RE: [nsp] 12.0.12S experiences?

From: Martin, Christian (cmartin@gnilink.net)
Date: Tue Sep 26 2000 - 08:21:57 EDT


I am running it now. It still has the following glaring bugs:
 
atm OC3 interfaces show up in STM-1 mode only.
snmp ifTable still returns cef-layer interfaces.
 
Other than that, so far so good.
 
chris
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Marcio Pilotto [mailto:marcio.pilotto@intelig.net.br]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 8:08 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [nsp] 12.0.12S experiences?

Does anyone have experiences with 12.0.12S on GSR12012?
12.0.11S3 has some very small problems, some crazy voltage warning messages.

I wonder to know if the 12.0.12S is stable on GSR.

Thanks,
Marcio Pilotto

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin, Christian [ mailto:cmartin@gnilink.net
<mailto:cmartin@gnilink.net> ]
Sent: sexta-feira, 22 de setembro de 2000 18:55
To: 'Ron Lewkiewicz'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [nsp] 12.0.12S experiences?

STM-1 bug may be bad for software upgrades/downgrades. Also, 12.0S still
has the cef-layer subif bug. It is fixed in 12.0.12(6) and 12.0.13(1).

No other issues that I know of.

chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron Lewkiewicz [ mailto:rlewkiew@digisle.net
<mailto:rlewkiew@digisle.net> ]
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 2:42 PM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [nsp] 12.0.12S experiences?
>
>
>
> I've been testing 12.0.12S in the lab on some 7507's, and
> haven't run into
> any real problems yet (except for a cosmetic bug where it insists on
> having STM-1 for ATM interfaces).
>
> Was hoping I could get feedback from anyone who is using this in
> production and any good/bad experiences they've had. If
> there were bad
> experiences, what versions did you wind up downgrading to?
>
> Thanks much.
> -Ron Lewkiewicz
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:17 EDT