Nobody mentioned that this could be alleviated with the "no synch" command.
Am I to assume this means that no one uses it?
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Zaheer Aziz [mailto:zaziz@cisco.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2000 10:03 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [nsp] Question about BGP routing damping
At 02:55 PM 07/21/2000 -0400, Tatsuya Kawasaki wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>I have a simple bgp question.
>
>In the BGP statement, we defined the network.
>
>I thought network statement in the bgp statement is
>independent of internal routing protocol.
>Even if we lost the connectivity to a network,
>which does not cause BGP routing damping or does it?
>
>Only time that BGP routing damping occurs when you lose the connection
>to peer provided that we do not change any configuration change?
if the connection to peer meaning relationship is lost that we delete
everything and no dampening happens.
if prefixes are withdrawn from EBGP neighbor than dampening is applied
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios113ed/113ed_cr/n
p1_c/1cbgp.htm#xtocid2382838
Zaheer
>
>Or am I missing something?
>
>
>Tatsuya
>
>
>/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
>Tatsuya Kawasaki
>Allegiance Telecom
>Unlock the Power of the Internet
>http://www.kivex.com
>Phone 301.215.6777 Fa 301.215.5991
>Affiliation given for identification not representation
>/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:14 EDT