6MB, 24MB, >or something e-ëÅ;
-- Simon Lockhart | Tel: +44 (0)17»ôÅ;39InTernet Engineering Manager | Fax: +44 (0)1737 839516 BBC Internet Services | Email: Simon»ôÅ;khKingswood Warren,Tadworth,Surrey,UK | URL: http://support.bbc.co.uk/
From dol@info.east.r»ôÅ;huReceived: from someone claiming to be frog.east.ru (frog.east.ru [195.170.62.133]) by puck.nether»ôÅ; ( for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:17:27 -0400 (envelope-from dol@»ôÅ;.eReceived-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:17:27 -0400 Received: from info.east.ru (info.east.ru [195.170.33.24]) by frog»ôÅ;t. Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:19:28 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from dol@info.east.ru) Received»ôÅ;om by info.east.ru (8.9.3/8.8.5/BD2) with ESMTP id UAA94882; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:16:36 +-ëÅ; (DaTe: ThuTo: Steven Saner <ssaner@southwin»ôÅ;t>Subject: Re: [nsp] 2600 RAM In-Reply-To: <20000413102912.A18656@southwind.net> Message-ID: »ôÅ;e.X-NCC-RegID: ru.east MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset»ôÅ;AS
On
> This may be a pretty elementary question, but I can't seem to find any > »ôÅ;me> > I have a 2610 and I'm trying to figure out how much RAM I have on > it. I do a show version and get th»ôÅ;ll> > cisco 2610 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x100) with 18432K/6144K bytes > of memory > > What is the 18432»ôÅ;44> or something else? 24M splitted for taking 25% (default) as I/O memory. »ôÅ;--Basil (Vasily) Dolmatov CCIE #5347, CCNP-Security, CCDA East Conne»ôÅ;n
From jrichard@fix.ne»ôÅ;huReceived: from someone claiming to be clark.fix.net (jrichard@clark.fix.net [206.190.71.2]) by pu»ôÅ;et for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:28:13 -0400 (envelope-»ôÅ; jReceived-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:28:13 -0400 Received: from localhost (jrichard@localhost) by clark.fi»ôÅ;t for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13»ôÅ; 2From: Josh Richards <jrichard@fix.net> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] Load Bala»ôÅ;g Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.21.0004131326190.17674-100000@clark.fix»ôÅ;> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Horacio T. Cadiz wrote:
> Any poin»ôÅ; o> web servers through IOS?
On what platform? And what exactly would *you* consider load-balancing? »ôÅ;e
But there are many ways to do "load balancing". It will depend on the deta»ôÅ;ofwork, how reliable it needs to be, etc.
-jr
---- Josh Ric»ôÅ;s <jrichard@cubicle.net> - <jrichard@fix.net> - <jrichard@freedom.gen.ca.us> IP Network Engineering and C
From jared@puck.neth»ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA10695 for cisco-nsp@p»ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004132043.QAA10695@puck.nether.net»ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA10660; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:42:49 -0400 (envelope-fr»ôÅ;isDate: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:42:49 -0400 X-From_: Subscriptions@TechGarage.Com Thu Apr 13 16»ôÅ;48REceived: from someone claiming to be mail.hekimian.net (w244.z208037032.lax-ca.dsl.cnc.net [208.37.32.244]) by p»ôÅ;ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:42:47 -0400 (envelope»ôÅ;m Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:42:47 -0400 Received: from w244.z208037032.lax-ca.dsl.cnc»ôÅ; ( id HBAZBS0W»ôÅ;u,Received: from david ([206.82.194.36]) by w244.z208037032.lax-ca.dsl.cnc.net with SMTP (Lyris »ôÅ;erMessage-ID: <006501bfa588$ce1f0d20$6c0210ac@david> From: "David Hekimian" <»ôÅ;crTo: "Josh Richards" <jrichard@fix.net>, <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> References: <Pine.BSI.4.21.000»ôÅ;32Subject: Re: [nsp] Load Balancing Old-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:42:36 -0700 MIME-Version:»ôÅ; C charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-M»ôÅ;r:X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Diagnostic: Not on th»ôÅ;ceX-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:43:14 -0400 Resent-To»ôÅ;sc
Wouldn't the Cisco Local Director be a better fit than the PIX?
- David
----- OrFTo: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Sent: Subject: Re»ôÅ;sp
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Horacio T. Cadiz wrote: > > > Any pointers on load balancing for > > web ser»ôÅ; t> > On what platform? And what exactly would *you* consider load-balancing? > One (Cisco) platform to look at»ôÅ;ld> > But there are many ways to do "load balancing". It will depend on the > details of the application, how »ôÅ; h> work, how reliable it needs to be, etc. > > -jr > > ---- > Josh Richards [JTR38/JR539»ôÅ;N]> IP Network Engineering and Consulting > > ,From jrichard@fix.ne»ôÅ;huReceived: from someone claiming to be clark.fix.net (jrichard@clark.fix.net [206.190.71.2]) by pu»ôÅ;et for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:45:39 -0400 (envelope-»ôÅ; jReceived-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:45:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (jrichard@localhost) by clark.fi»ôÅ;t for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:45:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13»ôÅ; 2From: Josh Richards <jrichard@fix.net> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] HDLC erro»ôÅ;t In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1000411091900.11398B-100000@kds1> Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.21.0004131343470.17674-100»ôÅ;clMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Tatsuya Kawasaki wrote:
>»ôÅ;n > Apr 11 08:41:47 xxxxxxx 10490: *Apr 10 23:38:43.750 CST: > Illegal HDLC »ôÅ;al> > When I look at cisco web site, it tells me that .. Illegal HDLC serial > type code xxx, »ôÅ; 0> packet type is received. > > I have been checking config, I have not fou»ôÅ;ny
I'd try to take a look at the packet in question:
debug packet serial
-jr
---- J<jrichard@cubicle.net> - <jrichard@fix.net> - <jrichard@freedom.gen.Received: from someone claiming to be clark.fix.net (jrichard@clark.fix.net [206.190.71.2]) by pu»ôÅ;et for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:52:24 -0400 (envelope-»ôÅ; jReceived-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:52:24 -0400 Received: from localhost (jrichard@localhost) by clark.fi»ôÅ;t Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:52:14 -0700 (PDT) F»ôÅ; JTo: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cc: Rajesh Talpade <rrt@research.telcordia.com> Subject: Re:»ôÅ;p]In-Reply-To: <200004071746.NAA04067@vagrant.research.telcordia.com> Message-ID:»ôÅ;neMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Fri, »ôÅ;r
> Do the TOS/precedence bits get copied from the inner IP > packet to the outer when an IP pa»ôÅ; i> IPSec tunneling ?
Yes, this is defined as a requirement of tunnel mode IPSec, so it would (hopefu»ôÅ; bIPSec setup is not alive right now to verify this in IOS at the »ôÅ;nt> If> specific ?
For same reasons as above, any version of I»ôÅ;hado this. Hardware platform should not matter.
> If no, can someone point me in the right directi»ôÅ;bo> not, and when Cisco plans to do this ?
I'll be optimistic and say that the answer is, indeed, a "yes".
-jr
--»ôÅ;os<jrichard@cubicle.net> - <jrichard@fix.net> - <jrichard@freedom.gen.ca.us> IP Network Engine»ôÅ;g
From jrichard@fix.ne»ôÅ;huReceived: from someone claiming to be clark.fix.net (jrichard@clark.fix.net [206.190.71.2]) by pu»ôÅ;et for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:57:25 -0400 (envelope-»ôÅ; jReceived-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:57:25 -0400 Received: from localhost (jrichard@localhost) by clark.fi»ôÅ;t for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13»ôÅ; 2From: Josh Richards <jrichard@fix.net> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] question »ôÅ;epMessage-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.21.0004131353190.17674-100000@clark.fix.net»ôÅ;MEContent-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Tatsuya Kawasaki wrote:
> I need a exmaple »ôÅ;hy> routing protocol no access-list that prevent from reaching IP.
No access»ôÅ;t ping/traceroute?
> why ping works but not traceroute?
Well they are di»ôÅ;en
I guess what I really want to know is how ping works and how traceroute > works.
This is an interesting read to »ôÅ;n them:
RFC 1739: A Primer on Internet and TCP/IP Tools <URL:http://www.rfc-editor.org/»ôÅ;rf
-jr
---- Josh Richards [JTR38/JR539-ARIN] <jrichard@cubicle.net> - <jrichard@fix.net> - <jrichard@freedom.gen»ôÅ;us
From wwilliam@cisco.»ôÅ; TReceived: from someone claiming to be mailman.cisco.com (mailman.cisco.com [171.68.225.9]) by p»ôÅ;ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:01:56 -0400 (envelope»ôÅ;m Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:01:56 -0400 Received: from wwilliampc (atlantis-dial-1-16.cisco.com»ôÅ;1.To: "George Robbins" <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com>, <mfcho@hknet.com>, <panigl»ôÅ;unCc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: RE: [nsp] IOS Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 15:56:03 -0500 Message-ID: <NCBB»ôÅ;NMMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-»ôÅ;diX-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Imp»ôÅ;ncIn-Reply-To: <200004072306.TAA21267@shandakor.tharsis.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6»ôÅ; Aout.
Wade
-------------------------------------»ôÅ;--Wade Williams "Put your message in a modem Systems Engineer, Cisco S»ôÅ;msNSP Ohio Valley Region - N. Peart Brentwood, TN 615-221-2918 wwilliam»ôÅ;co-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>I've never been able to find anything d»ôÅ;it>charts and downloading images and rebooting the router gets tedious as >a way of checking inlu
George
From jrichard@fix.ne»ôÅ;huReceived: from someone claiming to be clark.fix.net (jrichard@clark.fix.net [206.190.71.2]) by pu»ôÅ;et for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:30:54 -0400 (envelope-»ôÅ; jReceived-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:30:54 -0400 Received: from localhost (jrichard@localhost) by clark.fi»ôÅ;t for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:30:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13»ôÅ; 2From: Josh Richards <jrichard@fix.net> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] Load Bala»ôÅ;g Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.21.0004131429460.17721-100000@clark.fix.net> M»ôÅ;VeContent-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, David Hekimian wrote:
> Wouldn't the Cisco Lo»ôÅ;Di
Doh! Yeah that is what I was *thinking* but not what I *typed*. You would be corre»ôÅ; -
--- Josh Richards [JTR38/JR539-ARIN] <jrichard@cubicle.net> - <jrichard@fix.net> - <jrichard@freedom.gen.ca.us> IP Ne
From bgreene@cisco.c»ôÅ;ThReceived: from someone claiming to be mail1.cisco.com (mail1.cisco.com [171.68.225.60]) by puck.»ôÅ;er for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:13:47 -0400 (envelope-fro»ôÅ;reReceived-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:13:47 -0400 Received: from bgreenent2 (bgreene-dsl2.cisco.com [144.254.1»ôÅ;9]Fr»ôÅ;"BTo: "Wade Williams" <wwilliam@cisco.com>, "George Robbins" <grr@shanda»ôÅ;th <panigl@cc.univie.ac.at> Cc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: RE: [nsp] IOS Dat»ôÅ;huMessage-ID: <007001bfa594$a27458e0$5f01a8c0@bgreenent2.cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-T»ôÅ; t charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer»ôÅ;crIn-Reply-To: <NCBBJJMHNMHCKBBLEDPOKEGLGHAA.wwilliam@cisco.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By»ôÅ;roImportance: Normal
Try http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/620/roadmap.shtml
Barry
> -----Orig»ôÅ; M> From: Wade Williams [mailto:wwilliam@cisco.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 1:56 PM > To: George Robbin»ôÅ;fc> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: RE: [nsp] IOS > > > Ask your SE. While »ôÅ;ay> out. > > Wade > > ----------------------------------------------------»ôÅ;--> --------- > Wade Williams "Put your message in a modem > Systems Engineer, Cisco Systems »ôÅ;nd> NSP Ohio Valley Region - N. Peart > Brentwood, TN > 615-221-2918 > wwilliam»ôÅ;co> ----------------------------------------------------------------- > --------- > > >I've never been able to find a»ôÅ;in> >charts and downloading images and rebooting the router gets tedious as > >a way of »ôÅ;ki> > George > > > > >
From kline@uiuc.edu »ôÅ; AReceived: from someone claiming to be cub.cso.uiuc.edu (root@cub.cso.uiuc.edu [130.126.113.5]) by p»ôÅ;ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:24:19 -0400 (envelope»ôÅ;m Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:24:19 -0400 Received: from tailwind (tailwind.cso.uiuc.edu [130.126.113»ôÅ;) for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:24:09 -0500»ôÅ;T)To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: RE: [nsp] Load Balancing Date: Thu, 13 Ap»ôÅ;00Message-ID: <NDBBLJEILKJEKNKGEOAMGEGHCBAA.kline@uiuc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; cha»ôÅ;="Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook I-ëÅ;BuX-MimeOLE: Produced By Mic-ëÅ;ft> > On what platform? And wh»ôÅ;xa> One (Cisco) platform to look at would be the PIX.
I know this is a Cisco list»ôÅ; ato look at the Foundry ServerIron for this application.
/cvk
From kashani@enterac»ôÅ;m Received: from someone claiming to be mail9.wlv.netzero.net (mail9.wlv.netzero.net [209.247.16»ôÅ;]) for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:37:41 -0400»ôÅ;nvReceived-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:37:41 -0400 Received: (qmail 25876 invoked by uid 0); »ôÅ;prReceived: from fw2.wlv.netzero.net (HELO Arrakkis.enteract.com) (@209.247.163.243) by mail9.wlv.net»ôÅ;.nMessage-Id: <4.3.1.2.20000413163341.01ec5100@pop.enteract.com> X-Sender: kashani@»ôÅ;(UX-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:40:38 -0700 To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nethe»ôÅ;t>Subject: RE: [nsp] Load Balancing In-Reply-To: <NDBBLJEILKJEKNKGEOAMGEGHCBAA.kline@u-ëÅ;edRefePences:Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charse»ôÅ;s-
Speaking from experience it would probably be a good idea to look at just about any load »ôÅ;ncare underpowered, have fewer features, and more expensive then just about e»ôÅ;on
kasHani
At 05:24 PM 4/13/00 -0500, Charley Kline wrote: > > From: Josh Richards [mailto:jrichard@fix.net] > > > > On »ôÅ; p> > One (Cisco) platform to look at would be the PIX. > >I»ôÅ;w >to look at the Foundry ServerIron fo
_____________________________________________ NetZero - Defenders of thhttp://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
From jared@puck.neth»ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA05797 for cisco-nsp@p»ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004132353.TAA05797@puck.nether.net»ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA05444; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:44:32 -0400 (envelope-fr»ôÅ;isDate: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:44:32 -0400 X-From_: vravi@research.telcordia.com Thu Apr 13 19»ôÅ;32REceived: from someone claiming to be thumper.research.telcordia.com (thumper.research.telcordia.com [128.96.41.1]»ôÅ;y for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:44:31 -0400 (e»ôÅ;opReceived-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:44:31 -0400 Received: from breeze-fddi (breeze-fdd»ôÅ;92 by thumper.research.telcordia.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA29844; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:43:48 -0400 (EDT) O»ôÅ;atFrom: Ravichander Vaidyanathan <vravi@research.telcordia.com> X-Sender: vravi@bre»ôÅ;Tocc: Ed Orlando <eorlando@cisco.com> Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0004131916160.6050-100000@breez»ôÅ;IMContent-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Re»ôÅ;-FResent-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:53:29 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsp»ôÅ;nf
Hi, I am trying to configure a BGP MPLS VPN using Cisco 3640s and 3620s running IOS 12.1.1(T). M»ôÅ;stthis : 10.1.254.0 10.1.1.0 10.1.2.0 10.1.253.0 (CE1»ôÅ;-- vrf
I have IBGP sessions between the PE (so-called Provider Edge) routersinterfaces between the PEs and the CEs (Customer Edge) as shown. MPLS is enabled in the PE and the P (ba»ôÅ;neam even showing that IBGP exchanging MPLS tags for VPN routes. I followed the instruct»ôÅ; oconfig reference for 12.1.1(T).
However, I am unable to get connectiv»ôÅ;beassigned a VRF to the interfaces between the PE and the CE routers, the interfaces dropped ou»ôÅ; tthe VRF. Sample output is shown below.
outputs of sample commands on PE2 ar»ôÅ;ow
<-- - global IP table--->
C 10.1.2.0 is directly connected, Ethernet1/0 S 10.1.1.0 [1/0] via 10.1.2.1
<-»ôÅ; v
B 10.1.255.0 [200/0] via 10.1.1.1, 00:28:23 C 10.1.253.0 is dire
Also, "show ip vrf detail" on the PE cribs about this (I think)
<--- oVRF co; de»ôÅ;t Interfaces: Ethernet1/1 ***Connected addresses are not in global routing table*** (asteriks »ôÅ;) RT:100:1 Import VPN route-target communities RT:100:1 »ôÅ; No export route-map
<------show tag-switching forwarding table-------> Local Outgoing P»ôÅ;x tag tag or VC or Tunnel Id switched interface 26 »ôÅ;op27 Aggregate 10.1.253.0/24[V] 0 »ôÅ;
Am I missing something big ??! thanks, Ravi
From CMartin@mercury»ôÅ;inReceived: from someone claiming to be hermes.balink.com (baisgate.balink.com [199.45.32.»ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:22:09 -0400 »ôÅ;veReceived-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:22:09 -0400 Received: by HERMES with Internet Mai»ôÅ;rv id <26DM78BY>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:20:55 -0400 Message-ID: <4F8C08CC6E76D311AD1F00508B7872495DA847@HERME-ëÅ;ro Cc: Ed Orlando <eorlando@cisco.com> Subject: RE: [nsp] Date: Thu, 13 Apr »ôÅ; 2Return-Receipt-To: "Martin, Christian" <CMartin@mercury.balink.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mai»ôÅ;rvContent-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
First, I'm assuming P-3620 is a MPLS LSR. Thus, a (T)»ôÅ;isPE1 and PE2.
Then, the interface to the CE needs to be known by BGP on the PE, so that it can be distribut»ôÅ;iaredistribute static, redistribute connected into the ipv4 address family. F»ôÅ;lychoice, ie:
interface Serial0 ip address 10.1.254.1 255»ôÅ;.2! router bgp 65535 no synchronization neighbor 10.1.2.1 remote-as 65534 ! address-family ip»ôÅ;rf reDistribute connected redistribute-static route-map VRF-CO(assuming statics to the CE) no auto-summary no synchro»ôÅ;ti exiT-address-family ! address-family vpnv4 neighbor 10.1.2.1 activate neighbor 10.1.2.1 send-community extended ex»ôÅ;dd! route-map VRF-CO permit 10 match (something to signify statics to the CE) ! end
The key isfor the remote PE-to-CE interfaces, distribut»ôÅ;etsuch a way as to minimize LSP explosion for every prefix. This,»ôÅ; suSe loopbacks for peering sessions, stick the loopbacks in your IGP(TDP), and make your tag interfaces unnumbered to»ôÅ;s next-hop-self and update-source Loopback0 on your iBGP sessions.
HTH, -/chris
>-----Original Messa»ôÅ;-->Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 7:53 PM >To: cisco»ôÅ;@p>Cc: Ed Orlando >Subject: [nsp] configuring BGP/MPLS VPNs > > > >Hi, > I am trying to configure a BGP MPLS»ôÅ; u>3620s running IOS 12.1.1(T). My test network is a simple daisy >chain like >this : > > 10.1.25»ôÅ; >(CE1)----------(PE1-3640)---------(P-3620)---------(PE2-3620)-- >---»ôÅ;-(> > > > >I have IBGP sessions between the PE (so-ca»ôÅ; P>running and exchanging VPN NLRI. Two VRFs are also assigned on the >interfaces between the PEs and »ôÅ;CE>shown. MPLS is >enabled in the PE and the P (backbone) routers and seems to >work fine. I >am even»ôÅ;wi>I followed >the instructions on cofiguring MPLS VPNs precisely from th»ôÅ;sc>Config reference for 12.1.1(T). > >However, I am unable to get connectivity between the CE routers. When I >assigne»ôÅ;VR>interfaces dropped out of the global IP routing table and only»ôÅ;pp the VRF. Sample output is shown below. > >outputs of sample commands on PE2 are shown. > ><---- global IP table---»ôÅ;>C>S 10.1.1.0 [1/0] via 10.1.2.1 > ><----- vrf on i/f 10.1.253.2 --»ôÅ;> >C 10.1.253.0 is directly connected, Ethernet1/1 > >also, "show»ôÅ;vr> ><--- output of "show ip vrf detail"---> >VRF co; default RD 100:100 > I»ôÅ;fa> >***Connected addresses are not in global routing table*** >(asteriks mine) > Export »ôÅ;ro> RT:100:1 > Import VPN route-target communities > RT:100:1 »ôÅ;o > No export route-map > ><------show tag-switching forwarding table-------> >Local Outgoing Prefix »ôÅ; >tag tag or VC or Tunnel Id switched interface >26 Po»ôÅ;g >10.1.2.1 >27 Aggregate 10.1.253.0/24[V] 0 »ôÅ; > > >Am I missing something big ??! >thanks, >Ravi > > > >
From hcadiz@i2sys.co»ôÅ;huReceived: from someone claiming to be fileserver.ph.i2sys.com ([202.43.193.253]) by puck.nether.n»ôÅ;8. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:15:35 -0400 (envelope-from hcadiz»ôÅ;ysREceived-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:15:35 -0400 Received: from bombim (bombim.ph.i2sys.com [202.43.193.3]) by fileser»ôÅ;ph id 2MLH3SA2; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:08:4»ôÅ;80Reply-To: "Horacio T. Cadiz" <hcadiz@i2sys.com> From: "Horacio»ôÅ;CaTo: "Tatsuya Kawasaki" <tatsuya@kivex.com> Cc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> References: <Pine.GSO.3»ôÅ;10Subject: Re: [nsp] Load Balancing Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:15:26 +0800 Organization: Infi»ôÅ; IMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit»ôÅ;riX-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Mim»ôÅ; V
Thanks. We already do round-robin DNS but it doesn't have the granularity I am looking for.
I to»ôÅ; lit has what I am looking for. I'll be trying that.
On a related note, I »ôÅ;'tcisco-nsp list. I might have been bumped off the list. Who do I contact regarding this? Thanks.
»ôÅ;************************************************ * Horacio T. Cadiz HCadiz@tge.net | "Carpe per diem!" * * T»ôÅ;ob************************************************************
----- Origi»ôÅ;MeFrom: Tatsuya Kawasaki <tatsuya@kivex.com> To: Horacio T. Cadiz <hcadiz@i2sys.com> Cc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.»ôÅ; SSubject: Re: [nsp] Load Balancing
> Horacio, > > not I am aware of. > There are c»ôÅ;ri> I suggest the following. > - load balancing via DNS > - load balancing via web s»ôÅ;r > > If you are getting more than it can handle, I suggest to > get either hi performace machine. IMHO, run linux»ôÅ;so> on Pent. based machine with apache should be suffice for the most case. > > Tatsuya > > > /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_»ôÅ;/_> Tatsuya Kawasaki > Allegiance Telecom > Unlock the Power of the Internet > http://www.kivex.com »ôÅ;on> Affiliation given for identification not representation > /_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/»ôÅ;_/> > On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Horacio T. Cadiz wrote: > > > Any pointers on load balancing for > > web ser»ôÅ; t> > > > -- Bombim Cadiz > > ************************************************************ > > ** > > * Horacio »ôÅ;ad> > * > > * Infinity Information Systems, Inc. | "Seize the paycheck!" > > * > > »ôÅ;************************************************ > > ** > > > > > >
From wrath@mailserve»ôÅ;.cReceived: from someone claiming to be mailserver-ng.cs.umbc.edu (mailserver-ng.cs.u»ôÅ;ed by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA13871 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr»ôÅ;0 (envelope-from wrath@mailserver-ng.cs.umbc.edu) Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:27:00 -0400 Received: f»ôÅ;lo by mailserver-ng.cs.umbc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA16789; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:26:49 -0»ôÅ;(EDatE: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:26:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Vijay Gill <wrath@cs.umbc.edu> To: Jeff Aitken <jaitken@aitken.com> »ôÅ;ciSubject: Re: number of prefixes heard from bgp neighbor] In-Reply-To: <200004121415.KAA26033@eagle»ôÅ;keMessage-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.95.1000413232546.15405D-100000@mailserver-ng.cs.umbc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: T»ôÅ;PL
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Jeff Aitken wrote:
> I'd like to be able to poll the number of prefixes heard»ôÅ;m >> in a counter somewhere, I can't find any »ôÅ;re> mib. The only solution I see is to poll the entire bgp4PathAttrTable > and do the counting myself.»ôÅ;n > better way to do this?
If I remember correctly, there isn't a single entry one can poll»ôÅ; t
I've played around with MIBs that allow you to download each route table en»ôÅ; b
/vijay
From grr@shandakor.t»ôÅ;isReceived: from someone claiming to be shandakor.tharsis.com (IDENT:root@shandakor.tharsis»ôÅ; [ by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA15591 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000»ôÅ;47 (envelope-from grr@shandakor.tharsis.com) Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:47:54 -0400 Received: (from grr@lo»ôÅ;osDate: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:47:»ôÅ;04From: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com> Message-Id: <200004140347.XAA28594@shandakor.tharsis.com> To: ja»ôÅ;n@shandakor.tharsis.com859 Subject: Re: number of prefixes heard from bgp neighbor] Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Some»ôÅ;ngof "rsh foo" or a send/expect script to do your data collection... »ôÅ;
> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:26:49 -0400 (EDT) > From: Vijay Gill <wrath@cs.umbc.edu> > To: Jeff Aitken <jaitken@a»ôÅ;n.> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: number of prefixes heard from bgp neighbor] > > On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, »ôÅ; A> > > I'd like to be able to poll the number of prefixes heard from a bgp > > peer. Despite the fact that C»ôÅ; r> > in a counter somewhere, I can't find any reference to it in the bgp > > mib. The o»ôÅ;so> > and do the counting myself. Can anyone confirm that there is no »ôÅ;be> > If I remember correctly, there isn't a single entry one can poll for to > get th> > I've played around with MIBs that allow you to download e> entry, but nothing on the > > /vijay
From jaitken@aitken.¼ôÅ; FReceived: from someone claiming to be eagle.aitken.com (jaitken@eagle.aitken.com [209.249.97.250¼ôÅ;by for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:37:39 -0400 (¼ôÅ;loReceived-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:37:39 -0400 Received: (from jaitken@localhost) by eagle.ai¼ôÅ;.c for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:37:28 -0400 From: Jeff Aitken <jaitken@a¼ôÅ;n.MeSsage-Id: <200004140437.AAA00568@eagle.aitken.com> Subject: Re: number of prefixes heard from bgp neighbor In-Reply¼ôÅ; <To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.n¼ôÅ;atX-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL53 (25)]
Vijay Gill writes: > I've played around¼ôÅ;h > entry, but nothing on the per peer level.
Right, in addition to bgpPee¼ôÅ;leand get an entry for every single prefix you've heard, and then do any analysis you wa¼ôÅ; Uand is hugely inefficient if all you care about is a simply the number of prefix¼ôÅ;ec
George Robbins writes: > Some things just aren't in the mibs, leaving you the fun options > of "rs¼ôÅ;o"
It would appear that this is exactly the case; our isp-expert rep ¼ôÅ;ir
I wonder if this is something they can add...
--Jeff
From rs@valhalla.sea¼ôÅ;m.Received: from someone claiming to be valhalla.seastrom.com (rs@valhalla.seastrom.com [192¼ôÅ;.2 by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA26466 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:11:¼ôÅ;04 (enVelope-from rs@valhalla.seastrom.com) Received-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:11:46 -0400 Received: (from rs@localhost) ¼ôÅ;va Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:11:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rs) To: Jeff Aitken ¼ôÅ;tkCc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, rs@valhalla.seastrom.com Subject: Re: number of prefixes heard from bgp neig¼ôÅ; RFrom: rs@seastrom.com (Robert E. Seastrom) Date: 14 Apr 2000 09:11:27 ¼ôÅ;0 Message-ID: <878zygddz4.fsf@valhalla.seastro¼ôÅ;m>X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald"
Jeff Aitken <jaitken@aitken.com> writes:
> I wonder if this is s¼ôÅ;hi
One would suppose, given that (as previously noted), 11.1(CC) and 11.2-and-later print it out along wi¼ôÅ;vecan't go fiddling around with mib-2 or you'll risk incurring the wrath of the masses, so it would¼ôÅ;e
If you're still running 7000/RP/S[S]Ps, 11.2 is somewhat unadvisable; I have run 11.1(¼ôÅ;inthis or a similar situation, "show ip bgp neighbor 1.2.3.4 route" will retu¼ôÅ;+7noted, all one has to do is rsh to the router and away you go...
¼ôÅ;
From gibbs@servint.c¼ôÅ;FrReceived: from someone claiming to be mecca.servint.com (mecca.servint.com [209.50.225.14]) by p¼ôÅ;ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:30:58 -0400 (envelope¼ôÅ;m Received-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:30:58 -0400 Received: from localhost (gibbs@localhost) by mecca.ser¼ôÅ;.c for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:54:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri,¼ôÅ;ApFrom: Mike Gibbs <gibbs@servint.com> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net In-Reply-To: <878zygddz4.fs¼ôÅ;lhMessage-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10004140952080.14762-100000@mecca.servint.com> MIME-VersionContent-TySubject: [nsp] European STM1
I am getting a STM1 a 513 to accept this card? I was told the normal POS adapter won't do it.
Mike Gibbs
From amb@uk.concentr¼ôÅ;omReceived: from someone claiming to be sapphire.noc.gxn.net (sapphire.noc.gxn.net [194.143.161¼ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:00:28 -0400 ¼ôÅ;veReceived-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:00:28 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo¼ôÅ;co by sapphire.noc.gxn.net with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #2) id 12g6dq-0005Ro-00; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:00:14 +0100 X-M¼ôÅ;r:From: Alex Bligh <amb@gxn.net> To: Mike Gibbs <gibbs@servint.com> cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.ne¼ôÅ;bjIn-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:54:12 EDT." <Pine.BSI.4.05L.1¼ôÅ;14Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 14 Apr 20¼ôÅ;5:Sender: amb@uk.concentric.com Message-Id: <E12g6dq-0005Ro-00@sapphire.noc.gxn.net>
Mike,
> I am getting a ST¼ôÅ;ro> a 7513 to accept this card? I was told the normal POS adapter won't¼ôÅ;>
A Normal POS adapter should do it assuming you have an STM-1 end to end.
Beware that some nefarious telcos will atte¼ôÅ;toOC-3 one end and a STM-1 the other, by patching through 3 DS-3s between them on a DACS. It is alleged this¼ôÅ;uayou are running ATM on the circuit, as the overhead is what's dropped, but it surely won't work for POS.
You¼ôÅ;t the interface:
crc 16 pos ais-shut pos framing sdh pos scramble-a¼ôÅ;.. pos flag j0 1 pos flag s1s0 2
-- Alex Bligh VP Core Network, Concentric Network Corporation (formerly ¼ôÅ;et
From zisiadis@forthn¼ôÅ;r Received: from someone claiming to be forthnet.gr (eos.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.23]) by puck.n¼ôÅ;r. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:10:44 -0400 (envelope-from¼ôÅ;iaReceived-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:10:44 -0400 Received: from kastorias (kastorias.forthnet.gr [194.219.2¼ôÅ;9] for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:10:53 -0400 Me¼ôÅ;e-X-Sender: zisiadis@popper.forthnet.gr X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro¼ôÅ;siDate: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:14:56 +0300 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net From: Dimitris Zisiadis <zisiadis@forthnet¼ôÅ; MContent-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [nsp] Cisco 2610 and VOIP
Hello all,
we are try¼ôÅ;toPlus IOS, configured as a voice gateway. Does anyone know how we¼ôÅ; gIt seams that the value of ConnectTime remains always zero:
2w6d: %VOIPAAA-5-VOIP_CAL¼ôÅ;ST7BBC01A 3 0 5616066E, SetupTime 0, PeerAddress 017294995, PeerSubAddress , Disco¼ôÅ;tCse 1 , DisconnectText normal call clearing., ConnectTime 0, DisconnectTime 0, CallOrigin 2, ChargedUnits 0, InfoType ¼ôÅ;raTransmitBytes 602 0, ReceivePackets 241, ReceiveBytes 4820 2w6d: %VOIPAAA-5-VOIP_CALL_HISTORY: CallLegTy¼ôÅ;, 7BBC01A 3 0 5616066E, SetupTime 0, PeerAddress 061, PeerSubAddress , DisconnectCause 10 , Disconnec¼ôÅ;t 0, CallOr igin 1, ChargedUnits 0, InfoType 2, TransmitPackets 241, Tr¼ôÅ;it18, Rece ivePackets 391, ReceiveBytes 16592
Regards Dimitris Zisiadis FORTHnet
From neil@COLT.NET ¼ôÅ;ApReceived: from someone claiming to be NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET (NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET [212.74.95.132]) by p¼ôÅ;ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:23:59 -0400 (envelope¼ôÅ;m Received-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:23:59 -0400 Received: from COLT.NET (localhost.colt.net by Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:23:2To: Alex Bligh <amb@gxn.net> cc: Mike Gibbs <gibbs@servint.com>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, "N¼ôÅ;J.Subject: Re: [nsp] European STM1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:00:14 BST." ¼ôÅ; From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET> Reply-To: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.¼ôÅ; DSender: neil@COLT.NET
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:00:14 +0100 Alex Bligh <amb@gxn.net> ¼ôÅ;e:> OC-3 one end and a STM-1 the other, between them on a DACS. It is alleged this actually works if > you ar>
I'd be amazed if this works under any circumstance.
Regards, Neil. --¼ôÅ;l neil@COLT.NET "In this world there's two kinds of people ¼ôÅ;ri
From CMartin@mercury¼ôÅ;inReceived: from someone claiming to be hermes.balink.com (baisgate.balink.com [199.45.32.¼ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:25:27 -0400 ¼ôÅ;veReceived-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:25:27 -0400 Received: by HERMES with Internet Mai¼ôÅ;rv id <28B5XWXD>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:24:17 -0400 Message-ID: <4F8C08CC6E76D311AD1F00508B7872495DA84D@HERME-ëÅ;ro Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, ESubject: RE: ¼ôÅ;] Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:24:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.244¼ôÅ; C charset="windows-1252"
Ahh! You are configured correctly.
Try 'ping vrf co x.x.x.x'
The CE r¼ôÅ;s co VPN only. You need to do everything in VPN-v4 mode now.¼ôÅ;l
HTH, Chris
PS
To get the CE routes 'LAN-side' routes, you can use static¼ôÅ;P,Either way, redistribution is necassary.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Ravichander Vaidyanathan [mailto:v¼ôÅ;@r> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 10:08 AM > To: Martin, Christian > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Ed¼ôÅ;an> SuBject: RE: [nsp] configuring BGP/MPLS VPNs > > > > Thanks for the response. > > > First, I'm assuming P-3620 is¼ôÅ;PL> is built between > > PE1 and PE2. > That is correct. > > Enclosed is relevant config from *PE2*¼ôÅ;e > identical to your sample. I have enclosed the figure again for > reference. > > > 10.1¼ôÅ;.0> (CE1)----------(PE1-3640)---------(P-3620)------>> vrf vrf > ! > ip vr.ëÅ; >>> ! > ! > interface Ethernet1/0 > ip addr¼ôÅ;10> ip router isis backbone > tag-switching ip > ! > interface Ethernet1/1 > ip vrf forward¼ôÅ;co> no cdp enable > ! > ! > router bgp 1 > bgp router-id 10.1.20¼ôÅ;> > ! > address-family ipv4 vrf co > redistribute connected > redistribute static¼ôÅ;no> no synchronization > exit-address-family > ! > address-family vpnv4 > neighbor 10.1.1.1 activ¼ôÅ;> > exit-address-family > ! > > *** sh ip bgp vpnv4 vrf co tags *** > ¼ôÅ;wo> Route Distinguisher: 100:100 (co) > 10.1.253.0/24 0.0.0.0 27/aggr¼ôÅ;e(> > > ----- > > So it looks to me like tags are being d> routers. Are there any other static routes that I need enabled in > >> BGP into the > ipv4 address family would suffice to d¼ôÅ;ib> to the remote > PE. Any help/comments would be much appreciated. > > Another symptom is that I am una¼ôÅ;to> *connected* PE router. (this happens after I enable a VRF on > the interface > to the CE r¼ôÅ;r)> > thanks, > Ravi > > > > > Then, the interface to the CE needs to be known by BGP on > the PE, so/ëÅ;t > > Aan be > > redistribute static, redistribute connecte¼ôÅ;to> address family. > > Finally, ensure that the CE interface is set to forward > into the VPN of > > choice, ie-ëÅ;> > > ip vrf forwarding co > > ! > > router bgp 65535 > >¼ôÅ; s> > neighbor 10.1.2.1 remote-as 65534 > > ! > > address-family ipv4 vrf co > > redistribute connected > >¼ôÅ;di> > no auto-summary > > no synchronization > > exit-addres¼ôÅ;mi> > > > address-family vpnv4 > > neighbor 10.1.2.1 activate > > neighbor 10.1.2.1 send-community extended > > exi¼ôÅ;dr> > ! > > route-map VRF-CO permit 10 > > match (something to signify statics to the CE) > > ! > > end > > > >¼ôÅ; k> information (per vrf) > > for the remote PE-to-CE interfaces, as well as¼ôÅ; r> information > > distributed between them. Secondly, the iBGP session > should be built in > > such a way as to¼ôÅ;im> This, you should > > use loopbacks for peering sessions, stick the loopbacks in >¼ôÅ;r > > and make your tag interfaces unnumbered to this loopback. Then set > > next-hop-self and update-source Loop¼ôÅ;0 > > > > > > HTH, > > -/chris > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Ravichander Vai¼ôÅ;at> [mailto:vravi@research.telcordia.com] > > >Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 7:53 PM > > >To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.ne¼ôÅ;> > > >Subject: [nsp] configuring BGP/MPLS VPNs > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi, > > > I am trying to configure a¼ôÅ; M> > >3620s running IOS 12.1.1(T). My test network is a simple daisy > > >chain like > > >th¼ôÅ; >>> > > > > > > > >I have IBGP sessions between the PE (so-called Provider > Edge) routers > > > > >interfaces between the PEs > > >shown. ¼ôÅ; i> > >work fine. I > > >am even showing that IBGP excha¼ôÅ;g > > >I followed > > >the instructions on cofiguring MPLS VPNs precisely from > the Cisco IOS >¼ôÅ;co> > > > > >However, I am unable to get connectivity between the CE > routers. When I > > >a¼ôÅ;ne> routers, the > > >interfaces dropped out of the global IP routing t¼ôÅ; a> > >appear in > > >the VRF. Sample output is shown below. > > > > > >outputs of sample commands on PE2 are shown¼ôÅ;> > > > > > >C 10.1.2.0 is directly connected, Ethernet1/0 > > >S 10.1.1.0 [1/0¼ôÅ;a > > > > > ><----- vrf on i/f 10.1.253.2 ------> > > > > > >B 10.1.255.0 [200/0] via 10.1.1.1, 00:28:23 > > ¼ôÅ; > > > > > >also, "show ip vrf detail" on the PE cribs about this (I think¼ôÅ;> > > >VRF co; default RD 100:100 > > > Interfaces: > > > Ethernet1/1 ¼ôÅ; > >> > >(asteriks mine) > > > Export VPN route-target co¼ôÅ;it> >> > > Import VPN route-target communities > > > RT:100:1 > > > ¼ôÅ;mp> > > No export route-map > > > > > ><------show tag-switching forwarding table-------> > > >Local Outgoin¼ôÅ; P> Next Hop > > >tag tag or VC or Tunnel Id switched > > >26 Pop tag 10.1.1.0/24 0 Et1/0 > > >1> > >Am I missing something big ??! > > >thanks, > > >Ravi > > > > > > > >
From jared@puck.neth¼ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA30617 for cisco-nsp@p¼ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004141427.KAA30617@puck.nether.net¼ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id EAA22265; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 04:31:45 -0400 (envelope-fr¼ôÅ;isDate: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 04:31:45 -0400 X-From_: strakad@forthnet.gr Fri Apr 14 04:31:45 20¼ôÅ;ec forthnet.gr (minos.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.22]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) wit¼ôÅ;MT for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 04:31:42 -0400 (envelope-from strakad@forthnet.gr) Recei/ëÅ;Da by forthnet.gr (8¼ôÅ;/8 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:31:31 +0300 Message-ID: <38F6D856.12B6FA5A@forthnet.gr> Old-Date: Fri, ¼ôÅ;prFrom: Strakadounas Kostas <strakad@forthnet.gr> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (Win98; I) MIME-Version: ¼ôÅ;ToContent-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Diagnostic: Not¼ôÅ;thX-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:27:47 -0400 Res¼ôÅ;ToSubject: [nsp] CDR collection on cisco 2610 voice gateway
Does anyone know how I can get the ¼ôÅ;econ a Cisco 2610 with 12.0.7T IP Plus IOS, configured as a Voice Gateway?
I get the following CDRs bu¼ôÅ;e
Kostas
2w6d: %VOIPAAA-5-VOIP_CALL_HISTORY: CallLegType 2, ConnectionId E0BF38B3 7BB¼ôÅ; 3DisconnectCau se 10 , DisconnectText normal call cleari¼ôÅ; CDisconnectTime 0, CallOrigin 2, ChargedUnits 0, InfoType 2, TransmitPackets 301, TransmitBytes 602 0, Receiv.ëÅ;ke7BBC01A 3 0 5616066E, S¼ôÅ;TiDisconnectCause 10 , DisconnectText normal call clearing., ConnectTime 0, Disconn¼ôÅ;imigin 1, ChargedUnits 0, InfoType 2, TransmitPackets 241, TransmitBytes 128, Rece ivePackets 391, ReceiveBytes --- Kostas Strakandounas FORTHnet 6 Thetidos str. Athens, Greece
From jared@puck.neth¼ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA32161 for cisco-nsp@p¼ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004141440.KAA32161@puck.nether.net¼ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA25074; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 07:45:34 -0400 (envelope-fr¼ôÅ;isDate: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 07:45:34 -0400 X-From_: jhenry@cisco.com Fri Apr 14 07:45:33 2000 ¼ôÅ;iv lint.cisco.com (lint.cisco.com [171.68.224.209]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ¼ôÅ;P for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 07:45:32 -0400 (envelope-from jhenry@cisco.com) Received-D¼ôÅ; FReceived: from jhenry-pc1.cisco.com (jhenry-isdn.cisco.com [171.70.247.52]) by lint.cisco.c¼ôÅ;8.Message-Id: <4.1.200004140¼ôÅ;9.X-Sender: jhenry@lint.cisco.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Old-Date: Fri,¼ôÅ;ApTo: Josh Richards <jrichard@fix.net>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net From: Jean Henry <jhenry@cisco.com> ¼ôÅ;ecIn-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.21.0004131429460.17721-100000@clark.fix.net> References: <006501bfa58¼ôÅ;1fMime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X¼ôÅ;elResent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:40:46 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puc¼ôÅ;th
Or I'd recommend the Catalyst 6500 w/Server Load Balancing...
JH
At 02:30 PM 04/13/2000 -0700, Josh Richards wro¼ôÅ;>O> >> Wouldn't the Cisco Local Director be a better fit than the PIX? > >Doh! Ye¼ôÅ;ha>would be correct. > >-jr > >---- >Josh Richards [JTR38/JR539-ARIN¼ôÅ;jr>IP Network Engineering and Consulting > >
From jared@puck.neth¼ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA32300 for cisco-nsp@p¼ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004141441.KAA32300@puck.nether.net¼ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA29102; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:08:30 -0400 (envelope-fr¼ôÅ;isDate: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:08:30 -0400 X-From_: vravi@research.telcordia.com Fri Apr 14 10¼ôÅ;29REceived: from someone claiming to be thumper.research.telcordia.com (thumper.research.telcordia.com [128.96.41.1]¼ôÅ;y for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:08:28 -0400 (e¼ôÅ;opReceived-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:08:28 -0400 Received: from breeze-fddi (breeze-fdd¼ôÅ;92 by thumper.research.telcordia.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA28506; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:07:36 -0400 (EDT) O¼ôÅ;atFrom: Ravichander Vaidyanathan <vravi@research.telcordia.com> X-Sender: vravi@bre¼ôÅ;Tocc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, Ed Orlando <eorlando@cisco.com> Subject:¼ôÅ; [In-Reply-To: <4F8C08CC6E76D311AD1F00508B7872495DA847@HERMES> Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.000¼ôÅ;95MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept lis¼ôÅ;EnResent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:41:48 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@¼ôÅ;.n
Thanks for the response.
> First, I'm assuming P-3620 is a MPLS LSR. Thus, a (T)LSP is built between > PE1 a¼ôÅ;E2
Enclosed is relevant config from *PE2*. The commands I have used seem identical to your sample. I hav¼ôÅ;clreference.
10.1.254.0 10.1.1.0 10.1.2.0 10.1.253.0 (CE1)-------¼ôÅ;PE vrf vrf¼ôÅ; *! ip vrf co rd 100:100 route-target export 100:1 route-target import 100:1 ! ! interfa¼ôÅ;th ip address 10.1.2.2 255.255.255.0 ip router isis backbone tag-switching ip ! interface Ethernet1/1 i¼ôÅ;f ip address 10.1.253.2 255.255.255.0 no cdp enable ! ! router bgp 1 bgp router-id 10.1.2¼ôÅ; ! address-family ipv4 vrf co redistribute connected redistribute static no auto¼ôÅ;ma no Synchronization exit-address-family ! address-family vpnv4 neighbor 10.1.1.1 activate neighbor 10.1.1.¼ôÅ;nd exit-address-family !
*** sh ip bgp vpnv4 vrf co tags *** Network Next Hop I¼ôÅ;g/Route Distinguisher: 100:100 (co) 10.1.253.0/24 0.0.0.0 27/aggregate(co) 10.1.254.0/24 10.1.1.¼ôÅ;
-----
So it looks to me like tags are being distributed between the two PE routers. Are there any other stat¼ôÅ;oueither the VRF or the global IP routing table ?
I am assuming that enabling "ipv4 address family would suffice to distribute CE2's PE. Any help/comments w/ëÅ; b*connected* PE router. (this happe¼ôÅ;ftto the CE router). Is this normal ?
thanks, Ravi
> > Then, the interface to the CE n¼ôÅ; t> can be distributed via extended community to the other peer(s). Try > redistrib¼ôÅ;st> Finally, ensure that the CE interface is set to forward into ¼ôÅ;VP> Choice, ie: > > interface Serial0 > ip address 10.1.254.1 255.255.255.252 > ip vrf forwarding co > ! > router bg¼ôÅ;53> neighbor 10.1.2.1 remote-as 65534 > ! > address-family ipv4 vrf co > redistribute connected > ¼ôÅ;is> no auto-summary > no synchronization > exit-address-famil¼ôÅ;! > neighbor 10.1.2.1 activate > neighbor 10.1.2.1 send-community extended > exit-address-family ¼ôÅ;> > match (something to signify statics to the CE) > ! > end > > The key is to ensure that the ¼ôÅ;te> for the remote PE-to-CE interfaces, as well as any routing information > distribut¼ôÅ;et> such a way as to minimize LSP explosion for every prefix. Thi¼ôÅ;ou> use loopbacks for peering sessions, stick the loopbacks in your IGP(TDP), > and make your tag interfaces unnumbe¼ôÅ;to> next-hop-self and update-source Loopback0 on your iBGP sessions. > > > HTH, > -/chris > > .ëÅ;--> >Sent: Thursday, April 1¼ôÅ;00> >To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > >Cc: Ed Orlando > >Subject: [nsp] configuring BGP/MPLS VPNs > > > > > > > >Hi¼ôÅ; >> >3620s running IOS 12.1.1(T). My test network is a simple¼ôÅ;sy> >this : > > > > > > > > > >I have IBGP sessions between the PE (so-called Provider Edge) routers > >run¼ôÅ; a> >interfaces between the PEs and the CEs (Customer Edge) as > ¼ôÅ;wn> >enabled in the PE and the P (backbone) routers and seems to > >work fine. I > >am even showing that IBGP exc¼ôÅ;in> >I followed > >the instructions on cofiguring MPLS VPNs precisely from the Cisco IOS > >con¼ôÅ;re> > > >However, I am unable to get connectivity between the CE routers. When I > >assigned a VRF to¼ôÅ; i> >interfaces dropped out of the global IP routing table and only > >app¼ôÅ;in> > > >outputs of sample commands on PE2 are shown. > > > ><---- global IP tabl¼ôÅ;> > >C 10.1.2.0 is directly connected, Ethernet1/0 > >S 10.1.1.0 [1/0] via 10.1.2.1 > > > ><----- vrf on i/f¼ôÅ;1.> > > >B 10.1.255.0 [200/0] via 10.1.1.1, 00:28:23 > >C 10.1.253.0 is directly connected, Ethern¼ôÅ;1 > >Also, "show ip vrf detail" on the PE cribs about this (I think) > > > ><--- output of "show ip vrf detail"---> > >V¼ôÅ;o;> > Interfaces: > > Ethernet1/1 > >***Connected addresses are not in global routing t¼ôÅ;**> >(Asteriks mine) > > Export VPN route-target communities > > RT:100:1 > > Import VPN route-targe¼ôÅ;mm> > RT:100:1 > > No import route-map > > No export route-map > > > ><------show tag-switching¼ôÅ;wa> >Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes tag Outgoing Next Hop > >tag tag or VC or Tu¼ôÅ; I> >26 Pop tag 10.1.1.0/24 0 Et1/0 > >10.1.2.1 ¼ôÅ;7 > > > > > > > >Am I missing something big ??! > >tha> > > > > > > > >
From jared@puck.neth¼ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA04802 for cisco-nsp@p¼ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004141658.MAA04802@puck.nether.net¼ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA04130; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 12:29:48 -0400 (envelope-fr¼ôÅ;isDate: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 12:29:48 -0400 X-From_: anton@strul.net Fri Apr 14 12:29:47 2000 R¼ôÅ;ve nemec.strul.net (anton@nemec.strul.net [193.15.228.194]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3¼ôÅ;th for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 12:29:47 -0400 (envelope-from anton@strul.net) Rece¼ôÅ;-DReceived: (from anton@localhost) by nemec.strul.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA64779; Fri¼ôÅ; AOld-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:29:25 +0200 From: Anton Gunnarsson <anton@strul.net> To: Jean ¼ôÅ;y Cc: Josh Richards <jrichard@fix.net>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] Load Balancing Messa¼ôÅ;D:References: <006501bfa588$ce1f0d20$6c0210ac@david> <Pine.BSI.4.21.0004131429460.17721-1¼ôÅ;0@david"1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X¼ôÅ;leIn-Reply-To: <4.1.20000414074859.009b1270@lint.cisco.com>; from Jean Henry on Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 07:45:3¼ôÅ;-0X-JAwohl: Javisst! X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Re/ëÅ;-D
On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 07:45:34AM -0400, Jean ¼ôÅ;y Or I'd recommend the Catalyst 6500 w/Server Load Balancing... >
I'we tested 6500 + LD with Accelerated Server L¼ôÅ;Baworks fine for TCP loadbalancing, i guess UDP isn't implemeted yet.
/Anton
> JH > > At 02:30 PM 04/13/2000 -07¼ôÅ;Jo> >On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, David Hekimian wrote: > > > >> Wouldn't the Cisco Local Directo> > > >Doh! Yeah that is what I was *thinking* but not what I *type> >-jr > >> >JOsh Richards [JTR38/JR539-ARIN] > ><jrichard@cubicle.net> - <jrichard@f> >IP¼ôÅ;wo> > > >
From russb@puffer.qu¼ôÅ;nnReceived: from someone claiming to be puffer.quadrunner.com (root@puffer.quadrunner.com¼ôÅ;5. by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA30103 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 04¼ôÅ;53 (envelope-from russb@puffer.quadrunner.com) Received-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 04:38:53 -0400 Received: (from russb@l¼ôÅ;ho by Sat, 15 Apr 2000 01:37:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 ¼ôÅ;7:From: Russell Briggs <russb@puffer.quadrunner.com> To: Anton Gunnarsson <anton@strul.net> Cc: Jean Henry <jhenry@/ëÅ;o.Subject: Re: [nsp] Load Balancing Message-ID: <2¼ôÅ;41References: <006501bfa588$ce1f0d20$6c0210ac@david> <Pine.BSI.4.21.0004131429460.1772¼ôÅ;00Mime-Version: 1.0 Content¼ôÅ;e:X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000414182925.I30767@strul.net>; from anton@strul.net o¼ôÅ;i,
It has been a few months since I've worked on a LDIR, but last I recall, it remained ¼ôÅ;heits inability to load balance UDP, as well as poor SSL handeling, and ¼ôÅ;haout there.
/russb
On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 12:29:48PM -¼ôÅ;, > On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 07:45:34AM -0400, Jean Henry wrote: > > Or I'd recommend the Catalyst 650¼ôÅ;Se> > > > I'we tested 6500 + LD with Accelerated Server Load Balancing, > works fine for TCP loadba¼ôÅ;in> > /Anton > > > JH > > > > At 02:30 PM 04/13/2000 -0700, Josh Richards wrote: > >¼ôÅ; T> > > > > >> Wouldn't the Cisco Local Director be a better fit than the PIX? > > > ¼ôÅ;>D> > >would be correct. > > > > > >-jr > > > > > >----¼ôÅ; >> > ><jrichard@cubicle.net> - <jrichard@fix.net> - <jrichard@freedom.gen.ca.us> > > >IP N¼ôÅ;rk> > > > > >
From grr@shandakor.t¼ôÅ;isReceived: from someone claiming to be shandakor.tharsis.com (IDENT:root@shandakor.tharsis¼ôÅ; [ by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA07028 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sat, 15 Apr 2000¼ôÅ;19 (envelope-from grr@shandakor.tharsis.com) Received-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 14:19:04 -0400 Received: (from grr@lo¼ôÅ;osDate: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 14:18:¼ôÅ;04From: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com> Message-Id: <200004151818.OAA22904@shandakor.tharsis.com> To: ci¼ôÅ;nsSubject: Re: [nsp] Arp table screwed
what you want to do is used "debug arp" and a¼ôÅ;gedebug output, either using syslog debugging to another system, or captureing the output of a console or te¼ôÅ; scan analyze the spew off-line.
Usually what happens is that you have an address conflict, one machine t¼ôÅ;ththat's causing the a router to "proxy arp" for anyone one¼ôÅ; n
George
> From: Mauricio Marquez <mmarquez@enlace.net> > Subject: [nsp] Arp table screwed > > > Hello > ¼ôÅ;he> addresses as Incomplete on IP addresses from di¼ôÅ;en> to manually insert the addresses on the table. Now obviously this is > causing alot of problems wi¼ôÅ;ur> dial-up users. > > Does anyone have any idea how to trace the root of the proble¼ôÅ; w> Appreciate any input. > > Thanks in advance, > > Mauricio > >
From niels@euro.net ¼ôÅ; AReceived: from someone claiming to be venus.euro.net (venus.euro.net [194.134.0.9]) by puck.nether.¼ôÅ;(8 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 15:58:49 -0400 (envelope-from niels¼ôÅ;o.ReCeived-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 15:58:49 -0400 Received: from localhost (niels@localhost) by venus.euro.net (8.8.8/8¼ôÅ;) Sat, 15 Apr 2000 21:58:33 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 21:58:32 +0200 (MET DST) From: Ni¼ôÅ;BaTo: Mike Gibbs <gibbs@servint.com> cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] European STM1 In¼ôÅ;lyMessage-ID: <1000415214652.24438B-100000@venus.euro.ne¼ôÅ;-NMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Mike Gibbs wrote:
> I am getting a STM¼ôÅ;om> a 7513 to accept this card? I was told the normal POS adapter won't ¼ôÅ; i
PA-POS-OC3 cards do STM1 fine. I have on a 7513 (PA-POS-OC3-SMI in a VIP2-50 filled to the max with DRAM and SRAM - v¼ôÅ;im
! interface POS4/1/0 [..] no ip directed-broadcast ip route-cache distributed crc 32 pos ais-shut pos fram¼ôÅ;sd pos flag s1s0 2 !
and on the 12008 on the other side: (linecard with 4 OC3/STM1 interfaces)
! inter¼ôÅ; P[.] no ip directed-broadcast ip mroute-cache distributed crc 32 pos ais-shut pos framing sdh pos scramble-atm¼ôÅ;s !
`pos framing sdh' is all you basically need, s1s0 is to denote the payload as PPP. The other flag¼ôÅ;0,ais-shut' is so that the other end can mark the interface down as well if you do a `¼ôÅ;doimportant but it doesn't hurt to enable it.
As said, this is a Wo¼ôÅ;omnetworks they only need to put an adapter that takes the VC-4 out of the OC192 ¼ôÅ;r connectors.
-- Niels.
From amb@uk.concentr¼ôÅ;omReceived: from someone claiming to be sapphire.noc.gxn.net (sapphire.noc.gxn.net [194.143.161¼ôÅ; for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 05:16:05 -0400 ¼ôÅ;veReceived-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 05:16:05 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo¼ôÅ;co by sapphire.noc.gxn.net with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #2) id 12gl9R-00052Z-00; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 10:15:33 +0100 X-M¼ôÅ;r:From: Alex Bligh <amb@gxn.net> To: Niels Bakker <niels@euro.net> cc: Mike Gibbs <gibbs@servint¼ôÅ;>,Subject: Re: [nsp] European STM1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 15 Apr 2000 21:58:32 +0200¼ôÅ; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date:¼ôÅ;, Sender: amb@uk.concentric.com Message-Id: <E12gl9R-00052Z-00@sapphire.noc.gxn.net>
> As said, ¼ôÅ; i> networks they only need to put an adapter that takes the VC-4 out¼ôÅ;th> connectors.
It is my understanding all cables¼ôÅ;rt(i.e. would be STM-64, not OC-192).
The scrambling is needed as I understand it as with POS, ¼ôÅ;e seem to remember a certain ping packet method to take down¼ôÅ;r
-- Alex Bligh VP Core Network, Concentric Network Corporation (formerly GX Networks, Xar
From tkernen@deckpoi¼ôÅ;h Received: from someone claiming to be shadow.deckpoint.ch (shadow2.deckpoint.ch [194.38.160.14¼ôÅ; b for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 07:01:02 -0400 (¼ôÅ;loReceived-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 07:01:02 -0400 Received: from violator.kernen.net (violator.¼ôÅ;enMessage-ID: <006301bfa792$ff108600$02aa26c2@deckpoint.ch> From: "Thomas Kernen" <tkernen@de.ëÅ;inTM: <cisDate: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 13:00:37 +0200 MIME-Vers¼ôÅ; 1ContEnt-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal¼ôÅ;aiX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.3825.400
All,
I'm trying to.ëÅ;uppeer-group and applying the community at that ¼ôÅ;t better way to do this.
Any ideas?
Thomas
From mjc@cooper.org.¼ôÅ;SuReceived: from someone claiming to be nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk (nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.12.28]) by¼ôÅ;k. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 10:45:16 -0400 (envelo¼ôÅ;roReceived-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 10:45:16 -0400 Received: from mjc64 by nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk with local ¼ôÅ;m id 12gqIE-0005BN-00 for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 15:44:58 +0100 From: Martin Cooper <mjc@coo¼ôÅ;orTO: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] European STM1 Message-Id: <E12gqIE-0005BN-00@nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk> D¼ôÅ; S
Alex Bligh <amb@gxn.net> wrote:
> I seem to remember a certain ping packet method to take¼ôÅ;n > Favourite unscrambled POS link.
Indeed. :-)
> The scrambling is needed as I understand it as with POS, there > is¼ôÅ;hi
Which makes it somewhat puzzling why the RFC for it (1619) says:
¼ôÅ; T Envelope (SPE), with the octet boundaries aligned w¼ôÅ;th No scrambling is needed during insertion into the SPE. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^¼ôÅ;^^
I'm a bit confused about how that happened, since the one character you'd think it might want¼ôÅ;woused to signify the start and end of every SONET/SDH frame...
M.
From mjc@cooper.org.¼ôÅ;SuReceived: from someone claiming to be nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk (nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.12.28]) by¼ôÅ;k. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 11:06:15 -0400 (envelo¼ôÅ;roReceived-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 11:06:15 -0400 Received: from mjc64 by nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk with local ¼ôÅ;m id 12gqcb-0005DQ-00 for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 16:06:01 +0100 From: Martin Cooper <mjc@coo¼ôÅ;orTO: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] European STM1 Message-Id: <E12gqcb-0005DQ-00@nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk> D¼ôÅ; S
Earlier, I wrote:
> I'm a bit confused about how that happened, since the one character >¼ôÅ;'d> used to signify the start and end of every SONET/SDH fram¼ôÅ;
was that something at a higher level that did implement such escap¼ôÅ; Rthe same author) for instance, would be used to avoid that particular problem.
M./ëFrom jared@puck.neth¼ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA32198 for cisco-nsp@p¼ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004162241.SAA32198@puck.nether.net¼ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA12883; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:59:52 -0400 (envelope-fr¼ôÅ;isDate: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:59:52 -0400 X-From_: smeuse@genuity.net Fri Apr 14 17:59:51 200/ëÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3¼ôÅ;.3 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:59:50 -0400 (envelope-from smeuse@genuity.¼ôÅ; RReceived: from smeuse_2 (dalek.bbnplanet.com [199.94.208.159]) by burlma1-s¼ôÅ;.g Fri, 14 Apr 2000 21:59:38 GMT Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20000414175632.00b57180¼ôÅ;.0X Sender: smeuse@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Old-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:59:¼ôÅ;09To: Mike Gibbs <gibbs@servint.com> From: Steve Meuse <smeuse@genuity.net> Subject: Re: [nsp] European STM1 Cc: cisco-n¼ôÅ;ucIn-Reply-To: <E12g6dq-0005Ro-00@sapphire.noc.gxn.net> References: <Your message of "Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:54:12¼ôÅ;."Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-as¼ôÅ;; X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date¼ôÅ;n,Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
At 03:00 PM 04/14/2000 +0100, Alex Bligh wrote: >Mike, >¼ôÅ; I> > a 7513 to accept this card? I was told the ¼ôÅ;al> > it. > >A normal POS adapter should do it assuming you have an STM-1 end >to end.
int pos0/0/0 ¼ôÅ;s
>Beware that some nefarious telcos will attempt to deliver you an >OC-3 one end and a STM-1 the other, by pa¼ôÅ;ng>between them on a DACS. It is alleged this actually works if >you are running ATM on the circuit, as the¼ôÅ;rh>dropped, but it surely won't work for POS.
Also, beware that many European Telco's will give you a coax h¼ôÅ;ofyOu don't specify Fiber SC/FC.
I had no Idea that they even did SDH over coax, but apparently this is common in th
-Steve
From warner@cats.UCS¼ôÅ;U Received: from someone claiming to be mx.nether.net (mx.nether.net [204.42.253.2]) by puck.ne¼ôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 21:12:49 -0400 (envelope-from ¼ôÅ;erReceived-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 21:12:49 -0400 Received: from cats.ucsc.edu (rumpleteazer.ucsc.edu [128.11¼ôÅ;9. bY mx.nether.net (8.10.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e3GJNw213283 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 15:23:¼ôÅ;04Received: from sasha.UCSC.EDU (IDENT:12@sasha.ucsc.edu [128.114.129.29]) by cats.ucsc.edu (8.9.3/8.8.4.¼ôÅ;-a id MAA16032; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 12:24:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Jim Warner <warner@cats.UCSC.EDU> Received: /ëÅ;m Sun, 16 Apr 2000 12:24:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: S¼ôÅ;16Message-Id: <200004161924.MAA20869@sasha.UCSC.EDU> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, mjc@coope¼ôÅ;g.SubjEct: Re: [nsp] European STM1
RFC 1619 not withstanding, the scrambling in the SPE is insufficient if the intent is¼ôÅ;icmapped to a long string of zeros by the scrambling function. If you send that ¼ôÅ;ghup bit-aligned to give you enough zeros in a row to cause sonet errors.
From mjc@cooper.org.¼ôÅ;SuReceived: from someone claiming to be mx.nether.net (mx.nether.net [204.42.253.2]) by puck.nethe¼ôÅ;t for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 21:14:48 -0400 (envelope-from mjc¼ôÅ;peReceived-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 21:14:48 -0400 Received: from nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk (nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.12¼ôÅ;) for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 12:18:12 -0¼ôÅ;(ERecEived: from mjc64 by nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12grkZ-0005JU-00 for cisco-nFrom: Martin Cooper <mjc@cooper.org.uk> To: ciscSubjecMEssage-Id: <E12grkZ-0005JU-00@nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 200
Earlier still, I wrote:
>¼ôÅ; a> you'd think it might want to worry about escaping is the ¼ôÅ;th> Used to signify the start and end of every SONET/SDH frame...
Before anyone jumps on the deliberate mistake in the¼ôÅ;vewhat I meant to say was "at the start and end of every PPP frame" (since they can span SONET/SDH SPEs).
M.
From ferguson@cisco.¼ôÅ; SReceived: from someone claiming to be lint.cisco.com (lint.cisco.com [171.68.224.209]) by puck.¼ôÅ;er for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 22:29:29 -0400 (envelope-fro¼ôÅ;rgReceived-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 22:29:29 -0400 Received: from bigger-dawgs.cisco.com (pferguso-isdn.cisco.¼ôÅ;[1MEssage-Id: <4.3.1.2.20000416222653.00a94740@lint.cisco.com> X-Sender: pX-Mailer: QUALCOMM Wi/ëÅ;s To: Jim Warner <warner@cats.UCSC.EDU> From: Paul Ferguson <ferg¼ôÅ;@cSubject: Re: [nsp] European STM1 Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, mjc@cooper.org.uk In-Reply-To: <200004161924.MAA¼ôÅ;9@cooper.org.ukALCOMM Wi/ëÅHMime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 12:24 PM 04/16/2000 -0700, Jim Warner w¼ôÅ;: >if the intent is malicious. You can find a patter¼ôÅ;at>mapped to a long string of zeros by the scrambling function. If >you send that enough times, some small fractio¼ôÅ; t>up bit-aligned to give you enough zeros in a row to cause sonet >errors.
We've been through yhis over & ove¼ôÅ; A
- paul
From danny@sofos.tcb¼ôÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be tcb.net (tcb.net [205.168.100.1]) by puck.nether.net (8.¼ôÅ;8. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 22:43:40 -0400 (envelope-from danny@sofos.¼ôÅ;neReceIved-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 22:43:40 -0400 Received: from sofos.tcb.net (sofos.tcb.net [127.0.0.1]) by tcb.net (8.¼ôÅ;8. Mon, 17 Apr 2000 02:48:48 -0600 Message-Id: <200004170848.CAA00667@tcb.net> X-Mailer: exmh v¼ôÅ;onTo: Jim Warner <warner@cats.UCSC.EDU> cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, mjc@cooper.org.uk From: Danny McPherson <danny¼ôÅ;.nRepLy-To: danny@tcb.net Subject: Re: [nsp] European STM1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii¼ôÅ;e:Sender: danny@sofos.tcb.net
> RFC 1619 not withstanding, the scrambling in the SPE is in¼ôÅ;ic> If the intent is malicious. You can find a pattern that will be > mapped to a long string of zeros by the scrambli¼ôÅ;un> you send that enough times, some small fraction of them will end > up bit-aligned to give you enough zeros in¼ôÅ;ow> errors.
Of course, as clearly spelled out in the RFC:
"Predicting the output of the scrambler requires¼ôÅ;wlof the transmitter as the scrambling of a known input is begun. This requires knowledge of bot¼ôÅ;e and every byte of data scrambled by the device sincOf guessing correctly are 1/2**43, with the additional probability of 1payload, which results in a probability of 9e-16 against being able to deliberately caus¼ôÅ;NEthis application."
Probability of 9e-16, _this application, been¼ôÅ;elnetworks for a while .... I'll talk my chances. Of course, if you've a better idea I'm sure fo¼ôÅ;wo
-danny
From jared@puck.neth¼ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA16643 for cisco-nsp@p¼ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004171234.IAA16643@puck.nether.net¼ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id FAA14024; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 05:05:42 -0400 (envelope-fr¼ôÅ;isDate: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 05:05:42 -0400 X-From_: riho.raassild@tele2.ee Mon Apr 17 05:05:41/ëÅ;0 by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ¼ôÅ;P for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 05:05:40 -0400 (envelope-from riho.raassild@tele2.ee) Rece¼ôÅ;-DReceived: from riho (fw.tele2.ee [212.107.32.156]) by my.tele2.ee (8.9.3/8.9.3) with¼ôÅ;P for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 11:05:24 +0200 Message-ID: <328e01bfa844$01eb3ee0$4301a8c0@¼ôÅ;eeTo: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> References: <200003281459.GAA11280@omega.¼ôÅ;o.OlD-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 11:07:43 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-T¼ôÅ;feX-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Pro¼ôÅ;d X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck¼ôÅ;heREsent-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 08:34:14 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsp] UPS control via AUX¼ôÅ;
loss via Cisco's aux port?
Riho
From jared@puck.neth¼ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA03103 for cisco-nsp@p¼ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004171801.OAA03103@puck.nether.net¼ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA03090; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:01:17 -0400 (envelope-fr¼ôÅ;isDate: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:01:17 -0400 X-From_: allan@alum.mit.edu Mon Apr 17 14:01:16 200/ëÅ;ce by puck.nether.net for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:01:15 -040Receiv¼ôÅ;atReceived: from GRAND-CENTRAL-STATION.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA21344; Mon, 17 ¼ôÅ;00Received: from melbourne-city-street.MIT.EDU (MELBOURNE-CITY-STREET.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.45]) by grand-central-¼ôÅ;io for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 13:56:08 -0400 (EDT) Rec¼ôÅ;d: by melbourne-city-street.MIT.E¼ôÅ;8. for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 13:55:56 -0400 (EDT) Sender: allan@MI¼ôÅ;U Old-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 09:54:50 -0700 From: Allan Chong <allan@alum.mit.e½ôÅ;OrX-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version:½ôÅ; TContent-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Diagnostic: Not ½ôÅ;heX-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:01:37 -0400 Rese½ôÅ;o:Subject: [nsp] CCIE & ATM
I'm headed in for my CCIE lab in a few days, and I'm wondering if an/ëÅ; ohas aget familiar enough with t½ôÅ;ntnot fail that portion of the test.
Any pointers on the lab would be appreciated as well. I'm not sure how much½ôÅ;e like AT & Decnet & IBM. I studied those quite a bit for the written and½ôÅ;llcursory knowledge of it.
Many thanks, allan -- Allan Chong allan@alum.mit.edu
From jared@puck.neth½ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA04237 for cisco-nsp@p½ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004171822.OAA04237@puck.nether.net½ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA04137; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:20:14 -0400 (envelope-fr½ôÅ;isDate: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:20:14 -0400 X-From_: mjc64@cam.ac.uk Mon Apr 17 14:20:14 2000 R½ôÅ;ve nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk (nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.12.28]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3)½ôÅ;h for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:20:13 -0400 (envelope-from mjc64@cam.ac.uk) Recei½ôÅ;DaReceived: from mjc64 by nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12hG7m-00077P½ôÅ; fTo: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] CCIE & ATM ½ôÅ;agFrom: Martin Cooper <mjc64@cam.ac.uk> Old-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 19:19:54 +01½ôÅ;-DX-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 200½ôÅ;:2Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Allan Chong <allan@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> I'm headed in for my CCIE lab ½ôÅ; f> and I'm wondering if anyone out there > has a Lightstream ATM switch plugged in that > I could hop on and play ½ôÅ;, > get familiar enough with the interface to > not fail that portion of the test.
I'd like to help, but it's a½ôÅ;n
Lightstream 1010 runs IOS though, so it really shouldn't be all that tricky... ;-)
> Any poin½ôÅ; o> as well.
You're unlikely to get any specific help, since all candidates are required to ½ôÅ; aadvice is to get lots of rest the night before, know where you're going so you g½ôÅ;hethere are no points for appearance (this is virtually word for word what the off½ôÅ;l than my advice really!).
> I'm not sure how much time I should be > spending on½ôÅ;se> like AT & Decnet & IBM. I studied those > quite a bit for the written and really > didn't need to ½ôÅ; a> a cursory knowledge of it.
Who can say? ;-)
I must say that I would probably be a lot closer to att½ôÅ;inthat I'll probably never use weren't on the syllabus th½ôÅ;..AnywAy, best of luck with it!
M.
From jared@puck.neth½ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA04302 for cisco-nsp@p½ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004171823.OAA04302@puck.nether.net½ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA04233; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:22:49 -0400 (envelope-fr½ôÅ;isDate: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:22:49 -0400 X-From_: bradley@dunn.org Mon Apr 17 14:22:48 2000 ½ôÅ;iv gould.dunn.org (gould.dunn.org [216.254.16.152]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ½ôÅ;P for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:22:48 -0400 (envelope-from bradley@dunn.org) Received-D½ôÅ; MReceived: from bradley (helo=localhost) by gould.dunn.org with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) ½ôÅ;12Old-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 11:22:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Bradley Dunn <bradle½ôÅ;nnTO: Allan Chong <allan@alum.mit.edu> cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] CCIE & ATM In-Reply-To: <38FB4/ëÅ;A6MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: T½ôÅ;PLX-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Res½ôÅ;DaResent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Allan Chong wrote:
> I'm h½ôÅ;d > and I'm wondering if anyone out there > has a Lightstream ATM switch plugged in that >½ôÅ;ou> get familiar enough with the interface to > not fail that portion of the test.
The½ôÅ;hthttp://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/ro½ôÅ;g.http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/wan.html http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certif½ôÅ;iohttp://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/sna_ip.html
> Any pointers on the lab would be ½ôÅ;ec>
Before taking the lab you have to sign an NDA. So anyone who could help wo½ôÅ;be
From jared@puck.neth½ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA05435 for cisco-nsp@p½ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004171836.OAA05435@puck.nether.net½ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA05388; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:36:11 -0400 (envelope-fr½ôÅ;isDate: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:36:11 -0400 X-From_: mjc64@cam.ac.uk Mon Apr 17 14:36:11 2000 R½ôÅ;ve nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk (nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.12.28]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3)½ôÅ;h for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:36:10 -0400 (envelope-from mjc64@cam.ac.uk) Recei½ôÅ;DaReceived: from mjc64 by nmg4.csi.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12hGNH-00079B½ôÅ; fTo: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] CCIE & ATM ½ôÅ;agFrom: Martin Cooper <mjc64@cam.ac.uk> Old-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 19:35:55 +01½ôÅ;-DX-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 200½ôÅ;:3Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Bradley Dunn <bradley@dunn.org> wrote:
> The Lightstream is not on the e½ôÅ;me
The ATM Switch Module for the Catalyst is a Lightstream, though, and the Catalyst is o
M.
From jared@puck.neth½ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA10740 for cisco-nsp@p½ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004171939.PAA10740@puck.nether.net½ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA10652; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 15:39:41 -0400 (envelope-fr½ôÅ;isDate: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 15:39:41 -0400 X-From_: shawn@smorris.com Mon Apr 17 15:39:40 2000½ôÅ;ei astro.smorris.com (IDENT:root@astro.smorris.com [157.238.77.132]) by puck.nether.net (½ôÅ;3/ for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 15:39:40 -0400 (envelope-from shawn@smor½ôÅ;coReceIved-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 15:39:40 -0400 Received: from scooby (scooby.smorris.com [157.238.77.131]) by astro.sm½ôÅ;s. Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:39:19 -0500 From: "Shawn Morris" <shawn@smorris.com> To: "Al½ôÅ;ChSubject: RE: [nsp] CCIE & ATM Old-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:39:19 -/ëÅ; MMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii½ôÅ;ntX-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.24½ôÅ;9.In-Reply-To: <38FB41DA.A6660901@alum.mit.edu> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Importanc½ôÅ;orX-DIagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Mon, 17 ½ôÅ;20Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
I recently spoke with a former coworker who just passed his lab ex½ôÅ;Aclightstreams.
> -----Original Message----- > From: allan½ôÅ;.E> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2000 13:01 > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > S½ôÅ;ct> > > I'm headed in for my CCIE lab in a few days, > and I'm wondering if anyone out there > has a Ligh½ôÅ;ea> I could hop on and play with, or at least > get familiar enough with the interface to > not½ôÅ;l > > Any pointers on the lab would be appreciated > as well. I'm not sure how much time I > shou½ôÅ;e > like AT & Decnet & IBM. I studied those > quite a bit for the written and really >½ôÅ;n'> cursory knowledge of it. > > > Many thanks, > allan > -- > Allan Chong allan@alum.
From grr@shandakor.t½ôÅ;isReceived: from someone claiming to be shandakor.tharsis.com (IDENT:root@shandakor.tharsis½ôÅ; [ by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA18461 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000½ôÅ;16 (envelope-from grr@shandakor.tharsis.com) Received-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 17:16:15 -0400 Received: (from grr@lo½ôÅ;osDate: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 17:15:½ôÅ;04From: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com> Message-Id: <200004172115.RAA22723@shandakor.tharsis.com> To: ci½ôÅ;nsSubject: Re: [nsp] UPS control via AUX
Should be. Some of the UPS indications ½ôÅ;a the RS232 modem-control signals, and with the appropriate line configuration for the aux port, y½ôÅ;shthem via snmp. You may also find UPS's that can "talkor
> From: "Riho R½ôÅ;il> To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> > Subject: [nsp] UPS control via AUX > > Hi > > Is there a½ôÅ;PS> loss via Cisco's aux port? > > > Riho
From ed@texas.net M½ôÅ;prReceived: from someone claiming to be mw1.texas.net (mw1.texas.net [206.127.30.11]) by puck.nether.ne½ôÅ;.9 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 17:18:43 -0400 (envelope-from ed@texa½ôÅ;t)Received: from staff2.texas.net (staff2.texas.net [207.207.0.39]) ½ôÅ; m id QAA03719 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 16:18:27 -0500 (CDT) Re½ôÅ;edDate: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 16:18:22 -0500 From: Edward Henigin <ed@datafoundry.net> To: Cisco Gurus <cisco-nsp@puck.n½ôÅ;r.MeSsage-ID: <20000417161821.J15029@datafoundry.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Ma½ôÅ;: Subject: [nsp] failover with policy routing?
Hi gents,
I'm looking at a network configuration for a customer ½ôÅ;e and some traffic out through another backbone provider. ½ôÅ;e load balancing. Some traffic through us, some through the other guy½ôÅ;hainto the equation. I just don't see it.
backbone A bac½ôÅ;e \ / 3640 | | internal netw½ôÅ;
that you set must be a directly connected router. (The polic½ôÅ;oumust be adjacent.)
I'm just trying to figure out how to do½ôÅ; punder some sort of conditional scenario, or dynamically set the next-hop, or something, based on reachabilit½ôÅ; t
The best thing I can think of is to have a script somewhere that would go in and delete the policy routing ½ôÅ;igthe remote gateway becomes unreachable ...
yuck.
Thoughts?
From russb@puffer.qu½ôÅ;nnReceived: from someone claiming to be puffer.quadrunner.com (root@puffer.quadrunner.com½ôÅ;5. by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA20609 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 17/ëÅ;57 (envelReceived: (from russb@l½ôÅ;ho by Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:56:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 ½ôÅ;6:From: Russell Briggs <russb@puffer.quadrunner.com> To: Edward Henigin <ed@datafoundry.net> Cc: Cisco Gurus <cisco½ôÅ;@pSubject: Re: [nsp] failover with policy routing? Message-ID: <20000417145625.C25918@puffer.quadrunner.com>½ôÅ;erMime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt½ôÅ;.1
½ôÅ;
long as it is reachable in the routing table (recursive route½ôÅ; and let that provide the redundancy for you.
Let me k½ôÅ;if
-Russ
On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 04:18:22PM -0500, Edward Henigin said: > Hi gents, > > I'm looking at a n½ôÅ;rk> he'd be using policy routing to push some traffic out through us, > and some traffic½ôÅ; t> > The essense of the design gives our customer policy-based > load balancing. Some ½ôÅ;fi> guy. What we're trying to figure out now is how to wrap redundancy > into the equa½ôÅ;. > > > backbone A backbone B > \ / > \ / > 3640 > ½ôÅ; > | > internal > network > > > From what I understand about policy routing, ½ôÅ;'n> that you set must be a directly connected router. (The policy- > routing cisco just re-writes the layer 2 head½ôÅ;so> must be adjacent.) > > I'm just trying to figure out how to do the policy routing > under some sort of c½ôÅ;ti> next-hop, or something, based on reachability of the next-hop. > > The best thin½ôÅ;ca> that would go in and delete the policy routing configuration if > the remote ga½ôÅ;y > > yuck. > > Thoughts?
-- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=½ôÅ;-= RuSsell Briggs V 512-474-7676 Director of Engineering ½ôÅ; FreeMe.Com, Inc. F 512-474-9446 russb@quadrunner.com ½ôÅ;
From grr@shandakor.t½ôÅ;isReceived: from someone claiming to be shandakor.tharsis.com (IDENT:root@shandakor.tharsis½ôÅ; [ by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA21911 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000½ôÅ;29 (envelope-from grr@shandakor.tharsis.com) Received-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 18:29:23 -0400 Received: (from grr@lo½ôÅ;osDate: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 18:29:½ôÅ;04From: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com> Message-Id: <200004172229.SAA16808@shandakor.tharsis.com> To: ci½ôÅ;nsSubject: Re: [nsp] failover with policy routing?
You can specify multiple next-hops½ôÅ; ithat there's a usuable route for. Of course each of the possible next-hops needs to know how to ½ôÅ;hewhat happens if none of them are reachable, in some cases treating the destination as unreac½ôÅ;e overriding the otherwise determined next hop would be better.
Having a 2nd next-hop t½ôÅ;loaccomplishing the later (or melting down your router 8-)
George
> Date: Mon, 17½ôÅ; 2> From: Edward Henigin <ed@datafoundry.net> > To: Cisco Gurus <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> > Subject: [n½ôÅ;fa> > Hi gents, > > I'm looking at a network configuration for a customer where > he'd be usi½ôÅ;ol> and some traffic out through another backbone provider. > > The essen½ôÅ;f > load balancing. Some traffic through us, some through the other > guy. What½ôÅ;re> into the equation. I just don't see it. > > > backbone A ba½ôÅ;ne> > \ / > 3640 > | > | > internal > ½ôÅ; > > > From what I understand about policy routing, the 'next hop' > that you set must be a directly connec½ôÅ;ro> routing cisco just re-writes the layer 2 header, so the next-hop > must be adjacent.) > > I'm just½ôÅ;in> under some sort of conditional scenario, or dynamically set the > next-hop,½ôÅ;so> > The best thing I can think of is to have a script somewhere > that w½ôÅ; g> the remote gateway becomes unreachable ... > > yuck. > > Thought½ôÅ;
From jared@puck.neth½ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA23120 for cisco-nsp@p½ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004172246.SAA23120@puck.nether.net½ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA22666; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 18:38:38 -0400 (envelope-fr½ôÅ;isDate: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 18:38:38 -0400 X-From_: jtpop@mail2.fox-den.com Mon Apr 17 18:38:3½ôÅ;00 mail2.fox-den.com (mail2.fox-den.com [204.91.156.27]) by puck.ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 18:ReceIved-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 18:38:36 -0400 Received: (from jtpop@localhost) by mail2.fox-den.com ( MOn, 17 Apr 2000 18:38:19 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: jtpop@localhost9 -0400(Message-Id: <v04210122b52130ëÅ;cbReferences: <20000417161821.J15029@datafoundry½ôÅ;> Old-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 18:37:58 -0400 To: Russell Briggs <russb@puffer.½ôÅ;ruFrom: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com> Subject: Re: [nsp] failover with policy routing? Cc: ed@datafoundry.net, cisc½ôÅ;p@datafoundry.netContent-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Enve½ôÅ;-TResent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 18:46:49 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.net½ôÅ;ne
I dOn't think this is correct. I tried to make this work some time ago with cache redirection, and hit the wall with½ôÅ;n-since the manual clearly states 'next-hop does not need ½ôÅ;e have it next to me.) They contacted Section and he said "Whoops! Typo! Yes, it does need to be directly cnon-adjacent hosts (i.e. layer 3 re-write instead of layer 2) I'd be eternally grateful beca½ôÅ;th
Ed, to answer your question directly: WCCP is the only thing that I know of that can0ëÅ;seyou're ½ôÅ;inmay be) solution, use BGP and then weight the paths with localpr½ôÅ;r dynamic, but does provide failover ability. I've fo½ôÅ;thwith the localprefs of only a few AS'es is all you need to make the traffic "more-or-less" balanced. Granted½ôÅ;u of AS path-length as a preferred metric, but since you're talking about using next-hop to break it½ôÅ;wais as good as another. ;)
Upon re-reading this whole document, I find that "use BGP" is t½ôÅ;vesomehow, but I don't see where. Please feel free to clout½ôÅ;onhEad for stating the obvious solution if you've already discounted it for some reason.
JT
>Ed: > > The next-hop ½ôÅ; n>long as it is reachable in the routing table (recursive routes). >With that in mi½ôÅ;yo>and let that provide the redundancy for you. > > Let me know if this works... ½ôÅ;Ru> >ON Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 04:18:22PM -0500, Edward Henigin said: > > Hi gents, > > > > I'm looking at a network confi½ôÅ;ti> > he'd be using policy routing to push some traffic out through us, > > and some traffic out thr½ôÅ; a> > > > The essense of the design gives our customer policy-based > > load balancing. Some tra½ôÅ; t> > guy. What we're trying to figure out now is how to wrap redundancy > > into the equ½ôÅ;n.> > > > > > backbone A backbone B > > \ / > > \ / > > ½ôÅ;36> > > > | > > internal > > network > > > > > > From what I understand½ôÅ;ut> > that you set must be a directly connected router. (The policy- > > routing cisco just½ôÅ;wr> > must be adjacent.) > > > > I'm just trying to figure out how to do the polic½ôÅ;ut> >> > next-hop, or something, based on reachability ½ôÅ;he> > > > The best thing I can think of is to have a script somewhere > > that would go in and delete the policy½ôÅ;ti> > the remote gateway becomes unreachable ... > > > > yuck. > > > > Thoughts? > >-- >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-½ôÅ;=-> Russell Briggs V 512-474-½ôÅ; >> FreeMe.Com, Inc. ½ôÅ; > russb@quadrunner.com www.freeme.com
From russb@puffer.qu½ôÅ;nnReceived: from someone claiming to be puffer.quadrunner.com (root@puffer.quadrunner.com½ôÅ;5. by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA23784 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 180ëÅ;13 (envelReceived: (from russb@l½ôÅ;ho by Mon, 17 Apr 2000 15:57:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 ½ôÅ;7:From: Russell Briggs <russb@puffer.quadrunner.com> To: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com> Cc: ed@datafoundry.net, cisco½ôÅ;@pSubject: Re: [nsp] failover with policy routing? Message-ID: <20000417155746.B26510@puffer.quadrunner.com> ½ôÅ;reContent-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <v04210122b5213fd0dcb8@[½ôÅ;16
Ah, I too read somewhere that the next-hop didn'½ôÅ;veadjacent. Though I've never tried to do anything like this, it evidentally won't work.
The only problem with us½ôÅ;BGis that I believe Ed is trying to do port-based policy routes, ie. send all traffi½ôÅ;thI don't know of many ways to accomplish this while incorporating redund½ôÅ; i
-Russ
On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 06:37:58PM -0400, John Todd said: > > I don't think this is correct. I½ôÅ;ed> ago with cache redirection, and hit the wall with > non-directly-connected next-hop locat½ôÅ;. > since the manual clearly states 'next-hop does not need to be > directly connected' (this is½ôÅ;ap> have it next to me.) They contacted the developer for that code > section and he sai½ôÅ;ho> connected." > > If either of you can tell me that next-hop can be made to½ôÅ;k > nOn-adjacent hosts (i.e. layer 3 re-write instead of layer 2) I'd be > eternally grateful because that would solve ½ôÅ;e > > Ed, to answer your question directly: WCCP is the only thing that I > know of that can cause layer 2 ½ôÅ;ri> during failure modes in the instances of which you're speaking. If > you're looking for½ôÅ;or> may be) solution, use BGP and then weight the paths with localpref or > ½ôÅ; o> dynamic, but does provide failover abilit with the localprefs of only a few AS'es is all you need to make the > of AS path-length as a preferred metric, but since you're talking > about using n> is as good as another. ;) > > Upon re-re very obvious answer - so obvious that I must be mis-reading this > s> head for stating the obvious solution if you've already discounted it > for some reason. > > JT > ½ôÅ; >> > > > The next-hop does not have to be on a connected subnet, as > >long as it is reachable in the routing table (re½ôÅ;iv> >With that in mind, you can set the next-hop to a dynamic route, > >and let that provide the > > > >-Russ > > > >On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at> > ½ôÅ; g>> > > I'm looking at a network configuration for a customer where > > > he'd be using policy routing to push ½ôÅ; t> > > and some traffic out through another backbone provider. > > > > > > The essense of the desig½ôÅ;ve> > > load balancing. Some traffic through us, some through the other > > > guy. What we're ½ôÅ;ng> > > into the equation. I just don't see it. > > > > > > > > > backbone½ôÅ; b> > > \ / > > > \ / > > > 3640 > > > | > > > ½ôÅ;> > > > network > > > > > > > > > From what I understand about policy routing, the 'next ½ôÅ; >> > > routing cisco just re-writes the layer 2 header½ôÅ; t> > > must be adjacent.) > > > > > > I'm just trying to figure out how to do the policy routing > > > under s½ôÅ;so> > > next-hop, or something, based on reachability of the next-hop. > ½ôÅ;> > > > that would go in and delete the policy routing conf½ôÅ;at > > the remote gateway becomes unreachable ... > > > > > > yuck. > > > > > > Thoughts?
From jared@puck.neth½ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA24940 for cisco-nsp@p½ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004172322.TAA24940@puck.nether.net½ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA24914; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 19:21:30 -0400 (envelope-fr½ôÅ;isDate: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 19:21:30 -0400 X-From_: jtpop@mail2.fox-den.com Mon Apr 17 19:21:2½ôÅ;00 mail2.fox-den.com (mail2.fox-den.com [204.91.156.27]) by puck.ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 19:ReceIved-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 19:21:29 -0400 Received: (from jtpop@localhost) by mail2.fox-den.com ( MOn, 17 Apr 2000 19:21:10 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: jtpop@localhost0 -0400(Message-Id: <v04210127b52140ëÅ;21References: <20000417161821.J15029@datafoundry½ôÅ;> <v04210122b5213fd0dcb8@[172.16.2.77]> <20000417155746.B26510@puffer.quadr0ëÅ;r.OlD-Date:From: John Todd <jtodd@lol½ôÅ;coSubjEct: Re: [nsp] failover with policy routing? Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, ed@datafoundry.net Content-Type: text/p½ôÅ;; X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck½ôÅ;heREsent-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 19:22:23 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
>Ah, I too read somewhere that th½ôÅ;xt>adjacent. Though I've never tried to do anything like this, >it evidentally won't work. > >The on½ôÅ;ro>is that I believe Ed is trying to do port-based policy routes, ie½ôÅ;en>I don't know of many ways to accomplish this while inco½ôÅ;at>reDundancy into the equation.
Ah - I didn't see any explicit "why" in the document; just that policy-routing was be½ôÅ;us
GeOrge Robbins I think has the right idea in his followup - use multiple next-hops and make the first one the "desir½ôÅ;pacourse, this implies that the next-hops can go "down" and their next-hop entry correspondingly removed from the ½ôÅ;e.connections between backbone A or B to the 3640 are on ethernet, the chances that the link will go "down" are s½ôÅ;ctreally likes to stay up/up even though packets can't make it across, and if the interface shows up phys½ôÅ;lystays valid. If these were serial (PPP/HDLC/POS) connections that would probably be a better b½ôÅ;yokeeping the next-hop IP address "alive."
I tried doing something similar to this a w½ôÅ; anext-hops but that was a crash-and-burn for a number of reasons; I can't remember if it was failure ½ôÅ;unif it was that the standard tunnelling that Cisco uses always shows as "up/up" even though½ôÅ;rt11.1, anyone know if tunnel state is now tied to actual ability of tunnel ends to s½ôÅ;acVLAN?)
JT
>-Russ > >On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 06:37:58PM -04> > > > since the manual clearly states 'next-hop doe½ôÅ;t > > directly connected' (this is paraphrased from the manual - I don't > > have it next to me.) They contacted½ôÅ; d> > section and he said "Whoops! Typo! Yes, it does need to be directly > > connected." > > > > If½ôÅ;he> > non-adjacent hosts (i.e. layer 3 re-write instead of layer 2½ôÅ;d > > Eternally grateful because that would solve quite a few kludges. > > > > Ed, to answer your question directly: WCCP½ôÅ;th> > know of that can cause layer 2 re-writes or passthroughs to change > > during failure modes in the½ôÅ;ta> > you're looking for a more elegant (or horribly more ugly, as the case > > may be) s½ôÅ;io> > some other method. This will require tuning by hand and isn't ½ôÅ; >> > with the localprefs of only a few AS'es is all½ôÅ; n> > traffic "more-or-less" balanced. Granted, you break the whole point > > of AS path-length as a prefer½ôÅ;me> > about using next-hop to break it anyway, I figure one broken choice > > is as good as a½ôÅ;er>> > Upon re-reading this whole document, I find that "use BGP" is the > > very obvious answer - so obvious that ½ôÅ;st> > somehow, but I don't see where. Please feel free to clout me on the > > head for stating the obv½ôÅ; s> > for some reason. > > > > JT > > > > > > >Ed: > > > > > > The next-hop does not½ôÅ;e > > >long as it is reachable in the routing table (recursive routes). > > >With that in mi½ôÅ;yo> > >and let that provide the redundancy for you. > > > > > > Let me know if th½ôÅ;or>> > >-Russ > > > > > >On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 04:18:22PM -0500, Edward Henigin said: > > > > Hi gents, > > > >½ôÅ; >> > > > he'd be using policy routing to push some traffic ½ôÅ;th> > > > and some traffic out through another backbone provider. > > > > > > > > The essense of the design gives½ôÅ; c> > > > load balancing. Some traffic through us, some through the other > > > > guy. What we're try½ôÅ;to> > > > into the equation. I just don't see it. > > > > > > > > > > > > bac½ôÅ;e > > > > \ / > > > > \ / > > > > 3640 > > > > | > > ½ôÅ; > > > > internal > > > > network > > > > > > > > > > > > From what I understand about p½ôÅ;y > > > > that you set must be a directly connected router. (The policy- > > > > routing cisco just½ôÅ;wr> > > > must be adjacent.) > > > > > > > > I'm just trying to figure out how to ½ôÅ;he> > > > under some sort of conditional scenario, or dynamically set the > > > > next-hop, or something, ba½ôÅ;on> > > > > > > > The best thing I can think of is to have a script somewhere > > > > that w½ôÅ; g> > > > the remote gateway becomes unreachable ... > > > > > > > > yu½ôÅ;> >
From ed@texas.net M½ôÅ;prReceived: from someone claiming to be mw3.texas.net (mw3.texas.net [206.127.30.13]) by puck.nether.ne½ôÅ;.9 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 19:54:51 -0400 (envelope-from ed@texa½ôÅ;t)Received: from staff2.texas.net (staff2.texas.net [207.207.0.39]) ½ôÅ; m id SAA22036; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 18:54:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from ed@localhost) by s½ôÅ;2.Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 18:54:31 -0500 From: Edw½ôÅ;HeTo: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] failover with½ôÅ;icMessage-ID: <20000417185431.L15029@datafoundry.net> References: <20000417161821.J15029@datafoundry.net> <200004½ôÅ;56Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset½ôÅ;asX-MAiler: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <v04210122b5213fd0dcb8@[172.16.2.77]>; from jtodd@loligo.com on Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at ½ôÅ;7:
We want to policy route so we can push (for example) http traffic through one link and all other traffic thro½ôÅ;thlayer 4 routing vs. layer 3 routing. That's why BGP won't work.
Thanks for the info, tho.
Ed
-- On Mon, Apr½ôÅ; 2> > I don't think this is correct. I tried to make this work some time > ago w½ôÅ;ca> non-directly-connected next-hop locations. I called Cisco about it, > since th½ôÅ;nu> directly connected' (this is paraphrased from the manual - I don't > h½ôÅ;it> section and he said "Whoops! Typo! Yes, it does need to be d½ôÅ;tl> coNnected." > > If either of you can tell me that next-hop can be made to work on > non-adjacent hosts (i.e. layer ½ôÅ;-w> eternally grateful because that would solve quite a few kludges. > > Ed, to answer you½ôÅ;es> know of that can cause layer 2 re-writes or passthroughs to change > duri½ôÅ;ai> you're looking for a more elegant (or horribly more ugly, as ½ôÅ;ca> mAy be) solution, use BGP and then weight the paths with localpref or > some other method. This will require tunin½ôÅ; h> dynamic, but does provide failover ability. I've found that fooling > with the localprefs of only ½ôÅ;w > traffic "more-or-less" balanced. Granted, you break the whole point > of AS path-le½ôÅ; a> about using next-hop to break it anyway, I figure one broken choice > i½ôÅ; g> > Upon re-reading this whole document, I find that "use BGP" is the > very obvious answer - so obv½ôÅ; t> somehow, but I don't see where. Please feel free to clout me on the > head for stating½ôÅ; o> for some reason. > > JT
From bgreene@cisco.c½ôÅ;TuReceived: from someone claiming to be mail1.cisco.com (mail1.cisco.com [171.68.225.60]) by puck.½ôÅ;er for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 01:02:36 -0400 (envelope-fro½ôÅ;reReceived-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 01:02:36 -0400 Received: from bgreenent2 (bgreene-dsl2.cisco.com [144.254.1½ôÅ;9]Fr½ôÅ;"BTo: "George Robbins" <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com>, <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>,½ôÅ; Subject: RE: [nsp] failover with policy routing? Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 21:57:13 -0700 Message-ID:½ôÅ;2bMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content½ôÅ;nsX-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-½ôÅ;y-X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Importance: Normal½ôÅ;el
Check out Netflow Policy Based Routing (NPR). It's not only faster (flow enhanced feature with more pps), bu½ôÅ; unext-hop is active. Not the best way to work a fail-over, but better than before.
http://www.½ôÅ;o.t/120t3/policyrt.htm
NPR would work in the topology below (as½ôÅ;ngwith CDP turned on).
Barry
> -----Original Message----- > From: George Robbins [mailto:grr@s½ôÅ;ak> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2000 3:29 PM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; ed@datafoundry.net > Subject: Re: ½ôÅ;] > > > You can specify multiple next-hops and it will use the first one > that there's a usua½ôÅ;ro> next-hops needs to know how to do the "right thing". I'm not sure > what happe½ôÅ;f > the destination as unreachable would be good, in others simply not > ½ôÅ;ri> > Having a 2nd next-hop to a loopback might be an explict way of½ôÅ;cc> > George > > > Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 16:18:22 -0500 > > Fr½ôÅ;Ed> > To: Cisco Gurus <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> > > Subject: [nsp] failo> > > Hi gents, > > > > I'm looking at a network configuration for a cus> > and some traffic out through another backbone provider. > > > > The essense of the de½ôÅ; g> > load balancing. Some traffic through us, some through the other > > guy. What we're t½ôÅ;g > > into the equation. I just don't see it. > > > > > > backbone A back½ôÅ; B> > \ / > > 3640 > > | > > | > > i½ôÅ;na> > > > > > From what I understand about policy routing, the 'next hop' > > that you set must be½ôÅ;ir> > routing cisco just re-writes the layer 2 header, so the next-hop > > must be adj½ôÅ;t.>> > under some sort of conditional scenario, or dyna½ôÅ;ll> > next-hop, or something, based on reachability of the next-hop. > > > > The best thing I can think of is to ½ôÅ; a> > that would go in and delete the policy routing configuration if > > the remote gateway becomes unrea½ôÅ;le> > > yuck. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > >
From bgreene@cisco.c½ôÅ;TuReceived: from someone claiming to be mail1.cisco.com (mail1.cisco.com [171.68.225.60]) by puck.½ôÅ;er for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 01:10:28 -0400 (envelope-fro½ôÅ;reReceived-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 01:10:28 -0400 Received: from bgreenent2 (bgreene-dsl2.cisco.com [144.254.1½ôÅ;9]Fr½ôÅ;"BTo: "Edward Henigin" <ed@datafoundry.net>, "John Todd" <jtodd@loligo.com> Cc: ½ôÅ;coSubject: RE: [nsp] failover with policy routing? Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 22:04:51 -0700 Message-ID: <½ôÅ;01MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-T½ôÅ;feX-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Re½ôÅ;ToX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Importance: Normal
Then ½ôÅ;is
> -----Original Message----- > From: Edward Henigin [mailto:ed@datafoundry.net] > Sent: Monday, April 17,½ôÅ;0 > To: John Todd > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [nsp] failover with policy routing? > > > We wan½ôÅ; p> traffic through one link and all other traffic through the other. > layer ½ôÅ;ut> > Thanks for the info, tho. > > Ed > > -- > On Mon, Apr 17, 20½ôÅ;t > > > > I don't think this is correct. I tried to make this work some time > > ago wi½ôÅ;ac> > non-directly-connected next-hop locations. I called Cisco about it, > > since½ôÅ; m> > directly connected' (this is paraphrased from the manual - I don't½ôÅ;> > > section and he said "Whoops! Typo! Yes, it does nee½ôÅ; b> > connected." > > > > If either of you can tell me that next-hop can be made to work on > > non-adjacent h½ôÅ; (> > eternally grateful because that would solve quite a few kludges. > >½ôÅ;> > > know of that can cause layer 2 re-writes or passt½ôÅ;gh> > during failure modes in the instances of which you're speaking. If > > you're looking for a more elegan½ôÅ;r > > may be) solution, use BGP and then weight the paths with localpref or > > some other½ôÅ;ho> > dynamic, but does provide failover ability. I've found that fool½ôÅ; >> > traffic "more-or-less" balanced. Granted, you½ôÅ;ak> > of AS path-length as a preferred metric, but since you're talking > > about using n> > is as good as another. ;) > > > > Upon> > very obvious answer - so obvious that I must be mis-reading this > > somehow, but I don't see where. Pl½ôÅ; f> > head for stating the obvious solution if you've already discounted it > > for some reaso½ôÅ; >> > >
From rodrigo.loureir½ôÅ;tsReceived: from someone claiming to be nsrjo4.netstream.com.br ([200.244.82.19]) ½ôÅ;uc for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 14:30:52 -0400 (enve½ôÅ;-fReceived-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 14:30:52 -0400 Received: by nsrjo4 with Internet Ma½ôÅ;er id <2VK9ZG8N>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:24:44 -0300 Message-ID: <F12A0EB611C0D21193BB00105A18482529B412@nsrj½ôÅ;FrTo: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: "Loureiro, Rodrigo" <rodrigo½ôÅ;reDate: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:24:18 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)½ôÅ;te charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [nsp] Asynchronous E1
Hi,½ôÅ;uaway that a router can map time-slots into serial inter½ôÅ;s.operation generate an overhead of one time-slot used by CAS/CCS = signaling. The point is: I would like to u½ôÅ;y mode (and the line too), in such a way that i could use the 32 time-slots, = but I think ½ôÅ;ouserial. Does anyone know if i can use Cisco 3620 E1 port in asynchrTo routing data?
Regards, --
Rodrigo Loureiro Netstream Telecom (AT&TReceived: from someone claiming to be gateg.kw.bbc.co.uk (gateg.kw.bbc.co.uk [132.185.132.16]) ½ôÅ;pu for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 14:45:16 -0400 (env½ôÅ;e-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 14:45:16 -0400 Received: from sunf0.rd.bbc.co.uk (ddmailgate.rd.½ôÅ;co by gateg.kw.bbc.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA09206; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 19:44:51 +0100 (BST) ½ôÅ;ivReceived: from sunf25 by sunf25.rd.bbc.co.½ôÅ;TuX-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: "Loureiro, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.loureiro@nets½ôÅ;m.Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] Asynchronous E1 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 18 Apr 2000 1½ôÅ;:1 <F12A0EB611C0D21193BB00105A18482529B412@nsrjo4> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: teMime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Tue, 18 Apr 200Message-Id: <24008.956083480ëÅ;nfFroM: Simo½ôÅ;ti
s/asynchronous/unframed/
No, I don't think you can do this. For all our E1's we use external DS
Simon -- Simon Lockhart | Tel: +44 (0)1737 83BBC Internet Services | Email: Simon.Lockhart@bbc.co.uk Kingswood Warren,Tadworth,Su½ôÅ;,U
From rodrigo.loureir½ôÅ;tsReceived: from someone claiming to be nsrjo4.netstream.com.br ([200.244.82.19]) ½ôÅ;uc for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:36:50 -0400 (enve½ôÅ;-fReceived-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:36:50 -0400 Received: by nsrjo4 with Internet Ma½ôÅ;er id <2VK9ZHJR>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:30:45 -0300 Message-ID: <F12A0EB611C0D21193BB00105A18482529B415@nsrj½ôÅ;FrTo: "'Robert Kiessling'" <Robert.Kiessling@de. <simonl@rd.bbc.co.uk> Cc: "Loureiro, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.lourei DAte: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:30:01 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: InternContent-Type: t¾ôÅ;pl cHarset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [nsp] RES: [nsp] Asynchronous E1
Actually¾ôÅ;cabut how can i route data through this interface?
-----Mensagem ¾ôÅ;inDe: Robert Kiessling [mailto:Robert.Kiessling@de.easynet.net] Enviada em: Ter=E7a-feira, 18 de Abril de 2000 16:210ëÅ;a:Assunto: Re: [nsp] Asynchronous E1=20
Simon Lockhart wr¾ôÅ;: mode to > >routing data? >=20 > s/asynchronous/u¾ôÅ;me >=2 > No, I don't think you can do this. For all our E1's we use external = DSU=20 > and a serial port (X.21).
Wel¾ôÅ; t
3640 with E1 and "clock source internal" | |¾ôÅ;ra | 3640 with E1 in normal framed mode
Robert
From jared@puck.neth¾ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA14407 for cisco-nsp@p¾ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004181944.PAA14407@puck.nether.net¾ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA13767; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:21:12 -0400 (envelope-fr¾ôÅ;isDate: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:21:12 -0400 X-From_: robert@easynet.de Tue Apr 18 15:21:11 2000¾ôÅ;ei doncamillo.local.easynet.de (gw2.Muenchen1.easynet.de [212.224.33.122]) by puck.nether¾ôÅ; ( for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:21:11 -0400 (envelope-from robe¾ôÅ;asReceived-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:21:11 -0400 Received: (from robert@localhost) by doncamillo.local.easynet.de ¾ôÅ;.3 Tue, 18 Apr 2000 21:20:41 +0200 From: Robert Kiessling <Robert.Kiessling@de.easynet.net> Message-ID:¾ôÅ;58Old-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 21:20:41 +0200 (MEST) To: Simon Lockhart <si¾ôÅ;@rCc: "Loureiro, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.loureiro@netstream.com.br>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [¾ôÅ; AIn-Reply-To: <24008.956083488@sunf25> References: <F12A0EB611C0D21193BB00105A18482529B412@nsrjo4> <24008.¾ôÅ;83X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 9) "Canyonlands" XEmacs Lucid X-NCC-RegID: de.easynet Mime-Version: 1.0 (g¾ôÅ;atContent-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-ns¾ôÅ;seResent-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:44:14 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Simon Lo¾ôÅ;rt > >Does anyone know if i can use Cisco 3620 E1 port in asynchronous mode to > >routing data? > > s/asynchron¾ôÅ;un > > No, I don't think you can do this. For all our E1's we use external DSU > and a serial port (X.21).
Well¾ôÅ;th
3640 with E1 and "clock source internal" | | ¾ôÅ;am | 3640 with E1 in normal framed mode
Robert
From jared@puck.neth¾ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA14633 for cisco-nsp@p¾ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004181947.PAA14633@puck.nether.net¾ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA14503; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:45:19 -0400 (envelope-fr¾ôÅ;isDate: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:45:19 -0400 X-From_: robert@easynet.de Tue Apr 18 15:45:19 2000¾ôÅ;ei doncamillo.local.easynet.de (gw2.Muenchen1.easynet.de [212.224.33.122]) by puck.nether¾ôÅ; ( for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:45:18 -0400 (envelope-from robe¾ôÅ;asReceived-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:45:18 -0400 Received: (from robert@localhost) by doncamillo.local.easynet.de ¾ôÅ;.3 Tue, 18 Apr 2000 21:44:53 +0200 From: Robert Kiessling <Robert.Kiessling@de.easynet.net> Message-ID:¾ôÅ;58Old-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 21:44:53 +0200 (MEST) To: "Loureiro, Rodrigo¾ôÅ;odCc: Simon Lockhart <simonl@rd.bbc.co.uk>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net In-RReferences: <F12A0EB611C0D21193BB00105A1848X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.¾ôÅ;atX-NCC-RegID: de.easynet Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.5) Content-Type: text/p¾ôÅ;; X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-D¾ôÅ; TResent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsp] RES: [nsp] Asynchronous E1
Loureiro, R¾ôÅ;go > Actually, I can configure the controller to operate in unframed mode, but > how can i route d
Oh, which IOS version is this? Up to and including 12.0 it is not possiReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA14689 for cisco-nsp@p¾ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004181947.PAA14689@puck.nether.net¾ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA07659; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 14:09:03 -0400 (envelope-fr¾ôÅ;isDate: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 14:09:03 -0400 X-From_: jackseo@npix.net Tue Apr 18 14:09:02 2000 ¾ôÅ;iv ns2.npix.net (ns2.npix.net [211.43.193.34] (may be forged)) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8¾ôÅ;) for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 14:09:01 -0400 (envelope-from jackseo@npix.net)¾ôÅ;eiReceived: from ns ([211.43.193.76]) by ns2.npix.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id ¾ôÅ;96 forFrom: "Jack Seo" <jackseo@npix.net> To: "Cisco ¾ôÅ;s"Old-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 03:13:06 +0900 Message-ID: <NDBBJEOFGLIHFDPOJICNAEPPCAAA.jackseo@n0ëÅ;neMIME VersioX-Priority0ëÅ;(NX-MSMaiX-MimeOLE: Produced By Micro¾ôÅ; MImportance: Normal X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: jared¾ôÅ;k.Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:47:38 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsp] VIP2-50 & PA-4¾ôÅ; S
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0009_01BFA9AD.2EB1BDE0 Content-Type: te0ëÅ;la chArset="
DQpIaSwgR3V5cw0KDQpJJ20gdXNpbmcgVklQMi01MCBhbmQgUEEtNHBvc¾ôÅ;XJYWNlIHRvZ2V0aGVyIC4gb2YgY291cmNlIFJTUDQgDQphbmQgdGhpcyBJT1MgdmVyc2lvbiBpcyAx MS4xLjMwIGNjIC4gYnV0IHRoZXNlIGR0ëÅ;gddXN0I¾ôÅ;SBaHJlZSB0aW1lcyBldmVyeSBkYXkuDQpUaGVyZSBpcyBubyBzcGVjaWFs¾ôÅ;YXZSB0aGlzLCBJJ20gc3VyZS4gDQoNCllvdSBndXlzIGRpZCB5b3UgZXZlciBoZWFyZCB0aGF0IFZJ UDItNTAgaGFzIGFueSBwcm9ibGVtIH¾ôÅ;4gIEludGVyZmFjZXMgPw0KDQpJZiB5b3UgZGlkLCBkbyB5b3Uga25vdyBhbnkgaWRlYSB0byBzb2x2 ZSB0¾ôÅ;IH
------=_NextPart_000_0009_01BFA9AD.2EB1BDE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ks_c_5601-1¾ôÅ; C
PCFET0NUWVBFIEhUTUwgUFVCTElDICItLy9XM0MvL0RURCBIVE1MIDQuMCBUcmFuc2l0aW9uYWwv L0VOIj4NCjx¾ôÅ;MPX2NfNTYwMS0xOTg3IiBodHRwLWVxdWl2PUNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZT4NCjxNRVRBIG¾ôÅ;RlSFRNTCA1LjAwLjI5MTkuNjMwNyIgbmFtZT1HRU5FUkFUT1I+PC9IRUFEPg0KPEJPRFk+DQo8RElW PiZuYnNwOzwvRElWPg0KPERJVj48Rk9OVCBz¾ôÅ;PTMDQyMDAwPkhpLCBHdXlzPC9TUEFOPjwvRk9OVD48L0RJVj4NCjxESVY+PEZPTlQgc2l6ZT0yPjxT UEFOIGNsYX¾ôÅ;YyPERJVj48Rk9OVCBzaXplPTI+PFNQQU4gY2xhc3M9NjIwMzMzMTE3LTE4MDQyM0ëÅ;kkZyBWdXJjZSBSU1A0IDwvU1BBTj48L0ZPTlQ+PC9¾ôÅ;+DbGFzcz02MjAzMzMxMTctMTgwNDIwMDA+YW5kIHRoaXMgSU9TIHZlcnNpb24gaXMgMTEuMS4zMCAN CmNjIC4gY¾ôÅ;HRIC48L1NQQU4+PC9GT05UPjwvRElWPg0KPERJVj48Rk9OMzMzMTE3LTE4MDQyMDAwPkl0cyBvbmUgb2YgNCZuYnNwO3NlcmlhbCANCmludGVyZmFIA0KcmVwZWF0aW5nIGRvd24gYW5kIHVwICwgdHdvIG9yIHRocmVlIHRpbWVzIGV2ZXJ5IGRheS48 L1NQQU4+0ëÅ;T0MTE3LTE4MDQyMDAwPlRoZXJlIGlzIG5vIHNwZWNpYWwgcmVhc29uIHRvIA0¾ôÅ;1cSSdtIHN1cmUuIDwvU1BBTj48L0ZPTlQ+PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPjxGT05UIHNpemU9Mj48U1BBTiBj bGFzcz02MjAzMzMxMTctMTgwNDIwMDA+P0ëÅ;EFeW91IGV¾ôÅ;gaZyB3aXRoIFBBIC0gNHBvcnQgU2VyaWFsIEludGVyZmFjZXMgDQo/PC9TUE¾ôÅ;wvVj4NCjxESVY+PEZPTlQgc2l6ZT0yPjxTUEFOIGNsYXNzPTYyMDMzMzExNy0xODA0MjAwMD48L1NQ QU4+PC9GT05UPiZuYnNwOzwvRElWPg0K¾ôÅ;VjMzMzMTE3LTE4MDQyMDAwPklmIHlvdSBkaWQsIGRvIHlvdSBrbm93IGFueSANCmlkZWEgdG8gc29s dmUgdG¾ôÅ;BwIHNpemU9Mj48U1BBTiBjbGFzcz02MjAzMzMxMTctMcDs8L0RJVj4NCjxESVY+PEZPTlQgc2l6ZT0yPjxTUEFOIA0KY2xhc3M9NjIwMzMz
------=_NextPart_000_0009_01BFA9AD.2EB1BDE0--
From alfredo@intelid¾ôÅ;coReceived: from someone claiming to be s1.intelideas.com (s1.intelideas.com [194.145.140.10])¾ôÅ; p for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:54:02 -0400 (en¾ôÅ;peReceived-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:54:02 -0400 Received: from intelideas.com (intelideas-gw.¾ôÅ;ns by s1.intelideas.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e3IJrMO24043; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 21:53:22 +0¾ôÅ;(MMessage-ID: <38FCBD34.B03D6D99@intelideas.com> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 21:53:24 +0200 From: Alfredo Sola <alfredo@i¾ôÅ;idX-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; I) X-Accept-Language: es,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Lockhart <si¾ôÅ;@rCC: "Loureiro, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.loureiro@netstream.com.br>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [¾ôÅ; AReferences: <24008.956083488@sunf25> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: ¾ôÅ;
> >routing data?
> s/asynchronous/unframed/ ¾ôÅ;o,> and a serial port (X.21).
I am using an NM-2CE1U ¾ôÅ;ankbps (timeslot 0 unusable as of this hw and IOS 11.3(10)T:
controller E1¾ôÅ; channel-group 0 timeslots 1-31 ! interface Serial0/0:0
[...]
Remember to check about clock sources. N¾ôÅ;soclock source internal!
-- Alfredo Sola Administrador del sistema
From jesper@skriver.¾ôÅ;TuReceived: from someone claiming to be freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]) by ¾ôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:58:51 -0400 (envelop¾ôÅ;omReceived-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:58:51 -0400 Received: by freesbee.wheel.dk (Postfix, from userid 10¾ôÅ; iDate: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 21:58:34 +0200 From: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skr¾ôÅ;.dTo: Loureiro, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.loureiro@netstream.com.br> Cc: "'Robert Kiessling'" <Robert.Kiessling@de.easynet.net>,¾ôÅ; Subject: Re: [nsp] RES: [nsp] Asynchronous E1 Message-I¾ôÅ;20References: <F12A0EB611C0D21193BB00105A18482529B415@nsrjo4> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type¾ôÅ;xtX-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <F12A0EB611C0D21193BB00105A18482529B415@nsrjo4>; from rodrigo.¾ôÅ;ei
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 04:30:01PM -0300, Loureiro, Rodrigo ¾ôÅ;e:> how can i route data through this interface¾ôÅ;es
We have several on
PA-MC-8E1 PA-4E1
on 7200/7500's
/Jesper
-- Jes¾ôÅ;SkWork: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetwork
One Unix to rule them all, One ResOne IP to bring them all¾ôÅ; i
From jesper@skriver.¾ôÅ;TuReceived: from someone claiming to be freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]) by ¾ôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:00:23 -0400 (envelop¾ôÅ;omReceived-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:00:23 -0400 Received: by freesbee.wheel.dk (Postfix, from userid 10¾ôÅ; iDate: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 22:00:06 +0200 From: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skr¾ôÅ;.dTo: Alfredo Sola <alfredo@intelideas.com> Cc: Simon Lockhart <simonl@rd.bbc.co.uk>, "Loureiro, Rodrigo" <rodrig¾ôÅ;ur cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] Asynchronous E1 Message-ID: <20000418220006.B¾ôÅ;4@puck.nether.netrReferences: <24008.956083488@sunf25> <38FCBD34.B03D6D99@intelideas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/p¾ôÅ;; X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <38FCBD34.B03D6D99@intelideas.com>; from alfredo@intelideas.com on Tue¾ôÅ;r
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 09:53:24PM +0200, Alfredo Sola wrote: > > > >Does anyone know if i ¾ôÅ;us> > >routing data? > > > s/asynchronous/unframed/ > > > No, I don't think y0ëÅ;an> > I am using an NM-2CE1U for an E1. For i¾ôÅ;nc> kbps (timeslot 0 unusable as of this hw and IOS 11.3(10)T: > > controller E1 0/0 > fr¾ôÅ;g > channel-group 0 timeslots 1-31
You can also use
channel-group 0 timeslots 0-31
If it's a unstructured E1 t¾ôÅ;el
/Jesper
-- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network managerPrivate: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-) OnE IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
From kline@uiuc.edu ¾ôÅ; AReceived: from someone claiming to be cub.cso.uiuc.edu (root@cub.cso.uiuc.edu [130.126.113.5]) by p¾ôÅ;ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:01:41 -0400 (envelope¾ôÅ;m Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:01:41 -0400 Received: from tailwind (tailwind.cso.uiuc.edu [130.126.113¾ôÅ;) for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:01:23 -0500¾ôÅ;T)To: "Cisco NSP List" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 15:01:23 -0ëÅ; MContent-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"¾ôÅ;teX-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.241¾ôÅ;.0Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Subject: [nsp] Anyone done a lot with¾ôÅ; w
Hi, we're thinking about switching into L3 switching via MLS on our routed core. (7200's) that right now are doing t
The Cisco dox are¾ôÅ;asforth on this thing, so I thought I'd turn to experience for some answe¾ôÅ; 1yes, some things say no.
2. Does an input access¾ôÅ;t network? The same Cisco document says two different things in two differen¾ôÅ;ac
3. What's with this requirement that the MLS router know and join the VTP domain of the switch?
4. (I thi¾ôÅ; kat a router explicitly in order for it to stcache? Can one router serve multiple switches so that cut-through ca
Any good/bad t¾ôÅ; fthe routing agent?
Thanks in advance for any wisdom.
-- Charle¾ôÅ;inData Communications Architect ¾ôÅ;21Computing and Communications Services Office University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
From deepak@ai.net ¾ôÅ;ApReceived: from someone claiming to be aries.ai.net (aries.ai.net [205.134.163.4]) by puck.nether.net¾ôÅ;9. Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:09:18 -0400 (envelope-from deepak@ai.net) Received-Date: Tue, 18 Ap¾ôÅ;00Received: from localhost (deepak@localhost) by aries.ai.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA16618; Tue, 1¾ôÅ;r (envelope-from deepak@ai.net) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:08:47 -0400 (EDT) From:To: Jack Seo <jackseo@npix.net> cc: Cisco Users <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.Subject: Re: [ns¾ôÅ;IPIn-Reply-To: <NDBBJEOFGLIHFDPOJICNAEPPCAAA.jackseo@npix.net> Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.00¾ôÅ;16MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
If you are talking up the ¾ôÅ;albouncing, you may want to try moving the serial port to an unused one on the sam¾ôÅ;rd
It Could be a bad port.
Deepak Jain AiNET
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Jack Seo wrote:
> > Hi, Guys > > I'm using VIP2-5¾ôÅ;d > and this IOS version is 11.1.30 cc . but these days these machines a¾ôÅ;ot> Its one of 4 serial interfaces ( atually I'm using just one serial port) is repeating down and up , two or ¾ôÅ;e > There is no special reason to cause this, I'm sure. > > You guys did you ever heard that VIP2-50 has ¾ôÅ;pr> > If you did, do you know any idea to solve this problem exactly>
From rodrigo.loureir¾ôÅ;tsReceived: from someone claiming to be nsrjo4.netstream.com.br ([200.244.82.19]) ¾ôÅ;uc for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:15:32 -0400 (enve¾ôÅ;-fReceived-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:15:32 -0400 Received: by nsrjo4 with Internet Ma¾ôÅ;er id <2VK9ZHPN>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 17:09:30 -0300 Message-ID: <F12A0EB611C0D21193BB00105A18482529B416@nsrj¾ôÅ;FrTo: "'Robert Kiessling'" <Robert.Kiessling@de.easynet.net>, ¾ôÅ; Cc: Simon Lockhart <simonl@rd.bbc.co.uk>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.ne¾ôÅ;teMIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain;¾ôÅ;arContent-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [nsp] RES: [nsp] Asynchronous E1
Ok, I thought that¾ôÅ;f the framing, but i was wrong. Actually this command turns on the default co¾ôÅ;ur
-----Mensagem original----- De: Robert Kiessling [mailto:Robert.Kiessling@de.easynet.net]¾ôÅ;iaPara: Loureiro, Rodrigo Cc: Simon Lockhart; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Assu¾ôÅ; R
Loureiro, Rodrigo writes: > Actually, I can configure the controller to operate in unframe¾ôÅ;mo > how can i route data through this interface?
Oh, which IOS version is this? Up to and including 12.0 it is not
BObert
From jesper@skriver.¾ôÅ;TuReceived: from someone claiming to be freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]) by ¾ôÅ;.n Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:16:26 -0400 (envelope-from jesper@skriver.dk) Receiv0ëÅ;at id 20D333E42; Tue, 18 Apr 2¾ôÅ;22Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 22:16:09 +0200 From: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk> To: Deepak Jain <deepak0ëÅ;neCc: Hack Se jared@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [n¾ôÅ;VIMessage-ID: <20000418221609.A32955@skriver.dk> References: <NDBBJEOFGLIHFDPOJICNAEPPCAAA.0ëÅ;seMime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us¾ôÅ;iiIn-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004181608110.22073-100000@aries.ai.net>; from deepak@ai.net on Tue, Ap¾ôÅ;,
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 04:08:47PM -0400, Deepak Jain wrote: > On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Jack Seo wr¾ôÅ; > > Hi, Guys > > > > I'm using VIP2-50 and PA-4por Serial interface together . of cource RSP4 > > and this IOS ve¾ôÅ;n > > Its one of 4 serial interfaces ( atually I'm using ju¾ôÅ;ne> > There is no special reason to cause this, I'm ¾ôÅ;. >> > >0ëÅ;f > > If you are talking up the serial port bouncing and not ¾ôÅ;IP> bouncing, you may want to try moving the serial port to an unused one on > the same card.
Or perhaps a bad link ...
/Jesper
-- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriWork: Network m¾ôÅ;erPrivate: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)
One Unix to rule them¾ôÅ;, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
From deepak@ai.net ¾ôÅ;ApReceived: from someone claiming to be aries.ai.net (aries.ai.net [205.134.163.4]) by puck.nether.net¾ôÅ;9. Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:26:19 -0400 (envelope-from deepak@ai.net) Received-Date: Tue, 18 Ap¾ôÅ;00Received: from localhost (deepak@localhost) by aries.ai.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA01512; Tue, 1¾ôÅ;r (envelope-from deepak@ai.net) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:25:58 -0400 (EDT) From:To: Jack Seo <jackseo@ibrglobal.com> cc: Cisco Users <cisco-nsp@puck.neSubject: RE¾ôÅ;spIn-Reply-To: <NDBBJEOFGLIHFDPOJICNCEACCBAA.jackseo@ibrglobal.com> Message-ID: <Pine.B0ëÅ;.2Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
What is your sys¾ôÅ;lo
Deepak
On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Jack Seo wrote:
> > Thank you for response. > > Bad port ? > > Well, I don't ¾ôÅ;k > :) , but still the same prob¾ôÅ;is> I think, this problem might come from the discord between VIP2-50 and PA-4port Serial interface , also I¾ôÅ;> > > -----Original Message----- > From: Deepak Jain [mailto:deepak@ai.net] > Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 5:0¾ôÅ; >> Cc: Cisco Users; jared@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [nsp] VIP2-50 & PA-4port Searial problem > > > > ¾ôÅ;ou> bouncing, you may want to try moving the serial port¾ôÅ;an> the same card. > > It could be a bad port. > > Deepak Jain > AiNET > > On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Jack Seo¾ôÅ;te> > > Hi, Guys > > > > I'm using VIP2-50 and PA-4por Serial interface together . of cource RSP4 > > and this IOS¾ôÅ;si> > Its one of 4 serial interfaces ( atually I'm using¾ôÅ;t > > There is no special reason to cause this, I¾ôÅ;ur> >> > You guys did you ever heard that VIP2-50 has any problem when working with PA - 4port Serial Interfaces ? > >¾ôÅ;> > > > > > > >
From niels@euro.net ¾ôÅ; AReceived: from someone claiming to be venus.euro.net (venus.euro.net [194.134.0.9]) by puck.nether.¾ôÅ;(8 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:34:45 -0400 (envelope-from niels¾ôÅ;o.ReCeived-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:34:45 -0400 Received: from localhost (niels@localhost) by venus.euro.net (8.8.8/8¾ôÅ;) for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 22:34:27 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 2¾ôÅ;:2From: Niels Bakker <niels@euro.net> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] Asynchronous E1 In-0ëÅ;y-X-NCC-RegID: nl.euronet MI¾ôÅ;erContent-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Jesper Skriver skrev:
>> controller E1 0/0 >> framing NO-CRC4 >> ¾ôÅ;ne> > You can also use > > channel-group 0 timeslots 0-31 > > If it's a unstructured E1 the te¾ôÅ;pr
What about
channel-group 0 unframed
?
-- Niels (connecting his first customer this way but right now ther¾ôÅ;em
From jesper@skriver.¾ôÅ;TuReceived: from someone claiming to be freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]) by ¾ôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:55:23 -0400 (envelop¾ôÅ;omReceived-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:55:23 -0400 Received: by freesbee.wheel.dk (PostfixDate: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 22:To: Niels Bakker <niels@euro.net> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] Asynchronous E1 Message-ID: <2000041¾ôÅ;50References: <20000418220006.B32884@skriver.dk> <1000418223258.15972A-100000@venus.euro.net> Mime-Vers¾ôÅ; 1ContEnt-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <1000418223258.15972A-100000@venus.euro.n¾ôÅ; f
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 10:34:27PM +0200, Niels Bakker wrote:0ëÅ;es> >> channel-group 0 timeslots 1-31 > > > > You can a¾ôÅ;us > channel-group 0 timeslots 0-31 > > > > If it's a unstructured E1 the telco provide. > > What about > > ch¾ôÅ;l-
You're right, in a 12.1(1a) router
router(config)#controller e1 1/7 router(config-controller)#ch router¾ôÅ;fi timeslots List of timeslots in the channel group unframed Unframed in the channel g¾ôÅ;
^ % Invalid ¾ôÅ;t
router(config-controller)#
I'm quite sure I've been able to do this, and it probably changed it¾ôÅ;un
/Jesper
-- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: ¾ôÅ;etPrivate: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)
One Unix ¾ôÅ;ulOne IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
From rodrigo.loureir¾ôÅ;tsReceived: from someone claiming to be nsrjo4.netstream.com.br ([200.244.82.19]) ¾ôÅ;uc for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 17:06:01 -0400 (enve¾ôÅ;-fReceived-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 17:06:01 -0400 Received: by nsrjo4 with Internet Ma¾ôÅ;er id <2VK9ZHVJ>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:00:01 -0300 Message-ID: <F12A0EB611C0D21193BB00105A18482529B417@nsrj¾ôÅ;FrTo: "'Jesper Skriver'" <jesper@skriver.dk>, Alfredo So¾ôÅ; <Cc: Simon Lockhart <simonl@rd.bbc.co.uk>, "Loureiro, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.loureiro@netstrea¾ôÅ;m. Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 17:58:26 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Ser¾ôÅ; (Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [nsp] RES¾ôÅ;sp
I think if we are operating in unframed mode, the medium become asynchronous, so we can=B4t do the mapp¾ôÅ;suthere isn=B4t any time-slots.
-----Mensagem original----- De: Jesper Skriver [mailto:jesper@skri¾ôÅ;dkPara: Alfredo Sola Cc: Simon Lockhart; Loureiro, Rodrigo; cisco-nsp¾ôÅ;k.Assunto: Re: [nsp] Asynchronous E1
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 09:53:24PM +0200, Alfredo Sola wrote: >=20 > > >Do¾ôÅ;nymode to > > >routing data? >=20 > > s/asynchronous/unframed/ >=¾ôÅ; >DSU > > and a serial port (X.21). >=20 > I am usin¾ôÅ; Nyou 1984 > kbps (timeslot 0 unusable as of this hw and IOS 11.3(10)T¾ôÅ;20> framing NO-CRC4 > channel-group 0 timeslots 1-31
You can also use
channel-group 0 timeslots 0¾ôÅ; I
/Jesper
--=20 Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: ¾ôÅ;etPrivate: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)
One Unix ¾ôÅ;ulOne IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
From neil@COLT.NET ¾ôÅ;ApReceived: from someone claiming to be NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET (NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET [212.74.95.132]) by p¾ôÅ;ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:00:28 -0400 (envelope¾ôÅ;m Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:00:28 -0400 Received: from COLT.NET (localhost.colt.net by Tue, 18 Apr 2000 22:59:5To: Simon Lockhart <simonl@rd.bbc.co.uk> cc: "Loureiro, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.loureiro@netstream.com.br>, ¾ôÅ; Subject: Re: [nsp] Asynchronous E1 In-reply-to: Your message¾ôÅ;"T <24008.956083488@sunf25> From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET> Reply-To: "Nei0ëÅ; MSender: neil@COLT.NET
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000 19:44:48 +0100 Si¾ôÅ;Lo
No you can't with the 3620 ports- you can with the 7000 PA-MC-8E1 though.
> >Does a¾ôÅ;e > >routing data? > > s/asynchronous/unframed/ > > No, I don¾ôÅ;hi> and a serial port (X.21). > > Simon > -- > Simon Lockhart ¾ôÅ; > Internet Engineering Manager | Fax: +44 (0)1737 839516 > BBC Inter¾ôÅ;Se> Kingswood Warren,Tadworth,Surrey,UK | URL: http://support.bb¾ôÅ;.u> >
-- Neil J. McRae C O L T I N T E R N E T neil@COLT.NET "In this world there'¾ôÅ;o Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig?"
From neil@COLT.NET ¾ôÅ;ApReceived: from someone claiming to be NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET (NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET [212.74.95.132]) by p¾ôÅ;ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:02:40 -0400 (envelope¾ôÅ;m Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:02:40 -0400 Received: from COLT.NET (localhost.colt.net by Tue, 18 Apr 2000 23:02:0To: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk> cc: "Loureiro, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.loureiro@netstream.com.br>, ¾ôÅ; Simon Lockhart <simonl@rd.bbc.co.uk>, cisco-nsp@puck.nethe¾ôÅ;t,Subject: Re: [nsp] RES: [nsp] Asynchronous E1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue,¾ôÅ;Ap <20000418215834.A32884@skriver.dk> From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET> Reply-To: "2ëÅ; JSender: neil@COLT.NET
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000 21:58:34 +0200 ¾ôÅ;pe
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 04:30:01PM -0300, Loureiro, Rodrigo wrote: > > Actually, I¾ôÅ; c> > how can i route data through this interface?
on the 3600 int¾ôÅ;cethere was though!!!
> > Yes, given it's a unstructured E1 the telco provide¾ôÅ; >> > PA-MC-8E1 > PA-4E1 > > on 7200/7500's > > /Jesper > > -- > Jesper Skriver, j> Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetwork> > One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, > One IP to bring them all and in the zone to ¾ôÅ; t>
-- Neil J. McRae C O L T I N T E R N E T neil@COLT.NET "In this world there's¾ôÅ; k Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig?"
From neil@COLT.NET ¾ôÅ;ApReceived: from someone claiming to be NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET (NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET [212.74.95.132]) by p¾ôÅ;ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:03:43 -0400 (envelope¾ôÅ;m Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:03:43 -0400 Received: from COLT.NET (localhost.colt.net by Tue, 18 Apr 2000 23:03:1To: "Loureiro, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.loureiro@netstream.com.br> cc: "'Robert Kiessling'" <Robert.Kiessling¾ôÅ;ea Simon Lockhart <simonl@rd.bbc.co.uk>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NE¾ôÅ;ubIn-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 18 Apr 2000 17:09:04 -0300." <¾ôÅ;0EFrom: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET> Reply-To: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET> ¾ôÅ;: Sender: neil@COLT.NET
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000 17:09:04 -0300 "Loureiro, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.l¾ôÅ;ir
on a 7206 with pa-mc-8e1 you use:
channel group 0 unframed - this option does
> Ok, I thought that conf t/cont e1 */no framing command could disabl> configuration, i mean, the CRC framing. > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: Robert Kiessli¾ôÅ;ma> Enviada em: Terça-feira, 18 de Abril de 2000 16:45 > Para: Loureiro, Rodrigo > Cc:¾ôÅ;on> Assunto: RES: [nsp] Asynchronous E1 > > > Loureiro, Rodrigo writes: > > Actuall¾ôÅ; c> > how can i route data through this interface? > > Oh, wh¾ôÅ;IO> possible. > > Robert >
-- Neil J. McRae ¾ôÅ; neil@COLT.NET "In this world there's two kinds of people my friend: Those¾ôÅ;h
From neil@COLT.NET ¾ôÅ;ApReceived: from someone claiming to be NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET (NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET [212.74.95.132]) by p¾ôÅ;ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:04:37 -0400 (envelope¾ôÅ;m Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:04:37 -0400 Received: from COLT.NET (localhost.colt.net by Tue, 18 Apr 2000 23:04:1To: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk> cc: Niels Bakker <niels@euro.net>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, 2ëÅ; In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 18 Apr 2000 22:55:¾ôÅ;02 From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET> Reply-To: "Neil J. McRae" <nei2ëÅ;LTDAte: Tu
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000 22:55:06 +0200 Jesper Skriver <je¾ôÅ;@s
on a 3600? I don't think so.
Neil.
> You're right, in a 12.1(1a) router > > router(config)#controlle¾ôÅ; 1> roUter(config-controller)#ch > router(config-controller)#channel-group 0 ? > timeslots List of timeslots in the ch¾ôÅ;l >> > router(config-controller)#channel-group 0 timeslots 0-31 > ¾ôÅ; > % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. > > router(config-controller)# > > I¾ôÅ;ui> changed it to unframed, but my memory might serve me wrong .. > > /¾ôÅ;er> - > Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 > Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark Data¾ôÅ;or> PRivate: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-) > > One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find t¾ôÅ; >>
-- Neil J. McRae C O L T I ¾ôÅ;E neil@COLT.NET "In this world there's two kinds of people my friend: Those with loaded guns and ¾ôÅ;e
From jared@puck.neth¾ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA32106 for cisco-nsp@p¾ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004182245.SAA32106@puck.nether.net¾ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA31429; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:30:04 -0400 (envelope-fr¾ôÅ;isDate: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:30:04 -0400 X-From_: robert@easynet.de Tue Apr 18 18:30:03 2000¾ôÅ;ei doncamillo.local.easynet.de (gw2.Muenchen1.easynet.de [212.224.33.122]) by puck.nether¾ôÅ; ( for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:30:03 -0400 (envelope-from robe¾ôÅ;asReceived-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:30:03 -0400 Received: (from robert@localhost) by doncamillo.local.easynet.de ¾ôÅ;.3 Wed, 19 Apr 2000 00:29:39 +0200 From: Robert Kiessling <Robert.Kiessling@de.easynet.net> Message-ID:¾ôÅ;58Old-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 00:29:39 +0200 (MEST) To: "Neil J. McRae" <n¾ôÅ;COCc: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk>, "Loureiro, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.loureiro@netstream.com.br>, S¾ôÅ; LSubject: Re: [nsp] RES: [nsp] Asynchronous E1 In-Reply-To: <2000¾ôÅ;22References: <20000418215834.A32884@skriver.dk> <200004182202.XAA16283@NetBSD.noc.COLT.NE2ëÅ;-MX-NCC-RegID: de.easynet Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-¾ôÅ; 1ConTent-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp Resent-From: ¾ôÅ;d@NetBSD.noc.COLT.NE2Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:45:33 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Neil J. McRae writes: ¾ôÅ; T > Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 04:30:01PM ¾ôÅ;0, > > > Actually, I can configure the controller to operate in unframed mode, but > > > how can ¾ôÅ;ut > > on the 3600 interfaces there is no option to run unframed! I wish > there was thoug¾ôÅ;
controller E1 x/y channel-group 1 timeslots 1-31 clock source internal
work, with the other side config
Robert
From simonl@rd.bbc.c¾ôÅ; Received: from someone claiming to be gateg.kw.bbc.co.uk (gateg.kw.bbc.co.uk [132.185.132.16]) ¾ôÅ;pu for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:54:26 -0400 (env¾ôÅ;e-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:54:26 -0400 Received: from sunf0.rd.bbc.co.uk (ddmailgate.rd.¾ôÅ;co by gateg.kw.bbc.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA19064; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 23:53:10 +0100 (BST) ¾ôÅ;ivReceived: from sunf25 by sunf25.rd.bbc.co.¾ôÅ;TuX-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Robert Kiessling <Robert.Kiessling@de.easy¾ôÅ;neCc: Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET>, Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk>, "Loureiro, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.loureiro@¾ôÅ;tr cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [nsp] RES: [nsp] Asynchronous E1 In-Reply-To: Your message of¾ôÅ;e, <14588.57811.754969.893888@doncamillo.local.easynet.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Conten¾ôÅ;peDate: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 23:53:07 +0100 Message-Id: <26218.956098387@sunf25> From: Simon Lock¾ôÅ; <
>Why, doesn't > >controller E1 x/y > channel-group 1 timeslots 1-31 > clock source internal > >wor¾ôÅ;it
It would, but that'd be framed, not unframed, and you'd only get 31*64k = 1984kbp¾ôÅ;th
Simon -- Simon Lockhart | Tel: +44 (0)1737 839676 Internet Engineeri¾ôÅ;anBBC Internet Services | Email: Simon.Lockhart@bbc.co.uk Kingswoo¾ôÅ;rr
From neil@COLT.NET ¾ôÅ;ApReceived: from someone claiming to be NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET (NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET [212.74.95.132]) by p¾ôÅ;ne for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 03:36:56 -0400 (envelope¾ôÅ;m Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 03:36:56 -0400 Received: from COLT.NET (localhost.colt.net by Wed, 19 Apr 2000 08:36:2To: Robert Kiessling <Robert.Kiessling@de.easynet.net> cc: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET>, Jesper Skr2ëÅ; < Simon Lockhart <simonl@rd.bbc¾ôÅ;ukSubject: Re: [nsp] RES: [nsp] Asynchronous E1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Apr 2000¾ôÅ;29 <14588.57811.754969.893888@doncamillo.local.easynet.de> From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET> Re¾ôÅ;ToDate: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 08:36:27 +0100 Sender: neil@COLT.NET
On Wed, 19 Apr 2000 00:29:3¾ôÅ;20 Robert Kiessling <Robert.Kiessling@de.easynet.net> wrote:
> Why, doesn't > > controller E1 x/y > channel-gr¾ôÅ;1 > clock source internal > > work, with the other side configured as framed? >
That does work - but you¾ôÅ;ll
-- Neil J. McRae C O L T I N T E R N E T neil@COLT.NET "In this world th¾ôÅ;s Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig?"
From nrh@ikami.com ¾ôÅ;ApReceived: from someone claiming to be squig.ikami.com (IDENT:q@squig.ikami.com [169.207.160.17]) by ¾ôÅ;.n for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:56:38 -0400 (envelop¾ôÅ;omReceived-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:56:38 -0400 Received: (from nrh@localhost) by squig.ikami.com (8.9.3/3¾ôÅ;) for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 15:56:20 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 15:56:20 -0500 Fr¾ôÅ;niTo: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <20000419155620.U11985@execpc.com> Mime-Version: ¾ôÅ;CoX-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Subject: [nsp] cat5k w/rsm versus foundry 802.1q
Anyone d¾ôÅ;an
I'm trying to get my sup3 to tag packets as 802.1q on a gigabit uplink port and play¾ôÅ;e
However, 'set vlan mapping' doesn't seem to do what I think it does:
set vlan mapping ¾ôÅ;q set trunk 1/1 on dot1q 1-1005
would make trunk 1/1 speak vlan 10 via 802.1q with vlanid of 1010? it doesn't ¾ôÅ; t
Any help would be appreciated.
-- nicholas harteau nrh@ikami.com
From jt@jumbo.surfar¾ôÅ;t Received: from someone claiming to be mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (mta6.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.240]¾ôÅ;y for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 22:08:00 -0400 (e¾ôÅ;opReceived-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 22:08:00 -0400 Received: from jtide (adsl-63-196-194-84.dsl.s¾ôÅ;1. by mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with SMTP id <0FTA00B74LV7UR¾ôÅ;6. cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 19:06:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 19:05:23 -070¾ôÅ;omTo: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-id: <009601bfaa6c$e40fe4e0$0611fea9@jtide> MIME-¾ôÅ;ioX-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-e¾ôÅ;inX-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 X-Priority: 3 Subject: [nsp] Ano¾ôÅ; C
I have been running with one Class C on my 2501 and am going to attach another Class C, is there anything special ¾ôÅ;ed'announce' this IP Block to my router? Or is there a tutorial somewhere that I can be directed to in o¾ôÅ; ttechnique?
Thanks in advance!
From dek@hades.uz T¾ôÅ;prReceived: from someone claiming to be hades.uz (postfix@hades.uz [196.22.173.11]) by puck.nether.net ¾ôÅ;.3 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 01:11:57 -0400 (envelope-from dek@hades¾ôÅ; RReceived: by hades.uz (Postfix, from userid 214) id 2A4BDB51BE; Thu, 20 Apr2ëÅ;0 From: Dmitri Kalintsev <dek@hades.uz> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nethe¾ôÅ;t Message-ID: <20000420071134.D393@hades.uz> Mail-Followup-To: cisco-ns¾ôÅ;ckReferences: <20000419155620.U11985@execpc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Co¾ôÅ;t-User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.11i In-Reply-To: <20000419155620.U11985@execpc.com>; from nrh@ikami.com on Wed, A¾ôÅ;9,X-Class: Fast Return-Receipt-To: dek@hades.uz Precedence: special-delivery
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000¾ôÅ;03> > However, 'set vlan mapping' doesn't seem to do what I think it does: > > set¾ôÅ;n > set trunk 1/1 on dot1q 1-1005
IMHO, right command here would be
set trunk 1/1 on dot1q 1-4¾ôÅ; sright?)
The idea behind this is that 802.1q has V¾ôÅ;idremember, and you are not allowing VLAN that you've just mapped. Actually I don't see why in¾ôÅ; fis used for vice versa - when you have 802.1q VLAN number that is l2ëÅ;r 100 - in
SY, -- CCNP,CCDA (R&S) ¾ôÅ; CDPlayer@irc Senior network engineer at NetActive Internet dek @ hades¾ôÅ; http://hades.uz UIN:7150410 cell +27 (0)82-336-1033
From bbruins@cisco.c¾ôÅ;ThReceived: from someone claiming to be popcorn.cisco.com (popcorn.cisco.com [171.69.18.32]) by pu¾ôÅ;et for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 01:28:38 -0400 (envelope-¾ôÅ; bReceived-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 01:28:38 -0400 Received: from bbruins-nt (bbruins-dsl4.cisco.com [144.25¾ôÅ;4. bY popcorn.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.2-SunOS.5.5.1.sun4/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA15162; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 22:27:05 -0700¾ôÅ;T)X-Sender: bbruins@popcorn.cisco.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Wind¾ôÅ;EuDate: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 22:27:11 -0700 To: Jim Tinlin <jt@jumbo.surfari.net>, cisco-nsp@puck.nether¾ôÅ; FSubject: Re: [nsp] Another Class C In-Reply-To: <009601bfaa6c$e40fe4e0$0611fea9@jtid¾ôÅ;imContent-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
You don't "announce it" you just config it on one of the inte¾ôÅ;esaddress.
Barry
At 07:05 PM 4/19/00 -0700, Jim Tin¾ôÅ;wr>I>another Class C, is there anything special I¾ôÅ;d >'announce' this IP Block to my router? Or is there a tutorial somewhere >that I can be directed to in ¾ôÅ;r >technique? > >Thanks in advance! > >
From jared@puck.neth¾ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA28907 for cisco-nsp@p¾ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004201246.IAA28907@puck.nether.net¾ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA24415; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 02:47:36 -0400 (envelope-fr¾ôÅ;isDate: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 02:47:36 -0400 X-From_: doka@kiev.sovam.com Thu Apr 20 02:47:35 20¾ôÅ;ec relay.kiev.sovam.com (mail@relay.kiev.sovam.com [212.109.32.5]) by puck.nether.net (¾ôÅ;3/ for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 02:47:34 -0400 (envelope-from doka@kiev.¾ôÅ;m.ReCeived-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 02:47:34 -0400 Received: from doka.kiev.sovam.com ([212.109.32.15]) by relay.kiev.so¾ôÅ;co id 12iAk7-000AOo-00 for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 09:47:15 +0300 Old-Date:¾ôÅ;, From: Vladimir Litovka <doka@kiev.sovam.com> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <¾ôÅ;.LX-NCC-RegID: ua.svitonline Organization: http://www.tekmetrics.com/t¾ôÅ;crMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Env¾ôÅ;e-Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 08:46:22 -0400 Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.ne¾ôÅ;.nSubjEct: [nsp] ISDN incoming calls
Hello,
Do I need to configure and use Dialer interface for incoming ISDN data co¾ôÅ;ti for accepting incoming calls? For example:
isdn switch-¾ôÅ; p! interface Serial0:15 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0 encapsulation ppp no ip directed-broadcast isdn switch-¾ôÅ; p isdn incoming-voice modem peer default ip address pool default ppp authentication pap no cdp enable !
As¾ôÅ;nd it is need to accept incoming ISDN calls.
Thank you.¾ôÅ; . Phone/Fax: +380 44 2351511 . ICQ/none, talk/none ;)
From baur@smaragd.no¾ôÅ;n.Received: from someone claiming to be obsidian.noc.dfn.de (obsidian.noc.dfn.de [193.174.247¾ôÅ;]) for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 09:22:58 -040¾ôÅ;enReceived-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 09:22:58 -0400 Received: from smaragd.noc.dfn.de (sma¾ôÅ;.n by obsidian.noc.dfn.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA00593; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 15:22:37 +020¾ôÅ;ETREceived: (from baur@localhost) by smaragd.noc.dfn.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA03146; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 15:22:37 +0200 (¾ôÅ;DSMessAge-ID: <20000420152236.H2882@noc.dfn.de> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 15:22:36 +0200 From: Steffen Baur <baur@noc.dfn.de¾ôÅ;: Subject: Re: [nsp] ISDN incoming calls References: <Pine¾ôÅ;.4Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: M¾ôÅ;0.In Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0004200933470.558-100000@doka.kiev.sovam.com>; from Vladimir Litovka on T
Vladimir,
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 02:47:36AM -0400, Vladimir > Hello, > > Do I need to c¾ôÅ;gu> connections? Or it is enought to setup SerialX:15 exactly as Group-A¾ôÅ; >
Just a few days ago I've had to learn that Cisco IOS sends packets to a dial interface o¾ôÅ;ifpresent. Without a dialer-group statement, an incoming call will accepted, a ppp session¾ôÅ; hforwarded.
Steffen
-- ## Network Operation Center, German science ne¾ôÅ;k ## http://www.noc.dfn.de/ finger trouble@noc.dfn.de wartung@noc.dfn.de ## ## >>>>>> mailto:¾ôÅ;c@noc.dfn.dege ## Phone: +49 711-63314-112, FAX +49 711-63314-133 (business hours) ##
From dol@info.east.r¾ôÅ;huReceived: from someone claiming to be frog.east.ru (frog.east.ru [195.170.62.133]) by puck.nether¾ôÅ; ( for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 10:00:25 -0400 (envelope-from dol@¾ôÅ;.eReceived-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 10:00:25 -0400 Received: from info.east.ru (info.east.ru [195.170.33.24]) by frog¾ôÅ;t. Thu, 20 Apr 2000 17:59:55 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from dol@info.east.ru) Received¾ôÅ;om by info.east.ru (8.9.3/8.8.5/BD2) with ESMTP id RAA47037; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 17:59:50 +2ëÅ; (DaTe: ThuTo: Steffen Baur <baur@noc.dfn.de¾ôÅ;: Subject: Re: [nsp] ISDN incoming calls In-Reply-To: <200¾ôÅ;01Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004201756590.46396-100000@info.east.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.east MIME-Vers¾ôÅ; 1ContEnt-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Steffen Baur wrote:
> Vladimir, > > On Thu, Apr 20, ¾ôÅ; a> > Hello, > > > > Do I need to configure and use Dialer interface for incom¾ôÅ;IS> > connections? Or it is enought to setup SerialX:15 exactly as Group-Async > > for accepting incoming calls? ¾ôÅ; J> a dial interface only if there's a dialer-group sta¾ôÅ;nt> accepted, a ppp session and host route established b¾ôÅ;o > forwarded. Definitely. Router needs information about binding of specific user to specific configuration.
Y¾ôÅ;av
"Legacy" - writing "dialer map" statements on D-channel interface for all clients "Dia¾ôÅ; - with "dialer pool-member" command "Virtual" - creat¾ôÅ;vi and AAA-server supplied information for clones creating.
>¾ôÅ; > > -- > ## Network Operation Center, German science network (DFN) ## > ## http://www.noc.dfn.de/¾ôÅ;ge> ## >>>>>> mailto: noc@noc.dfn.de <<<<<< ## > #¾ôÅ;ho>
---------------------------------------------------¾ôÅ;--East Connection ISP, Moscow, Russia. (http://www.east.ru)
From grr@shandakor.t¾ôÅ;isReceived: from someone claiming to be shandakor.tharsis.com (IDENT:root@shandakor.tharsis¾ôÅ; [ by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA02630 for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 20 Apr 2000¾ôÅ;12 (envelope-from grr@shandakor.tharsis.com) Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:12:25 -0400 Received: (from grr@lo¿ôÅ;osFrom: George Robbins <grr@shandakor.tharsis.com> Message-Id: <200004201612.MAA20564¿ôÅ;ndTo: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [nsp] just the facts please... 8-)
Does anyone have a pointer t¿ôÅ;foof the Cisco 3500XL series switches? The boss-man wants to get a bunch of these an¿ôÅ;n'"better"...
George
From jared@puck.neth¿ôÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA11980 for cisco-nsp@p¿ôÅ;ne (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200004202132.RAA11980@puck.nether.net¿ôÅ;ce by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA11969; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 17:32:25 -0400 (envelope-fr¿ôÅ;isDate: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 17:32:25 -0400 X-From_: doron@isoc.org.il Thu Apr 20 17:32:24 2000¿ôÅ;ei tamar.cc.biu.ac.il (root@tamar.cc.biu.ac.il [132.70.9.24]) by puck.nether.net (8.9.3/8¿ôÅ;) for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 17:32:22 -0400 (envelope-from doron@isoc.org.il¿ôÅ;ceReceived: from isoc.org.il (p7.as5200-1.biu.ac.il [132.70.102.7]) by tamar.cc.b¿ôÅ;c.Mess¿ôÅ;IDOld-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 21:35:02 +0000 From: Doron Shikmoni <doron@isoc.org.il> Organ2ëÅ;ioX-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cis¿ôÅ;spContent-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Diagnostic: Not on the accep¿ôÅ;stResent-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 17:32:50 -0400 Resent-To: cisco¿ôÅ;@pSubject: [nsp] Maximum-prefix and soft-reconfiguration
Hello,
I'm running a BGP peering point with 20+ pe¿ôÅ; Ieach of the neighbors is small. All prefixes heard from peers are being fi¿ôÅ;ed"protected" from being swamped by large amounts of peers.
To "protect" it even further, I have "maximu¿ôÅ;efset for each of the neighbors.
So far so good; however, I also have "soft-reconfiguration inbound" for each of th¿ôÅ;ig(mainly, distribute lists). In a painful way, I have learned that maximum-prefix¿ôÅ;s that go into the "soft" table - just the number that is actually accepted. So, if a few p¿ôÅ;su(for example), or even larger tables (our of sheer cluelessness), the router may be swa¿ôÅ; w
Is there *any* way to protect a router against clueless BGP "flooding", when soft-reconfiguration in¿ôÅ;d I would have thought there should be *some* way of limiting the number of "received" prefixes.
The box is a 7¿ôÅ; c
Thanks! Doron Shikmoni
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:12 EDT