Whoops, I misread the message. He was suggesting that IBGP with a customer
would cause liability. I read it as he didn't want to originate routes
from, say, a spamhaus. In this case, the routes, as seen from the
default-free, private-as-free Internet would originate from the public AS.
Sorry for the confusion.
chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Manning [mailto:bmanning@ISI.EDU]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 6:19 PM
To: cmartin@gnilink.net
Cc: bmanning@ISI.EDU; OZhang@tsibroadband.net; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [nsp] BGP Multihome
%
% >% since we will be liable
% >% for their problems if we do so. Has anyone come across this
problem.
% >% If so, how do you resolved it ?
% >%
% >% -Ou Zhang
% >%
% >
% > Private ASNs.
% >
%
% The routes would still be originated from Ou's AS. This doesn't help
% obviate liability.
%
% chris
%
Er, that is not a given. I use a private ASN to BGP peer w/ your public
ASN. Seen from someother place, where do my prefixes originate?
-- --bill
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:15 EDT