Re: [nsp] 12.0.12S experiences?

From: Neil J. McRae (neil@COLT.NET)
Date: Tue Sep 26 2000 - 08:20:21 EDT


We're running 12.0.11S without any issues [we don't use subifs] on 12012's.

We did see one issue relating to POS cards on a 7507/VIP box but we have
not been able to reproduce it.

Regards,
Neil.

[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> Does anyone have experiences with 12.0.12S on GSR12012?
> 12.0.11S3 has some very small problems, some crazy voltage warning messages.
>
> I wonder to know if the 12.0.12S is stable on GSR.
>
> Thanks,
> Marcio Pilotto
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin, Christian [mailto:cmartin@gnilink.net]
> Sent: sexta-feira, 22 de setembro de 2000 18:55
> To: 'Ron Lewkiewicz'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [nsp] 12.0.12S experiences?
>
>
> STM-1 bug may be bad for software upgrades/downgrades. Also, 12.0S still
> has the cef-layer subif bug. It is fixed in 12.0.12(6) and 12.0.13(1).
>
> No other issues that I know of.
>
> chris
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ron Lewkiewicz [mailto:rlewkiew@digisle.net]
> > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 2:42 PM
> > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [nsp] 12.0.12S experiences?
> >
> >
> >
> > I've been testing 12.0.12S in the lab on some 7507's, and
> > haven't run into
> > any real problems yet (except for a cosmetic bug where it insists on
> > having STM-1 for ATM interfaces).
> >
> > Was hoping I could get feedback from anyone who is using this in
> > production and any good/bad experiences they've had. If
> > there were bad
> > experiences, what versions did you wind up downgrading to?
> >
> > Thanks much.
> > -Ron Lewkiewicz
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:17 EDT