> For safety sake, in the event of a interface failure the
> static should be
> pointed to the interface, not the remote gateway. That way
> when/if the
> interface fails the default will go away and all traffic will
> be routed to
> the live interface. But, for sure, per packet load balancing
> would cause
> problems.
>
> -David
> Network Engineer
Didn't you mean that the other way around?
Where:
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1
is a true static route. In the event of link failure for any
reason it will be withdrawn from the table.
Whereas
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0
is treated as a connected route and will remain in the routing
table no matter what kind of tumult may be occurring on the link.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:18 EDT