Re: Policy routing

From: Scott Whyte (swhyte@cisco.com)
Date: Thu Oct 12 2000 - 12:05:02 EDT

Next message: Allan Silverstein: "[nsp] "show ip ospf" question"
Previous message: Siva Valliappan: "Re: [nsp] Access router thtoughputs"
In reply to: Agnes Tow: "Policy routing"
Next in thread: Mark Milhollan - Franklin Employee: "Re: Policy routing"
Reply: Mark Milhollan - Franklin Employee: "Re: Policy routing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Agnes Tow wrote:

> I try to use " ip policy route-map" to specify an explicit route for policy
> routing by matching an access-list. If I "set ip next-hop", should I
> redistribute to the OSPF that I am using as the IGP, or is it necessary to
> redistribute?

Policy routing overrides all IGPs. That's what its for. You can think of
it as glorified static routing, it has the same limitations as static
routes do (local to router, leads to black-holing, etc) but is not limited
to destination based forwarding. There is no way to redistribute a policy
route into an IGP.

-Scott

--
Scott Whyte     swhyte@cisco.com | Hobbes: "What would *you* call the
Global Solutions Engineering     |          creation of the universe?"
Network Design Consultant        |
CCIE 3340                        | Calvin: "The Horrendous Space Kablooie!"

Next message: Allan Silverstein: "[nsp] "show ip ospf" question"
Previous message: Siva Valliappan: "Re: [nsp] Access router thtoughputs"
In reply to: Agnes Tow: "Policy routing"
Next in thread: Mark Milhollan - Franklin Employee: "Re: Policy routing"
Reply: Mark Milhollan - Franklin Employee: "Re: Policy routing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:18 EDT